# Convergence problem

Last updated

In the analytic theory of continued fractions, the convergence problem is the determination of conditions on the partial numeratorsai and partial denominatorsbi that are sufficient to guarantee the convergence of the continued fraction

## Contents

${\displaystyle x=b_{0}+{\cfrac {a_{1}}{b_{1}+{\cfrac {a_{2}}{b_{2}+{\cfrac {a_{3}}{b_{3}+{\cfrac {a_{4}}{b_{4}+\ddots }}}}}}}}.\,}$

This convergence problem for continued fractions is inherently more difficult than the corresponding convergence problem for infinite series.

## Elementary results

When the elements of an infinite continued fraction consist entirely of positive real numbers, the determinant formula can easily be applied to demonstrate when the continued fraction converges. Since the denominators Bn cannot be zero in this simple case, the problem boils down to showing that the product of successive denominators BnBn+1 grows more quickly than the product of the partial numerators a1a2a3...an+1. The convergence problem is much more difficult when the elements of the continued fraction are complex numbers.

### Periodic continued fractions

An infinite periodic continued fraction is a continued fraction of the form

${\displaystyle x={\cfrac {a_{1}}{b_{1}+{\cfrac {a_{2}}{b_{2}+{\cfrac {\ddots }{\quad \ddots \quad b_{k-1}+{\cfrac {a_{k}}{b_{k}+{\cfrac {a_{1}}{b_{1}+{\cfrac {a_{2}}{b_{2}+\ddots }}}}}}}}}}}}\,}$

where k 1, the sequence of partial numerators {a1, a2, a3, ..., ak} contains no values equal to zero, and the partial numerators {a1, a2, a3, ..., ak} and partial denominators {b1, b2, b3, ..., bk} repeat over and over again, ad infinitum.

By applying the theory of linear fractional transformations to

${\displaystyle s(w)={\frac {A_{k-1}w+A_{k}}{B_{k-1}w+B_{k}}}\,}$

where Ak-1, Bk-1, Ak, and Bk are the numerators and denominators of the k-1st and kth convergents of the infinite periodic continued fraction x, it can be shown that x converges to one of the fixed points of s(w) if it converges at all. Specifically, let r1 and r2 be the roots of the quadratic equation

${\displaystyle B_{k-1}w^{2}+(B_{k}-A_{k-1})w-A_{k}=0.\,}$

These roots are the fixed points of s(w). If r1 and r2 are finite then the infinite periodic continued fraction x converges if and only if

1. the two roots are equal; or
2. the k-1st convergent is closer to r1 than it is to r2, and none of the first k convergents equal r2.

If the denominator Bk-1 is equal to zero then an infinite number of the denominators Bnk-1 also vanish, and the continued fraction does not converge to a finite value. And when the two roots r1 and r2 are equidistant from the k-1st convergent or when r1 is closer to the k-1st convergent than r2 is, but one of the first k convergents equals r2 the continued fraction x diverges by oscillation. [1] [2] [3]

### The special case when period k = 1

If the period of a continued fraction is 1; that is, if

${\displaystyle x={\underset {1}{\overset {\infty }{\mathrm {K} }}}{\frac {a}{b}},\,}$

where b 0, we can obtain a very strong result. First, by applying an equivalence transformation we see that x converges if and only if

${\displaystyle y=1+{\underset {1}{\overset {\infty }{\mathrm {K} }}}{\frac {z}{1}}\qquad \left(z={\frac {a}{b^{2}}}\right)\,}$

converges. Then, by applying the more general result obtained above it can be shown that

${\displaystyle y=1+{\cfrac {z}{1+{\cfrac {z}{1+{\cfrac {z}{1+\ddots }}}}}}\,}$

converges for every complex number z except when z is a negative real number and z<¼. Moreover, this continued fraction y converges to the particular value of

${\displaystyle y={\frac {1}{2}}\left(1\pm {\sqrt {4z+1}}\right)\,}$

that has the larger absolute value (except when z is real and z<¼, in which case the two fixed points of the LFT generating y have equal moduli and y diverges by oscillation).

