Beamtimes and Lifetimes

Last updated
Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists
Beamtimes and Lifetimes.jpg
Editors Sharon Traweek
Subject cultural anthropology
Publisher Harvard University Press
Publication date
1988
ISBN 978-0674063488

Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists is a book by Sharon Traweek on cultural anthropology and the sociology of science among people in the field of particle physics. It is an ethnography of high energy physicists that chronicles the laboratories, career paths, and values of a community of scientists based on her observations at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in California, US, and KEK High Energy Accelerator Research Organization in Japan.

Contents

Various reviewers profiled the book. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Ethnography and sociology of science

Beamtimes and Lifetimes represents a turn of sociologists and anthropologists to use the tools of their discipline toward the powerful within modern culture rather than colonized cultures. [6] It aims to broaden the understanding provided by philosophy and intellectual history which traditionally focused on the rational components of knowledge making. Anthropologists aim to enrich an understanding of science by presenting science as an activity embedded in culture, a domain rich in human practice and expression. In contrast to a view of science as a wholly rational pursuit, laboratory studies like Traweek's detail a process of constructing knowledge by situating it as products of local practices and cultural contingencies. [7]

By illustrating strategies of individuals, groups, and institutions pursuing science goals, Traweek enriches an understanding of how science is practiced, extending beyond the laws of nature. [8] Beamtimes and Lifetimes describes ways physicists create networks, the interpersonal connections through which preprints and informal communication are diffused, graduate students exchanged, and discussions about findings and goals are channeled. [9] Creating these contacts and networks, that can then be tapped for opportunities, information, and support for ideas, is conceptualized by sociologists as a process of developing and leveraging social capital. [10]

In Beamtimes and Lifetimes, Traweek aims to shed light on how high energy physicists create agreement and common understanding. She brings modes of knowledge-making sociologists call tacit knowledge, ideas and skills that are not explicitly articulated. Tacit knowledge, distinct from formal or codified knowledge such as that found in journals or textbooks, is gained primarily in collaboration with others and shared experience. [11] [12]

Traweek describes stories that American physicists tell with rhetorical flair about their own prowess in contrast to others. Humor is viewed by anthropologists as emblematic of cultural expression, because it captures play and otherwise unspoken attitudes, concepts, and values. [13] Physicists engaged with Sharon's work about linguistic play between major labs or between experimentalists and theorists. An example she provided of a provocative suggestion that no one at Fermilab could "experimentally tie their shoes" and boast that at another lab they check the "tension in their shoelaces by hand every half hour" was responded to with banter from another physicist, in the form of a call for a workshop at Fermilab where there were "so many experts on topology, string tension, and all that". [14]

Values of high energy physicists

Traweek's description illustrates values held by high energy physicists, such as disregard for neatness as an indication of focusing on intellectual pursuits, or distaste for secret work as less prestigious by being more applied than basic research.

Secret work is distasteful to them because it is seen as applied research, in which ideas already established in basic or pure research are applied to less fundamental and challenging problems. They are proud of working at a lab where no classified work is conducted, because in their eyes basic research has much higher status.

Physicists’ concept of their work is saturated with the value they place on objectivity. Traweek concludes that particle physics is "an extreme culture of objectivity: a culture of no culture, which longs passionately for a world without loose ends, without temperament, gender, nationalism." [15] [16]

Traweek illustrates cultural performance of competition within various groups of physicists. [17] Describing the transition of a student into a full-fledged member of the community, she points to a double-bind of unspoken expectations faced by a person holding a postdoc, a short-term research position after receiving a Ph.D. in the U.S. The "official description of group work as cooperative" is at odds with the status achieved amongst peers and group leaders trying to make a name for themselves selling ideas, illustrating the "disguised message that only competition and transgression will prevail." [15] Since the majority of postdocs in high energy physics do not gain employment in the field, for individuals this is a high stakes process where they aren't told the keys to success. In the stories Traweek shares, senior physicists rationalize this competitive individualism as both just and effective in producing fine physics. American physicists "emphasize that science is not democratic: decisions about scientific purposes should not be made by majority rule within the community, nor should there be equal access to a lab's resources. On both these issues, most Japanese physicists assume the opposite." [15]

