Bolometric correction

Last updated

In astronomy, the bolometric correction is the correction made to the absolute magnitude of an object in order to convert its visible magnitude to its bolometric magnitude. It is large for stars which radiate most of their energy outside of the visible range. A uniform scale for the correction has not yet been standardized.

Contents

Description

Mathematically, such a calculation can be expressed:

The bolometric correction for a range of stars with different spectral types and groups is shown in the following table: [1] [2] [3]

Spectral typeMain SequenceGiantsSupergiants
O3−4.3−4.2−4.0
G0−0.10−0.13−0.1
G5−0.14−0.34−0.20
K0−0.24−0.42−0.38
K5−0.66−1.19−1.00
M0−1.21−1.28−1.3

The bolometric correction is large and negative both for early type (hot) stars and for late type (cool) stars. The former because a substantial part of the produced radiation is in the ultraviolet, the latter because a large part is in the infrared. For a star like the Sun, the correction is only marginal because the Sun radiates most of its energy in the visual wavelength range. Bolometric correction is the correction made to the absolute magnitude of an object in order to convert an object's visible magnitude to its bolometric magnitude.

Alternatively, the bolometric correction can be made to absolute magnitudes based on other wavelength bands beyond the visible electromagnetic spectrum. [4] For example, and somewhat more commonly for those cooler stars where most of the energy is emitted in the infrared wavelength range, sometimes a different value set of bolometric corrections is applied to the absolute infrared magnitude, instead of the absolute visual magnitude.

Mathematically, such a calculation could be expressed: [5]

Where MK is the absolute magnitude value and BCK is the bolometric correction value in the K-band. [6]

Setting the correction scale

The bolometric correction scale is set by the absolute magnitude of the Sun and an adopted (arbitrary) absolute bolometric magnitude for the Sun. Hence, while the absolute magnitude of the Sun in different filters is a physical and not arbitrary quantity, the absolute bolometric magnitude of the Sun is arbitrary, and so the zero-point of the bolometric correction scale that follows from it. This explains why classic references have tabulated apparently mutually incompatible values for these quantities. [7] The bolometric scale historically had varied somewhat in the literature, with the Sun's bolometric correction in V-band varying from -0.19 to -0.07 magnitude. It follows that any value for the absolute bolometric magnitude of the Sun is legitimate, on the condition that once chosen all bolometric corrections are rescaled accordingly. If not, this will induce systematic errors in the determination of stellar luminosities. [7] [8]

The XXIXth International Astronomical Union (IAU) General Assembly in Honolulu adopted in August 2015 Resolution B2 on recommended zero points for the absolute and apparent bolometric magnitude scales. [9] [10]

Although bolometric magnitudes have been in use for over eight decades, there have been systematic differences in the absolute magnitude-luminosity scales presented in various astronomical references with no international standardization. This has led to systematic differences in bolometric correction scales. When combined with incorrect assumed absolute bolometric magnitudes for the Sun this can lead to systematic errors in estimated stellar luminosities. Many stellar properties are calculated based on stellar luminosity, such as radii, ages, etc.

IAU 2015 Resolution B2 proposed an absolute bolometric magnitude scale where corresponds to luminosity 3.0128×1028  W , with the zero point luminosity chosen such that the Sun (with nominal luminosity 3.828×1026 W) corresponds to absolute bolometric magnitude . Placing a radiation source (e.g. star) at the standard distance of 10 parsecs, it follows that the zero point of the apparent bolometric magnitude scale corresponds to irradiance , where the nominal total solar irradiance measured at 1 astronomical unit (1361 W/m2) corresponds to an apparent bolometric magnitude of the Sun of .

A similar IAU proposal in 1999 (with a slightly different zero point, tied to an obsolete solar luminosity estimate) was adopted by IAU Commissions 25 and 36. However it never reached a General Assembly vote, and subsequently was only adopted sporadically by astronomers in the literature.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apparent magnitude</span> Brightness of a celestial object observed from the Earth

Apparent magnitude is a measure of the brightness of a star or other astronomical object. An object's apparent magnitude depends on its intrinsic luminosity, its distance, and any extinction of the object's light caused by interstellar dust along the line of sight to the observer.

