Article IV of the Final Protocol refers to a key provision of the Greco-Turkish Agreement of December 1, 1926, which outlined procedures for resolving disputes arising from the compulsory population exchange between Greece and Turkey. The article established the framework for referring unresolved disagreements to arbitration, a mechanism critical for addressing the complex legal and logistical challenges resulting from the exchange.
The agreement's "Article IV of the Final Protocol" provided a legal basis for escalating unresolved disputes to an arbitrator, under the supervision of the Greco-Turkish Mixed Arbitral Tribunal. This provision sought to clarify the processes and authorities involved in dispute resolution, ensuring that such conflicts could be managed effectively.
Key Provisions of Article IV
The main elements of the article included:
Conditions for Arbitration: The article outlined specific conditions under which unresolved disputes could be referred to an arbitrator, requiring that initial efforts by the Mixed Commission to resolve the matter be exhausted.
Authority of the Mixed Commission: It granted the Mixed Commission the authority to determine whether the conditions for arbitration had been met.
Exclusive Right to Refer Disputes: Article IV established that the Mixed Commission alone had the right to initiate arbitration and refer cases to the Greco-Turkish Mixed Arbitral Tribunal.[2]
Procedural Framework: The article provided guidelines for how disputes should be documented, presented, and resolved by the arbitrator or tribunal.
had sole responsibility for deciding whether arbitration conditions were met.
held the exclusive authority to initiate arbitration, ensuring the process remained impartial and insulated from government interference.[3]
This ruling clarified the scope of Article IV and resolved ambiguities in its implementation, reinforcing the independence of international arbitration mechanisms.
Impact and legacy
The interpretation and application of Article IV of the Final Protocol had significant implications for international law and arbitration. Its key contributions include:
Strengthening Arbitration Frameworks: The provision set a precedent for using arbitration to resolve complex disputes involving multiple governments and displaced populations.
International Procedural Law: The ruling of the PCIJ provided clarity on the authority of specialized commissions, influencing the design of similar mechanisms in subsequent treaties.[4]
Post-Conflict Resolution: The article's framework demonstrated the potential for international law to mediate disputes in the aftermath of forced migrations, property restitution, and ethnic conflicts.
While the legal framework established under Article IV was specific to the Greco-Turkish population exchange, it has been studied as a model for addressing disputes arising from other post-conflict situations, particularly in the context of forced migrations.[5]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
