Behistun papyrus

Last updated
Column V (verso) of the Behistun papyrus, showing fragments of 17 of the original 18 lines Aramaic translation of the behistun inscripton.png
Column V (verso) of the Behistun papyrus, showing fragments of 17 of the original 18 lines

The Behistun papyrus, formally known as Berlin Papyrus P. 13447, is an Aramaic-Egyptian fragmentary partial copy of the Behistun inscription, and one of the Elephantine papyri discovered during the German excavations between 1906 and 1908. [1]

Contents

The text is known as DB Aram in the identification code of the Achaemenid royal inscriptions, and separately as TADAE C2.1+3.13. It is the only known Aramaic version of an Achaemenid royal inscription, despite Aramaic being considered the lingua franca of the Achaemenid Empire. [2]

The papyrus is held at the Egyptian Museum of Berlin.

Discovery and Historical Context

The papyrus was unearthed amid the 1906-1908 German archaeological excavations at Elephantine, a site known for its historical significance as a Jewish colony within the Persian Empire. The papyrus's discovery was a part of a broader excavation effort to uncover the cultural, social, and political landscape of the region during antiquity. [1]

Publication

Eduard Sachau's publication in 1911 brought the papyrus to scholarly attention, followed by Arthur Ernest Cowley's English language edition in 1923. Subsequent research and contributions, including the 1982 edition by the Corpus Inscriptionum Iranicarum (CII 1.1), provided further understanding of the papyrus's significance.

Content

The document contains two primary texts, one on the front (the Behistun text) and one on the back.

Behistun inscription

The papyrus's recto and initial columns of the verso feature an Aramaic version of Darius I's well known Behistun Inscription (DB Aram). The original rock inscription, itself carved in three languages and scripts, narrates Darius I's ascension to power, his accomplishments, and his lineage. The Berlin Papyrus's version of DB Aram offers scholars a unique window into the linguistic nuances and variations of this monumental proclamation.

The papyrus is highly fragmented, but is thought to have originally been written on a scroll of 24 sheets in eleven columns, nine on the recto and two on the verso. [3] None of the eleven original columns are preserved intact; in total parts of fourteen paragraphs are readable:

Memoranda (Mem.) and Administrative Insights

The verso columns of the papyrus host a collection of memoranda, providing detail on the administrative and economic activities of Elephantine. These memoranda record transactions involving diverse goods, including valuable items such as bowls and incense burners, as well as commodities like grains. The repetition of the term "zokrān" (memorandum) highlights a systematic approach to documenting transactions and suggests an organized record-keeping practice.

The coexistence of DB Aram and the memoranda on the same papyrus raised scholarly questions about their role within the YHW-temple library. This suggests a connection between administrative records and educational materials. It is possible that the papyrus served as a resource for training scribes in the art of temple management and record-keeping, revealing a nexus between practical applications and pedagogical purposes.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Behistun Inscription</span> Ancient multilingual stone inscription in Iran

The Behistun Inscription is a multilingual Achaemenid royal inscription and large rock relief on a cliff at Mount Behistun in the Kermanshah Province of Iran, near the city of Kermanshah in western Iran, established by Darius the Great. It was important to the decipherment of cuneiform, as it is the longest known trilingual cuneiform inscription, written in Old Persian, Elamite, and Babylonian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Darius the Great</span> Persian ruler from 522 to 486 BCE

Darius I, commonly known as Darius the Great, was a Persian ruler who served as the third King of Kings of the Achaemenid Empire, reigning from 522 BCE until his death in 486 BCE. He ruled the empire at its territorial peak, when it included much of Western Asia, parts of the Balkans and the Caucasus, most of the Black Sea's coastal regions, Central Asia, the Indus Valley in the far east, and portions of North Africa and Northeast Africa including Egypt (Mudrâya), eastern Libya, and coastal Sudan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elephantine papyri and ostraca</span> 5th- to 4th-century BCE Egyptian texts

The Elephantine Papyri and Ostraca consist of thousands of documents from the Egyptian border fortresses of Elephantine and Aswan, which yielded hundreds of papyri and ostraca in hieratic and demotic Egyptian, Aramaic, Koine Greek, Latin and Coptic, spanning a period of 100 years in the 5th to 4th centuries BCE. The documents include letters and legal contracts from family and other archives, and are thus an invaluable source of knowledge for scholars of varied disciplines such as epistolography, law, society, religion, language and onomastics. The Elephantine documents include letters and legal contracts from family and other archives: divorce documents, the manumission of slaves, and other business. The dry soil of Upper Egypt preserved the documents.

Old Persian is one of two directly attested Old Iranian languages and is the ancestor of Middle Persian. Like other Old Iranian languages, it was known to its native speakers as ariya (Iranian). Old Persian is close to both Avestan and the language of the Rig Veda, the oldest form of the Sanskrit language. All three languages are highly inflected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Achaemenes</span> Apical ancestor of the Achaemenid dynasty

Achaemenes was the apical ancestor of the Achaemenid dynasty of rulers of Persia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amyrtaeus</span> Egyptian Pharaoh from 404 to 399 BC

Amyrtaeusof Sais is the only pharaoh of the Twenty-eighth Dynasty of Egypt and is thought to be related to the royal family of the Twenty-sixth Dynasty. He ended the first Persian occupation of Egypt and reigned from 404 BC to 399 BC. Amyrtaeus' successful insurrection inaugurated Egypt's last significant phase of independence under native sovereigns, which lasted for about 60 years until the Persians conquered the country again.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old Persian cuneiform</span> Semi-alphabetic cuneiform script

