Cultural burning

Last updated

Cultural burning is the process of using prescribed burns to manage landscapes, a process used primarily by Indigenous peoples; more specifically the Indigenous people of Australia and the Western parts of North America [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] have been found to use this method extensively. This practice created a relationship between the land and the people so strong that the local flora became dependent on patterned burnings. The practice then elevated the Indigenous peoples of their respected environments to a keystone species status as the interspecies connections strengthened over time, [8] [7] which is partially why Indigenous people still manage 40-60% of all ecological reserves.

Contents

Besides the ecological function there is also the cultural aspect. Species most adapted to the burns are also ones most used by the Indigenous peoples, such as California Black Oak. [2] Lands historically occupied by Indigenous peoples have become attuned to this process of low frequent burns, but all environment are not adjusted to this management. [7]

Benefits

A study done was done in Western Australia that looked into different fire management strategies and how they influence an endangered plant species known as the Backwater grevillea. They compared the different effects of current fire suppression strategies, cultural burning and wildfires on this species. From their results they concluded the cultural burning was the best management style for the conservation of this species. [7] But besides just benefitting this species they also noticed it had a greater effect in slowing the spread and occurrence of wildfires in the area benefitting other plant species and people as well. Incorporating cultural burning was also found to have a secondary benefit to the local communities. Returning the Indigenous peoples' connection to the land created an opportunity for knowledge and kinship of local plants to be restored. This was due to the close studying done on the plants to find out what intensity of fire best suited their growth patterns. What the authors concluded as to why this management method proved more effective is that current fire management strategies are to generalized and do not take into account on site ecosystem relations and services. When the people working on the site have a spiritual connection to it they know how the ecosystem will respond to the fire and can better control its trajectory. [7]

In California fire was an integral part to how the Indigenous population managed the land. It has been shown that areas managed using Indigenous practices had created forests that were open and had a mixed stand of tree species. With lower fuel levels the understory could host a diverse number of plants species. This in turn increased the forests' resistance to drought and fire with the smoke from the small regular fires even decreasing pests and pathogen levels in the forests leading to a healthier tree stand. [6] Without fire, California forests are now experiencing and over-densification of conifer trees which crowd out understory species and hinder the success rate of Black Oak saplings. Due to the lack of diversity these forest are then more susceptible to drought and can create huge forest fires as the fuel builds up.

Today some groups are currently working to bring back cultural burns to Californias forests in order to create healthier forests and reduce wildfires. The North Fork Mono Tribe and Sierra National forests have been implementing a 3 stage process designed in turn with other local tribes in 2015. The first stage was to remove as many invasive species, small conifers, and fuel sources as you could from a site before conducting an initial burn to reduce the fuel level even further. In the second stage they would then try and remove as many large conifers as possible focusing around the black oaks followed by another burn. In the final stage they would prune and trim the Black Oaks to encourage a tree shape that would have existed prior to the conifers' take over. This would be followed by another low intensity burn. The tribe then planned to keep up management practices with routine burns and smoking the trees regularly to deter pests. [6] The Plumas National Forest has been working with The Greenville Rancheria to incorporate prescribed burns for the purpose of maintaining an open understory and conserving Black Oak forests. They hope to use the site for gathering acorns, cultural activities and the development of cultural items using saplings. These restoration efforts are extremely important as they not only improve the environments' resilience to climate change but also grant more opportunities to tribes and low income communities as they now have more ecological services and cultural benefits.

