Community power

Last updated

Community power is an approach to public service design and delivery, [1] primarily influential in British local government.

Contents

It is characterised by an adherence to "principles of devolution, localisation and democratisation" [2] and foregrounds the belief that "communities have knowledge, skills and assets which mean they themselves are well placed to identify and respond to any challenges that they face". [3] In practice, proponents of community power seek to create public services that are non-transactional, non-hierarchical, and where local communities and communities of interest are able to shape the parts of the state that they interact with. [4]

A range of think-tanks and charities are associated with promoting community power, including New Local, Power to Change, The Cares Family, Locality, The Young Foundation, People’s Health Trust, Friends Provident Foundation, [5] and Local Trust. [6] Similarly, community power has been endorsed by politicians from across the British political spectrum, [7] [8] both at national and local levels.

Approach

Community power advocates contrast their approach to public service design and delivery with other models that they characterise as being driven by either state or market. [9] Community power critiques state-led approaches as being overly hierarchical, professionalized and paternalistic, and market-led ones as being overly transactional and target-driven. [10]

The idea of more community focused forms of public service design and delivery is to avoid these dynamics, and to co-produce solutions to the challenges that those using public services face. By foregrounding people’s wants and needs, rather than a ‘service offer’, the idea is to create public services that are better able to respond to the complexities of people’s lives, while being more preventative and resilient. [11]

Examples of practices associated with community power include co-production, social proscribing, community organising, local area coordination and deliberative democracy. [11]

Background

Beyond being a critique of state and market driven modes of public service delivery, community power sees itself as representing a response to a particular set of challenges facing the British public sector in the 21st century. [12]

One of these challenges is the fact that demand has been rising for acute public services of all kinds since 2010, while budgets, especially in local government, have been cut substantially. As such, community power sees itself as being a way for public services to become more preventative [13] – allowing public sector professionals to work with people to prevent them reaching the point at which they need to access expensive and acute public services, so as to tackle the issue of spiralling demand.

Another perceived challenge relates to Britain’s unusual level of centralisation, [14] and an interpretation of political events in this country since 2016 as being driven by a dissatisfaction on the part of the British public with democratic institutions. [15] Community power seeks to address these issues by aiming to deepen people’s ability to shape the state and localising decision-making [16]

Intellectually, community power advocates have cited a range of thinkers as influencing their approaches. These include Elinor Ostrom, [17] Peter Kropotkin, [18] Hillary Cottam [19] and Ted Howard. [20]

Impact

At the level of local government, over sixty councils currently pay to be members of New Local’s network, which aims to equip local authorities with the tools to "transform public services and unlock community power". [21]

At the national level, a group of 10 Conservative Party MPs co-authored a report exploring the potential for a right-wing vision of community power. [22] On the left, community power has been endorsed by figures such as Andy Burnham, [23] Kim Leadbitter [24] and institutions like the Cooperative Party. [25]

A group of organisations interested in community power have also launched a parliamentary campaign entitled ‘We’re Right Here’ [26] aimed at passing a national "community power act", which would give ‘communities a legal right to self determination’ and bake in the principle of subsidiarity into British public service decision making. [27]

Response

Community power has at various times been critiqued from the political left. Critics have compared community power to David Cameron’s vision of the Big Society, [9] and questioned whether conservative interest in community power means that it is simply being used as a cover for further austerity. [28]

Proponents of community power have tended to reject the Big Society comparison, [29] and on the question of austerity, argued that community power doesn't necessarily imply a bigger or smaller state, just a different kind of public service design and delivery. [30]

Related Research Articles

A hierarchical organization or hierarchical organisation is an organizational structure where every entity in the organization, except one, is subordinate to a single other entity. This arrangement is a form of hierarchy. In an organization, this hierarchy usually consists of a singular/group of power at the top with subsequent levels of power beneath them. This is the dominant mode of organization among large organizations; most corporations, governments, criminal enterprises, and organized religions are hierarchical organizations with different levels of management power or authority. For example, the broad, top-level overview of the hierarchy of the Catholic Church consists of the Pope, then the Cardinals, then the Archbishops, and so on. Another example is the hierarchy between the four castes in the Hindu caste system, which arises from the religious belief "that each is derived from a different part of the creator God’s (Brahma) body, descending from the head downwards."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-governmental organization</span> Organization, usually created to aid those in need

A non-governmental organization (NGO) is an organization that generally is formed independent from government. They are typically nonprofit entities, and many of them are active in humanitarianism or the social sciences; they can also include clubs and associations that provide services to their members and others. NGOs can also be lobby groups for corporations, such as the World Economic Forum. NGOs are distinguished from international and intergovernmental organizations (IOs) in that the latter are more directly involved with sovereign states and their governments.

The Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) is the public service department of New Zealand charged with issuing passports; administering applications for citizenship and lottery grants; enforcing censorship and gambling laws; registering births, deaths, marriages and civil unions; supplying support services to ministers; and advising the government on a range of relevant policies and issues.

