Animal welfare and rights in Switzerland

Last updated

Animal welfare and rights in Switzerland is about the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in Switzerland. Switzerland has high levels of animal welfare protection by international standards. [1]

Contents

History

Animal law

Concerns over animal welfare in Switzerland emerged in the mid-eighteenth century. Public vivisection was met with scattered disapproval when first performed in Swiss universities in the 1830s, but did not see organized opposition. In 1842, the Swiss canton of Schaffhausen enacted Switzerland's first law against animal cruelty, and in 1844, the first Swiss animal protection society–Tierschutzverein–was founded in Berne. By 1885, all Swiss cantons had legal regulations against animal cruelty, though many of these laws prohibited only public cruelty. [2] In 1893, slaughtering without anesthesia was banned by referendum. [3]

In 1978, the Animal Welfare Act was approved by Swiss voters with 80% of the popular vote, [4] and in 1992, Switzerland became the first country to constitutionally recognize animals, with a constitutional provision warranting the protection of "the dignity of the creature". [5]

In 2010, Swiss voters rejected a referendum which would appoint lawyers on the behalf of animals, with only 29.5% voting in favor of the measure. [6]

Animal agriculture

Intensive animal farming began in Switzerland in the early to mid-twentieth century. The first major battery egg farm was constructed in 1935. In 1974, 160,000 Swiss signed a petition calling for a ban on factory farming, but it failed. [4]

Legislation

The Animal Welfare Act 2005 prohibits inflicting pain, suffering, or harm on an animal, inducing anxiety in an animal, or otherwise disregarding its dignity without justification. Mishandling, neglect, or unnecessary overwork is also prohibited. This legislation applies to all vertebrates as well as to invertebrates designated by the Federal Council. [1]

The Animal Welfare Act 2005 and the Animal Welfare Ordinance 2008 contain specific regulations on farmed animal welfare. The Act provides that animal handlers must account for their needs as best as possible and ensure their well-being as far as the circumstances of the intended purpose permit. In regard to livestock transportation, cattle, pigs, goats, sheep, horses, and poultry travelling to slaughter must travel by rail or air. The Ordinance sets out specific requirements for transporting livestock. Mammals are required to be stunned before slaughter, including slaughter for religious purposes (though halal and kosher meat from non-stunned animals is permitted to be imported and sold). [1] Battery cages, gestation crates, debeaking, and piglet castration are banned. [7] [8] [9]

In 2014, Switzerland received a grade A out of possible grades A, B, C, D, E, F or G on World Animal Protection's Animal Protection Index. [1]

Animal issues

Animals used for food

Animal agriculture

In 2015, Switzerland had the following numbers of livestock:

  • 1.56 million cattle
  • 60,000 horses
  • 410,000 sheep
  • 90,000 goats
  • 1.48 million pigs
  • 10 million poultry [10]

The number of cows has been roughly stable since 2000. The number of pigs has decreased since 2006, while the number of poultry has increased continually. [10]

The number of animal welfare animal convictions for mistreatment of farmed animals has risen significantly since the revised Animal Welfare Act came into force in September 2008, from slightly over 200 convictions in 2008 to approximately 500 in 2013. [10]

Veganism

In 2005, the Swiss Nutrition Report found that 2.5% of respondents self-identified as vegetarian, while in 2006 a survey commissioned by the meat lobby organization Proviande found that 5% of respondents self-identified as vegetarian. [11] Estimates of the number of vegans are not readily available.

Animals used in research

In 2016, the Swiss government decided to ban the sale of cosmetics products containing ingredients newly tested on animals. [12]

In 2016, 606,505 animals were reported to have been used in research in Switzerland, not including invertebrates except cephalopods and lobsters. 95% of the animals reported being used were mice, rats, birds, and fish. 42% of experiments were categorized below threshold severity, 35% were mild, 21% were moderate and 2% were classified as severe. Since the early 1980s, there was a steady downward trend in the use of animals in research in Switzerland, which stabilized in recent years. [13]

Animal personhood

In June 2016, Swiss and German-based anti-speciesist political think-tank Sentience Politics began collecting signatures for a ballot initiative on fundamental rights for primates in Basel, Switzerland. If passed, the measure would amend the cantonal constitution to "right to life and respect for the physical and mental integrity" for non-human primates. If passed, it would significantly curtail medical experimentation on primates and primate confinement practices in Basel. [14] [15]

