Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy

Last updated

Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy.jpg
Author Daniel Ziblatt
SubjectPolitics
GenreNon-fiction
Set in
  • German
  • United Kingdom
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Publication date
2017

Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy is a 2017 non-fiction book by Daniel Ziblatt, published by Cambridge University Press, discussing the growth of democratic countries in 19th and 20th century Europe. Ziblatt's thesis is that in those democracies the conservative parties were often crucial on whether a democracy survives: he analysed both Germany and the United Kingdom. [1] Ziblatt argued that if conservative parties were robust they would assist democracy but if they had weaknesses they would impede democracy. [2]

Contents

John Markoff, in the American Journal of Sociology , wrote that "Ziblatt shines his spotlight on how those who had held economic and political power in the past attempted to keep on doing so and on how they innovated in order to keep essential things unchanged." [3] Markoff states that, according to the book, "an antidemocratic right" is the faction that "prevails in democracy's crises" and that according to the book "democracy's stability depends on keeping "the propertied and powerful" (p. 368) content." [3] Seva Gunitsky, in Perspectives on Politics , wrote that, as per the book, established conservative parties are crucial elements in changes in politics that lack violence and that such parties perceive democracy "as a gamble—a risky one, to be sure, but one on which they could place their own bets, and even win." [4]

Background

Ziblatt is a political scientist. [5]

The book uses both statistics and archives as sources. [1]

Ziblatt did much of his research whilst in the basement of the Hatfield House. [6]

Contents

The book's initial portion [7] describes a crisis of the British Conservative Party circa 1906 and the German National People's Party. [8] The author argues that the British discovered how a political party could continue the influence of the existing conservatives, [6] and that the British party had stronger organization than the equivalent in 20th century Germany. [9] Mark Koyama, in The Journal of Economic History , stated that "The British case-study foregrounds the main components of Ziblatt’s argument." [7] The content about the UK has three chapters. [4]

The content about Germany, in the second part of the book, [7] has about four chapters. [9] Hermann Beck of the University of Miami states that "the lion's share" of the content is about those two countries. [6]

In addition to the United Kingdom and Germany the book, in a third section, [7] has content about post 1879-France, [4] Italy, [7] Latin America, Sweden, and Spain, [3] as well as other parts of Scandinavia. The author stated that the countries that had conservative parties developing similarly to the British one accordingly had more democracy, using Sweden as an example of the British model. [7]

Frieder Günther of the Institute of Contemporary History said that the manner of writing was "institutional". [5]

Reception

Gunitsky stated that the book "accomplishes" its argument on how democracy developed on the continent, "usefully critiques explanations that emphasize economic development or the role of the working class" and "is an exemplary case of a deeply researched controlled comparison, one that performs the valuable service of offering paths to more questions." [4] Gunitsky argued that the book does not adequately explore "external forces" and international relations, but that "These are perhaps unfair demands to make of" the work. [4] Citing changes in the United States Republican Party, Gunitsky added "Although Donald Trump does not appear anywhere in the book, his specter looms over the argument." [4] In response to Gunitsky's point about Eastern European parties, Ziblatt stated "The existence of strong autocrat parties is not a refutation of my thesis but, rather, an illustration of what happens over time when strong center-right parties are missing." [10]

Günther wrote that the book presented a "viable argument" and that "All in all, the book's scope is impressive." [5]

According to Koyama, the work is "a powerful and comprehensive account of the divergent political trajectories of Britain and Germany in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries." [7]

Markoff stated that the book was "splendid". [3]

Jorgen Møller of Aarhus University wrote that the study of Denmark's conservative party could be a rebuttal to the book's thesis. [11]

J. M. Stonecash of Syracuse University gave the book three stars and stated it was "highly recommended". He added that it had "persuasive", "considerable evidence". [12]

Beck described it as "well-written" and "astute". [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democracy</span> Form of government

Democracy is a form of government in which the people have the authority to deliberate and decide legislation, or to choose governing officials to do so. Who is considered part of "the people" and how authority is shared among or delegated by the people has changed over time and at different rates in different countries. Features of democracy often include freedom of assembly, association, property rights, freedom of religion and speech, inclusiveness and equality, citizenship, consent of the governed, voting rights, freedom from unwarranted governmental deprivation of the right to life and liberty, and minority rights.

Right-wing politics describes the range of political ideologies that view certain social orders and hierarchies as inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable, typically supporting this position based on natural law, economics, authority, property or tradition. Hierarchy and inequality may be seen as natural results of traditional social differences or competition in market economies.

In political science, a political system means the type of political organization that can be recognized, observed or otherwise declared by a state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratization</span> Trend towards democratic norms in a society

Democratization, or democratisation, is the transition to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. It may be a hybrid regime in transition from an authoritarian regime to a full democracy, a transition from an authoritarian political system to a semi-democracy or transition from a semi-authoritarian political system to a democratic political system.

An illiberal democracy describes a governing system in which, although elections take place, citizens are cut off from knowledge about the activities of those who exercise real power because of the lack of civil liberties; thus it does not constitute an open society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrington Moore Jr.</span> American sociologist (1913–2005)

Barrington Moore Jr. was an American political sociologist, and the son of forester Barrington Moore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Centre-right politics</span> Political orientation

Centre-right politics lean to the right of the political spectrum, but are closer to the centre. From the 1780s to the 1880s, there was a shift in the Western world of social class structure and the economy, moving away from the nobility and mercantilism, towards capitalism. This general economic shift toward capitalism affected centre-right movements, such as the Conservative Party of the United Kingdom, which responded by becoming supportive of capitalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polity data series</span> Political science project ranking states by democraticity

The Polity data series is a data series in political science research. Along with the Varieties of Democracy project and Freedom House, Polity is among prominent datasets that measure democracy and autocracy.