New localism is a concept associated with Tony Blair's Labour government in the United Kingdom. It was intended to indicate a cautious devolution of power to the local level in an attempt to better implement national goals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commons</span> Shared resources

The commons is the cultural and natural resources accessible to all members of a society, including natural materials such as air, water, and a habitable Earth. These resources are held in common even when owned privately or publicly. Commons can also be understood as natural resources that groups of people manage for individual and collective benefit. Characteristically, this involves a variety of informal norms and values employed for a governance mechanism. Commons can also be defined as a social practice of governing a resource not by state or market but by a community of users that self-governs the resource through institutions that it creates.

In economics, a common-pool resource (CPR) is a type of good consisting of a natural or human-made resource system, whose size or characteristics makes it costly, but not impossible, to exclude potential beneficiaries from obtaining benefits from its use. Unlike pure public goods, common pool resources face problems of congestion or overuse, because they are subtractable. A common-pool resource typically consists of a core resource, which defines the stock variable, while providing a limited quantity of extractable fringe units, which defines the flow variable. While the core resource is to be protected or nurtured in order to allow for its continuous exploitation, the fringe units can be harvested or consumed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Local</span>

New Local, formerly known as the New Local Government Network, is an independent British think tank and local government network. Founded in 1996, it is based in London, and brings together over 60 councils and other organisations aiming to transform public services and unlock community power.

Public administration theory refers to the study and analysis of the principles, concepts, and models that guide the practice of public administration. It provides a framework for understanding the complexities and challenges of managing public organizations and implementing public policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elinor Ostrom</span> American political economist (1933–2012)

Elinor Claire "Lin" Ostrom was an American political scientist and political economist whose work was associated with New Institutional Economics and the resurgence of political economy. In 2009, she was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for her "analysis of economic governance, especially the commons", which she shared with Oliver E. Williamson; she was the first woman to win the prize.

The New South Wales Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) was a department of the New South Wales Government, responsible for effective and sustainable planning to support the growth in the state of New South Wales, Australia. It made plans based on evidence for the state's cities and regions, working with the community, business and local government to create places for people in NSW to live, work and spend their leisure time, while ensuring good access to transport and other services like shops and restaurants. The department was also responsible for the evidence-based assessment of state significant development applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NHS Scotland</span> Publicly-funded healthcare system in Scotland

NHS Scotland, sometimes styled NHSScotland, is the publicly–funded healthcare system in Scotland and one of the four systems that make up the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. It operates 14 territorial NHS boards across Scotland, supported by seven special non-geographic health boards, and Public Health Scotland.

Public participation, also known as citizen participation or patient and public involvement, is the inclusion of the public in the activities of any organization or project. Public participation is similar to but more inclusive than stakeholder engagement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bureaucracy</span> Administrative system governing any large institution

Bureaucracy is a system of organization where decisions are made by a body of non-elected officials. Historically, a bureaucracy was a government administration managed by departments staffed with non-elected officials. Today, bureaucracy is the administrative system governing any large institution, whether publicly owned or privately owned. The public administration in many jurisdictions is an example of bureaucracy, as is any centralized hierarchical structure of an institution, including corporations, societies, nonprofit organisations, and clubs.

Community-based monitoring (CBM) is a form of public oversight, ideally driven by local information needs and community values, to increase the accountability and quality of social services such as health, development aid, or to contribute to the management of natural resources. Within the CBM framework, members of a community affected by a social program or environmental change track this change and its local impacts, and generate demands, suggestions, critiques and data that they then act on, including by feeding back to the organization implementing the program or managing the environmental change. For a Toolkit on Community-Based Monitoring methodology with a focus on community oversight of infrastructure projects, see www.communitymonitoring.org. For a library of resources relating to community-based monitoring of tropical forests, see forestcompass.org/how/resources.

Co-production is an approach in the development and delivery of public services and technology in which citizens and other key stakeholders and concepts in human society are implicitly involved in the process. In many countries, co-production is increasingly perceived as a new public administration paradigm as it involves a whole new thinking about public service delivery and policy development. In co-productive approaches, citizens are not only consulted, but are part of the conception, design, steering, and ongoing management of services. The concept has a long history, arising out of radical theories of knowledge in the 1970s, and can be applied in a range of sectors across society including health research, and science more broadly.

Vincent Alfred Ostrom was an American political economist and the Founding Director of the Ostrom Workshop based at Indiana University and the Arthur F. Bentley Professor Emeritus of Political Science. He and his wife, the political economist Elinor Ostrom, made numerous contributions to the field of political science, political economy, and public choice.

