Automated Payment Transaction tax

Last updated

The Automated Payment Transaction (APT) tax is a small, uniform tax on all economic transactions, which would involve simplification, base broadening, reductions in marginal tax rates, the elimination of tax and information returns and the automatic collection of tax revenues at the payment source. This proposal is to replace all United States taxes with a single tax (using a low rate) on every transaction in the economy. The APT approach would extend the tax base from income, consumption and wealth to all transactions. Proponents regard it as a revenue neutral transactions tax, whose tax base is primarily made up of financial transactions. It is based on the fundamental view of taxation as a "public brokerage fee accessed by the government to pay for the provision of the monetary, legal and political institutions that protect private property rights and facilitate market trade and commerce." [1] The APT tax extends the tax reform ideas of John Maynard Keynes, [2] James Tobin [3] and Lawrence Summers, [4] to their logical conclusion, namely to tax the broadest possible tax base at the lowest possible tax rate. The goal is to significantly improve economic efficiency, enhance stability in financial markets, and reduce to a minimum the costs of tax administration (assessment, collection, and compliance costs).

Contents

History

The system was developed by University of Wisconsin–Madison Professor of Economics Dr. Edgar L. Feige, a student of Milton Friedman who earned his PhD in economics at the University of Chicago. [5] Feige first presented the idea of taxing all transactions at the International Institute of Public Finance meetings in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 1989. Brazil took Feige's advise and adopted a plan similar to the APT Tax. However, Brazil added it on top of its existing taxes. Despite this, the tax has been relatively successful according to a 2009 report. [6] It was first put in the US national spotlight in February 2003 when it was covered by The New York Times . [7] The Times endorsed the plan as "fair, simple, and efficient." [7] On April 28, 2005, the APT proposal was presented to the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform in Washington, DC. [8] Economists at the World Bank in 2010 noted Feige's proposal for a "comprehensive automated payments tax applied at a very low rate... replacing a wide range of other taxes and greatly reducing the deadweight cost of the entire tax system." [9]

Dr. William J. Hermann Jr. has been one of the most vocal supporters of the APT Tax in recent decades, becoming the Director of a group advocating for the tax in 2004. [10] [11] In 2021, Dr. Hermann began pushing a differing proposal called the Automated Deposit Tax, which he also calls the "Tiny Tax." [12] He says it is a combination of a Tobin Tax and APT Tax. It would only charge the party depositing money into their account, rather than both parties to a transaction. [13]

In 2019, the Lighthouse Law Club, led by Mark Emery Boswell, began supporting and promoting the idea. [14]

Additionally, another similar proposal (by an anonymous author) known as the Universal Exchange Tax (UET) has been proposed since circa 2010. The UET is a tax on all electronic transactions of any kind that pass through any clearinghouse, albeit with some subtle differences (such as only taxing one side of each transaction rather than splitting it to both sides). A rate of 0.1% in the US at the federal level is estimated to be able to raise up to 5 trillion dollars (on an estimated tax base of 5 quadrillion dollars), assuming no significant shrinking of the tax base, which is more optimistic than Feige's proposal. [15]

Overview

The APT Tax was originally proposed to replace the entire federal and state tax system - including income, corporate profits, excise and estate taxes - in favor of a tiny tax on all transactions. [8] The tax would be automatically deducted from special taxpayer accounts, linked by software to all accounts at financial institutions capable of making final payments to the government seamlessly in real-time. [8] The APT Tax non-profit organization advocated for an Automated Payment Transaction Tax writes that under the plan that financial account opened by a taxable organization or individual would pay the same percentage on all incoming and outgoing funds on the account. The tax "would be automatically transferred to a federal government tax collection account in the same institution." [16] The group goes on to add that the funds would be "taxed and collected immediately, without recording who or what was the source of funds or the recipient" and that the practice would "eliminate the need for filing tax returns and information returns, freeing individuals and businesses of enormous costs of tax compliance and greatly reducing the government's costs of collection and enforcement." [17]

The rate of the tax is measured as the Electronic Single Side Rate (ESSR). [18] The ESSR is the tax rate charged to each individual. If the ESSR were 1%, then both parties to a transaction would pay the 1% tax. If a person were transferring money from one account to another, each account would pay a rate of 1%. For this transaction, the government would receive a combined rate of 2%. Dr. Feige writes that the tax could be as low as 0.3% to remain revenue neutral using data from 2005. [19] Instead of acquiring taxes solely based on income (whether corporate or individual), the APT Tax would broaden the tax base to include Stocks, Bonds, and Options Transfers, Money Saving Transactions, Goods and Services, and Foreign Exchange related transactions. [20] The ultimate goal is for the APT Tax to fund not only the Federal Government, but also "all state budgets (allowing the elimination of state income, sales, and excise taxes) as well as the public school portion of the local property tax." [21]