Traweek's book enables a view into a culture with an ideology of meritocracy, a culture featuring values and norms characteristically white and masculine. Scholars have built on her work by researching ways to increase the retention of women and people of color in science. [18] Cultural analysis of science includes considering the politics of the aesthetics held by physicists regarding their own knowledge and making practices. The perception of the beauty of a truth or the role of certain forms of humor expresses the particular and situated cultural activity of its community. When that community can make such claims as if they are universal, it illustrates the power of that community of knowers. [19]

High energy physics in Japan and US

Traweek's comparison of how high energy physics is conducted in KEK in Japan and SLAC in the US makes visible alternative values and social norms that might otherwise be taken for granted by studying one country. Comparing the physical environments and relations with surrounding communities, she notes that whereas the fence constructed around SLAC represents contention between the lab and the community fears about radiation safety, no fence was built around KEK. The researchers and employees of KEK reside in a social engineered science city in rural Japan, whereas SLAC is located near the existing hub of scientific and technological communities. [15]

Because of the koza system of academic chairs, Japanese researchers function within lifelong work relationships in a vertical and non-competitive group structure having clear advancement trajectory, yet with little mobility from institution to institution as is practiced in the US. [15] [20] The stories about a life in physics told by Americans pivot on traits traditionally associated with men, such as independence in defining goals and fierce competition in a race for discoveries. [15] Traweek contrasts that with an image in Japan of women as "not sufficiently schooled in the masculine virtues of interdependence, dependence, in the effective organization of teamwork and camaraderie, commitment to working in one team in order to complete a complex task successfully and consulting with group members in decision making, and the capacity to nurture the newer group members in developing these skills." [15] Traweek notes that although the traits associated with leadership are contrasting, in both cultural instances, virtues leading to success are ascribed to men.

Technoscience

Traweek describes ways that technology such as particle detectors, not as neutral objects, but as artifacts embedded within and reflective of the values and social systems of their creators. [21] Donna Haraway points to Beamtimes and Lifetimes as a reconceptualization and reading of machine and organism as coded texts in such a way that it opens up technological determinism. [22] Detectors and laboratory environment are key characters in the matrix of ideas, experiences, organizational structures, and histories providing a context in which scientists ask questions. [23]

Traweek describes the detector of one research group as enabling a particular form of research because experimentalists could regularly tinker with it to rule out alternative explanations. This contrasts with a detector built at KEK, which was optimized for stability, due to expectations within funding frameworks that the detector be active for a long time and because relationships with the industrial companies providing components hamper ad hoc adjustments. [15]

Drawing on Traweeks empirical work observing physicists, Karin Knorr Cetina suggests that laboratories are environments that illustrate "levels of sociality that are object-centered" and an embedding environment for a modern self "uprooted and disembedded" from the human bonds and traditions in previous contexts of belonging. Objects such as laboratories and detectors play significant roles in providing a context for a sense of self. [24]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Particle physics</span> Study of subatomic particles and forces

Particle physics or high-energy physics is the study of fundamental particles and forces that constitute matter and radiation. The field also studies combinations of elementary particles up to the scale of protons and neutrons, while the study of combination of protons and neutrons is called nuclear physics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory</span> Research center at Stanford University

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, originally named the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, is a federally funded research and development center in Menlo Park, California, United States. Founded in 1962, the laboratory is now sponsored by the United States Department of Energy and administrated by Stanford University. It is the site of the Stanford Linear Accelerator, a 3.2 kilometer (2-mile) linear accelerator constructed in 1966 that could accelerate electrons to energies of 50 GeV.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fermilab</span> High-energy particle physics laboratory in Illinois, US

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab), located in Batavia, Illinois, near Chicago, is a United States Department of Energy national laboratory specializing in high-energy particle physics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">KEK</span> Japanese high-energy physics organization

The High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, known as KEK, is a Japanese organization whose purpose is to operate the largest particle physics laboratory in Japan, situated in Tsukuba, Ibaraki prefecture. It was established in 1997. The term "KEK" is also used to refer to the laboratory itself, which employs approximately 695 employees. KEK's main function is to provide the particle accelerators and other infrastructure needed for high-energy physics, material science, structural biology, radiation science, computing science, nuclear transmutation and so on. Numerous experiments have been constructed at KEK by the internal and international collaborations that have made use of them. Makoto Kobayashi, emeritus professor at KEK, is known globally for his work on CP-violation, and was awarded the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility</span> Particle accelerator laboratory in Newport News, Virginia, USA

