![]() | |
Motto | On March to Glory |
---|---|
Type | Law College |
Established | 2018 |
Principal | Dr. Madhushree Joshi [1] |
Location | 18°45′12″N73°35′11″E / 18.7532748°N 73.5863939°E |
Campus | Suburban |
Affiliations | University of Pune; BCI |
Website | www |
![]() |
Army Law College (ALC), Pune is a residential law college located at Kanhe, near Pune, Maharashtra, India. It was established in 2018 under the aegis of the Army Welfare Education Society (AWES). [2] [3] It is affiliated with the Savitribai Phule Pune University and approved by the Bar Council of India. [2] [3] The college offers a five-year integrated BBA LL.B. programme with an intake of 60 students through the Maharashtra Common Entrance Test (MAH-CET Law). [2] [4]
The Army Law College was inaugurated on 16 July 2018 by Lieutenant General D. R. Soni, then General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Southern Command. [1] [4] It was established on land and buildings donated by the Radha Kaliandas Daryanani Charitable Trust at Kanhe, about 45 km from Pune. [1] [5]
The Kanhe campus is fully residential and has been developed in phases. [3] [2] In August 2021, a five-storey girls’ hostel with capacity for 165 students was inaugurated by Anita Nain, President of the Army Wives Welfare Association (AWWA). [6] In December 2022, the Chanakya Academic Block and the Sai Auditorium with 450-seat capacity were inaugurated by Lt Gen A. K. Singh, Southern Army Commander. [7]
The college offers a five-year integrated BBA LL.B course under SPPU, with admissions through MAH-CET Law. [2] [4] Facilities include classrooms, library resources, and moot court activities. [7] [1]
The Army Law College functions under the Army Welfare Education Society with oversight from the Southern Command. [2] Dr. Madhushree Joshi, a gold medallist from SPPU, was appointed as the first Principal in 2018. [1] [4] The Registrar’s post has been held by retired Army officers, including Colonel A. K. Pandey (2018) and Colonel Suneel Mann (2025). [2] [8]
In August 2025, more than 300 students staged protests against the principal and registrar, alleging academic mismanagement, dissolution of the student council, and discrimination based on parents’ military ranks. [9] [10] The administration described the agitation as being driven by a few individuals and stated that the college maintained discipline and academic focus. [9] [10]