Bradley v Commonwealth

Last updated

Bradley v Commonwealth
Coat of Arms of Australia.svg
Court High Court of Australia
Full case nameBradley v. The Commonwealth
Decided10 September 1973 (1973-09-10)
Citation(s) [1973] HCA 34, (1973) 128 CLR 557
Case opinions
The Postmaster-General does not have the power to unilaterally cut off telephones or postal services
Case opinions
Decision byChief Justice Barwick, Justice Gibbs
ConcurrenceJustice Stephen
DissentJustice McTiernan, Justice Menzies

Bradley v Commonwealth, also referred to as the Rhodesian Information Centre case, is a 1973 High Court of Australia case. It was brought by Denzil Bradley [1] against Australia following the Postmaster-General of Australia cutting off telephones and postal service to the Rhodesian Information Centre that he operated. The court ruled on a 3–2 majority that the Postmaster-General lacked the power to arbitrarily stop providing services. [2]

Contents

Background

Upon its election in late 1972, the Australian Labor Party Whitlam Government was determined to take strong action against the white minority Rhodesian government. This differed from the stance taken by the McMahon Government that had preceded it. The Whitlam Government's priorities included strongly enforcing the United Nations sanctions against Rhodesia, banning visits by Rhodesian sports teams that had been racially selected and closing the Rhodesian Information Centre. [3]

The Rhodesian Information Centre was located in Crows Nest, Sydney. Its ostensible purpose was to provide Rhodesian government-sponsored information about the country. [2] In reality, it represented the Rhodesian Government in Australia and its activities included advising Australian businesses about how they could evade the sanctions on Rhodesia. [4] The Rhodesian Government operated similar centres in the United States and France. At this time, only South Africa and Portugal had formal diplomatic relations with Rhodesia. [5]

Denzil Bradley was a South African, registered as the person carrying on business under the name Rhodesian Information Centre. Prime Minister Gough Whitlam wrote to the Premier of New South Wales Robert Askin on 7 December 1972 to request that Askin's government cancel the registration of the centre's business name. [6] The Askin Government applied to the Supreme Court of New South Wales for a declaration that would enable the cancellation of the registration of the centre's business name in March the next year. [7] Justice Sheppard permitted the federal government to intervene, [8] and declared that (1) "Rhodesia Information Centre" was a name suggesting a connection with the government of the territory known as Southern Rhodesia and (2) the Corporate Affairs Commission had the power to cancel the registration of the business name. [9] Bradley later appealed to the New South Wales Court of Appeal which held in June 1974 that the federal government should not have been allowed to intervene but otherwise dismissed his appeal. [10] [11] While the declaration permitted the Corporate Affairs Commission to take steps to cancel the registration of the business name, it is unclear if it took any such steps and in any event the business continued under that name.

Bradley also set up and registered a newspaper called The Rhodesian Commentary and was going to send it through the Australian postal system. [2]

On 18 April 1973, Postmaster-General Lionel Bowen issued a directive instructing the Postmaster-General's Department to cease all mail, telephone and telegram services to the centre, [12] including locking their post office box and deregistering The Rhodesian Commentary as a newspaper. [13] The rationale given for this was because the Postmaster-General was following an Australian government policy to not recognize Rhodesia due to United Nations Security Council Resolution 277 following Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence from the United Kingdom in 1965 which was viewed as internationally illegal. [13] Bradley sued over the ban, [2] and a day later Justice Harry Gibbs of the High Court issued an interim injunction restraining the government from enforcing it. [12]

Case

The case was heard by the High Court before Chief Justice Barwick, Justice McTiernan, Justice Menzies, Justice Gibbs and Justice Stephen. Bradley argued that the Postmaster-General had violated contractual obligations and acted ultra vires . [14] The defendants provided copies of the UN resolution as their explanation for the actions taken. They also argued that under the Post and Telegraph Act 1901, the Postmaster-General had the right to remove service and that it was not a right for Australian residents to be able to use them. [2] [15]

Chief Justice Barwick and Justice Gibbs delivered the verdict that the Post and Telegraph Act did not grant unilateral power to the Postmaster-General to refuse service. [2] Section 58 of the act specified only limited circumstances where service could be withdrawn unilaterally and they ruled that this situation did not fall under those circumstances as the communications sent were not fraudulent, offensive or blasphemous. [2] They ruled that even though Bradley was working for what was considered an illegal regime in Australia in rebellion against The Queen, as long as he was not breaking Australian law then he was entitled to protection from government interference in his or the centre's activities as the UN resolution was not a part of Australian law. [14] Justice Stephen wrote a concurring opinion. [2]

Justice Menzies issued a dissenting opinion which was joined by Justice McTiernan. They argued that the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate the Australian government and Postmaster-General had a legal obligation to provide postal and telephonic services. [14]

