Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992

Last updated

Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992
Act of Parliament
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (Variant 1, 2022).svg
Long title An Act to replace the Bills of Lading Act 1855 with new provision with respect to bills of lading and certain other shipping documents.
Citation 1992 c. 50
Territorial extent  England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland
Singapore [1]
Dates
Royal assent 16 July 1992
Commencement 16 September 1992
Other legislation
Repeals/revokesBills of Lading Act 1855
Status: Amended
Text of statute as originally enacted
Text of the Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.
Bills of Lading Act 1855
Act of Parliament
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (variant 1, 1952-2022).svg
Long title An Act to amend the Law relating to Bills of Lading.
Citation 18 & 19 Vict. c. 111
Dates
Royal assent 14 August 1855
Repealed16 September 1992
Other legislation
Repealed by Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

The Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1992 (c. 50) is a UK statute regarding bills for the lading of goods onto ships. It repealed the Bills of Lading Act 1855 [2] (18 & 19 Vict. c. 111) and made new provisions.

Contents

Background to the act

The Bills of Lading Act 1855 (18 & 19 Vict. c. 111) was commendably brief and proved useful, but as time went by certain defects became apparent. [3] The English courts devised some ways round the problem: in Brandt v Liverpool (1924) [4] [5] the concept of implied contracts was developed, although the courts proved reluctant to use this concept. [6] Nevertheless, there were difficulties relating to passing of property and passing of risk. [7]

The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission addressed the issue in a report, "Rights of Suit in respect of Carriage of Goods by Sea". [8] [9] [10] The Report contained a draft bill which Parliament adopted in full without amendment. [11]

The act's provisions

The statute makes provision for Bills of Lading and other documents of carriage, as follows:

Bills of lading

A bill of lading serves three main functions:

Although the term "bill of lading" is well known and well understood, it may become obsolete. Articles 1:15 and 1:16 of the Rotterdam Rules create the new term "transport document"; but (assuming the Rules come into force) it remains to be seen whether shippers, carriers and "maritime performing parties" (another new Rotterdam Rules coinage) will abandon the long-established and familiar term, "bill of lading".

The Carriage of Goods By Sea Act 1971

The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971 incorporates the Hague-Visby Rules into English Law. These rules require (where the Article X invokes the Rules) that, on demand, the carrier must provide the shipper with a bill of lading that meets the requirements of Article III. Although CoGSA 1992 cannot amend the Hague-Visby Rules, which are an International Convention, s.4 of the 1992 Act (above) upgrades the status of a bill of lading to be conclusive evidence of receipt for shipment.

See also

Related Research Articles

The Incoterms or International Commercial Terms are a series of pre-defined commercial terms published by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) relating to international commercial law. Incoterms define the responsibilities of exporters and importers in the arrangement of shipments and the transfer of liability involved at various stages of the transaction. They are widely used in international commercial transactions or procurement processes and their use is encouraged by trade councils, courts and international lawyers. A series of three-letter trade terms related to common contractual sales practices, the Incoterms rules are intended primarily to clearly communicate the tasks, costs, and risks associated with the global or international transportation and delivery of goods. Incoterms inform sales contracts defining respective obligations, costs, and risks involved in the delivery of goods from the seller to the buyer, but they do not themselves conclude a contract, determine the price payable, currency or credit terms, govern contract law or define where title to goods transfers.

A waybill is a document issued by a carrier giving details and instructions relating to the shipment of a consignment of cargo. Typically it will show the names of the consignor and consignee, the point of origin of the consignment, its destination, and route. Most freight forwarders and trucking companies use an in-house waybill called a house bill. These typically contain "conditions of contract of carriage" terms on the back of the form that cover limits to liability and other terms and conditions.

In a contract of carriage, the consignee is the entity who is financially responsible for the receipt of a shipment. Generally, but not always, the consignee is the same as the receiver.

A charterparty is a maritime contract between a shipowner and a "charterer" for the hire of either a ship for the carriage of passengers or cargo, or a yacht for leisure.

An air waybill (AWB) or air consignment note is a receipt issued by an international airline for goods and an evidence of the contract of carriage. It is not a document of title to the goods. The air waybill is non-negotiable.

<i>NZ Shipping Co Ltd v A M Satterthwaite & Co Ltd</i> 1974 decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

New Zealand Shipping Co. Ltd. v. A. M. Satterthwaite & Co. Ltd., or The Eurymedon is a leading case on contract law by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. This 1974 case establishes the conditions when a third party may seek the protection of an exclusion clause in a contract between two parties.

