Apostolides v Orams

Last updated

Apostolides v Orams
European stars.svg
European Court of Justice
Submitted 13 September 2007
Decided 28 April 2009
Full case name Meletios Apostolides v David Charles Orams and Linda Elizabeth Orams
CaseC-420/07
CelexID 62007J0420
ChamberGrand Chamber
Nationality of parties Cyprus and United Kingdom
Procedural historyCourt of Appeal (England), Civil Division, judgment of 19 June 2007 (2153/2007 ; A2/2006/2114)
Ruling
1. The suspension of the application of the acquis communautaire in those areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of that Member State does not exercise effective control, provided for by Article 1(1) of Protocol No 10 on Cyprus to the Act concerning the conditions of accession [to the European Union] of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, does not preclude the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to a judgment which is given by a Cypriot court sitting in the area of the island effectively controlled by the Cypriot Government, but concerns land situated in areas not so controlled.
2.Article 35(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 does not authorise the court of a Member State to refuse recognition or enforcement of a judgment given by the courts of another Member State concerning land situated in an area of the latter State over which its Government does not exercise effective control.
3. The fact that a judgment given by the courts of a Member State, concerning land situated in an area of that State over which its Government does not exercise effective control, cannot, as a practical matter, be enforced where the land is situated does not constitute a ground for refusal of recognition or enforcement under Article 34(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 and it does not mean that such a judgment is unenforceable for the purposes of Article 38(1) of that regulation.
4.The recognition or enforcement of a default judgment cannot be refused under Article 34(2) of Regulation No 44/2001 where the defendant was able to commence proceedings to challenge the default judgment and those proceedings enabled him to argue that he had not been served with the document which instituted the proceedings or with the equivalent document in sufficient time and in such a way as to enable him to arrange for his defence.
Court composition
Judge-Rapporteur
Rosario Silva de Lapuerta
President
Vassilios Skouris
Judges
Advocate General
Juliane Kokott
Legislation affecting
Interprets Regulation (EC) No 44/2001
Interprets Protocol No 10 on Cyprus of the 2003 Accession Treaty

Apostolides v Orams is a landmark legal case decided in the European Court of Justice on 28 April 2009. [1] It concerned the right for Greek Cypriot refugees to reclaim land in northern Cyprus, displaced after the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974. The case determined that although Cyprus does not exercise effective control in northern Cyprus, cases decided in its courts are applicable through European Union law. [2]

Contents

Background to the case

In 1974, Meletios Apostolides, an architect, was displaced with his family from his property in Lapithos as a result of the partition of Cyprus which followed a Greek Cypriot coup and the subsequent Turkish invasion of Cyprus.

In 2002, David Charles and Linda Elizabeth Orams, from Hove, Sussex, England, invested £160,000 of their retirement fund to acquire the land from a third party and to construct a villa on the premises. The third party claimed to have acquired the property from the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), a de facto state which, to this day, has not been recognised by any state except the Republic of Turkey. [3] [4] The Orams used the property in northern Cyprus for vacations and maintained a separate property in the UK.

In 2003, the de facto administration of northern Cyprus eased crossing restrictions along the ceasefire line giving the opportunity to displaced Cypriots to visit their old properties. Meletios Apostolides visited his property and confirmed the construction of the house occupied by the Orams.

Meletios Apostolides took his case to the Nicosia District court, [5] demanding that the Orams vacate his property. Northern Cyprus, although a de facto functioning entity, remains an unrecognised state internationally. Mr Apostolides' case centred on the argument that although following the Turkish invasion the government of Cyprus had lost effective control over the northern part of the island, its laws still applied even if these were not easily enforceable.