Dr. Feige claims that the APT tax would be very simple, efficient, and hard to evade. He writes, "Since every transaction must be settled by some means of final payment, taxes are routinely assessed and collected at source through the electronic technology of the automated banking/payment clearing system at the moment that economic exchange is evidenced by final payment. This automatic collection feature eliminates the need for individuals and firms to file tax and information returns. Real time tax collection at source of payment applies to all types of transactions, thereby reducing administration and compliance costs as well as opportunities for tax evasion." [8] Some raise concerns about privacy—believing that such a tax would allow the government to see each transaction in the economy; however, Dr. Bill Hermann writes that it "only collects money by software in financial institutions." [22]

The cash loophole is closed as well. Since cash goes through an average of 2.5 transactions between leaving a bank or other tax collecting entity, before it returns, a tax of 2.5 times the electronic single side rate would be charged on withdrawal and deposit. [21]

With the proposed rate of 0.3%, there would be a tax of $0.75 per $100 cash entering or leaving what Dr. Feige calls a "taxing institution/account". [23]

Progressive Debate

There is disagreement over whether the tax is progressive, with the debate primarily centered on whether the volume of taxed transactions rise disproportionately with a person's income and net worth. Simulations of the Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finances demonstrate that high income and wealthy individuals undertake a disproportionate volume of transactions since they own a disproportionate share of financial assets that have relatively high turnover rates. However, since the APT tax has not yet been adopted, some argue that one can not predict whether the tax will be progressive or not. In 2016, Andrew VanHook wrote on his website promoting the proposal that the APT Tax would lead to more fairness in taxation. "According to the Government Accountability Office, 65% of US companies, and 45% of US Households, pay nothing in taxes... [which] places a huge burden on the rest of us. It also undermines our democratic ideals, and leads to widespread resentment and distrust of our entire system. Under the Transaction Tax, everybody would pay their share with the assurance that everybody else was doing the same." [24]

Proposed Implementation

Because the APT Tax would radically affect taxation and the US economy, Dr. Feige recommends a 3 phase implementation. All rates listed below are based on Dr. Feige's 2005 report. [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

A tax is a mandatory financial charge or levy imposed on a taxpayer by a governmental organization to support government spending and public expenditures collectively or to regulate and reduce negative externalities. Tax compliance refers to policy actions and individual behavior aimed at ensuring that taxpayers are paying the right amount of tax at the right time and securing the correct tax allowances and tax relief. The first known taxation occurred in Ancient Egypt around 3000–2800 BC. Taxes consist of direct or indirect taxes and may be paid in money or as labor equivalent.

A Tobin tax was originally defined as a tax on all spot conversions of one currency into another. It was suggested by James Tobin, an economist who won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. Tobin's tax was originally intended to penalize short-term financial round-trip excursions into another currency. By the late 1990s, the term Tobin tax was being applied to all forms of short term transaction taxation, whether across currencies or not. The concept of the Tobin tax is being picked up by various tax proposals currently being discussed, amongst them the European Union Financial Transaction Tax as well as the Robin Hood tax.

A capital gains tax (CGT) is the tax on profits realized on the sale of a non-inventory asset. The most common capital gains are realized from the sale of stocks, bonds, precious metals, real estate, and property.

A corporate tax, also called corporation tax or company tax, is a type of direct tax levied on the income or capital of corporations and other similar legal entities. The tax is usually imposed at the national level, but it may also be imposed at state or local levels in some countries. Corporate taxes may be referred to as income tax or capital tax, depending on the nature of the tax.

Although the actual definitions vary between jurisdictions, in general, a direct tax is a tax imposed upon a person or property as distinct from a tax imposed upon a transaction, which is described as an indirect tax. There is a distinction between direct and indirect taxes depending on whether the tax payer is the actual taxpayer or if the amount of tax is supported by a third party, usually a client. The term may be used in economic and political analyses, but does not itself have any legal implications except in the United States of America, where the term has special constitutional significance because of two provisions in the U.S. Constitution that any direct taxes imposed by the national government be apportioned among the states on the basis of population; and in the European Union, where direct taxation remains the sole responsibility of member states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indirect tax</span> Type of tax

An indirect tax is a tax that is levied upon goods and services before they reach the customer who ultimately pays the indirect tax as a part of market price of the good or service purchased. Alternatively, if the entity who pays taxes to the tax collecting authority does not suffer a corresponding reduction in income, i.e., the effect and tax incidence are not on the same entity meaning that tax can be shifted or passed on, then the tax is indirect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taxation in New Zealand</span> Overview of taxation in New Zealand

Taxes in New Zealand are collected at a national level by the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) on behalf of the New Zealand Government. National taxes are levied on personal and business income, and on the supply of goods and services. Capital gains tax applies in limited situations, such as the sale of some rental properties within 10 years of purchase. Some "gains" such as profits on the sale of patent rights are deemed to be income – income tax does apply to property transactions in certain circumstances, particularly speculation. There are currently no land taxes, but local property taxes (rates) are managed and collected by local authorities. Some goods and services carry a specific tax, referred to as an excise or a duty, such as alcohol excise or gaming duty. These are collected by a range of government agencies such as the New Zealand Customs Service. There is no social security (payroll) tax.