<i>Vita Food Products Inc v Unus Shipping Co Ltd</i> JCPC decision on choice of law clauses

Vita Food Products Inc v Unus Shipping Co Ltd [1939] UKPC 7, is a leading decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on the conflict of laws. The case stands for the proposition that an express choice of law clause in a contract should be honoured as long as the agreement was bona fide and not against public policy. The case is significant in the field of contract law, as it greatly expanded the ability of parties to choose the jurisdiction of their contacts.

The Hague–Visby Rules is a set of international rules for the international carriage of goods by sea. They are a slightly updated version of the original Hague Rules which were drafted in Brussels in 1924.

The Hague Rules of 1924 is an international convention to impose minimum standards upon commercial carriers of goods by sea. Previously, only the common law provided protection to cargo-owners; but the Hague Rules should not be seen as a "consumers' charter" for shippers because the 1924 Convention actually favoured carriers and reduced their obligations to shippers.

Affreightment is a legal term relating to shipping.

<i>The Aramis</i>

The Aramis [1989] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 213 is an English case, relevant for the concept of an implied contract.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deviation (law)</span>

The doctrine of deviation is a particular aspect of contracts of carriage of goods by sea. A deviation is a departure from the "agreed route" or the "usual route", and it can amount to a serious breach of contract.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill of lading</span> Document issued by a carrier (or their agent) to acknowledge receipt of cargo for shipment

A bill of lading is a document issued by a carrier to acknowledge receipt of cargo for shipment. Although the term is historically related only to carriage by sea, a bill of lading may today be used for any type of carriage of goods. Bills of lading are one of three crucial documents used in international trade to ensure that exporters receive payment and importers receive the merchandise. The other two documents are a policy of insurance and an invoice. Whereas a bill of lading is negotiable, both a policy and an invoice are assignable. In international trade outside the United States, bills of lading are distinct from waybills in that the latter are not transferable and do not confer title. Nevertheless, the UK Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992 grants "all rights of suit under the contract of carriage" to the lawful holder of a bill of lading, or to the consignee under a sea waybill or a ship's delivery order.

Norfolk Southern Ry. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 543 U.S. 14 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the extent to which maritime bills of lading cover non-maritime portions of a shipment, together with connected clauses for exclusion of liability.

A freight claim or cargo claim is a legal demand by a shipper or consignee against a carrier in respect of damage to a shipment, or loss thereof.

Seaworthiness is a concept that runs through maritime law in at least four contractual relationships. In a marine insurance voyage policy, the assured warrants that the vessel is seaworthy. A carrier of goods by sea owes a duty to a shipper of cargo that the vessel is seaworthy at the start of the voyage. A shipowner warrants to a charterer that the vessel under charter is seaworthy; and similarly, a shipbuilder warrants that the vessel under construction will be seaworthy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971 is a United Kingdom act of Parliament. It incorporates into English Law the Hague-Visby Rules which are to be found as the Schedule to the Act. The Act does not use the term "Hague-Visby Rules" as such; instead, the Rules are referred to in that Act as the "Hague Rules As Amended".

The law of carriage of goods by sea is a body of law that governs the rights and duties of shippers, carriers and consignees of marine cargo.

Grant v Norway (1851) is a case on the Law of Carriage of Goods by Sea; but since 1992 it has no longer been good law.

<i>Leduc v Ward</i>

Leduc v Ward is a leading English case on deviation within the law of carriage of goods by sea. The case also addresses bills of lading, and the parol evidence rule.

References

  1. Adopted by the Parliament of Singapore through Application of English Law Act 1993(No. 35 of 1993), now item 13, Part 2 of First Schedule to the Application of English Law Act 1993.
  2. UK Legislation, Bills Of Lading Act 1855
  3. Carver, T. G. (1890). "On Some Defects in the Bills of Lading Act 1855 6 Law Quarterly Review 1890". Law Quarterly Review. 6: 289. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  4. [1924] 1 KB 575
  5. Brandt v Liverpool, Brazil and River Plate Steam Navigation Co. Ltd
  6. Todd, P., Carriage contracts, updated 8 May 1997, archived 4 March 2015, accessed 5 December 2023
  7. Clive Maximilian Schmitthoff (January 1988). Clive M. Schmitthoff's Select Essays on International Trade Law. p. 380. ISBN   9024737028 . Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  8. LAW COM No. 196 & SCOT LAW COM No. 130
  9. "Rights of suit in respect of carriage of goods by sea - Publications". Gov.uk. 20 March 1991. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  10. "Archived copy" (PDF). www.gov.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 September 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  11. Except that, for obvious reasons, the proposed short title was changed from "Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 to " ~~~ 1992"
  12. "Grant v Norway". Maritimelawdigital.com. Retrieved 15 December 2016.
  13. "Grant v. Norway". Archived from the original on 17 May 2006. Retrieved 15 January 2012.