In political science, the waves of democracy are major surges of democracy that have occurred in history. Although the term appears at least as early as 1887, it was popularized by Samuel P. Huntington, a political scientist at Harvard University, in his article published in the Journal of Democracy and further expounded in his 1991 book, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Democratization waves have been linked to sudden shifts in the distribution of power among the great powers, which created openings and incentives to introduce sweeping domestic reforms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steven Levitsky</span> American political scientist (born 1968)

Steven Levitsky is an American political scientist and Professor of Government at Harvard University. A comparative political scientist, his research interests focus on Latin America and include political parties and party systems, authoritarianism and democratization, and weak and informal institutions. He is notable for his work on competitive authoritarian regimes and informal political institutions.

Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government. Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have some times been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratic backsliding</span> Phenomenon where liberal democracies may gradually become authoritarian

Democratic backsliding, also called autocratization, is the decline in the democratic characteristics of a political system, and is the opposite of democratization. Democracy is the most popular form of government, with more than half of the nations in the world being democracies according to a study examining 165 countries determined that 98 of them were democracies in 2020. Since the 2010s, the world has grown more authoritarian, with one quarter of the world's population under democratically backsliding hybrid regimes into the 2020s.

<i>How Democracies Die</i> 2018 book on democracy

How Democracies Die is a 2018 comparative politics book by Harvard University political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt about how elected leaders can gradually subvert the democratic process to increase their power. In 2021, The Economist described the book as the "most important book of the Trump era." The book, which offers stark warnings about the impact of the Republican Party and Donald Trump's presidency on U.S. democracy, influenced Joe Biden prior to his decision to run for president in the 2020 presidential election.

Daniel Ziblatt is an American political scientist and a professor at Harvard University with a research focus on comparative politics, democracy and democratization as well as the politics and political history of Western Europe. Since 2018 he has been Eaton Professor of the Science of Government at Harvard University. He is the author of the book Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy. In 2018, Ziblatt also published How Democracies Die with fellow Harvard professor Steven Levitsky. The book examines the conditions that can lead democracies to break down from within, rather than due to external events such as military coups or foreign invasions. How Democracies Die received widespread praise. It spent a number of weeks on The New York Times Best Seller list and six weeks on the non-fiction bestseller list of the German weekly Der Spiegel. The book was recognized as one of the best nonfiction books of 2018 by The Washington Post, Time, and Foreign Affairs.

Constitutional hardball is the exploitation of procedures, laws and institutions by political actors for partisan gain in ways which violate pre-established norms and push the bounds of legality. Legal scholars and political scientists have characterized constitutional hardball as a threat to democracy, because it undermines shared understanding of democratic norms and undermines the expectation that the other side will comply with democratic norms. As a result, the use of constitutional hardball by one side of partisans encourages other partisans to respond in similar fashion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">V-Dem Institute</span> Swedish research institute

The V-Dem Institute is an independent research institute founded by Professor Staffan I. Lindberg in 2014 that studies the qualities of government. The institute is funded by a number of government organizations, World Bank and several research institutions. The headquarters of the project is based at the department of political science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing is a 2005 book by Michael Mann which argues that democracy often leads to violent ethnic cleansing to make the nation more ethnically homogenous. Mann's argument was described as a provocative challenge to positive views of democracy. However, one reviewer stated that in his book Mann often qualified the linkage of democracy and ethnic cleansing, to the extent that the principal argument in the book could be summarized as "in all periods in human history political leaders have ordered or tolerated the murder of subsets of their populations", but in recent times victims are targeted for their membership in an ethnic group rather than place of residence or religion.

Seva Gunitsky is an American political scientist. He is an associate professor of political science at the University of Toronto. His research focuses on the ways global forces and international politics affect democracy and domestic politics. He is the author of Aftershocks: Great Powers and Domestic Reforms in the Twentieth Century, which examines how shocks in the international system affect regime types. The book was selected by Foreign Affairs magazine as one of the best books of 2017. He has also published commentary and analysis in The Washington Post, Foreign Affairs, and The New Republic. Gunitsky is a frequent commentator on Russian politics and foreign policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Max Wallraf</span> German politician (1859–1941)

Ludwig Theodor Ferdinand Max Wallraf was a German politician who served as mayor of Cologne from 1907 to 1917. He was State Minister of the Interior from 1917 to 1918. As a German National People's Party politician, he was a member of the Reichstag from 1924 to 1930 and briefly served as its President in 1924/25.

David Stasavage is an American political scientist.

References

Notes

  1. 1 2 Friedman, Uri (14 June 2017). "Why Conservative Parties Are Central to Democracy". The Atlantic . Retrieved 1 November 2020.
  2. Günther, p. 1956.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Markoff.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Gunitsky.
  5. 1 2 3 Günther, p. 1957.
  6. 1 2 3 Beck, p. 158.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Koyama.
  8. Günther, p. 1956-1957.
  9. 1 2 Møller, p. 1.
  10. Ziblatt, "Response to Seva Gunitsky’s review of Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy".
  11. Møller, p. 2.
  12. Stonecash, J M. (May 2018). "Conservative parties and the birth of democracy". Choice Reviews . Middletown, Connecticut. 55: 1130.
  13. Beck, p. 160.