Many Indigenous populations still depend on gathering and foraging to engage in their cultural practices and to live a life of self subsistence. As many tribes in California have been forced to live on small reservations having a productive forests nearby is necessary to keep their traditions and way of life alive. However due to the lack of fire and the over-densification of forests finding the plants needed to make medicines or cultural materials can be difficult or impossible to find. Suppressing the ability of these tribes to carry out cultural burns eventually leads to the forests providing less of its cultural ecosystem services. Eventually these tribes will be unable to perform their cultural activities as they can no longer connect to the land in the same way their ancestors did. With Black Oaks being forced to compete with conifer trees they are forced to grow taller and narrower when in the past they would have low branches extending for 30–40 ft. On these low branches children would run and play while their family could easily gather everything they needed. [6] Ron Reed, a member of the Karuk Tribe from Northern California, has explained the importance of having access to these vital resources: “You can give me all the acorns in the world, you can get me all the fish in the world, you can get me everything for me to be an Indian, but it will not be the same unless I'm going out and processing, going out and harvesting, gathering myself. I think that really needs to be put out in mainstream society, that it's not just a matter of what you eat. It's about the intricate values that are involved in harvesting these resources, how we manage for these resources and when.” [6]

10 Common Questions Related to Wildfire Management (Figure1): [5]

(1) Are the effects of fire exclusion overstated? If so, are treatments unwarranted and even counterproductive?Broad-scale evidence of fire exclusion is strong across disciplines and western forest ecosystems. Although high severity fire was a component of many historical fire regimes, the frequency and extent of high severity fire over the past few decades is outside the range of historical range of variabilityHessburg et al. (2005), Reynolds et al. (2013), Stine et al. (2014), Safford and Stevens (2017), Stephens et al. (2020), Hagmann et al. (2021)
(2) Is forest thinning alone sufficient to mitigate wildfire hazard?Thinning alone can sometimes mitigate fire severity, but through residual logging slash, desiccation of understory fuels, and increased surface wind flow without accompanying surface fuel reduction, thinning can contribute to high-intensity surface fires and abundant mortalityStephens et al. (2009), Fulé et al. (2012), Martinson and Omi (2013), Kalies and Yocom Kent (2016)
(3) Can forest thinning and prescribed burning solve the problem?Although thinning and prescribed burning have been shown to be highly effective, not all forests are appropriate for this treatment (e.g., thin-barked species common in cold mixed-conifer forests). This type of fuel treatment is also not appropriate for wilderness and other roadless areasDellaSala et al. (2004), Battaglia and Shepperd (2007), Reinhardt et al. (2008)
(4) Should active forest management, including forest thinning, be concentrated in the wildland urban interface (WUI)?The majority of designated WUI is in private ownership and hence these lands are sometimes more difficult to treat than public lands. Treating dry and moist mixed-conifer forests beyond WUI buffers can modify fire behavior and change the intensity of wildfires arriving at communitiesKolden and Brown (2010), Bladon (2018), Hallema et al. (2018), Kolden and Henson (2019), Schultz et al. (2019)
(5) Can wildfires on their own do the work of fuel treatments?Unplanned fires that escape suppression often burn under extreme fire weather and can have severe wildfire effects. In contrast, prescribed burns and managed wildfires generally burn under more moderate weather conditions and contribute to variable fire effects and surface fuel reduction that can mitigate future wildfire severityMiller and Safford (2012), Parks et al. (2015a, 2016), Prichard et al. (2017), Stevens et al. (2017), Kane et al. (2019), Huffman et al. (2020), Rodman et al. (2020)
(6) Is the primary objective of fuel reduction treatments to assist in future firefighting response and containment?Although fuel reduction treatments can assist in suppression operations, primarily using fuel treatments to suppress future wildfires actually contributes to wildland fire deficit. Adaptive treatments in fire-adapted landscapes aim to restore the patch to landscape role of fire as an ecological process, reduce fire effects and need for aggressive suppression when the fire next occursReinhardt et al. (2008), Safford et al. (2012), Stephens et al. (2020)
(7) Do fuel treatments work under extreme fire weather?Fire behavior associated with persistent drought, high winds and column-driven spread are associated with higher burn severity in western North American forests. However, strong scientific evidence across dry and moist mixed conifer forests demonstrates effectiveness at mitigating burn severity, often even under extreme fire weather conditionsArkle et al. (2012), Yocom-Kent et al. (2015), Povak et al. (2020), Prichard et al. (2020)
(8) Is the scale of the problem too great? Can we ever catch up?The current pace and scale of treatments is decidedly inadequate to restore fire-resilient and climate adapted landscapes. However, evidence strongly supports that expanded use of fuel reduction treatments can be effectiveCollins et al. (2009), North et al. (2012), Parks et al. (2015a, 2016), Ager et al. (2016), Barros et al. (2018), Liang et al. (2018)
(9) Will planting more trees mitigate climate change in wNA forests?Temperate rainforests and other wet forests have the capacity to store and sequester high amounts of forest carbon. However, planting to increase tree density and continuity in fire-prone forests is unsustainable due to high fire danger, anticipated climatic water deficits and drought stressThompson et al. (2007), Veldman et al. (2019), Holl and Brancalion (2020)
(10) Is post-fire management needed or even ecologically justified?Active forest and fuels management may be required beyond the initial fire response in order to promote future forest resilience to disturbance and climate change. Due to fire exclusion, uncharacteristically dense patches of dead trees may contribute to high-severity reburns as they fall and create heavy surface fuel accumulationsPeterson et al. (2015), Lydersen et al. (2019a), North et al. (2019)

