Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023

Last updated

Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023
Parliament of India
  • A Bill to overhaul the regulatory framework for broadcasting services and to replace the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act of 1995 and encompass a wider range of platforms and technologies.
Territorial extent Flag of India.svg
Enacted byNot yet enacted
Introduced by Anurag Thakur
Repeals
Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act of 1995
Status: Pending

The Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023 [1] [2] is a proposed law that aims to overhaul the regulatory framework for broadcasting services in India. A draft of the bill was introduced in 2023 and was published for public consultation. [3] A second draft was created in 2024, and shared only with key stakeholders. [4] It was subsequently revoked and the 2023 draft has been revived, [5]

Contents

The bill would replace the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act of 1995 and encompass a wider range of platforms and technologies. [6] The 2023 draft, published in November 2023, included a programme code for OTT platforms (streaming platforms). [7] The revoked 2024 draft would have brought online content creators under the ambit of the law by introducing a new category called "digital news broadcasters". [1]

Proposal

The bill proposes establishing a new regulatory body called the Broadcasting Authority of India (BAI) to oversee the implementation of the bill and regulations. [6] [8] Other proposed changes include:

The stated objectives of the bill are:[ citation needed ]

As of December 2023, the draft bill is open for public consultation.

Reactions

The broad scope of the bill, encompassing even individual content creators, raises concerns about government overreach and potential censorship.[ according to whom? ] Critics[ who? ] argue that vague content codes and subjective interpretations could stifle creative expression and limit the diversity of voices. [13] [14] [15]

The two-tier self-regulation system, with government intervention as a backup, might not provide adequate safeguards against arbitrary decisions and suppression of dissent. [16] [ according to whom? ]

The emphasis on promoting "Indian content" and regulating harmful content could lead to unintended consequences for freedom of expression.[ according to whom? ] Critics[ who? ] argue that defining "Indian" and "harmful" subjectively could be used to suppress critical voices and diverse perspectives.

The bill's provisions for data localization and government access to user data raise concerns about privacy violations and potential misuse of information. [17] [18] [19]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass media in Australia</span>

Mass media in Australia spans traditional and digital formats, and caters mostly to its predominantly English-speaking population. It is delivered in a variety of formats including radio, television, paper, internet and IPTV. Varieties include local, regional, state, federal and international sources of media, reporting on Australian news, opinion, policy, issues and culture.

Independent media refers to any media, such as television, newspapers, or Internet-based publications, that is free of influence by government or corporate interests. The term has varied applications.

Television in Pakistan started in 1964 and the first live transmission of Pakistan Television began on 26 November 1964, in Lahore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship in India</span>

Internet censorship in India is done by both central and state governments. DNS filtering and educating service users in suggested usages is an active strategy and government policy to regulate and block access to Internet content on a large scale. Measures for removing content at the request of content creators through court orders have also become more common in recent years. Initiating a mass surveillance government project like Golden Shield Project is an alternative that has been discussed over the years by government bodies.

Mass media in Albania refers to mass media outlets based in Albania. Television, magazines, and newspapers are all operated by both state-owned and for-profit corporations which depend on advertising, subscription, and other sales-related revenues. The Constitution of Albania guarantees freedom of speech. Albanian media are quite diverse, although politicised, and often influenced by business and political interests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass media in Bosnia and Herzegovina</span>

The mass media of Bosnia and Herzegovina refers to mass media outlets based in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Television, radio, magazines and newspapers are all operated by both state-owned and for-profit corporations which depend on advertising, subscription, and other sales-related revenues. The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina guarantees freedom of speech, although political and business pressures - coupled with administrative fragmentation - still hinder the independence of journalists and media outlets.

Television, magazines, and newspapers in Bulgaria are all operated by both state-owned and for-profit corporations which depend on advertising, subscription, and other sales-related revenues. The Constitution of Bulgaria guarantees freedom of speech. As a country in transition, Bulgaria's media system is under transformation.

The mass media in North Macedonia refers to mass media outlets based in North Macedonia. Television, magazines, and newspapers are all operated by both state-owned and for-profit corporations which depend on advertising, subscription, and other sales-related revenues. The Constitution of North Macedonia guarantees freedom of the press and of expression, yet they are not upheld impartially by the authorities. As a country in transition, North Macedonia's media system is under transformation.

The mass media in Montenegro refers to mass media outlets based in Montenegro. Television, magazines, and newspapers are all operated by both state-owned and for-profit corporations which depend on advertising, subscription, and other sales-related revenues. The Constitution of Montenegro guarantees freedom of speech. As a country in transition, Montenegro's media system is under transformation.

In communication, media are the outlets or tools used to store and deliver semantic information or contained subject matter, described as content. The term generally refers to components of the mass media communications industry, such as print media (publishing), news media, photography, cinema, broadcasting, digital media, and advertising. Each of these different channels requires a specific, thus media-adequate approach, to a successful transmission of content.

Mass media regulations or simply media regulations are a form of media policy with rules enforced by the jurisdiction of law. Guidelines for mass media use differ across the world. This regulation, via law, rules or procedures, can have various goals, for example intervention to protect a stated "public interest", or encouraging competition and an effective media market, or establishing common technical standards. The principal targets of mass media regulation are the press, radio and television, but may also include film, recorded music, cable, satellite, storage and distribution technology, the internet, mobile phones etc. It includes the regulation of independent media.