Accordingly, as the Postmaster-General's actions in cutting off telephones and postal services were ruled as unlawful on a 3–2 majority, [15] the injunction was granted and the telephone and postal services were ordered to be restored to the centre. [2] The government was also ordered to pay the centre's legal costs. [16]

Proposed legislation

After the verdict, Prime Minister Whitlam stated that the government would consider amending the Post and Telegraphs Act to allow the Postmaster-General to withdraw services, possibly relying on the external affairs power of the constitution. [17] The Whitlam Government did not introduce any legislation to achieve this, however, due to competing legislative priorities and frequent disruptions to the parliamentary schedule. [18]

In 1977 the Liberal-National Party coalition Fraser Government developed draft legislation that would have allowed it to close the Rhodesian Information Centre. This move was strongly opposed by government backbenchers, and the legislation was not introduced to parliament. The Fraser Government considered legislating the closure of the centre again during 1979. [19]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Askin</span> Australian politician

Sir Robert William Askin, GCMG, was an Australian politician and the 32nd Premier of New South Wales from 1965 to 1975, the first representing the Liberal Party. He was born in 1907 as Robin William Askin, but always disliked his first name and changed it by deed poll in 1971. Before being knighted in 1972, however, he was generally known as Bob Askin. Born in Sydney in 1907, Askin was educated at Sydney Technical High School. After serving as a bank officer and as a Sergeant in the Second World War, Askin joined the Liberal Party and was elected to the seat of Collaroy at the 1950 election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Albury–Wodonga</span>

Albury–Wodonga is the broad settlement incorporating the twin Australian cities of Albury and Wodonga, which are separated geographically by the Murray River and politically by a state border: Albury on the north of the river is part of New South Wales, while Wodonga on the south bank is in Victoria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Kerr (governor-general)</span> 18th Governor-General of Australia

Sir John Robert Kerr was an Australian barrister and judge who served as the 18th Governor-General of Australia, in office from 1974 to 1977. He is primarily known for his involvement in the 1975 constitutional crisis, which culminated in his decision to dismiss the incumbent prime minister Gough Whitlam and appoint Malcolm Fraser as his replacement, unprecedented actions in Australian federal politics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edgar Whitehead</span>

Sir Edgar Cuthbert Fremantle Whitehead, was a Rhodesian politician. He was a longstanding member of the Southern Rhodesian Legislative Assembly, although his career was interrupted by other posts and by illness. In particular he had poor eyesight, and wore very thick glasses, and later experienced deafness whilst in office. An ally of Sir Roy Welensky, he was Prime Minister of Southern Rhodesia from 1958 to 1962. His government was defeated in the 1962 general election by the Rhodesian Front.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tom Lewis (Australian politician)</span> New South Wales Premier

Thomas Lancelot Lewis was a New South Wales politician, Premier of New South Wales and minister in the cabinets of Sir Robert Askin and Sir Eric Willis. He became Premier following Askin's retirement from politics and held the position until he was replaced by Willis in a party vote. Lewis was first elected to the New South Wales Legislative Assembly for the Electoral district of Wollondilly for the Liberal Party in 1957, and served until his resignation in 1978.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John McLeay Jr.</span> Australian politician

John Elden McLeay was an Australian politician. He was a member of the Liberal Party and represented the Division of Boothby in South Australia from 1966 to 1981. He held ministerial office in the Fraser Government as Minister for Construction (1975–1978) and Administrative Services (1978–1980).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bob Ellicott</span> Australian politician and judge (1927–2022)

Robert James Ellicott, was an Australian barrister, politician and judge. He served as Solicitor-General of Australia (1969–1973) before entering the House of Representatives at the 1974 federal election as a member of the Liberal Party. He held senior ministerial office in the Fraser Government, serving as Attorney-General (1975–1977), Minister for Home Affairs (1977–1980), the Capital Territory (1977–1980), and Home Affairs and the Environment (1980–1981). He retired from politics to be appointed to the Federal Court of Australia, serving as a judge from 1981 to 1983.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australia–Zimbabwe relations</span> Bilateral relations

Foreign relations exist between Australia and Zimbabwe. Both countries have full embassy level diplomatic relations. Australia currently maintains an embassy in Harare, and Zimbabwe maintains an embassy in Canberra.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wylie Gibbs</span> Australian politician (born 1922)

Wylie Talbot Gibbs is an Australian former surgeon and politician. He served in the House of Representatives from 1963 to 1969, representing the Liberal Party.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 409, adopted on May 27, 1977, reaffirmed the Council's previous resolutions and affirmed that the policies created by them would remain in place. The Council, acting under Chapter VII, further decided that all member states should prohibit the use of funds in their territory from use by Rhodesia and/or Rhodesian citizens, save for pensions. The Resolution also decided that the Committee established in Resolution 253 (1968) should examine possible uses of Article 41 of the Charter of the United Nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fraser government</span> Australian Government led by Malcolm Fraser, 1975–1983

The Fraser government was the federal executive government of Australia led by Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser. It was made up of members of a Liberal-Country party coalition in the Australian Parliament from November 1975 to March 1983. Initially appointed as a caretaker government following the dismissal of the Whitlam government, Fraser won in a landslide at the resulting 1975 Australian federal election, and won substantial majorities at the subsequent 1977 and 1980 elections, before losing to the Bob Hawke-led Australian Labor Party in the 1983 election.