Old Persian cuneiform is a semi-alphabetic cuneiform script that was the primary script for Old Persian. Texts written in this cuneiform have been found in Iran, Armenia, Romania (Gherla), Turkey, and along the Suez Canal. They were mostly inscriptions from the time period of Darius I, such as the DNa inscription, as well as his son, Xerxes I. Later kings down to Artaxerxes III used more recent forms of the language classified as "pre-Middle Persian".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nabataean Aramaic</span> Variety of Aramaic

Nabataean Aramaic is the extinct Aramaic variety used in inscriptions by the Nabataeans of the East Bank of the Jordan River, the Negev, and the Sinai Peninsula. Compared with other varieties of Aramaic, it is notable for the occurrence of a number of loanwords and grammatical borrowings from Arabic or other North Arabian languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Persepolis Administrative Archives</span> Clay administrative archives found in Persepolis dating to the Achaemenid Persian Empire

The Persepolis Fortification Archive and Persepolis Treasury Archive are two groups of clay administrative archives — sets of records physically stored together – found in Persepolis dating to the Achaemenid Persian Empire. The discovery was made during legal excavations conducted by the archaeologists from the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago in the 1930s. Hence they are named for their in situ findspot: Persepolis. The archaeological excavations at Persepolis for the Oriental Institute were initially directed by Ernst Herzfeld from 1931 to 1934 and carried on from 1934 until 1939 by Erich Schmidt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imperial Aramaic</span> Ancient language

Imperial Aramaic is a linguistic term, coined by modern scholars in order to designate a specific historical variety of Aramaic language. The term is polysemic, with two distinctive meanings, wider (sociolinguistic) and narrower (dialectological). Since most surviving examples of the language have been found in Egypt, the language is also referred to as Egyptian Aramaic.

Old Aramaic refers to the earliest stage of the Aramaic language, known from the Aramaic inscriptions discovered since the 19th century.

Jonas Carl Greenfield was an American scholar of Semitic languages, who published in the fields of Semitic Epigraphy, Aramaic Studies and Qumran Studies, and a distinguished member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hystaspes (father of Darius I)</span> c. 550 BC Persian satrap of Bactria and Persis

Hystaspes or Guštāsp, was a Persian satrap of Bactria and Persis. He was the father of Darius I, emperor of the Achaemenid Empire, and Artabanus, who was a trusted advisor to both his brother Darius as well as Darius's son and successor, Xerxes I.

<i>Story of Ahikar</i> Aramaic story from the fifth century BCE

The Story of Aḥiqar, also known as the Words of Aḥiqar, is a story first attested in Imperial Aramaic from the fifth century BCE on papyri from Elephantine, Egypt, that circulated widely in the Middle and the Near East. It has been characterised as "one of the earliest 'international books' of world literature".

Biblical Hebrew orthography refers to the various systems which have been used to write the Biblical Hebrew language. Biblical Hebrew has been written in a number of different writing systems over time, and in those systems its spelling and punctuation have also undergone changes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley</span> Persian military conquest that took place in Punjab from the 6th to 4th centuries BCE

The Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley refers to a process beginning in the 6th century BCE and ending in the 4th century BCE, whereby the Achaemenid Persian Empire established control over the northwestern regions of the Indian subcontinent, today predominantly comprising the territory of the Punjab region of the middle Indus Valley. The first of the two main invasions was conducted around 535 BCE by Cyrus the Great, who annexed the areas to the west of the Indus River, consolidating the early eastern border of the Achaemenid Empire. With a brief pause after Cyrus' death, the campaign continued under Darius the Great, who began to re-conquer former provinces and further expand Persia's political boundaries. Around 518 BCE, Persian armies under Darius crossed the Himalayas into India to initiate a second period of conquest by annexing regions up to Punjab.

Kanaanäische und Aramäische Inschriften, or KAI, is the standard source for the original text of Canaanite and Aramaic inscriptions not contained in the Hebrew Bible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julius Euting</span> German orientalist

Julius Euting was a German Orientalist.

Textbook of Aramaic Documents from Ancient Egypt, often referred to as TAD or TADAE, is a four volume corpus of Aramaic inscriptions written during the period of ancient Egypt, written by Bezalel Porten and Ada Yardeni.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Achaemenid royal inscriptions</span> 6th–4th century BCE cuneiform inscriptions

The Achaemenid royal inscriptions are the surviving inscriptions in cuneiform script from the Achaemenid Empire, dating from the 6th to 4th century BCE. These inscriptions are primary sources for the history of the empire, along with archaeological evidence and the administrative archives of Persepolis. However, scholars are reliant on Greek sources to reconstruct much of Achaemenid history.

References

  1. 1 2 Mitchell 2017.
  2. Tavernier 2001, p. 161.
  3. Porten and Yardeni, p. 59-70
  4. Porten and Yardeni, p. 59-70
  5. Porten and Yardeni, p. 59-70
  6. Porten and Yardeni, p. 59-70
  7. Porten and Yardeni, p. 59-70
  8. Porten and Yardeni, p. 59-70
  9. Porten and Yardeni, p. 59-70
  10. Porten and Yardeni, p. 59-70

Bibliography