Animal activism

Swiss Animal Protection (SAP), founded in 1861, is the largest and oldest animal protection organization in Switzerland. SAP has special units for pets, wild animals, farmed animals, animals in experiments, and veterinary and legal advisory services. [16] Their activities include campaigns to "improve and enlarge animal friendly husbandry of farm animals". [17]

In addition to its campaign for primate rights in Basel, Sentience Politics has ongoing campaigns in Basel, Lucerne, and Zurich to enact policies which would commit cantonal or municipal governments to promoting plant-based diets, including the offering of vegetarian and vegan options in public cafeterias. [18] [19] [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

Animal welfare and rights in Israel is about the treatment of and laws concerning nonhuman animals in Israel. Israel's major animal welfare law is the Animal Protection Law, passed in 1994, which has been amended several times since. Several other laws also related to the treatment of animals: Rabies Ordinance, 1934; Fishing Ordinance, 1937; Public Health Ordinance, 1940; Wildlife Protection Law, 1955; Plants Protection Law, 1956; Criminal Procedure Law, 1982; Animal Disease Ordinance, 1985; National Parks, Nature Reserves, National Sites and Memorial Sites Law, 1991; the Law of Veterinarians, 1991; Dog Regulation Law, 2002; Rabies Regulations (Vaccinations), 2005; and Prohibition on declawing cats unless for reasons vital to the cat's health or owner's health, 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal aspects of ritual slaughter</span>

The legal aspects of ritual slaughter include the regulation of slaughterhouses, butchers, and religious personnel involved with traditional shechita (Jewish) and dhabiha (Islamic). Regulations also may extend to butchery products sold in accordance with kashrut and halal religious law. Governments regulate ritual slaughter, primarily through legislation and administrative law. In addition, compliance with oversight of ritual slaughter is monitored by governmental agencies and, on occasion, contested in litigation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intensive animal farming</span> Branch of agriculture

Intensive animal farming, industrial livestock production, and macro-farms, also known by opponents as factory farming, is a type of intensive agriculture, specifically an approach to animal husbandry designed to maximize production, while minimizing costs. To achieve this, agribusinesses keep livestock such as cattle, poultry, and fish at high stocking densities, at large scale, and using modern machinery, biotechnology, and global trade. The main products of this industry are meat, milk and eggs for human consumption. There are issues regarding whether intensive animal farming is sustainable in the social long-run given its costs in resources. Analysts also raise issues about its ethics.

Women have played a central role in animal advocacy since the 19th century. The animal advocacy movement – embracing animal rights, animal welfare, and anti-vivisectionism – has been disproportionately initiated and led by women, particularly in the United Kingdom. Women are more likely to support animal rights than men. A 1996 study of adolescents by Linda Pifer suggested that factors that may partially explain this discrepancy include attitudes towards feminism and science, scientific literacy, and the presence of a greater emphasis on "nurturance or compassion" amongst women. Although vegetarianism does not necessarily imply animal advocacy, a 1992 market research study conducted by the Yankelovich research organization concluded that "of the 12.4 million people [in the US] who call themselves vegetarian, 68% are female, while only 32% are male".

Animal welfare and rights in India regards the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in India. It is distinct from animal conservation in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal welfare and rights in Japan</span> Treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in Japan

Japan has implemented several national animal welfare laws since 1973, but its protections for animals are considered weak by international standards. Animal activism and protection laws in Japan are mainly focused on the welfare of domesticated animals and farm animals.

Animal welfare and rights in Brazil is about the laws concerning and treatment of non-human animals in Brazil. Brazil is a leading producer of animal products, and its allowance of intensive animal farming methods such as extreme confinement make farm animal welfare a major concern.

Animal welfare and rights in Canada is about the laws concerning and treatment of nonhuman animals in Canada. Canada has been considered to have weak animal welfare protections by the organization World Animal Protection. The vast majority of Canadians are for further animal protections, according to a poll conducted on behalf of Mercy for Animals.

Animal welfare and rights in South Africa is about the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in South Africa.