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), commonly called Jefferson Lab or JLab, is a US Department of Energy National Laboratory located in Newport News, Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource</span> Research center at Stanford University

The Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, a division of SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is operated by Stanford University for the Department of Energy. SSRL is a National User Facility which provides synchrotron radiation, a name given to electromagnetic radiation in the x-ray, ultraviolet, visible and infrared realms produced by electrons circulating in a storage ring at nearly the speed of light. The extremely bright light that is produced can be used to investigate various forms of matter ranging from objects of atomic and molecular size to man-made materials with unusual properties. The obtained information and knowledge is of great value to society, with impact in areas such as the environment, future technologies, health, biology, basic research, and education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">QuarkNet</span> Teacher professional development in sciences

QuarkNet is a long-term, research-based teacher professional development program in the United States jointly funded by the National Science Foundation and the US Department of Energy. Since 1999, QuarkNet has established centers at universities and national laboratories conducting research in particle physics across the United States, and have been bringing such physics to high school classrooms. QuarkNet programs are designed and conducted according to best practices described in the National Research Council National Science Education Standards report (1995) and support the Next Generation Science Standards (2013).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nigel Lockyer</span> Particle physicist, Fermilab director

Nigel Stuart Lockyer is a British-American experimental particle physicist. He is the current director of the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS and Education (CLASSE) as of May 1, 2023. He was the Director of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab), in Batavia, Illinois, the leading particle physics laboratory in the United States, from September 2013 to April 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Makoto Kobayashi</span> Japanese physicist (born 1944)

Makoto Kobayashi is a Japanese physicist known for his work on CP-violation who was awarded one-fourth of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics "for the discovery of the origin of the broken symmetry which predicts the existence of at least three families of quarks in nature."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David R. Nygren</span> Particle Physicist who invented time projection chambers

David Robert Nygren is a particle physicist known for his invention of the time projection chamber. He is a Presidential Distinguished Professor of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington now. He has worked at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory since 1973. He has been called "the most distinguished developer of particle detection instruments in the country".

Mohammad Sajjad "Saj" Alam was a Bengali Pakistani and a naturalized American particle physicist. His work focused on particle physics and computational physics. He played a significant role in several major particle physics experiments that led to new discoveries in the area of high-energy particle physics.

Sharon Jean Traweek is associate professor in the Department of Gender Studies and History at University of California, Los Angeles. Her book Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists, which explores the social world of particle physicists, has been cited in thousands of books and articles relating to the sociology of science and translated into Chinese in 2003.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James E. Brau</span> American physicist and professor

James E. Brau is an American physicist at the University of Oregon (UO) who conducts research on elementary particles and fields. He founded the Oregon experimental high energy physics group in 1988 and served as director of the UO Center for High Energy Physics from 1997 to 2016. Prior to joining the Oregon faculty, he served in the Air Force and held positions at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and the University of Tennessee. He is a fellow of both the American Physical Society and also the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In 2006 he was appointed the Philip H. Knight Professor of Natural Science, an endowed professorship.

Vera G. Lüth is an experimental particle physicist and professor emerita at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), Stanford University, in the United States. A senator of the Helmholtz Association, she has worked in particle physics at SLAC since 1974. She is a fellow of the American Physical Society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">JoAnne L. Hewett</span> Theoretical particle physicist

JoAnne L. Hewett is a theoretical particle physicist on the faculty of the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory at Stanford University, where she is a professor in the Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics. Since 2017 she has been the associate lab director of the Fundamental Physics Directorate and the chief research officer at SLAC. Her research interests include physics beyond the Standard Model, dark matter, and hidden dimensions. She is a fellow of the American Physical Society and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free neutron decay</span> Decay of a neutron when outside a nucleus

When embedded in an atomic nucleus, neutrons are (usually) stable particles. Outside the nucleus, free neutrons are unstable and have a mean lifetime of 877.75+0.50
−0.44 s or 879.6±0.8 s. Therefore, the half-life for this process is 611±1 s.

