Charles J. Halperin

Last updated

Charles J. Halperin (born 1946 [1] ) is an American historian specialising in the high and late medieval history of Eastern Europe, particularly the political and military history of late Kievan Rus', the Golden Horde, and early Muscovy. Aside from several monographs, including three on Ivan the Terrible, over 100 articles of Halperin have been published. [2]

Contents

Biography

Born in Brooklyn, New York City on 21 July 1946, Halperin studied history between 1963 and 1967 [3] at Brooklyn College of the City University of New York (CUNY), obtaining a Bachelor of Arts. [1] He went on to obtain a PhD in Russian history from Columbia University. [3] [1] In 1971–1972, a Fulbright–Hays Program scholarship allowed him to do research in the Soviet Union, where he expanded his knowledge of the Russian language and writings of Russian scholars. [3] From 1972 to 1980, Halperin taught Russian history as assistant professor at the Department of History of Indiana University Bloomington. [3] As a senior fellow of Columbia University's Russian Institute (since 1992 Harriman Institute) from 1980 to 1982, Halperin returned to the Soviet Union in autumn 1981 as part of a scientific collaboration agreement. [3] In subsequent years, he worked as a computer instructor, programmer and system analyst, returning to Bloomington in 1996 as a Visiting Scholar at Indiana University's Robert F. Byrnes Russian and East European Institute. [3]

Two of Halperin's most influential monographs have been Russia and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval Russian History (1987 [1985]) and The Tatar Yoke: The Image of the Mongols in Medieval Russia (1986), [4] in which he challenged several Moscow-centric, Great Russian, and Russian nationalist as well as Ukrainian nationalist traditions in historiography. These included the centuries-long tacit denial that the Mongols had really defeated and conquered Kievan Rus', and the false assertion that the Rus' princes were still constantly fighting against the invaders. [a] In reality, the Rus' princes had been forced to completely submit themselves to the Golden Horde, and doing its bidding and adopting much of its culture, or suffer the dire consequences of a devastating punitive military expedition by the Mongols, Tatars and their other Rus' allies. [6] In 2011, Halperin stated that Fomenko and Nosovskii's popular pseudohistorical Novaia khronologiia (New Chronology), which received some attention in the early 1980s, arose out of "the dilemma of the Mongol conquest in Russian historiography": embarrassment among defensive Russian nationalists who object to "Russophobic" arguments that Russia acquired "barbarian" customs, institutions, and culture from uncivilized nomads. [7]

On the causes of the Tver Uprising of 1327, Janet L. B. Martin (1995, 2007) wrote: "While some scholars argue that Chol-khan had been sent deliberately to provoke a crisis in Tver' because the Mongol court perceived that principality as too powerful, Charles Halperin has suggested quite plausibly that his purpose was to oversee conscription and collection of revenue, which the Horde required in preparation for another campaign against the Ilkhans of Persia over Azerbaijan." [8] She similarly accepted the evidence presented by Halperin, Borisov, Kuchkin and others that certain texts, claiming that the Battle of Kulikovo represented a "nationally unified campaign for independence from Mongol suzerainty", were not written until the 15th century; instead the larger conflict of the Great Troubles was primarily one of dynastic struggle amongst the Mongol-Tatar elite, while a competition for the timely delivery of tribute payments amongst their Rus' vassals. [9] Halperin belongs to a group of scholars who argue that the princes of Moscow continued to accept the authority of the Mongol khans well into the 15th century, that there was a Muscovite–Crimean Tatar alliance in the late 15th and early 16th century, and that the Russo-Kazan Wars happened because Muscovy was interfering in Kazan's dynastic struggles on behalf of the Crimean khans, not because Kazan posed a threat to Rus' lands. [10]