By applying another equivalence transformation the condition that guarantees convergence of

${\displaystyle x={\underset {1}{\overset {\infty }{\mathrm {K} }}}{\frac {1}{z}}={\cfrac {1}{z+{\cfrac {1}{z+{\cfrac {1}{z+\ddots }}}}}}\,}$

can also be determined. Since a simple equivalence transformation shows that

${\displaystyle x={\cfrac {z^{-1}}{1+{\cfrac {z^{-2}}{1+{\cfrac {z^{-2}}{1+\ddots }}}}}}\,}$

whenever z 0, the preceding result for the continued fraction y can be restated for x. The infinite periodic continued fraction

${\displaystyle x={\underset {1}{\overset {\infty }{\mathrm {K} }}}{\frac {1}{z}}}$

converges if and only if z2 is not a real number lying in the interval 4 <z2 0 or, equivalently, x converges if and only if z 0 and z is not a pure imaginary number with imaginary part between -2 and 2. (Not including either endpoint)

### Worpitzky's theorem

By applying the fundamental inequalities to the continued fraction

${\displaystyle x={\cfrac {1}{1+{\cfrac {a_{2}}{1+{\cfrac {a_{3}}{1+{\cfrac {a_{4}}{1+\ddots }}}}}}}}\,}$

it can be shown that the following statements hold if |ai| ¼ for the partial numerators ai, i = 2, 3, 4, ...

• The continued fraction x converges to a finite value, and converges uniformly if the partial numerators ai are complex variables. [4]
• The value of x and of each of its convergents xi lies in the circular domain of radius 2/3 centered on the point z = 4/3; that is, in the region defined by
${\displaystyle \Omega =\lbrace z:|z-4/3|\leq 2/3\rbrace .\,}$ [5]
• The radius ¼ is the largest radius over which x can be shown to converge without exception, and the region Ω is the smallest image space that contains all possible values of the continued fraction x. [5]

The proof of the first statement, by Julius Worpitzky in 1865, is apparently the oldest published proof that a continued fraction with complex elements actually converges.[ disputed (for: Euler's continued fraction formula is older) ] [6]

Because the proof of Worpitzky's theorem employs Euler's continued fraction formula to construct an infinite series that is equivalent to the continued fraction x, and the series so constructed is absolutely convergent, the Weierstrass M-test can be applied to a modified version of x. If

${\displaystyle f(z)={\cfrac {1}{1+{\cfrac {c_{2}z}{1+{\cfrac {c_{3}z}{1+{\cfrac {c_{4}z}{1+\ddots }}}}}}}}\,}$

and a positive real number M exists such that |ci| M (i = 2, 3, 4, ...), then the sequence of convergents {fi(z)} converges uniformly when

${\displaystyle |z|<{\frac {1}{4M}}\,}$

and f(z) is analytic on that open disk.

## Śleszyński–Pringsheim criterion

In the late 19th century, Śleszyński and later Pringsheim showed that a continued fraction, in which the as and bs may be complex numbers, will converge to a finite value if ${\displaystyle |b_{n}|\geq |a_{n}|+1}$ for ${\displaystyle n\geq 1.}$ [7]

## Van Vleck's theorem

Jones and Thron attribute the following result to Van Vleck. Suppose that all the ai are equal to 1, and all the bi have arguments with:

${\displaystyle -\pi /2+\epsilon <\arg(b_{i})<\pi /2-\epsilon ,i\geq 1,}$

with epsilon being any positive number less than ${\displaystyle \pi /2}$. In other words, all the bi are inside a wedge which has its vertex at the origin, has an opening angle of ${\displaystyle \pi -2\epsilon }$, and is symmetric around the positive real axis. Then fi, the ith convergent to the continued fraction, is finite and has an argument:

${\displaystyle -\pi /2+\epsilon <\arg(f_{i})<\pi /2-\epsilon ,i\geq 1.}$

Also, the sequence of even convergents will converge, as will the sequence of odd convergents. The continued fraction itself will converge if and only if the sum of all the |bi| diverges. [8]

## Notes

1. 1886 Otto Stolz, Verlesungen über allgemeine Arithmetik, pp. 299-304
2. 1900 Alfred Pringsheim, Sb. München, vol. 30, "Über die Konvergenz unendlicher Kettenbrüche"
3. 1905 Oskar Perron, Sb. München, vol. 35, "Über die Konvergenz periodischer Kettenbrüche"
4. 1865 Julius Worpitzky, Jahresbericht Friedrichs-Gymnasium und Realschule, "Untersuchungen über die Entwickelung der monodromen und monogenen Functionen durch Kettenbrüche"
5. 1942 J. F. Paydon and H. S. Wall, Duke Math. Journal, vol. 9, "The continued fraction as a sequence of linear transformations"
6. 1905 Edward Burr Van Vleck, The Boston Colloquium, "Selected topics in the theory of divergent series and of continued fractions"
7. See for example Theorem 4.35 on page 92 of Jones and Thron (1980).
8. See theorem 4.29, on page 88, of Jones and Thron (1980).