In November 2004, the Nicosia District Court ordered the Orams to:

The Orams appealed this decision, which was heard at the supreme court of Cyprus. The appeal was dismissed. [6]

Due to the island's division, the judgement reached by the Cypriot court was not directly enforceable, hence Mr Apostolides used EU regulations to have it registered and applied against the Orams' assets in the UK. [7] The procedure for the enforcement of judgements between Member States of the European Union is provided by Regulation No 44/2001. [8] The Orams were represented in the English courts by Cherie Blair, an action criticised by the then president of Cyprus Tassos Papadopoulos. He argued that due to its political nature, the wife of a Prime Minister should not be involved in such a case. [9]

Royal Courts of Justice Royal courts of justice.jpg
Royal Courts of Justice

In September 2006, the High Court of Justice ruled in favour of the Orams. [10] Mr Apostolides appealed the decision at the Court of Appeal which in turn referred the case to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), in Luxembourg. [11] [12] [13]

The ECJ in turn ruled in favour of Mr Apostolides (see next section below).

The case was then returned to the Court of Appeal in England which decided in favour of Meletios Apostolides on 19 January 2010. [14] According to one of the judges of the Court of Appeal panel, under the current system, this decision is final and no further escalation is possible. [15] [16] [17] However, the Orams tried to appeal to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. [18]

On 26 March 2010, the U.K. Supreme Court refused permission for the Orams to take the case to appeal, effectively bringing it to a conclusion. [19] The Cyprus Mail reported that the Orams' had abandoned the property rather than demolish it. [20]

The case C-420/07, Apostolides v Orams, was heard by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg. A panel of judges ruled on 28 April 2009 that British courts were able to enforce the judicial decisions made in Cyprus, which uphold the property rights of Cypriots forced out during the invasion. [21]

Implications

The case has been described as a landmark test case as it sets a precedent for other Cypriots (primarily Greek Cypriot refugees) to bring similar actions to court. [21]

Both the British High Commission in Cyprus [22] and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office have issued warnings regarding the purchase of property in northern Cyprus. [23]

Following the final ruling by the Court of Appeal in England, Meletios Apostolides' lawyer Constantis Candounas stated that he was considering similar lawsuits against foreign tourists using hotels in the TRNC that were owned by Greek Cypriots previous to the partition of Cyprus. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Court of Justice</span> Supreme court in the European Union, part of the Court of Justice of the European Union

The European Court of Justice (ECJ), formally just the Court of Justice, is the supreme court of the European Union in matters of European Union law. As a part of the Court of Justice of the European Union, it is tasked with interpreting EU law and ensuring its uniform application across all EU member states under Article 263 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cyprus problem</span> Dispute between Greek and Turkish Cypriots

The Cyprus problem, also known as the Cyprus conflict, Cyprus issue, Cyprus dispute, or Cyprus question, is an ongoing dispute between the Greek Cypriot community which runs the Republic of Cyprus and the Turkish Cypriot community in the north of the island, where troops of the Republic of Turkey are deployed. This dispute is an example of a protracted social conflict. The Cyprus dispute's causes stem from ethnic Greek nationalist ideology, Greek-Cypriot sentiment, the Megali Idea and Enosis, and some of the ethnic Turkish peoples' desire for the partition of the island of Cyprus through Taksim as a means of protection of their people by what they considered to be the threat of Greek-Cypriots.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Cyprus</span> De facto state on the island of Cyprus

Northern Cyprus, officially the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), is a de facto state that comprises the northeastern portion of the island of Cyprus. It is recognised only by Turkey, and its territory is considered by all other states to be part of the Republic of Cyprus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Declaration of Independence of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus</span> Declaration of independence from the Republic of Cyprus by the Turkish Cypriot parliament

The declaration of Independence of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus was a unilateral declaration of independence (UDI) from the Republic of Cyprus by the Turkish Cypriot parliament on 15 November 1983.

Loizidou v. Turkey is a landmark legal case regarding the rights of refugees wishing to return to their former homes and properties.

Enclaved Greek Cypriots are the Greek Cypriots who have remained in enclaved villages in Northern Cyprus after the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974.

