Cannabis in the Vietnam War

Last updated

Map of Vietnam Divisions Map-of-Vietnam-Divisions.png
Map of Vietnam Divisions

Cannabis use during the Vietnam War became prevalent during the late 1960s and 1970s. This is primarily due to the usage of marijuana in the United States increasing along with soldiers using it as an escape from the conflicts around them. [1] The United States Government implemented policies and rules to stop the growing usage of marijuana and other substances, such as heroin. When the media in the United States learned about the usage of marijuana and heroin, they decided to write sensational news articles which often exaggerated the use of the substances. [2]

Contents

Cannabis use during the war

Origins

Cannabis plants are native to Southeast Asia, including Vietnam. [3] The indigenous cannabis plants of Vietnam had a stronger potency when compared to the cannabis that was grown in the Americas. [2] The Vietnamese did not usually use marijuana but preferred other substances such as betel nuts and opium, so they only increased the amount of marijuana they grew to sell more to American soldiers. [2] American soldiers changed the word for marijuana depending on where they were within Vietnam. The names they used were "Pleiku Pink," "Bleu de Hue," and "Cambodian Red." [2]

During the conflict in Vietnam, there were three primary substances that soldiers consumed: alcohol, marijuana, and heroin. [4] Each substance had its usage peak at different times. The first substance to peak was alcohol, then marijuana, and last heroin, which saw its peak towards the end of the war. [2]

Cannabis plant, sativa Cannabis sativa (51283590221).jpg
Cannabis plant, sativa

Marijuana usage during the war took place more towards the end of the 60s and during the 70s. [1] During the late 50s and 60s, the primary substance that was being used among the soldiers was alcohol. [2] The primary reason why soldiers drank alcohol more than they smoked marijuana is because they were not exposed to smoking marijuana back in the United States. [1] The shift from alcohol to marijuana happened when the newly drafted soldiers who came in were either exposed to marijuana in the United States or were current users. [1] As the number of troops who already smoked marijuana increased, the percentage of soldiers already stationed that started using marijuana also increased; however, the number of soldiers who smoked before entering the war was always greater than those who were first trying in Vietnam. [1] The increase of marijuana usage back in the United States rose with the growth of anti-war protests, which started to become more prevalent towards the end of the '60s. [5] Smoking marijuana became a form of rebellion among the youths at the protests because it was still illegal to use. [5]

Along with the increase of soldiers who had already smoked before entering Vietnam, soldiers also started smoking as a coping mechanism. [2] Soldiers turned to various substances to get them through the many experiences they encountered throughout the war, with one of the popular substances being cannabis. Marijuana was used as an escape by many soldiers and as a form of self-medication. [6]

Soldiers acquired cannabis through the Vietnamese, who sold it to them. [1] Vietnamese farmers started to grow more cannabis after recognizing the demand from American soldiers. Farmers sold cannabis to American troops in several ways, including placing the cannabis within cigarette packs. [2]

Impact

Marine and Cavalryman smoking at Khe Sanh Combat Base Marine and Cavalryman smoking at Khe Sanh Combat Base.jpg
Marine and Cavalryman smoking at Khe Sanh Combat Base

Statistics that were taken during the war show an increase in marijuana use as the years went on. In 1966, the percentage of people who used marijuana before Vietnam was 12%, while by 1970, it was 46%. [1] The same study also showed that from 1967 to 1971, the number of soldiers who used marijuana semi-regularly went from 7% to 34%, while the number that used it regularly was 17% by 1971. [1]

Marijuana use eventually went down and was replaced by heroin. Heroin usage did not increase with the number of users back in the United States as marijuana did. [4] Two primary reasons for heroin's popularity were that it was readily available in Vietnam, and it was easier to transport due to it having no scent. [4]

An unforeseen side effect was the growth of an illegal business within some U.S. bases in Vietnam. For example, 43 base members that were part of security at Cam Ranh Bay were arrested in a sting operation. Another incident happened in 1970 when an Air Force major and pilot were caught trying to smuggle eight million dollars worth of drugs out of Vietnam. [7]

Policies

The rapid drug use did not go unnoticed by the United States Government. When the war originally started, the government did not put a lot of effort into arresting soldiers who partook in drug usage simply because the number was so low it did not stand out as an issue. Congressional subcommittees brought to light that drug usage was increasing in Vietnam, which concerned the military, so they began measures to curb drug usage. [1] Efforts to curb drug usage also increased greatly when journalists in the United States released a number of articles to the public about the drug usage, which caused a commotion and put more pressure on the United States government. [6] The Army's Criminal Investigation Division contributed the most to arresting soldiers for drug usage and discouraging drug use. [1] Originally, the military focused more on punishment for soldiers getting caught with drugs until heroin became their number one concern. When heroin became the primary issue, the military pivoted from punishment to treatment, and by the 1970s more troops were sent home for drug treatment than for injuries. [4]