In astronomy, absolute magnitude is a measure of the luminosity of a celestial object on an inverse logarithmic astronomical magnitude scale. An object's absolute magnitude is defined to be equal to the apparent magnitude that the object would have if it were viewed from a distance of exactly 10 parsecs, without extinction of its light due to absorption by interstellar matter and cosmic dust. By hypothetically placing all objects at a standard reference distance from the observer, their luminosities can be directly compared among each other on a magnitude scale. For Solar System bodies that shine in reflected light, a different definition of absolute magnitude (H) is used, based on a standard reference distance of one astronomical unit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vega</span> Brightest star in the constellation Lyra

Vega is the brightest star in the northern constellation of Lyra. It has the Bayer designation α Lyrae, which is Latinised to Alpha Lyrae and abbreviated Alpha Lyr or α Lyr. This star is relatively close at only 25 light-years from the Sun, and one of the most luminous stars in the Sun's neighborhood. It is the fifth-brightest star in the night sky, and the second-brightest star in the northern celestial hemisphere, after Arcturus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luminosity</span> Measurement of radiant electromagnetic power emitted by an object

Luminosity is an absolute measure of radiated electromagnetic energy (light) per unit time, and is synonymous with the radiant power emitted by a light-emitting object. In astronomy, luminosity is the total amount of electromagnetic energy emitted per unit of time by a star, galaxy, or other astronomical objects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supergiant</span> Type of star that is massive and luminous

Supergiants are among the most massive and most luminous stars. Supergiant stars occupy the top region of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram with absolute visual magnitudes between about −3 and −8. The temperature range of supergiant stars spans from about 3,400 K to over 20,000 K.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmic distance ladder</span> Succession of methods by which astronomers determine the distances to celestial objects

The cosmic distance ladder is the succession of methods by which astronomers determine the distances to celestial objects. A direct distance measurement of an astronomical object is possible only for those objects that are "close enough" to Earth. The techniques for determining distances to more distant objects are all based on various measured correlations between methods that work at close distances and methods that work at larger distances. Several methods rely on a standard candle, which is an astronomical object that has a known luminosity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denebola</span> Star in the zodiac constellation of Leo

Denebola is the second-brightest individual star in the zodiac constellation of Leo. It is the easternmost of the bright stars of Leo. It has the Bayer designation Beta Leonis or β Leonis, which are abbreviated Beta Leo or β Leo. Denebola is an A-type main sequence star with 75% more mass than the Sun and 15 times the Sun's luminosity. Based on parallax measurements from the Hipparcos astrometry satellite, the star is at a distance of 36 light-years from the Sun. Its apparent visual magnitude is 2.14, making it readily visible to the naked eye. Denebola is a Delta Scuti type variable star, meaning its luminosity varies very slightly over a period of a few hours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beta Pegasi</span> Red giant star in the constellation Pegasus

Beta Pegasi, formally named Scheat, is a red giant star and the second-brightest star in the constellation of Pegasus. It forms the upper right corner of the Great Square of Pegasus, a prominent rectangular asterism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magnitude (astronomy)</span> Logarithmic measure of the brightness of an astronomical object

In astronomy, magnitude is measure of the brightness of an object, usually in a defined passband. An imprecise but systematic determination of the magnitude of objects was introduced in ancient times by Hipparchus.

Chi<sup>3</sup> Sagittarii Star in the constellation Sagittarius

Chi3 Sagittarii (χ3 Sagittarii) is a solitary, orange-hued star in the zodiac constellation of Sagittarius. It is faintly visible to the naked eye with an apparent visual magnitude of +5.45. Based upon an annual parallax shift of 6.53 mas as seen from Earth, it is located roughly 500 light years from the Sun. It is receding from the Earth with a radial velocity of 39.6 km/s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Red clump</span> Clustering of stars in astronomy diagram

The red clump is a clustering of red giants in the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram at around 5,000 K and absolute magnitude (MV) +0.5, slightly hotter than most red-giant-branch stars of the same luminosity. It is visible as a denser region of the red-giant branch or a bulge towards hotter temperatures. It is prominent in many galactic open clusters, and it is also noticeable in many intermediate-age globular clusters and in nearby field stars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta Velorum</span> Triple star system in the constellation Vela

Delta Velorum is a triple star system in the southern constellation of Vela, near the border with Carina, and is part of the False Cross. Based on parallax measurements, it is approximately 80.6 light-years from the Sun. It is one of the stars that at times lies near the south celestial pole due to precession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xi Persei</span> Star in the constellation Perseus

Xi Persei, known also as Menkib, is a star in the constellation of Perseus. Based upon parallax measurements taken during the Hipparcos mission, it is approximately 1,200 light-years from the Sun.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sigma Librae</span> Star in the constellation Libra

Sigma Librae is a binary star in the constellation of Libra. The apparent visual magnitude is +3.29, making it visible to the naked eye. Based upon parallax measurements, this system is at a distance of roughly 260 light-years from the Sun, with a 2% margin of error. At that distance, the visual magnitude is diminished by 0.20 ± 0.17 from extinction caused by intervening gas and dust.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gliese 667</span> Triple star system in the constellation Scorpius

Gliese 667 is a triple-star system in the constellation Scorpius lying at a distance of about 7.2 parsecs from Earth. All three of the stars have masses smaller than the Sun. There is a 12th-magnitude star close to the other three, but it is not gravitationally bound to the system. To the naked eye, the system appears to be a single faint star of magnitude 5.89.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">R Lyrae</span> Star in the constellation Lyra

R Lyrae, also known as its Flamsteed designation 13 Lyrae, is a 4th magnitude semiregular variable star in the constellation Lyra, approximately 350 light years away from Earth. It is a red giant star of the spectral type M5III, currently at the last stages of evolution. It is much larger and brighter, yet cooler, than the Sun. In the near-infrared J band, it is brighter than the nearby Vega.