Animal welfare and rights in Indonesia regards the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in Indonesia. Indonesia has limited animal welfare regulations by international standards.

Animal welfare and rights in Iran is about the laws concerning and treatment of non-human animals in Iran. Iran has no legislation protecting animals from cruelty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal welfare and rights in Australia</span> Treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in Australia

This article is about the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in Australia. Australia has moderate animal protections by international standards.

Animal welfare and rights in Sweden is about the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in Sweden.

Animal welfare and rights in Spain is about the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in Spain. Spain has moderate animal protections by international standards.

Animal welfare and rights in France is about the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in France. France has moderate animal welfare protections by international standards.

Animal welfare and rights in Denmark relates to the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in Denmark. Denmark has moderately strong protections for animals by international standards. In 2014 and again in 2020, Denmark received a B grade on the A–G scale of the World Animal Protection's Animal Protection Index.

Animal welfare and rights in the Netherlands is about the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in the Netherlands. The Netherlands has moderately strong animal protections by international standards.

Sentience Politics is a Swiss anti-speciesist political organization with the goal of reducing the suffering of non-human animals. Founded in 2013, their activities include political campaigns, such as ballot initiatives for sustainable food, fundamental rights for primates or a ban on factory farming.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 World Animal Protection (November 2, 2014). "Switzerland" . Retrieved September 13, 2016.
  2. ↑ Ulrich Trohler; Andreas-Holger Maehle (1990). "Anti-vivisection in 19th century Germany and Switzerland: Motives and Methods". In Nicolaas A. Rupke (ed.). Vivisection in Historical Perspective. Beckenham, Kent: Croom Helm, Ltd.
  3. ↑ Nohlen, D & Stöver, P (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, p1904 ISBN   9783832956097
  4. 1 2 Heinzpeter Studer (2001). "How Switzerland got rid of battery cages" (PDF).
  5. ↑ Vanessa Gerritsen (January 2013). "Animal Welfare in Switzerland – constitutional aim, social commitment, and a major challenge" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 6, 2016. Retrieved September 14, 2016.
  6. ↑ Alexandra Williams (March 8, 2010). "Swiss voters reject lawyers for animals in referendum" . Retrieved November 20, 2016.
  7. ↑ Joy Tischler (2011). "U.S. Lags Far Behind Europe in Protections for Farmed Animals".
  8. ↑ John McGlone. "Alternative Sow Housing Systems: Driven by legislation, regulation, free trade and free market systems (but not science)" (PDF).
  9. ↑ Compassion in World Farming. "Castration of Piglets". Archived from the original on 2016-11-21. Retrieved 2016-11-21.
  10. 1 2 3 Swiss Agriculture Pocket Statistics 2015 (Report). Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland. 2015.
  11. ↑ "Wie viele Vegetarier gibt es in der Schweiz?". vegetarismus.ch. 2001. Retrieved November 20, 2016.
  12. ↑ Humane Society International (March 9, 2016). "Switzerland Commits to End Sale of Cruel Cosmetics". Archived from the original on November 21, 2016. Retrieved June 18, 2020.
  13. ↑ Speaking of Research (November 13, 2015). "Switzerland releases 2014 animal research statistics" . Retrieved November 20, 2016.
  14. ↑ "Une initiative veut limiter les souffrances des primates". June 23, 2016. Retrieved November 15, 2016.
  15. ↑ "Schluss mit Affen-Versuchen: Basler Tierschützer fordern Gleichstellung von Mensch und Affe". June 24, 2016. Retrieved November 20, 2016.
  16. ↑ Swiss Animal Protection. "That's Us" . Retrieved November 20, 2016.
  17. ↑ Swiss Animal Protection. "For the well-being of animals" . Retrieved November 20, 2016.
  18. ↑ Sentience Politics. "Sustainable Food - Basel". Archived from the original on November 21, 2016. Retrieved November 20, 2016.
  19. ↑ Sentience Politics. "Sustainable Food - Lucerne". Archived from the original on November 21, 2016. Retrieved November 20, 2016.
  20. ↑ Sentience Politics. "Sustainable Food - Zurich". Archived from the original on November 21, 2016. Retrieved November 20, 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.