Halperin has engaged in a years-long but amicable public debate with Ukrainian historian Serhii Plokhy about the translatio of the Rus' land from the Middle Dnieper to Suzdalia. [11] [12] In his book The Origin of the Slavic Nations (2006), Plokhy said he has found their discussions 'very helpful', [13] was convinced by several of Halperin's arguments, [14] and recommended his papers on 15th-century Tverian political thought (1997) [15] and Russian historiography on the Golden Horde (2004). [16] While continuing to disagree in his 2010 review ('The chronology of the translatio of the myth of the Rus' Land from Kievan Rus' to Moscow is still a matter of contention'), Halperin in turn praised Plokhy's 2006 book as a 'masterfully constructed mosaic', though suggesting some corrections: 'The enormous value of [Plokhy's] contribution to scholarship cannot possibly be impaired by such a critique; indeed, in the best of all worlds fine-tuning some of the tiles should improve the artistry of his overall image.' [17] He acknowlegded Plokhy's point that he needed to revise some of his earlier publications in which he had used the unreliable reconstruction of the Trinity Chronicle for dating purposes, which Halperin (2001) himself told fellow scholars to stop doing. [11] [12] In his 2022 updated bundle of all previous articles about the Rus' land (published at Plokhy's suggestion [18] ), Halperin 'replaced citations to the Trinity Chronicle with references to the Simeonov Chronicle.' [19]

Selected works

Monographs
Journal articles (chronological selection)

Notes

  1. ↑ "Either the Christian God was not omnipotent, which was unthinkable, or else the Mongol conquest was his will. Faced with these two possibilities, the Russian bookman chose not to choose. Rather than rationalize conquest as other peoples had done, Russian intellectuals implicitly denied that it had occurred. (...) Texts from the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, generations after the conquest, accused the Mongols of plotting to rule Russia, as though this had not long been a fait accompli." [5]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus'</span> 13th-century Mongol military campaign in Europe

The Mongol Empire invaded and conquered much of Kievan Rus' in the mid-13th century, sacking numerous cities including the largest: Kiev and Chernigov. The siege of Kiev in 1240 by the Mongols is generally held to mark the end of the state of Kievan Rus', which had already been undergoing fragmentation. Many other principalities and urban centres in the northwest and southwest escaped complete destruction or suffered little to no damage from the Mongol invasion, including Galicia–Volhynia, Pskov, Smolensk, Polotsk, Vitebsk, and probably Rostov and Uglich.

Translatio imperii is a historiographical concept that was prominent in the Middle Ages in the thinking and writing of elite groups of the population in Europe, but was the reception of a concept from antiquity. In this concept the process of decline and fall of an empire theoretically is being replaced by a natural succession from one empire to another. Translatio implies that an empire metahistorically can be transferred from hand to hand and place to place, from Troy to Romans and Greeks to Franks and further on to Spain, and has therefore survived.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bolghar</span> UNESCO World Heritage Site in Russia

Bolghar was intermittently the capital of Volga Bulgaria from the 10th to the 13th centuries, along with Bilyar and Nur-Suvar. It was situated on the bank of the Volga River, about 30 km downstream from its confluence with the Kama River and some 130 km from modern Kazan in what is now Spassky District. West of it lies a small modern town, since 1991 known as Bolgar. The UNESCO World Heritage Committee inscribed Bolgar Historical and Archaeological Complex to the World Heritage List in 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Stand on the Ugra River</span> 1480 battle between the Great Horde and the Grand Duchy of Moscow

The Great Stand on the Ugra River or the Standing on the Ugra River, also known as the Battle of the Ugra, was a standoff in 1480 on the banks of the Ugra River between the forces of Akhmat Khan of the Great Horde, and Grand Prince Ivan III of the Grand Duchy of Moscow.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qasim Khanate</span> 1452–1681 Tatar vassal state of Russia

The Qasim Khanate was a Tatar-ruled khanate, a vassal of the Principality of Moscow, which existed from 1452 until 1681 in the territory of modern Ryazan Oblast in Russia with its capital at Kasimov, in the middle course of the Oka River. It was established in the lands which Grand Prince Vasily II of Moscow presented in 1452 to the Kazan prince Qasim Khan, son of the first Kazan khan Olug Moxammat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Horde</span> Rump state of the Golden Horde

The Great Horde was a rump state of the Golden Horde that existed from the mid-15th century to 1502. It was centered at the core of the former Golden Horde at Sarai on the lower Volga.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russo-Kazan Wars</span> 1439–1552 wars between Kazan and Russia

The Russo-Kazan Wars were a series of short, intermittent wars fought between the Grand Principality of Moscow and the Khanate of Kazan between 1437 and 1556. Most of these were wars of succession in Kazan, in which Muscovy intervened on behalf of the dynastic interests of its main ally, the Crimean Khanate. For most of the period, neither side sought to conquer the other, until Ivan the Terrible decided to annex Kazan upon the successful 1552 siege, which was followed by a rebellion lasting until 1556.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kievan Rus'</span> State in Europe, c. 880 to 1240