The Broadcasting Services Act 1992(Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia, which broadly covers issues relating to content regulation and media ownership in Australia. The law stipulates what is political advertising and the specific conditions which must be met before they are authorised for publication.

Internet intermediary refers to a company that facilitates the use of the Internet. Such companies include internet service providers (ISPs), search engines and social media platforms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Film and Publication Board</span> South African content classification authority

Since its debut for 28 years, the Film and Publication Board (FPB) has had the responsibility of classifying films, games and certain publications in line with South African values and norms under the overarching application of the Bill of Rights. This approach has a distinct difference from the censorship regime used by the Apartheid government to advance the then state’s discriminatory and dehumanising political agenda.

There are currently about 57 providers of over-the-top media services (OTT) in India, which distribute streaming media or video on demand over the Internet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Information Technology Rules, 2021</span> 2021 rules stemming from section 87 of the Information Technology Act, 2000

The Information Technology Rules, 2021 is secondary or subordinate legislation that suppresses India's Intermediary Guidelines Rules 2011. The 2021 rules have stemmed from section 87 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and are a combination of the draft Intermediaries Rules, 2018 and the OTT Regulation and Code of Ethics for Digital Media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital Services Act</span> European Union regulation on digital services content

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is an EU regulation adopted in 2022 that addresses illegal content, transparent advertising and disinformation. It updates the Electronic Commerce Directive 2000 in EU law, and was proposed alongside the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

The Online Streaming Act, commonly known as Bill C-11, is a bill introduced in the 44th Canadian Parliament. It was first introduced on November 3, 2020, by Minister of Canadian Heritage Steven Guilbeault during the second session of the 43rd Canadian Parliament. Commonly known as Bill C-10, the bill was passed in the House of Commons on June 22, 2021, but failed to pass the Senate before Parliament was dissolved for a federal election. It was reintroduced with amendments as the Online Streaming Act during the first session of the 44th Canadian Parliament in February 2022, passed in the House of Commons on June 21, 2022, and passed in the Senate on February 2, 2023. It received royal assent on April 27, 2023, after the consideration of amendments by the House.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Online Safety Act 2023</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Online Safety Act 2023 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to regulate online speech and media. It passed on 26 October 2023 and gives the relevant Secretary of State the power, subject to parliamentary approval, to designate and suppress or record a wide range of speech and media deemed "harmful".

The Online Harms Act, commonly known as Bill C-63 or the Online Harms Bill, is a bill introduced in the 44th Canadian Parliament. It was first introduced in 2021 by Justice Minister David Lametti during the second session of the 43rd Canadian Parliament as Bill C-36. A revised version was introduced on February 26, 2024, by Minister of Justice Arif Virani during the first session of the 44th Canadian Parliament.

References

  1. 1 2 Agrawal, Aditi (26 July 2024), "New draft of broadcasting bill: News influencers may be classified as broadcasters", Hindustan Times
  2. Gupta, Apar (31 July 2024). "A licence raj for digital content creators". The Hindu.
  3. "Key features of the draft Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023". The Indian Express. 11 November 2023.
  4. Agrawal, Aditi (27 July 2024), "Broadcasting Bill still in drafting stage: MIB tells RS", Hindustan Times
  5. Barik, Soumyarendra (13 August 2024). "Facing criticism, Govt withdraws new draft of broadcast Bill". The Indian Express.
  6. 1 2 "Draft Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023" (PDF). prsindia.org. Retrieved 5 August 2024.
  7. "Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Proposes Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023". pib.gov.in. Retrieved 15 December 2023.
  8. "Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Proposes Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023". pib.gov.in.
  9. Chawla, Akshit (22 December 2023). "Three New Laws Give the Govt Extraordinary Powers over Journalism, Entertainment and Internet". The Wire.
  10. Farooqui, Javed (28 November 2023). "Broadcasting regulation bill and its impact on content world". The Economic Times.
  11. Pandey, Devesh K. (19 November 2023). "Self-regulation provisions in draft broadcasting Bill draw diverse views". The Hindu.
  12. "Onus of content, power of inspection, penalties: Centre's new broadcasting bill". India Today.
  13. Chishti, Seema (7 December 2023). "Control + All or Delete: The Draft Broadcast Bill Is a Blueprint for Censorship". The Wire.
  14. Agrawal, Aditi (26 November 2023). "New broadcast bill may also cover those who put up news content online". Hindustan Times.
  15. "Digital Dialogues: Different kinds of censorship, thanks to the broadcast regulation bill". Newslaundry. 24 December 2023.
  16. Jha, Lata (26 November 2023). "Draft broadcast bill sparks concerns around creative freedom". Mint.
  17. Pandey, Devesh K. (10 November 2023). "Draft Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023, proposes self-classification of programmes by broadcasters". The Hindu.
  18. "Editorial. Broadcast Bill plugs regulatory gaps, but some provisions need watching". BusinessLine. 21 November 2023.
  19. Varier, Rajkumar (12 December 2023). "BSR Bill's Magic Trick: Now You See Clarity, Now You Don't!". ABP News.