Figure 1 comes from an article discussing the climate adaptation strategies currently being taken in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. During their research they worked to answer these 10 questions to determine if fire treatments are a valid adaptation strategy. From their research they concluded that pre-emptive burns have been proven to be effective and largely call for an increase of these efforts and a more habitual management strategy to follow these prescribed burns. Cultural burns need to occur regularly and can be used to adapt to the microclimates in order to improve its effectiveness. [6]

Fire in the Pacific Northwest has been shown to help beargrass populations as well. Low severity fires have been proven to benefit the low elevation species of this grass by increasing the overall biomass in the region. [4] While there was no effect on seedling establishment with the low severity method, high severity fires showed an increasing in seed germination and establishment. It was also found that for bear grass to grow long enough to produce basket making leaves there must be one every 20 years. This is to keep down on shrub encroachment while giving the time for the perennial grass to grow a deep root structure. [4]

Native Americans of the olympic peninsula in Washington have been known to manage their ecosystems in favor of beneficial plants like the Bear Grass which is used for basket weaving. This method of management was a form of cultural burning that maintained the savannah and wetland prairie system of the peninsula's low land environments.In 2008 it was found that after the suppression of these burns the area has since been forested by Douglas Firs with a decrease in the Bear Grass population. [4]

Source 5:Integrating Biophysical and Eco-Cultural Fire Processes in Canada’s Parks and Protected Areas [3]

Wildfires are an integral ecological process in Canada as well. They play a key role in stabilizing the region's various vegetation communities from grasslands and prairies to conifer and deciduous forests. [3] The cause of these wildfires are still disputed with Canadian forest fire researchers still declaring lightning strikes the cause not believing the Indigenous population capable of creating large scale fires. However there is evidence showing the Indigenous population used fires to change their ecosystem and decrease fuel load to lessen the severity of natural wildfires. In 2004 fire suppression methods were used to control the majority of Canada's wildfires. This would involve monitoring the weather, fuel, and topographic data of the region to predict when and where a lightning strike could occur, and where it could travel once igniting. If these methods did not work they would log or thin parts of forests near communities. Recently efforts have been undertaken by the Canada Parks system to incorporate prescribed burns. What they have found is a reduction in wildfire intensity in parks using prescribed burns though they did uncover some problems. In area with prescribed burns and a high herbivore population experience negative effects regarding in sapling occurrence. The solution was to start the fires more infrequently as to give the plants time to recover from the herbivore grazing. The study recognized from this and many other examples the restoring fire requires a holistic ecosystem restoration. That in order to have a successful management you must take into account the varying biospheres at play and the long-term human element and how we used to contribute to our local environments [3]