In astronomy, the zero point in a photometric system is defined as the magnitude of an object that produces 1 count per second on the detector. The zero point is used to calibrate a system to the standard magnitude system, as the flux detected from stars will vary from detector to detector. Traditionally, Vega is used as the calibration star for the zero point magnitude in specific pass bands, although often, an average of multiple stars is used for higher accuracy. It is not often practical to find Vega in the sky to calibrate the detector, so for general purposes, any star may be used in the sky that has a known apparent magnitude.

HD 34255, also known HR 1720, is a star located in the northern circumpolar constellation Camelopardalis, the giraffe. It has an apparent magnitude of 5.60, allowing it to be faintly visible to the naked eye. The object is located relatively far at a distance of about 1.65 kly but is approaching the Solar System with a heliocentric radial velocity of −7.7 km/s.

References

  1. Popper, Daniel M. (1980-09-01). "Stellar Masses". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 18 (1): 115–164. Bibcode:1980ARA&A..18..115P. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.000555. ISSN   0066-4146.
  2. Humphreys, R. M.; McElroy, D. B. (1984). "The initial mass function for massive stars in the Galaxy and the Magellanic Clouds". The Astrophysical Journal. 284: 565–577. Bibcode:1984ApJ...284..565H. doi: 10.1086/162439 . ISSN   0004-637X.
  3. B., Kaler, James (1989). Stars and their spectra: an introduction to the spectral sequence. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0521304948. OCLC   17731797.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. Bessell, M. S.; et al. (May 1998). "Model atmospheres broad-band colors, bolometric corrections and temperature calibrations for O - M stars". Astronomy and Astrophysics . 333: 231–250. Bibcode:1998A&A...333..231B.
  5. Salaris, Maurizio; et al. (November 2002). "Population effects on the red giant clump absolute magnitude: the K band". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society . 337 (1): 332–340. arXiv: astro-ph/0208057 . Bibcode:2002MNRAS.337..332S. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05917.x . S2CID   17930469. Lower effective temperatures correspond to higher values of ; since , cooler RC stars tend to be brighter.
  6. Buzzoni, A.; et al. (April 2010). "Bolometric correction and spectral energy distribution of cool stars in Galactic clusters". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 403 (3): 1592–1610. arXiv: 1002.1972 . Bibcode:2010MNRAS.403.1592B. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16223.x . S2CID   119181086.
  7. 1 2 3 Casagrande, Luca; VandenBerg, Don A. (October 2014), "Synthetic stellar photometry: general considerations and new transformations for broad-band systems", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 444 (1): 392, arXiv: 1407.6095 , Bibcode:2014MNRAS.444..392C, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1476 with up-to-date interpolation codes https://github.com/casaluca/bolometric-corrections
  8. 1 2 Casagrande, L; VandenBerg, Don A (2018-01-18). "Synthetic Stellar Photometry – II. Testing the bolometric flux scale and tables of bolometric corrections for the Hipparcos/Tycho, Pan-STARRS1, SkyMapper, and JWST systems". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 475 (4): 5023–5040. arXiv: 1801.05508 . Bibcode:2018MNRAS.475.5023C. doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty149 . ISSN   0035-8711.
  9. IAU XXIX General Assembly Draft Resolutions Announced , retrieved 2015-07-08
  10. Mamajek, E. E.; et al. (2015). "IAU 2015 Resolution B2 on Recommended Zero Points for the Absolute and Apparent Bolometric Magnitude Scales". arXiv: 1510.06262v2 [astro-ph.SR].
  11. Flower, Phillip J. (September 1996), "Transformations from Theoretical Hertzsprung-Russell Diagrams to Color-Magnitude Diagrams: Effective Temperatures, B-V Colors, and Bolometric Corrections", The Astrophysical Journal , 469: 355, Bibcode:1996ApJ...469..355F, doi:10.1086/177785
  12. 1 2 Torres, Guillermo (November 2010). "On the Use of Empirical Bolometric Corrections for Stars". The Astronomical Journal . 140 (5): 1158–1162. arXiv: 1008.3913 . Bibcode:2010AJ....140.1158T. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1158. S2CID   119219274.