Income taxes are the most significant form of taxation in Australia, and collected by the federal government through the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Australian GST revenue is collected by the Federal government, and then paid to the states under a distribution formula determined by the Commonwealth Grants Commission.

The tax system of the Russian Federation is a complex of relationships between fiscal authorities and taxpayers in the field of all existing taxes and fees. It implies continuous communication of all its members and related objects: payers; legislative framework; oversight authorities; types of mandatory payments. The Russian Tax Code is the primary tax law for the Russian Federation. The Code was created, adopted and implemented in three stages.

Taxes in India are levied by the Central Government and the State Governments by virtue of powers conferred to them from the Constitution of India. Some minor taxes are also levied by the local authorities such as the Municipality.

Taxation represents the biggest source of revenues for the Peruvian government. For 2016, the projected amount of taxation revenues was S/.94.6 billion. There are four taxes that make up approximately 90 percent of the taxation revenues:

The Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) is the government agency of Tanzania, charged with the responsibility of managing the assessment, collection and accounting of all central government revenue in Tanzania.

The tax legislation of Azerbaijan is comprised by the Constitution of Azerbaijan Republic, the Tax Code and legal standards which are adopted herewith. The taxes levied in Azerbaijan can be generally broken down into 3 main types: state taxes, taxes of autonomy republic and local (municipal) taxes. State taxes include the following: personal income tax, corporate tax, value added tax, excise tax, property tax, land tax, road tax, mineral royalty tax and simplified tax. Taxes of autonomy republic are the same as state taxes but levied in Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic.

A financial transaction tax (FTT) is a levy on a specific type of financial transaction for a particular purpose. The tax has been most commonly associated with the financial sector for transactions involving intangible property rather than real property. It is not usually considered to include consumption taxes paid by consumers.

A currency transaction tax is a tax placed on the use of currency for various types of transactions. The tax is associated with the financial sector and is a type of financial transaction tax, as opposed to a consumption tax paid by consumers, though the tax may be passed on by the financial institution to the customer.

A bank tax, or a bank levy, is a tax on banks which was discussed in the context of the financial crisis of 2007–08. The bank tax is levied on the capital at risk of financial institutions, excluding federally insured deposits, with the aim of discouraging banks from taking unnecessary risks. The bank tax is levied on a limited number of sophisticated taxpayers and is not especially difficult to understand. It can be used as a counterbalance to the various ways in which banks are currently subsidized by the tax system, such as the ability to subtract bad loan reserves, delay tax on interest received abroad, and buy other banks and use their losses to offset future income. In other words, the bank tax is a small reimbursement of taxpayer funds used to bail out major banks after the 2008 financial crisis, and it is carefully structured to target only certain institutions that are considered "too big to fail."

Taxes in Germany are levied at various government levels: the federal government, the 16 states (Länder), and numerous municipalities (Städte/Gemeinden). The structured tax system has evolved significantly, since the reunification of Germany in 1990 and the integration within the European Union, which has influenced tax policies. Today, income tax and Value-Added Tax (VAT) are the primary sources of tax revenue. These taxes reflect Germany's commitment to a balanced approach between direct and indirect taxation, essential for funding extensive social welfare programs and public infrastructure. The modern German tax system accentuate on fairness and efficiency, adapting to global economic trends and domestic fiscal needs.

A bank transaction tax is a tax levied on debit entries on bank accounts. In 1989, at the Buenos Aires meetings of the International Institute of Public Finance, University of Wisconsin–Madison Professor of Economics Edgar L. Feige proposed extending the tax reform ideas of John Maynard Keynes, James Tobin and Lawrence Summers, to their logical conclusion, namely to tax all transactions. Feige's Automated Payment Transaction tax proposed taxing the broadest possible tax base at the lowest possible tax rate. Since all transactions must ultimately be paid for by a final means of payment, namely via a transfer from a bank account or by settlement with currency, Feige proposed collecting his tax by levying the tax automatically on the debit and credit entries to bank accounts, thereby splitting the tax between the buyer and seller of every transaction. The APT tax is a uniform flat-rate tax on all transactions, assessed and collected automatically whenever there is a debit or credit entry to a bank account. As such, it can be viewed as a bank transaction tax. Since financial transactions account for the greatest component of the APT tax base, and since all financial transactions are taxed, the proposal eliminates substitution possibilities for evasion and avoidance. The goal of the APT tax is to significantly improve economic efficiency, enhance stability in financial markets, and reduce to a minimum the costs of tax administration. The Automated Payment Transaction tax proposal was presented to the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform in 2005. It can be automatically collected by a central counterparty in the clearing or settlement process.