More recently 2022 has shown unprecedented wildfires in Australia and which bring into question the current management strategies of the countries Forest Managers. To date the management service has focused on a fire suppression model in all cases. This resulted in a build up in fuel on the forest floor that could not be cleared manually. Not to mention the increase of tree cover and density which reduced the coverage of more fire resilient ecosystems. Looking at traces of pollen in Australia soils during the precolonial and modern eras Mariani, Michela, et al found that the landscape in the precolonial era were composed of 51% herbs and grasses, 15% tree cover, and 34% shrub cover. This is in stark contrast to today where the landscape is composed of 35% herbs and grasses, 48% tree cover, and 17% shrub cover. [2] Allowing tree cover to dominate expand in western Australia has resulted in greater intensity and frequency of wildfire. The reason for the expansion of these forests is credited to the suppression of cultural burns conducted by the indigenous population of Australia.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chaparral</span> Shrubland plant community in western North America

Chaparral is a shrubland plant community found primarily in California, in southern Oregon and in the northern portion of the Baja California Peninsula in Mexico. It is shaped by a Mediterranean climate and infrequent, high-intensity crown fires.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Savanna</span> Mixed woodland-grassland ecosystem

A savanna or savannah is a mixed woodland-grassland ecosystem characterised by the trees being sufficiently widely spaced so that the canopy does not close. The open canopy allows sufficient light to reach the ground to support an unbroken herbaceous layer consisting primarily of grasses. There exists four savanna forms; savanna woodland where trees and shrubs form a light canopy, tree savanna with scattered trees and shrubs, shrub savanna with distributed shrubs, and grass savanna where trees and shrubs are mostly nonexistent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Longleaf pine</span> Species of plant (tree)

The longleaf pine is a pine species native to the Southeastern United States, found along the coastal plain from East Texas to southern Virginia, extending into northern and central Florida. In this area it is also known as "yellow pine" or "long leaf yellow pine", although it is properly just one out of a number of species termed yellow pine. It reaches a height of 30–35 m (98–115 ft) and a diameter of 0.7 m (28 in). In the past, before extensive logging, they reportedly grew to 47 m (154 ft) with a diameter of 1.2 m (47 in). The tree is a cultural symbol of the Southern United States, being the official state tree of Alabama. This particular species is one of the eight pine tree species that falls under the "Pine" designation as the state tree of North Carolina.

<i>Bromus tectorum</i> Species of grass

Bromus tectorum, known as downy brome, drooping brome or cheatgrass, is a winter annual grass native to Europe, southwestern Asia, and northern Africa, but has become invasive in many other areas. It now is present in most of Europe, southern Russia, Japan, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Iceland, Greenland, North America and western Central Asia. In the eastern US B. tectorum is common along roadsides and as a crop weed, but usually does not dominate an ecosystem. It has become a dominant species in the Intermountain West and parts of Canada, and displays especially invasive behavior in the sagebrush steppe ecosystems where it has been listed as noxious weed. B. tectorum often enters the site in an area that has been disturbed, and then quickly expands into the surrounding area through its rapid growth and prolific seed production.

<i>Pinus elliottii</i> Species of conifer tree

Pinus elliottii, commonly known as slash pine, is a conifer tree native to the Southeastern United States. Slash pine is named after the "slashes" – swampy ground overgrown with trees and bushes – that constitute its habitat. Other common names include swamp pine, yellow slash pine, and southern Florida pine. Slash pine has two different varieties: P. e. var. elliottii and P. e. var. densa. Historically, slash pine has been an important economic timber for naval stores, turpentine, and resin. The wood of slash pine is known for its unusually high strength, especially for a pine. It exceeds many hardwoods and is even comparable to very dense woods such as black ironwood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Controlled burn</span> Technique to reduce potential fuel for wildfire through managed burning

A controlled or prescribed (Rx) burn is the practice of intentionally setting a fire to change the assemblage of vegetation and decaying material in a landscape. The purpose could be for forest management, ecological restoration, land clearing or wildfire fuel management. A controlled burn may also refer to the intentional burning of slash and fuels through burn piles. Controlled burns may also be referred to as hazard reduction burning, backfire, swailing or a burn-off. In industrialized countries, controlled burning regulations and permits are usually overseen by fire control authorities.