George H. Trilling was a Polish-born American particle physicist. He was co-discoverer of the J/ψ meson which evinced the existence of the charm quark. Trilling joined the Physics Department faculty at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1960, where he was Department Chair from 1968 through 1972. Trilling was on sabbatical leave to CERN in 1973–74, where he worked on the study of the properties of charm particles, their decay modes and excited states. He was also Director of the Physics Division at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory from 1984 until 1987. Trilling was a principal proponent of the Superconducting Super Collider project and spokesperson for the Solenoidal Detector Collaboration. After the SSC was cancelled in 1993, Trilling transitioned most of the SDC team to collaborate on the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, which led to the discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012. Trilling was elected Vice-President of the American Physical Society, beginning his term on 1 January 1999, and was President of the society in 2001.

Natalie Ann Roe is an experimental particle physicist and observational cosmologist, and the Associate Laboratory Director for the Physical Sciences Area at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) since 2020. Previously, she was the Physics Division Director for eight years. She has been awarded as the Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) and American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) for her exceptional scientific career and contributions.

Amber S. Boehnlein is a particle physicist, computer scientist, and administrator who has held leadership positions at several United States national laboratories and the United States Department of Energy.

Patricia Rankin is a British high energy physicist, equity researcher and Chair of the Department at the Arizona State University. Her research considers high energy particle physics and gender balance in scientific disciplines. She was previously responsible for the high energy physics section of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. ↑ Sutton, Christine (19 August 1989). "Particle physicists under scrutiny / Review of 'Beamtimes and Lifetimes' by Sharon Traweek". www.newscientist.com.
  2. ↑ Traweek, Sharon; Kernan, Anne (July 1990). "Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists". Physics Today. 43 (7): 68–69. Bibcode:1990PhT....43g..68T. doi:10.1063/1.2810632.
  3. ↑ Chasteen, Stephanie (22 March 2010). "An ethnography of particle physics (Beamtimes and Lifetimes)". blog.sciencegeekgirl.com.
  4. ↑ Demart, Lee (6 December 1988). "Book Review : 'Beamtimes' a Look at Little World of Studying Big Ideas". Los Angeles Times.
  5. ↑ Pickering, Andy (June 1990). "Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Sharon Traweek". Isis. 81 (2): 381–382. doi:10.1086/355431.
  6. ↑ Ho, K. (2009). Liquidated: an ethnography of Wall Street. Duke University Press, p. 329.
  7. ↑ Lee Kleinman, D. (2007). Laboratory Studies and the World of the Scientific Lab. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, G. Ritzer (Ed.). doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosl008
  8. ↑ Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2013). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Routledge, p.4.
  9. ↑ Golinski, J. (2008). Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science, with a new preface. University of Chicago Press, p 168.
  10. ↑ Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. (2000). Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge University Press, p. 124-128. Etzkowitz goes on to point out effects of lower social capital in examples of women in science, such as Rosalind Franklin, Evelyn Fox-Keller, and Barbara McClintock.
  11. ↑ Definition of tacit knowledge in business.
  12. ↑ Cowan, R., David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and corporate change, 9(2), 211-253. Cowan et al. express concern that through an observational methodology, it may be difficult to identify what can be considered tacit knowledge, if, for example, some previously codified knowledge has become common knowledge. In that case, observationally, it may appear as tacit knowledge. p.237.
  13. ↑ Basso, K. H., & Basso, K. H. (1979). Portraits of 'the whiteman': linguistic play and cultural symbols among the Western Apache. Cambridge University Press.
  14. ↑ JD Bjorken. (1985) The November revolution - a theorist reminisces. SLAC Beam Line, July. Special Issue Number 8, p2. https://www.slac.stanford.edu/history/pubs/bjorkennov.pdf
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes. Harvard University Press.
  16. ↑ Rajan, K. S. (2006). Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Duke University Press.
  17. ↑ Kling, R. (Ed.). (1996). Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices. Elsevier, p. 99.
  18. ↑ Sociological evidence has shown the relevance of the identity markers associated with values to retention of groups outside the norms. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218.
  19. ↑ Law, John. After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge, 2004. pdf
  20. ↑ Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. University of Pittsburgh Press, p. 197.
  21. ↑ Harding, S. (2016). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Cornell University Press, p. 37.
  22. ↑ 4 Haraway, Donna. "A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century." The international handbook of virtual learning environments. Springer, Dordrecht, 2006. 117-158. (End note 4).
  23. ↑ Greenwood, Davydd J., and Morten Levin. (2006) Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. SAGE publications, p81.
  24. ↑ Cetina, K. K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, culture & society, 14(4), 1-30.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.