Antitropical distribution

Last updated

Antitropical (alternatives include biantitropical or amphitropical) distribution is a type of disjunct distribution where a species or clade exists at comparable latitudes across the equator but not in the tropics. For example, a species may be found north of the Tropic of Cancer and south of the Tropic of Capricorn, but not in between. [1] With increasing time since dispersal, the disjunct populations may be the same variety, species, or clade. [2] How the life forms distribute themselves to the opposite hemisphere when they can't normally survive in the middle depends on the species; plants may have their seed spread through wind, animal, or other methods and then germinate upon reaching the appropriate climate, while sea life may be able to travel through the tropical regions in a larval state or by going through deep ocean currents with much colder temperatures than on the surface. For the American amphitropical distribution, dispersal has been generally agreed to be more likely than vicariance from a previous distribution including the tropics in North and South America. [2]

Contents

Peter Raven identified three patterns of amphitropical disjunct distribution of plants. Bipolar disjuncts are taxa which occur at high (subpolar or polar) latitudes. Temperate disjuncts are those which occur in temperate climates. Desert disjuncts occur in the Sonoran, Chihuahuan, and central Mexican deserts of North America (southwestern United States and northern Mexico) and in the deserts and semi-deserts of southern South America. Raven identified 30 bipolar disjunct species and closely-related species pairs, 130 temperate disjuncts, and 'a substantial number' of desert disjuncts. [3]

Known cases

Plants

Animals

Bryophytes and lichens

See also

References

  1. Raven, Peter H. (1963). "Amphitropical Relationships in the Floras of North and South America". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 38 (2): 151–177. doi:10.1086/403797. ISSN   0033-5770. S2CID   85310607.
  2. 1 2 3 Simpson, Michael G.; Johnson, Leigh A.; Villaverde, Tamara; Guilliams, C. Matt (2017). "American amphitropical disjuncts: Perspectives from vascular plant analyses and prospects for future research". American Journal of Botany. 104 (11): 1600–1650. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700308 . hdl: 10261/168338 . ISSN   0002-9122.
  3. Raven, Peter H. “Amphitropical Relationships in the Floras of North and South America.” The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 38, no. 2, 1963, pp. 151–77. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2819162. Accessed 1 February 2026.
  4. Ito, Y., T. Ohi-Toma, J. Murata and Nr. Tanaka (2010) Hybridization and polyploidy of an aquatic plant, Ruppia (Ruppiaceae), inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA phylogenies. American Journal of Botany 97: 1156-1167
  5. Nakamura, K., T. Denda, G. Kokubugata, P.I. Forster, G. Wilson, C.-I Peng, M. Yokota (2012) Molecular phylogeography reveals an antitropical distribution and local diversification of Solenogyne (Asteraceae) in the Ryukyu Archipelago of Japan and Australia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 105: 197-217
  6. "American Amphitropical Disjunction Working Group". figshare.com. Retrieved 2019-02-23.
  7. Lewis, Lily R.; Biersma, Elisabeth M.; Carey, Sarah B.; Holsinger, Kent; McDaniel, Stuart F.; Rozzi, Ricardo; Goffinet, Bernard (2017). "Resolving the northern hemisphere source region for the long-distance dispersal event that gave rise to the South American endemic dung mossTetraplodon fuegianus". American Journal of Botany. 104 (11): 1651–1659. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700144 . ISSN   0002-9122.