## Related Research Articles

In mathematics, an exponential function is a function of the form

In mathematics, a square root of a number x is a number y such that y2 = x; in other words, a number y whose square (the result of multiplying the number by itself, or y ⋅ y) is x. For example, 4 and −4 are square roots of 16, because 42 = (−4)2 = 16. Every nonnegative real number x has a unique nonnegative square root, called the principal square root, which is denoted by where the symbol is called the radical sign or radix. For example, the principal square root of 9 is 3, which is denoted by because 32 = 3 ⋅ 3 = 9 and 3 is nonnegative. The term (or number) whose square root is being considered is known as the radicand. The radicand is the number or expression underneath the radical sign, in this case 9.

The square root of 2, or the one-half power of 2, written in mathematics as or , is the positive algebraic number that, when multiplied by itself, equals the number 2. Technically, it must be called the principal square root of 2, to distinguish it from the negative number with the same property.

In complex analysis, a branch of mathematics, a generalized continued fraction is a generalization of regular continued fractions in canonical form, in which the partial numerators and partial denominators can assume arbitrary complex values.

Approximations for the mathematical constant pi in the history of mathematics reached an accuracy within 0.04% of the true value before the beginning of the Common Era (Archimedes). In Chinese mathematics, this was improved to approximations correct to what corresponds to about seven decimal digits by the 5th century.

In mathematics, a quadratic equation is a polynomial equation of the second degree. The general form is

In the analytic theory of continued fractions, Euler's continued fraction formula is an identity connecting a certain very general infinite series with an infinite continued fraction. First published in 1748, it was at first regarded as a simple identity connecting a finite sum with a finite continued fraction in such a way that the extension to the infinite case was immediately apparent. Today it is more fully appreciated as a useful tool in analytic attacks on the general convergence problem for infinite continued fractions with complex elements.

In the metrical theory of regular continued fractions, the kth complete quotient ζk is obtained by ignoring the first k partial denominators ai. For example, if a regular continued fraction is given by

In mathematics, an infinite periodic continued fraction is a continued fraction that can be placed in the form

In mathematics, and more particularly in the analytic theory of regular continued fractions, an infinite regular continued fraction x is said to be restricted, or composed of restricted partial quotients, if the sequence of denominators of its partial quotients is bounded; that is

In complex analysis, a Padé table is an array, possibly of infinite extent, of the rational Padé approximants

In complex analysis, Gauss's continued fraction is a particular class of continued fractions derived from hypergeometric functions. It was one of the first analytic continued fractions known to mathematics, and it can be used to represent several important elementary functions, as well as some of the more complicated transcendental functions.

The square root of 5 is the positive real number that, when multiplied by itself, gives the prime number 5. It is more precisely called the principal square root of 5, to distinguish it from the negative number with the same property. This number appears in the fractional expression for the golden ratio. It can be denoted in surd form as:

The Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction is a continued fraction discovered by Rogers (1894) and independently by Srinivasa Ramanujan, and closely related to the Rogers–Ramanujan identities. It can be evaluated explicitly for a broad class of values of its argument.

In mathematics, a rational number is a number such as -3/7 that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction p/q of two integers, a numerator p and a non-zero denominator q. Every integer is a rational number: for example, 5 = 5/1. The set of all rational numbers, often referred to as "the rationals", the field of rationals or the field of rational numbers is usually denoted by a boldface Q ; it was thus denoted in 1895 by Giuseppe Peano after quoziente, Italian for "quotient".

In mathematics, an infinite expression is an expression in which some operators take an infinite number of arguments, or in which the nesting of the operators continues to an infinite depth. A generic concept for infinite expression can lead to ill-defined or self-inconsistent constructions, but there are several instances of infinite expressions that are well-defined.

In mathematics, the Śleszyński–Pringsheim theorem is a statement about convergence of certain continued fractions. It was discovered by Ivan Śleszyński and Alfred Pringsheim in the late 19th century.

In mathematics, infinite compositions of analytic functions (ICAF) offer alternative formulations of analytic continued fractions, series, products and other infinite expansions, and the theory evolving from such compositions may shed light on the convergence/divergence of these expansions. Some functions can actually be expanded directly as infinite compositions. In addition, it is possible to use ICAF to evaluate solutions of fixed point equations involving infinite expansions. Complex dynamics offers another venue for iteration of systems of functions rather than a single function. For infinite compositions of a single function see Iterated function. For compositions of a finite number of functions, useful in fractal theory, see Iterated function system.

## References

• Jones, William B.; Thron, W. J. (1980), , 11, Reading. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ISBN   0-201-13510-8
• Oskar Perron, Die Lehre von den Kettenbrüchen, Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, NY 1950.
• H. S. Wall, Analytic Theory of Continued Fractions, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., 1948 ISBN   0-8284-0207-8