This glossary of wildfire terms is a list of definitions of terms and concepts relevant to wildfires and wildland firefighting. Except where noted, terms have largely been sourced from a 1998 Fireline Handbook transcribed for a Conflict 21 counter-terrorism studies website by the Air National Guard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fire ecology</span> Study of fire in ecosystems

Fire ecology is a scientific discipline concerned with the effects of fire on natural ecosystems. Many ecosystems, particularly prairie, savanna, chaparral and coniferous forests, have evolved with fire as an essential contributor to habitat vitality and renewal. Many plant species in fire-affected environments use fire to germinate, establish, or to reproduce. Wildfire suppression not only endangers these species, but also the animals that depend upon them.

Fire-stick farming, also known as cultural burning and cool burning, is the practice of Aboriginal Australians regularly using fire to burn vegetation, which has been practised for thousands of years. There are a number of purposes for doing this special type of controlled burning, including to facilitate hunting, to change the composition of plant and animal species in an area, weed control, hazard reduction, and increase of biodiversity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wildfire suppression</span> Firefighting tactics used to suppress wildfires

Wildfire suppression is a range of firefighting tactics used to suppress wildfires. Firefighting efforts depend on many factors such as the available fuel, the local atmospheric conditions, the features of the terrain, and the size of the wildfire. Because of this wildfire suppression in wild land areas usually requires different techniques, equipment, and training from the more familiar structure fire fighting found in populated areas. Working in conjunction with specially designed aerial firefighting aircraft, fire engines, tools, firefighting foams, fire retardants, and using various firefighting techniques, wildfire-trained crews work to suppress flames, construct fire lines, and extinguish flames and areas of heat in order to protect resources and natural wilderness. Wildfire suppression also addresses the issues of the wildland–urban interface, where populated areas border with wild land areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yellowstone fires of 1988</span> Natural event in Yellowstone National Park, United States

The Yellowstone fires of 1988 collectively formed the largest wildfire in the recorded history of Yellowstone National Park in the United States. Starting as many smaller individual fires, the flames quickly spread out of control due to drought conditions and increasing winds, combining into several large conflagrations which burned for several months. The fires almost destroyed two major visitor destinations and, on September 8, 1988, the entire park was closed to all non-emergency personnel for the first time in its history. Only the arrival of cool and moist weather in the late autumn brought the fires to an end. A total of 793,880 acres (3,213 km2), or 36 percent of the park, burned at varying levels of severity.

Prior to the European colonization of the Americas, indigenous peoples used fire to modify the landscape. This influence over the fire regime was part of the environmental cycles and maintenance of wildlife habitats that sustained the cultures and economies of the Indigenous peoples of the Americas. What was initially perceived by colonists as "untouched, pristine" wilderness in North America was the cumulative result of the indigenous use of fire, creating a mosaic of grasslands and forests across North America, sustained and managed by the peoples indigenous to the landscape.

A fire regime is the pattern, frequency, and intensity of the bushfires and wildfires that prevail in an area over long periods of time. It is an integral part of fire ecology, and renewal for certain types of ecosystems. A fire regime describes the spatial and temporal patterns and ecosystem impacts of fire on the landscape, and provides an integrative approach to identifying the impacts of fire at an ecosystem or landscape level. If fires are too frequent, plants may be killed before they have matured, or before they have set sufficient seed to ensure population recovery. If fires are too infrequent, plants may mature, senesce, and die without ever releasing their seed.