Most policies introduced at this time were done so by President Nixon. One of the first major policies was implemented June 11, 1971 which was urinary testing for returning soldiers, eventually random testing was implemented April 4, 1974. [8]

Heroin paraphernalia Heroin paraphernalia.jpg
Heroin paraphernalia

One unintended consequence of heightened monitoring for marijuana use was an increase in heroin usage. Heroin usage increased within Vietnam due to the military cracking down on marijuana use and the easy access to heroin within Vietnam. Vietnam was very close to the Golden Triangle which was a region for opium and heroin production. [9] Heroin was also harder to catch when compared to marijuana because it was odorless and easier for a soldier to hide and carry around. [9]

Effects in the United States

Media

The media in the United States pushed forward many false ideas about drug use in Vietnam. They relied on sensational media to spread ideas that the United States Army was having a serious drug problem. While there was a lot of drug use, it was not nearly as much as news outlets were saying it was. [2] Some journalists even circulated the idea that U.S. soldiers were using drugs from the communists as a form of sabotage. [2] These articles attempted to link drugs to a breakdown in the military's ability to function during wartime. [2]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recreational drug use</span> Use of drugs with the primary intention to alter the state of consciousness

Recreational drug use is the use of one or more psychoactive drugs to induce an altered state of consciousness, either for pleasure or for some other casual purpose or pastime. When a psychoactive drug enters the user's body, it induces an intoxicating effect. Recreational drugs are commonly divided into three categories: depressants, stimulants, and hallucinogens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drug prohibition</span> Prohibition of drugs through law

The prohibition of drugs through sumptuary legislation or religious law is a common means of attempting to prevent the recreational use of certain intoxicating substances.

"Drug paraphernalia" is a term to denote any equipment, product or accessory that is intended or modified for making, using or concealing drugs, typically for recreational purposes. Drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine are related to a wide range of paraphernalia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">War on drugs</span> Global anti-drug campaign led by the United States

The war on drugs is the policy of a global campaign, led by the United States federal government, of drug prohibition, military aid, and military intervention, with the aim of reducing the illegal drug trade in the United States. The initiative includes a set of drug policies that are intended to discourage the production, distribution, and consumption of psychoactive drugs that the participating governments, through United Nations treaties, have made illegal.

Commonly-cited arguments for and against the prohibition of drugs include the following:

The gateway drug effect is a comprehensive catchphrase for the often observed effect that the use of a psychoactive substance is coupled to an increased probability of the use of further substances. Possible reasons for the connection include environmental influence, impulsive people seeking both soft and hard drugs, alterations in the brain due to earlier substance exposure, as well as similar attitudes of people who use different substances, and therefore experience a "common liability to addiction". In 2020, the National Institute on Drug Abuse released a research report which supported allegations that marijuana is a "gateway" to more dangerous substance use; one of the peer-reviewed papers cited in the report claims that while "some studies have found that use of legal drugs or cannabis are not a requirement for the progression to other illicit drugs [...] most studies have supported the "gateway sequence"." However, a 2018 literature review conducted by the National Institute of Justice, which analyzed 23 peer-reviewed research studies, concluded "that existing statistical research and analysis relevant to the "gateway" hypothesis has produced mixed results", and that "no causal link between cannabis use and the use of other illicit drugs can be claimed at this time."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cannabis (drug)</span> Psychoactive drug from the cannabis plant

Cannabis, also known as marijuana or weed, among other names, is a non-chemically uniform drug from the cannabis plant. Native to Central or South Asia, the cannabis plant has been used as a drug for both recreational and entheogenic purposes and in various traditional medicines for centuries. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the main psychoactive component of cannabis, which is one of the 483 known compounds in the plant, including at least 65 other cannabinoids, such as cannabidiol (CBD). Cannabis can be used by smoking, vaporizing, within food, or as an extract.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LaGuardia Committee report</span> Study into the effects of smoking cannabis

The LaGuardia Committee report was an official scientific report published in 1944 that questioned the prohibition of cannabis in the United States. The report contradicted claims by the U.S. Treasury Department that smoking marijuana deteriorates physical and mental health, assists in criminal behavior and juvenile delinquency, is physically addictive, and is a "gateway" drug to more dangerous drugs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legalization of non-medical cannabis in the United States</span>