This article covers the civilian casualties and displacements that occurred between 1963 and 1975 – from the outbreak of the intercommunal fighting until the end of displacements following the Turkish invasion of Cyprus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turkish invasion of Cyprus</span> 1974 military conflict in Cyprus

The Turkish invasion of Cyprus began on 20 July 1974 and progressed in two phases over the following month. Taking place upon a background of intercommunal violence between Greek and Turkish Cypriots, and in response to a Greek junta-sponsored Cypriot coup d'état five days earlier, it led to the Turkish capture and occupation of the northern part of the island.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Politics of Northern Cyprus</span>

The Politics of Northern Cyprus takes place in a framework of a semi-presidential representative democratic republic, whereby the president is head of state and the prime minister is the head of government, and of a multi-party system. Executive power is exercised by the government. Legislative power is vested in both the government and the Assembly of the Republic. The judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vassilios Skouris</span> Greek judge

Vassilios Skouris is a Greek judge who was President of the European Court of Justice from 2003 to 2015. A European legal scholar, he served briefly in the government of Greece as Minister of the Interior in 1989 and again in 1996. He is professor at the Law School of the Aristotle University and at Bucerius Law School in Hamburg, Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of Northern Cyprus</span>

Northern Cyprus is recognised only by Turkey, a country which facilitates many of its contacts with the international community. After it was occupied by Turkey, Northern Cyprus' relations with the rest of the world were further complicated by a series of United Nations resolutions which declared its independence legally invalid. A 2004 UN Referendum on settling the Cyprus dispute was accepted by the Turkish Cypriots but rejected by the Greek Cypriots. After that, the European Union declared its intentions to assist in reducing the economic isolation of Northern Cyprus and began giving aid to the territory. However, due to pressure from Greece and the Republic of Cyprus, this aid coming from EU funds cannot be used on Greek Cypriot land and property nor on public bodies. As a result, these funds can be used only on 29 percent of people on the island of Cyprus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of Northern Cyprus</span> Overview of and topical guide to Northern Cyprus

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to Northern Cyprus:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 541</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 1983

Northern Cyprus declared its independence in 1983 with its official name being the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). It is recognized by Turkey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union–Northern Cyprus relations</span> Bilateral relations

Turkish Cypriots and the European Union have somewhat strained relations because the European Union (EU) does not recognise the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

Toumazou et al. v. Republic of Turkey et al., was a class action suit by Greek Cypriots and others against the TRNC Representative Offices in the United States and HSBC Bank USA. Turkey was dropped as defendant on 16 February 2010 and the lawsuit name was subsequently revised to Toumazou et al. v. Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. The TRNC Representative Offices are a commercial entity because the United States does not formally recognise the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. The staff of the Representative Offices do not have diplomatic visas and only operate within the United States using business visas. Tsimpedes Law in Washington DC sued for "the denial of access to and enjoyment of land and property held in the north". The lawsuit, originally initiated by Cypriots displaced during the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974, was joined by non-Cypriots who paid for but have never been given legal title to properties that they have purchased.

Human rights in Northern Cyprus are protected by the constitution of Northern Cyprus. However, there have been reports of violations of the human rights of minorities, democratic freedom, freedom from discrimination, freedom from torture, freedom of movement, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, right to education, right to life, right to property, and the rights of displaced persons. The rights of Greek Cypriots displaced by the 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus, notably their rights to property and right of return, is one of the focal points of ongoing negotiations for the solution of the Cyprus question.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Embargo against Northern Cyprus</span> Overview of the international sanctions imposed against Northern Cyprus

An international embargo against Northern Cyprus is currently in place in several areas. The embargo is supported by the policy of the United Nations and its application by the European Union is in line with a European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision taken in 1994.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Northern Cyprus</span>

The Judiciary of Northern Cyprus is the system of courts which interprets and applies the law in Northern Cyprus. Judicial independence is safeguarded by the Constitution of the country.

The 2008-2012 Cyprus talks were held as part of the long-going peace process, in order to resolve the Cyprus dispute. The talks failed to achieve their goals. An opinion poll conducted in 2010 reported that 84% of Greek Cypriots and 70% of Turkish Cypriots assumed that: "the other side would never accept the actual compromises and concessions that are needed for a fair and viable settlement". At the beginning of 2013, Cyprus negotiations were suspended because of a change of government in the Greek Cypriot community of Cyprus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-state solution (Cyprus)</span> Proposed diplomatic solution for the Cyprus dispute

The two-state solution for the Cyprus dispute refers to the proposed permanent division of the island of Cyprus into a Turkish Cypriot State in the north and a Greek Cypriot State in the south, as opposed to the various proposals for reunification that have been suggested since the island was split into two by the 1974 Turkish invasion. The two-state solution would entail the legalisation of the status quo, where Greek Cypriots govern the southern part of the island and Turkish Cypriots govern the northern part, the latter of which is currently not recognised by any country other than Turkey.