Kievan Rus', also known as Kyivan Rus', was the first East Slavic state and later an amalgam of principalities in Eastern Europe from the late 9th to the mid-13th century. Encompassing a variety of polities and peoples, including East Slavic, Norse, and Finnic, it was ruled by the Rurik dynasty, founded by the Varangian prince Rurik. The name was coined by Russian historians in the 19th century to describe the period when Kiev was at the center. At its greatest extent in the mid-11th century, Kievan Rus' stretched from the White Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south and from the headwaters of the Vistula in the west to the Taman Peninsula in the east, uniting the East Slavic tribes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Kiev (1240)</span> Mongol siege of a Rus city

The siege of Kiev by the Mongols took place between 28 November and 6 December 1240, and resulted in a Mongol victory. It was a heavy morale and military blow to the Principality of Galicia–Volhynia, which was forced to submit to Mongol suzerainty, and allowed Batu Khan to proceed westward into Central Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muscovite War of Succession</span> 14th-century war of succession in Muscovy

The Muscovite War of Succession, or Muscovite Civil War, was a war of succession in the Grand Duchy of Moscow (Muscovy) from 1425 to 1453. The two warring parties were Vasily II, the son of the previous Grand Prince of Moscow Vasily I, and on the other hand his uncle, Yury Dmitrievich, the Prince of Zvenigorod, and the sons of Yuri Dmitrievich, Vasily Kosoy and Dmitry Shemyaka. In the intermediate stage, the party of Yury conquered Moscow, but in the end, Vasily II regained his crown.

The Prince of Vladimir, from 1186 Grand Prince of Vladimir, also translated as Grand Duke of Vladimir, was the title of the monarch of Vladimir-Suzdal. The title was passed to the prince of Moscow in 1389.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Principality of Tver</span> Russian principality (1246–1485)

The Principality of Tver was a Russian principality which existed between the 13th and the 15th centuries with its capital in Tver. The principality was located approximately in the area currently occupied by Tver Oblast and the eastern part of Smolensk Oblast.

The gathering of the Russian lands or Rus' lands was the process in which new states – usually the Principality of Moscow and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania – acquired former territories of Kievan Rus' from the 14th century onwards, claiming to be its legitimate successor. In Russian historiography, this phenomenon represented the consolidation of a national state centered on Moscow. The sobriquet gatherer of the Russian lands or Rus' Land is also given to the grand princes of Moscow by Russian historians, especially to Ivan III. The term is also used to describe the expansion of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania into Rus' principalities; the Lithuanian grand dukes claimed authority over all territories inhabited by Rus' people. Some historians argue that Lithuania began "gathering Rus' lands" before Muscovy did.

This is a select bibliography of post World War II English language books and journal articles about the history of Russia and its borderlands from the Mongol invasions until 1613. Book entries may have references to reviews published in academic journals or major newspapers when these could be considered helpful.

Donald "Don" Gary Ostrowski is an American historian, and a lecturer in history at Harvard Extension School. He specialises in the political and social history Kievan Rus' and Muscovy.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Charles J. Halperin. "Author: Charles Halperin". Academia.edu. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  2. ↑ "Ivan the Terrible in Russian Historical Memory since 1991 — Academic Studies Press". Academic Studies Press. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Halperin 2007, p. 8.
  4. ↑ Halperin 2007, pp. 8–9.
  5. ↑ Halperin 1987, pp. 81–83.
  6. ↑ Martin 2007, pp. 429–430.
  7. ↑ Halperin 2011, p. 1–71.
  8. ↑ Martin 2007, pp. 195–196.
  9. ↑ Martin 2007, p. 431.
  10. ↑ Martin 2007, pp. 432–433.
  11. 1 2 Plokhy 2006, pp. 67–68.
  12. 1 2 Halperin 2010, pp. 281–282.
  13. ↑ Plokhy 2006, p. x.
  14. ↑ Plokhy 2006, pp. 67, 74–75.
  15. ↑ Plokhy 2006, p. 78.
  16. ↑ Plokhy 2006, p. 133.
  17. ↑ Halperin 2010, p. 276.
  18. ↑ Halperin 2022, p. vii.
  19. ↑ Halperin 2022, p. 11.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.