Wildfire suppression in the United States has had a long and varied history. For most of the 20th century, any form of wildland fire, whether it was naturally caused or otherwise, was quickly suppressed for fear of uncontrollable and destructive conflagrations such as the Peshtigo Fire in 1871 and the Great Fire of 1910. In the 1960s, policies governing wildfire suppression changed due to ecological studies that recognized fire as a natural process necessary for new growth. Today, policies advocating complete fire suppression have been exchanged for those who encourage wildland fire use, or the allowing of fire to act as a tool, such as the case with controlled burns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forest restoration</span>

Forest restoration is defined as "actions to re-instate ecological processes, which accelerate recovery of forest structure, ecological functioning and biodiversity levels towards those typical of climax forest", i.e. the end-stage of natural forest succession. Climax forests are relatively stable ecosystems that have developed the maximum biomass, structural complexity and species diversity that are possible within the limits imposed by climate and soil and without continued disturbance from humans. Climax forest is therefore the target ecosystem, which defines the ultimate aim of forest restoration. Since climate is a major factor that determines climax forest composition, global climate change may result in changing restoration aims. Additionally, the potential impacts of climate change on restoration goals must be taken into account, as changes in temperature and precipitation patterns may alter the composition and distribution of climax forests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation in British Columbia</span>

Deforestation in British Columbia has resulted in a net loss of 1.06 million hectares of tree cover between the years 2000 and 2020. More traditional losses have been exacerbated by increased threats from climate change driven fires, increased human activity, and invasive species. The introduction of sustainable forestry efforts such as the Zero Net Deforestation Act seeks to reduce the rate of forest cover loss. In British Columbia, forests cover over 55 million hectares, which is 57.9% of British Columbia's 95 million hectares of land. The forests are mainly composed of coniferous trees, such as pines, spruces and firs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Complex early seral forest</span> Type of ecosystem present after a major disturbance

Complex early seral forests, or snag forests, are ecosystems that occupy potentially forested sites after a stand-replacement disturbance and before re-establishment of a closed forest canopy. They are generated by natural disturbances such as wildfire or insect outbreaks that reset ecological succession processes and follow a pathway that is influenced by biological legacies that were not removed during the initial disturbance. Complex early seral forests develop with rich biodiversity because the remaining biomass provides resources to many life forms and because of habitat heterogeneity provided by the disturbances that generated them. In this and other ways, complex early seral forests differ from simplified early successional forests created by logging. Complex early seral forest habitat is threatened from fire suppression, thinning, and post-fire or post-insect outbreak logging.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pyrogeography</span> Study of the distribution of wildfires

Pyrogeography is the study of the past, present, and projected distribution of wildfire. Wildland fire occurs under certain conditions of climate, vegetation, topography, and sources of ignition, such that it has its own biogeography, or pattern in space and time. The earliest published evidence of the term appears to be in the mid-1990s, and the meaning was primarily related to mapping fires The current understanding of pyrogeography emerged in the 2000s as a combination of biogeography and fire ecology, facilitated by the availability of global-scale datasets of fire occurrence, vegetation cover, and climate. Pyrogeography has also been placed at the juncture of biology, the geophysical environment, and society and cultural influences on fire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fire adaptations</span> Traits of plants and animals

Fire adaptations are traits of plants and animals that help them survive wildfire or to use resources created by wildfire. These traits can help plants and animals increase their survival rates during a fire and/or reproduce offspring after a fire. Both plants and animals have multiple strategies for surviving and reproducing after fire. Plants in wildfire-prone ecosystems often survive through adaptations to their local fire regime. Such adaptations include physical protection against heat, increased growth after a fire event, and flammable materials that encourage fire and may eliminate competition.