Edgar L. Feige is an emeritus professor of economics at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. A graduate of Columbia University and the University of Chicago, he has taught at Yale University; the University of Essex; Erasmus University and held the Cleveringa Chair, at the University of Leiden in 1981–82. He has published widely on such topics as underground and shadow economies; tax evasion; transition economics; financial transaction taxes the Automated Payment Transaction tax ; and monetary theory and policy. He has consulted with various US and international government agencies.

References

  1. ↑ "Rethinking Taxation: The Automated Payment Transaction Tax - The Freedom Pub". blog.heartland.org. Archived from the original on 2018-03-12. Retrieved 2018-03-11.[ self-published source? ]
  2. ↑ Keynes, J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Harcourt Brace, New York, NY.[ page needed ]
  3. ↑ Tobin, James (1978). "A Proposal for International Monetary Reform". Eastern Economic Journal. 4 (3/4): 153–159. JSTOR   20642317.
  4. ↑ Summers, Lawrence H.; Summers, Victoria P. (December 1989). "When financial markets work too well: A cautious case for a securities transactions tax". Journal of Financial Services Research. 3 (2–3): 261–286. doi:10.1007/BF00122806. S2CID   154812065.
  5. ↑ https://www.gailfosler.com/edgar-l-feige%5B%5D%5B%5D
  6. ↑ Cintra, Marcos (July 2009). Bank transactions: pathway to the single tax ideal A modern tax technology;the Brazilian experience with a bank transactions tax (1993-2007) (Report).
  7. 1 2 Akst, Daniel (2 February 2003). "ON THE CONTRARY; Dreaming Out Loud: One Tiny Little Tax". The New York Times.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Feige, E. L. (1 October 2000). "Taxation for the 21st century: the automated payment transaction (APT) tax". Economic Policy. 15 (31): 474–511. doi:10.1111/1468-0327.00067. S2CID   14540367. SSRN   2486665.
  9. ↑ Honohan, Patrick; Yoder, Sean (2010-08-31). "Financial Transactions Tax: Panacea, Threat, or Damp Squib?" (PDF). World Bank .
  10. ↑ "The Automated Payment Transaction Tax". Archived from the original on 2004-03-20. Retrieved 2007-10-13.[ unreliable source? ]
  11. ↑ "Bill Hermann Bio". Archived from the original on 2021-03-15. Retrieved 2021-03-15.[ self-published source? ]
  12. ↑ "Tiny Tax". Archived from the original on 2021-01-20. Retrieved 2021-01-18.[ self-published source? ]
  13. ↑ "Auto Deposit Tax" . Retrieved 2021-02-22.
  14. ↑ "The Transaction Tax". Archived from the original on 2021-02-13. Retrieved 2019-05-29.[ self-published source? ]
  15. ↑ "Universal Exchange Tax" . Retrieved 2024-01-07.
  16. ↑ "APT - A Progressive Flat Tax". 2 February 2012.
  17. ↑ "Transaction Tax - How It Works". Archived from the original on 10 March 2020.
  18. ↑ Hermann, William J. "Frequently Asked Questions". Archived from the original on 2020-01-14. Retrieved 2021-03-15.[ self-published source? ]
  19. ↑ "Projected Tax Base and Tax Rates for 2005 Budgets". Archived from the original on 2020-01-14. Retrieved 2021-03-15.[ self-published source? ]
  20. ↑ "https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11533/1/MPRA_paper_11533.pdf"
  21. 1 2 "The Automated Payment Transaction Tax". Archived from the original on 2015-03-14. Retrieved 2021-03-15.[ self-published source? ]
  22. ↑ Hermann, Bill. "The Automated Deposit Tax". Archived from the original on 16 March 2021. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
  23. ↑ Fiege, Ed. "FAQ Q.7: Isn't there a big loophole around the APT Tax by simply using cash?". Automated Payment Transaction Tax. Archived from the original on 15 September 2019.
  24. ↑ "https://web.archive.org/web/20140406154901/http://thetransactiontax.org/benefits/%7B%7Bself-published%7B%7Bfull
  25. ↑ "The Automated Payment Transaction Tax". www.apttax.com. Archived from the original on 2017-03-02. Retrieved 2018-03-11.
  26. 1 2 3 "The Automated Payment Transaction Tax". Archived from the original on 2020-01-14. Retrieved 2021-03-15.
  27. ↑ "The Automated Payment Transaction Tax". www.apttax.com. Archived from the original on 2020-01-14. Retrieved 2018-03-11.

Other sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.