Corrine Sparks

Last updated

Corrine Sparks
Born
Loon Lake, Nova Scotia
Nationality Canadian
Alma mater
Occupations
  • Lawyer
  • Judge
Years active1979—2021
Known for
  • First black woman judge in Canada
  • First black judge in Nova Scotia

Corrine Sparks is a Canadian judge. She was the first Black Canadian woman to become a judge in Canada, and the first black judge in the province of Nova Scotia. [1] Her decision in the case R v S (RD) , which was controversially overturned on appeal, was later upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada in a leading decision on reasonable apprehension of bias.

Contents

Education

Sparks is from the area around Loon Lake, Nova Scotia, which is a historically racially segregated community. [2] She was descended both from Black Loyalists and from Black Refugees to Nova Scotia. [3] In 1971 Sparks matriculated at Mount Saint Vincent University, where she majored in economics with the intention of being a history teacher. [2] While Sparks was a student, she volunteered as a probation officer at the Department of Justice, and took a summer job with the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission. [2] This legal experience prompted her to consider attending law school, and she was accepted to The Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University, where in a class of 120 incoming students she was one of only 3 African Nova Scotians and the only black woman. [2] Sparks graduated with an LLB degree in 1979. [2] [4]

After graduating from Dalhousie Law School, Sparks entered private legal practice in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, where she worked in family law. [5] The practice that Sparks ran with Helen Foote was the first all-female law firm in Nova Scotia. [2]

In 2001, Sparks returned to Dalhousie Law School to obtain an LL.M degree. [3] Her Masters Thesis studied the relocation and compensation of residents of Halifax's Africville, [4] and was called The Construction and Deconstruction of Africville: A Case for Reparation. [2]

Career

On March 27, 1987, Sparks was appointed to the family court of Halifax, which made her the first black woman appointed to the Bench, and the first black judge in Nova Scotia. [6] [5] J. Michael MacDonald, the Chief Justice of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court, has noted that at the time of Sparks's appointment, the Canadian court system was slowly becoming more representative of local communities under the relatively new Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms . [6]

In 1995, Sparks heard the case R v S (RD), in which a 15-year old black teenager was accused of hitting a police officer with his bicycle while the officer was attempting to arrest another person. [1] Sparks acquitted the defendant, and in her decision she explicitly appealed to the "prevalent attitude of the day" as social context relevant to the ruling. [1] The legal scholars Allan C. Hutchinson and Kathleen Strachan later summarized Sparks's specific finding in the case as follows: the police officer in question was acting in a context in which police officers have been known to overreact while dealing with non-white people, and certain claims by the defendant were believable in context, with the consequence that the Crown had not discharged its evidentiary burden to prove that all of the alleged offenses had occurred beyond a reasonable doubt. [7] The Crown appealed Sparks's decision, focusing their case on the possible apprehension of bias, asserting that as a black Nova Scotian Sparks may have been biased towards the black Nova Scotian defendant. [1] The motivation for this appeal caused substantial controversy, particularly since the allegation of bias was directed against the first black woman to be a judge in Canada, who was also at that time the only black female judge in Nova Scotia, as well as the most senior woman and only racialized minority judge in the province's family court bench. [8] The appeal was initially successful, and Sparks's decision was overturned by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, but the case was taken up by the Supreme Court of Canada who in 1997 reversed the decision by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal and restored Sparks's original decision. [8] This appeal and the Supreme Court's rejection of it have been studied for their implications of bias in the Canadian justice system, and how they affect the reasonable apprehension of bias. The political scientist Shanti Fernando wrote that the appeal against Sparks assumed two things: first that to observe the existence of systemic racial bias in the legal system is to violate judicial impartiality, and second that judges are more sympathetic to defendants of the same ethnicity. [9] Hutchinson and Strachan wrote that the case functions "as a springboard" for understanding the connection between a judge's interpretation and their identity in their legal decision-making. [7] Judges have subsequently argued that the absence of similar official accusations of bias against white judges does not signify that white judges have never been biased towards white defendants, but rather demonstrates a depth of bias against non-white people in the Canadian justice system at the time. [6]

During her career as a lawyer and as a judge, Sparks has worked on the question of ensuring equity in Canadian law. In 1993, Sparks served on the Gender Equality Task Force of the Canadian Bar Association. [5] Sparks has also taught with the Commonwealth Judicial Education Institute, [5] where she has conducted social context training. [10]