The relationships between fire, vegetation, and climate create what is known as a fire regime. Within a fire regime, fire ecologists study the relationship between diverse ecosystems and fire; not only how fire affects vegetation, but also how vegetation affects the behavior of fire. The study of neighboring vegetation types that may be highly flammable and less flammable has provided insight into how these vegetation types can exist side by side, and are maintained by the presence or absence of fire events. Ecologists have studied these boundaries between different vegetation types, such as a closed canopy forest and a grassland, and hypothesized about how climate and soil fertility create these boundaries in vegetation types. Research in the field of pyrogeography shows how fire also plays an important role in the maintenance of dominant vegetation types, and how different vegetation types with distinct relationships to fire can exist side by side in the same climate conditions. These relationships can be described in conceptual models called fire–vegetation feedbacks, and alternative stable states.

References

  1. ↑ 391) Enrique Salmón: Ancestral foodways that enrich local landscapes, 2023-03-16, retrieved 2023-05-07
  2. 1 2 3 Mariani, Michela; Connor, Simon E; Theuerkauf, Martin; Herbert, Annika; Kuneš, Petr; Bowman, David; Fletcher, Michael-Shawn; Head, Lesley; Kershaw, A Peter; Haberle, Simon G; Stevenson, Janelle; Adeleye, Matthew; Cadd, Haidee; Hopf, Feli; Briles, Christy (June 2022). "Disruption of cultural burning promotes shrub encroachment and unprecedented wildfires". Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 20 (5): 292–300. Bibcode:2022FrEE...20..292M. doi: 10.1002/fee.2395 . ISSN   1540-9295. S2CID   246891908.
  3. 1 2 3 4 White, Clifford A.; Perrakis, Daniel D. B.; Kafka, Victor G.; Ennis, Timothy (April 2011). "Burning at the Edge: Integrating Biophysical and Eco-Cultural Fire Processes in Canada's Parks and Protected Areas". Fire Ecology. 7 (1): 74–106. Bibcode:2011FiEco...7a..74W. doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0701074 . ISSN   1933-9747. S2CID   56127392.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Shebitz, D. J.; Reichard, S. H.; Dunwiddie, P. W. (2009-09-01). "Ecological and Cultural Significance of Burning Beargrass Habitat on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington". Ecological Restoration. 27 (3): 306–319. doi:10.3368/er.27.3.306. ISSN   1522-4740. S2CID   85275224.
  5. 1 2 Prichard, Susan J.; Hessburg, Paul F.; Hagmann, R. Keala; Povak, Nicholas A.; Dobrowski, Solomon Z.; Hurteau, Matthew D.; Kane, Van R.; Keane, Robert E.; Kobziar, Leda N.; Kolden, Crystal A.; North, Malcolm; Parks, Sean A.; Safford, Hugh D.; Stevens, Jens T.; Yocom, Larissa L. (December 2021). "Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions". Ecological Applications. 31 (8): e02433. Bibcode:2021EcoAp..31E2433P. doi:10.1002/eap.2433. ISSN   1051-0761. PMC   9285930 . PMID   34339088.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Long, Jonathan W.; Goode, Ron W.; Gutteriez, Raymond J.; Lackey, Jessica J.; Anderson, M. Kat (2017-09-15). "Managing California Black Oak for Tribal Ecocultural Restoration". Journal of Forestry. 115 (5): 426–434. doi: 10.5849/jof.16-033 . ISSN   0022-1201.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 McKemey, Michelle; Banbai Rangers, The; Patterson, Maureen (Lesley); Hunter, John; Ridges, Malcolm; Ens, Emilie; Miller, Cara; Costello, Oliver; Reid, Nick (2021-08-12). "Indigenous cultural burning had less impact than wildfire on the threatened Backwater grevillea (". International Journal of Wildland Fire. 30 (10): 745–756. doi: 10.1071/WF20135 . ISSN   1049-8001. S2CID   238682062.
  8. ↑ Lindenmayer, David; Bowd, Elle (September 2022). "Cultural burning, cultural misappropriation, over-simplification of land management complexity, and ecological illiteracy". Ecological Management & Restoration. 23 (3): 205–208. Bibcode:2022EcoMR..23..205L. doi:10.1111/emr.12564. ISSN   1442-7001. S2CID   252515024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.