The Aboriginal Land Rights Commission, also known as the Woodward Royal Commission, was a Royal Commission that existed from 1973 to 1974 with the purpose to inquire into appropriate ways to recognise Aboriginal land rights in the Northern Territory of Australia. The Commission was chaired by Justice Edward Woodward, who was appointed to the role by Gough Whitlam. It was not long after the 1971 defeat of the Yolngu claimants in the Northern Territory Supreme Court, in Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd, in the first Aboriginal land rights case in Australia.

Walter Robert "Bob" Scott is a former Australian politician. He was a Liberal member of the New South Wales Legislative Council from 1974 to 1978.

The Department of the Media was an Australian government department that existed between December 1972 and December 1975.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Centre Party (Rhodesia)</span> Political party in Rhodesia

The Centre Party (CP) was a centre-left political party in Rhodesia. Founded in 1968, it was a multiracial party opposed to the discriminatory policies of the country's Rhodesian Front-dominated white minority government. It dissolved in 1977.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhodesia Information Centre</span> Unofficial representative office in Australia (1966–1980)

The Rhodesia Information Centre (RIC), also known as the Rhodesian Information Centre, the Rhodesia Information Service, the Flame Lily Centre and the Zimbabwe Information Centre, represented the Rhodesian government in Australia from 1966 to 1980. As Australia did not recognise Rhodesia's independence it operated on an unofficial basis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministry of External Affairs (Rhodesia)</span>

The Ministry of External Affairs was an agency of the Rhodesian government. It was involved in running the Rhodesian mission in Lisbon and Rhodesia's unofficial embassies in the United States, Australia and France.

References

  1. ↑ "Anti-Apartheid News" (PDF). 1 March 1974. Retrieved 14 August 2021– via Jstor.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Bradley v Commonwealth [1973] HCA 34 , (1973) 128 CLR 557 (10 September 1973), High Court.
  3. ↑ Goldsworthy, David (1973). "Australia and Africa: New Relationships?". The Australian Quarterly. 45 (4): 66. doi:10.2307/20634597. JSTOR   20634597.
  4. ↑ Jansen, Robert (1998). Australian Foreign Policy and Africa, 1972–1983 (PDF) (Thesis). Canberra: Australian National University. p. 142.
  5. ↑ Park, Stephen; Lake, Anthony (1973). "Business as Usual: Transactions Violating Rhodesian Sanctions". Issue: A Journal of Opinion. 3 (2): 7–8. doi:10.2307/1166623. JSTOR   1166623.
  6. ↑ "Rhodesian woman 'refused entry'". The Canberra Times . 12 December 1972. p. 3. Retrieved 22 August 2021– via Trove.
  7. ↑ "Rhodesia". The Canberra Times . 3 March 1973. p. 3. Retrieved 22 August 2021– via Trove.
  8. ↑ Corporate Affairs Commission v Bradley [1974] 1 NSWLR 408, Supreme Court (NSW).
  9. ↑ Corporate Affairs Commission v Bradley [1973] 1 NSWLR 382, Supreme Court (NSW). (Lawcite)
  10. ↑ Corporate Affairs Commission v Bradley [1974] 1 NSWLR 391, Court of Appeal (NSW). (Lawcite)
  11. ↑ "Name cancellation 'within power'". The Canberra Times . 13 June 1974. p. 12. Retrieved 18 February 2022– via Trove.
  12. 1 2 "Hearing on ban by PMG". The Canberra Times . 5 May 1973. p. 7. Retrieved 15 August 2021– via Trove.
  13. 1 2 Galbally, Francis (1974). "Bradley v Commonwealth (Ministerial discretion)". Melbourne University Law Review. (1974) 9(4) Melbourne University Law Review 789.
  14. 1 2 3 "PMG action on centre "invalid"" . The Sydney Morning Herald . 11 September 1973. Retrieved 14 August 2021– via Newspapers.com.
  15. 1 2 "Rhodesian mail, phone cuts invalid" . The Sydney Morning Herald . 11 September 1973. Retrieved 14 August 2021– via Newspapers.com.
  16. ↑ "Mail cut-off to Rhodesia centre invalid: court". The Canberra Times . 11 September 1973. p. 7. Retrieved 15 August 2021– via Trove.
  17. ↑ "Prime minister's press conference". The Canberra Times . 12 September 1973. p. 7. Retrieved 22 August 2021– via Trove.
  18. ↑ Jansen (1998), p. 143.
  19. ↑ "Peacock softens Rhodesia stand". The Canberra Times . 20 April 1979. p. 7. Retrieved 22 August 2021– via Trove.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.