Sparks was a 2015 inductee of the Bertha Wilson Honour Society, which recognises alumni of the Schulich School of Law, in honour of Bertha Wilson, the first woman on the Ontario Court of Appeal and the first female Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. [11] Sparks has also received the Lillian Fish Award from the National Association of the Women and the Law, as well as awards from the Elizabeth Fry Society, the Canadian Bar Association, and The Congress of Black Women. [11]

After more than 34 years on the Bench, Sparks retired on December 31, 2021. [12]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Schulich School of Law</span> Law school, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

The Schulich School of Law is the law school of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Founded in 1883 as Dalhousie Law School, it is the oldest university-based common law school in Canada. It adopted its current name in October 2009 after receiving a $20-million endowment from Canadian businessman and philanthropist Seymour Schulich.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario is the appellate court for the province of Ontario, Canada. The seat of the court is Osgoode Hall in downtown Toronto.

Claire L'Heureux-Dubé is a retired Canadian judge who served as a puisne justice on the Supreme Court of Canada from 1987 to 2002. She was the first woman from Quebec and the second woman appointed to this position, after Bertha Wilson. Previously, she had been one of the first woman lawyers to handle divorce cases, and was the first woman appointed as a judge to the Quebec Superior Court and the Quebec Court of Appeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bertha Wilson</span> First woman judge on Supreme Court of Canada

Bertha Wernham Wilson was a Canadian jurist and the first female puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. Before her ascension to Canada's highest court, she was the first female associate and partner at Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt and the first woman appointed to the Court of Appeal for Ontario. During her time at Osler, she created the first in-firm research department in the Canadian legal industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nova Scotia Supreme Court</span> Superior court in the province of Nova Scotia

The Nova Scotia Supreme Court is a superior court in the province of Nova Scotia.

<i>R v S (RD)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

R v. S (RD), [1997] 3 SCR 484, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision which established rules governing reasonable apprehension of judicial bias in the court system and the consideration of social context, such as systemic racism, when rendering judgement. The accused was defended by Burnley "Rocky" Jones of Halifax, Nova Scotia.

The court system of Canada is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. In the courts, the judiciary interpret and apply the law of Canada. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nova Scotia Court of Appeal</span>

The Court of Appeal for Nova Scotia is the highest appeal court in the province of Nova Scotia, Canada. There are currently 8 judicial seats including one assigned to the Chief Justice of Nova Scotia. At any given time there may be one or more additional justices who sit as supernumerary justices. The court sits in Halifax, which is the capital of Nova Scotia. Cases are heard by a panel of three judges. They publish approximately 80 cases each year.

<i>Doucet-Boudreau v Nova Scotia (Minister of Education)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Doucet-Boudreau v Nova Scotia [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3, 2003 SCC 62, was a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which followed the Nova Scotia Supreme Court's finding that a delay in building French language schools in Nova Scotia violated the claimants' minority language educational rights under section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This finding led to an important debate regarding the scope of section 24(1) of the Charter, which provides for remedies for those whose rights are infringed, and the applicability of the common law doctrine of functus officio. While the Supreme Court of Canada split on what constitutes an appropriate usage of section 24(1), the majority favoured a section 24(1) with broad, flexible capabilities.

<i>Mackeigan v Hickman</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Mackeigan v Hickman, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 796 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on judicial independence. The Court unanimously held that to require a federal judge to explain his or her decisions would violate the principle of judicial independence.

<i>Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 SCR 817 is a leading Canadian administrative law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court provided guidance on the standard of judicial review of administrative decisions. The issue was what standard of procedural fairness should be applied when considering the judicial review of the waiver of the requirement that applications for permanent residence be filed from abroad. The case also clarified the need for written reasons in some administrative decisions.

Constance Rachelle Glube, was the 21st Chief Justice of Nova Scotia and first female Chief Justice in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black Nova Scotians</span> Black Canadians descended from American slaves, black Indigenous people, or freemen

Black Nova Scotians are Black Canadians whose ancestors primarily date back to the Colonial United States as slaves or freemen, later arriving in Nova Scotia, Canada, during the 18th and early 19th centuries. As of the 2021 Census of Canada, 28,220 Black people live in Nova Scotia, most in Halifax. Since the 1950s, numerous Black Nova Scotians have migrated to Toronto for its larger range of opportunities. The first recorded free African person in Nova Scotia, Mathieu da Costa, a Mikmaq interpreter, was recorded among the founders of Port Royal in 1604. West Africans escaped slavery by coming to Nova Scotia in early British and French Colonies in the 17th and 18th centuries. Many came as enslaved people, primarily from the French West Indies to Nova Scotia during the founding of Louisbourg. The second major migration of people to Nova Scotia happened following the American Revolution, when the British evacuated thousands of slaves who had fled to their lines during the war. They were given freedom by the Crown if they joined British lines, and some 3,000 African Americans were resettled in Nova Scotia after the war, where they were known as Black Loyalists. There was also the forced migration of the Jamaican Maroons in 1796, although the British supported the desire of a third of the Loyalists and nearly all of the Maroons to establish Freetown in Sierra Leone four years later, where they formed the Sierra Leone Creole ethnic identity.