References

  1. ↑ Veronika Gaertner, "ECJ Judgment: Apostolides", April 29, 2009
  2. ↑ "Greek Cypriots can reclaim land". BBC . 28 April 2009. Archived from the original on 29 April 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  3. ↑ "Case C‑420/07". European Court of Justice. 28 April 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  4. ↑ Bodoni, Stephanie; Simon Packard (28 April 2009). "U.K. Couple Must Demolish Cyprus Home, EU Court Says". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  5. ↑ A French summary of the judgement of the Cypriot court (Eparchiako Dikastirio Lefkosias, case no. 9968/04, 19 April 2005, Apostolidis v. D. and L. Orams) is available in Reflets, Informations rapides sur les développements juridiques présentant un intérêt communautaire, Nº 1/2006, pages 15–16.
  6. ↑ Supreme Court of Cyprus, DAVID CHARLES ORAMS κ.α ν. ΜΕΛΕΤΗΣ ΑΠΟΣΤΟΛΙΔΗΣ, Πολιτική Έφεση Αρ. 121/2005, 21 December 2006
  7. ↑ Smith, Helena (19 December 2005). "Cherie Booth's role in Cyprus land dispute angers president". The Guardian . Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  8. ↑ "Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001". The Court of Justice of the European Communities. 22 December 2000. Archived from the original on 14 April 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  9. ↑ "Cypriot anger at Cherie land case". BBC . 17 December 2005. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  10. ↑ Orams v. Apostolides [2006] EWHC 2226(QB) , [2007] 1 WLR 241, [2007] 1 All ER (Comm) 1(6 September 2006), High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division), case no: QB/2005/PTA/0897.
  11. ↑ Veronika Gaertner, "Northern Cyprus and the Acquis Communautaire", February 23, 2008
  12. ↑ Veronika Gaertner, "ECJ: AG Opinion in “Apostolides”", December 20, 2008
  13. ↑ "Greek Cypriots can reclaim land – possible impact on holiday home owners". Holiday Lettings. 29 April 2009. Archived from the original on 2 May 2009. Retrieved 8 May 2009.
  14. ↑ Apostolides v Orams & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 9 , [2010] 1 All ER (Comm) 992, [2010] 4 EG 112, [2010] ILPr 20(19 January 2010); case No: A2/2006/2114
  15. ↑ Paragraph 102 of the Court of Appeal judgment (Lord Justice Lloyd): "The effect of article 44 [of Council Regulation No 44/2001 is that the present appeal is final. A further appeal to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is not permitted."
  16. ↑ "Judgment of the UK Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) in the Case of Meletios Apostolides V. David Charles Orams & Linda Elizabeth Orams January 19, 2010". PR newswire. Archived from the original on 12 February 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  17. ↑ Dixon, Suzi (19 January 2010). "The end of a dream?". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 22 January 2010. Retrieved 22 January 2010.
  18. ↑ Simon Bahceli, Orams packing up but hoping to stay put Archived 30 January 2010 at the Wayback Machine , Cyprus Mail , 27 January 2010
  19. ↑ Applications for permission to appeal, March/April 2010, case ID UKSC 2010/0032, U.K. Supreme Court.
  20. ↑ "End of the road for the Orams" Archived 9 September 2010 at the Wayback Machine , Cyprus Mail, 1 April 2010.
  21. 1 2 Waterfield, Bruno (29 April 2009). "Landmark court ruling means Britons could be forced to return homes in northern Cyprus". The Daily Telegraph . Archived from the original on 2 May 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  22. ↑ "Buying property". British High Commission. Archived from the original on 12 April 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  23. ↑ "Purchasing Property". Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Archived from the original on 20 May 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  24. ↑ "Northern Cyprus hotel visitors may be sued". Gulf Times. Reuters. 22 January 2010. Archived from the original on 6 June 2011. Retrieved 22 January 2010.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.