In the United States, the non-medical use of cannabis is legalized in 24 states and decriminalized in 7 states, as of November 2023. Decriminalization refers to a policy of reduced penalties for cannabis offenses, typically involving a civil penalty for possessing small amounts, instead of criminal prosecution or the threat of arrest. In jurisdictions without penalty the policy is referred to as legalization, although the term decriminalization is sometimes used for this purpose as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drug liberalization</span> Process of reducing drug prohibition laws

Drug liberalization is a drug policy process of decriminalizing, legalizing, or repealing laws that prohibit the production, possession, sale, or use of prohibited drugs. Variations of drug liberalization include drug legalization, drug relegalization, and drug decriminalization. Proponents of drug liberalization may favor a regulatory regime for the production, marketing, and distribution of some or all currently illegal drugs in a manner analogous to that for alcohol, caffeine and tobacco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drug policy of California</span> Overview of the drug policy of the U.S. state of California

Drug policy of California refers to the policy on various classes and kinds of drugs in the U.S. state of California. Cannabis possession has been legalized with the Adult Use of Marijuana Act, passed in November 2016, with recreational sales starting January of the next year. With respect to many controlled substances, terms such as illegal and prohibited do not include their authorized possession or sale as laid out by applicable laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tobacco and other drugs</span> Association between tobacco and other drug use

An association between tobacco and other drug use has been well established. The nature of this association remains unclear. The two main theories, which are not mutually exclusive, are the phenotypic causation (gateway) model and the correlated liabilities model. The causation model argues that smoking is a primary influence on future drug use, while the correlated liabilities model argues that smoking and other drug use are predicated on genetic or environmental factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spots (cannabis)</span> Method of smoking marijuana

Spots refers to a method of smoking cannabis. Small pieces of cannabis are rolled to form the spot.

The U.S. state of Oregon has various policies restricting the production, sale, and use of different substances. In 2006, Oregon's per capita drug use exceeded the national average. The most used substances were marijuana, methamphetamine and illicit painkillers and stimulants.

This is a history of drug prohibition in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drugs in the United States</span>

In the United States, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act defined the word "drug" as an "article intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals" and those "(other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals." Consistent with that definition, the U.S. separately defines narcotic drugs and controlled substances, which may include non-drugs, and explicitly excludes tobacco, caffeine and alcoholic beverages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minors and the legality of cannabis</span> Issue around the legalisation of cannabis

Minors and the legality of cannabis is one of the issues around the legalisation of cannabis, with most jurisdictions placing strict age limits in a similar way as is done with the drinking age for alcohol.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cannabis and the United States military</span>

Cannabis usage is currently prohibited in the United States military, but historically it has been used recreationally by some troops, and some cannabis-based medicines were used in the military as late as the twentieth century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glossary of cannabis terms</span>

Terms related to cannabis include:

Use of mind-altering substances in warfare has included drugs used for both relaxation and stimulation. Historically, drug use was often sanctioned and encouraged by militaries through including alcohol and tobacco in troop rations. Stimulants like cocaine and amphetamines were widely used in both World Wars to increase alertness and suppress appetite. Drug use can negatively affect combat readiness and reduce the performance of troops. Drug use also poses additional expenses to the health care systems of militaries.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Stanton, M. Duncan (January 1976). "Drugs, Vietnam, and the Vietnam Veteran: An Overview". The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 3 (4): 557–570. doi:10.3109/00952997609014295. ISSN   0095-2990.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Kuzmarov, Jeremy (October 2007). "The Myth of the 'Addicted Army': Drug Use in Vietnam in Historical Perspective". War & Society. 26 (2): 121–141. doi:10.1179/072924707791591640. ISSN   0729-2473.
  3. Hudak, John (2020-06-30). Marijuana: A Short History. Brookings Institution Press. ISBN   978-0-8157-3832-9.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Menninger, Roy W.; Nemiah, John C. (2008-11-01). American Psychiatry After World War II (1944–1994). American Psychiatric Pub. ISBN   978-1-58562-825-4.
  5. 1 2 "In 'Grass Roots,' A History Of Marijuana In America". Colorado Public Radio. 2018-04-09. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
  6. 1 2 "War and Drugs". drugfoundation.org.nz. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
  7. Westheider, James (2011). Fighting in Vietnam: The Experiences of the U.S. Soldier. Stackpole Books. ISBN   978-0-8117-0831-9.
  8. "Military Drug Program Historical Timeline" (PDF). Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel & Readiness. p. 1.
  9. 1 2 Collyer, Abigail (2023-10-10). "Heroin: The hidden enemy in the Vietnam War". UK Addiction Treatment Centres. Retrieved 2024-05-21.