R v Marshall [1999] 3 S.C.R. 456 and R v Marshall [1999] 3 S.C.R. 533 are two decisions given by the Supreme Court of Canada on a single case regarding a treaty right to fish.

David G. Coles, is a Canadian lawyer. He received his B.A. from Dalhousie University in 1981. He then received his LL.B. in 1984, also from Dalhousie. He was admitted to the Nova Scotia Bar in 1985.

Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24 (1980), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that individuals who bribed a judge for an injunction were not protected by judicial immunity and therefore could be held liable for the damages resulting from the injunction.

Sylvia D. Hamilton is a Canadian filmmaker, writer, poet, and artist. Based in Grand Pre, Nova Scotia, her work explores the lives and experiences of people of African descent. Her special focus is on African Nova Scotians, and especially women. In particular, her work takes the form of documentary films, writing, public presentations, teaching, mentoring, extensive volunteer work and community involvement. She has uncovered stories of struggles and contributions of African Canadians and introduced them to mainstream audiences. Through her work, she exposes the roots and the presence of systemic racism in Canada. She aims to provide opportunities for Black and Indigenous youth through education and empowerment.

Cecily Y. Strickland is a justice with the Federal Court of Canada. Before her appointment she was a lawyer at the firm Stewart McKelvey in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador. She is a graduate of the Marine Institute of Memorial University of Newfoundland and Dalhousie Law School, now known as Schulich School of Law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in law in Canada</span>

Women work in the legal profession and related occupations throughout Canada, as lawyers, prosecutors, judges, legal scholars, law professors and law school deans. In Canada, while 37.1% of lawyers are women, "50% ...said they felt their [law] firms were doing "poorly" or "very poorly" in their provision of flexible work arrangements". It was also reported that, in 2006 in Ontario, "racialized women accounted for 16% of all lawyers under 30" and that only 1% of lawyers were Aboriginal.

<i>Bula Ltd v Tara Mines Ltd</i> (No 6) Irish Supreme Court case

Bula Ltd v Tara Mines Ltd [2000] IESC 15; [2000] 4 IR 412 is a reported Irish Supreme Court case in which the court considered the test for objective bias in Ireland. During this case the Supreme Court considered:

  1. whether Supreme Court has jurisdiction to set aside its own previous order;
  2. whether an appellant must show real likelihood of bias or whether reasonable apprehension of bias suffices; and
  3. whether a prior relationship of legal advisor and client would disqualify a judge.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Tattrie, Jon (5 February 2017). "How a 'national crisis' showed the value of black judges". CBC. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Corrine Sparks (LLB '79)". Dalhousie Law School. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  3. 1 2 "Unique installation honours women from all walks of life". Mount Saint Vincent University. 7 March 2016. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  4. 1 2 "African Heritage Month Narratives". Government of Nova Scotia. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Judicial educators in profile" (PDF). Commonwealth Judicial Education Institute Newsletter. Vol. 5, no. 1. Commonwealth Judicial Education Institute. June 1999. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  6. 1 2 3 MacDonald, J. Michael (28 February 2018). "Broadening Our Perspectives" (PDF). Court of Nova Scotia. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  7. 1 2 Hutchinson, Allan C. (1998). "What's the Difference? Interpretation, Identity and R. v. R.D.S.". Dalhousie Law Journal. 21 (1): 219–235.
  8. 1 2 Thornhill, Esmeralda M. A. (January 2008). "So Seldom for Us, So Often Against Us: Blacks and Law in Canada". Journal of Black Studies. 38 (3): 321–337.
  9. ↑ Fernando, Shanti (1 November 2011). Race and the City: Chinese Canadian and Chinese American Political Mobilization. University of British Columbia Press. p. 37. ISBN   0774840234.
  10. ↑ "Celebrating Ten Years - A Retrospective" (PDF). Commonwealth Judicial Education Institute Newsletter. Vol. 10, no. 4. Commonwealth Judicial Education Institute. December 2004. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  11. 1 2 "Bertha Wilson Honour Society 2015 Inductees". Schulich School of Law. 2019. Retrieved 12 May 2020.
  12. ↑ "First African Nova Scotian appointed to Nova Scotia judiciary set to retire Friday". CBC News. 30 December 2021. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.