The reduction of carbon emissions, along with other greenhouse gases (GHGs), has become a vitally important task of international, national and local actors. If we understand governance as the creation of “conditions for ordered rule and collective action” then, given the fact that the reduction of carbon emissions will require concerted collective action, it follows that the governance of carbon will be of paramount concern. We have seen numerous international conferences over the past 20 years tasked with finding a way of facilitating this, and while international agreements have been infamously difficult to reach, action at the national level has been much more effective. In the UK, the Climate Change Act 2008 committed the government to meeting significant carbon reduction targets. In England, these carbon emissions are governed using numerous different instruments, which involve a variety of actors. While it has been argued by authors like Rhodes that there has been a “hollowing out” of the nation state, and that governments have lost their capabilities to govern to a variety of non-state actors and the European Union, the case of carbon governance in England actually runs counter to this. The government body responsible for the task, the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), is the “main external dynamic” behind governing actions in this area, and “rather than hollowing out central co-ordination”. The department may rely on other bodies to deliver its desired outcomes, but it is still ultimately responsible for the imposition of the rules and regulations that “steer (carbon) governmental action at the national level”. It is therefore evident that carbon governance in England is hierarchical in nature, in that “legislative decisions and executive decisions” are the main dynamic behind carbon governance action. This does not deny the existence of a network of bodies around DECC who are part of the process, but they are supplementary actors who are steered by central decisions. This article focuses on carbon governance in England as the other countries of the UK all have devolved assemblies who are responsible for the governance of carbon emissions in their respective countries.

Collaborative partnerships are agreements and actions made by consenting organizations to share resources to accomplish a mutual goal. Collaborative partnerships rely on participation by at least two parties who agree to share resources, such as finances, knowledge, and people. Organizations in a collaborative partnership share common goals. The essence of collaborative partnership is for all parties to mutually benefit from working together.

Communities come together and set up community businesses to address challenges they face together.

Communicative planning is an approach to urban planning that gathers stakeholders and engages them in a process to make decisions together in a manner that respects the positions of all involved. It is also sometimes called collaborative planning among planning practitioners or collaborative planning model.

References

  1. ↑ Lent, Adam; Studdert, Jessica (2019). The Community Paradigm. London: New Local.
  2. ↑ Tiratelli, Luca (2021). "We need to better capture the impact of community power". The Municipal Journal . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  3. ↑ Pollard, Grace; al, et (2021). Community Power: The Evidence. London: New Local.
  4. ↑ Golding, Nick. "Adam Lent: 'The hierarchical model has gone. We needed a name to reflect that'". Local Government Chronicle. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  5. ↑ "Home" . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  6. ↑ "Community power" . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  7. ↑ "Building Community Power: Annual Conference and AGM 2021" . Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  8. ↑ "Press release: Report for government calls for a new era of 'community power'". 24 September 2020. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  9. 1 2 An Economy For All: The role of community power (PDF). Centre for Local Economic Strategies. 2020.
  10. ↑ Lent, Adam; Studdert, Jessica (2019). The Community Paradigm. New Local.
  11. 1 2 Pollard, Grace; al, et (2021). Community Power: The Evidence. New Local.
  12. ↑ Jameson, Heather. "Community power – a step forwards?". The Municipal Journal. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  13. ↑ https://www.wypartnership.co.uk/application/files/6416/2616/5635/The_Power_of_Communities_and_the_NHS.pdf.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  14. ↑ Raikes, Luke; al, et (2019). Divided and connected: Regional inequalities in the North, the UK and the developed world – State of the North 2019 (PDF). IPPR.
  15. ↑ Fortune, Joe. "Communities must be equipped with the tools they need to take back control". Labour List. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  16. ↑ Lent, Adam. "Why councils should back the new call for a community power act". Local Government Chronicle. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  17. ↑ "Meet Elinor Ostrom – the intellectual hero of community power". Local Trust.
  18. ↑ Tiratelli, Luca; Kaye, Simon (2020). Communities vs Coronavirus: The rise of mutual aid (PDF). New Local.
  19. ↑ Tjoa, Pawda (2019). From Tiny Acorns: Communities Shaping the Future of Children's Services. New Local.
  20. ↑ "Ted Howard on the future of community wealth building" – via www.youtube.com.
  21. ↑ "Our members and partners".
  22. ↑ "Trusting the People". New Social Covenant Unit.
  23. ↑ "Andy Burnham on community power and devolution: why you can't have one without the other" – via www.youtube.com.
  24. ↑ "Danny Kruger MP and Kim Leadbeater MP on rebuilding the fabric of our communities" – via www.youtube.com.
  25. ↑ "Five ways that we'll keep Building Community Power". Co-operative Party. 19 October 2021.
  26. ↑ "Home". We're Right Here.
  27. ↑ "What we want".
  28. ↑ Milburn, Keir. "The Tories' New 'Community-Powered' Plan Is a Cynical Power Grab". Novara Media. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  29. ↑ "Big Society 2.0? What sets our Paradigm apart". February 26, 2020.
  30. ↑ "Why the left should back community power". December 10, 2021.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.