Customary international humanitarian law

Last updated

Customary international humanitarian law is a body of unwritten rules of public international law, which govern conduct during armed conflict.

Contents

Customary international law

Customary international law, like international treaty law, is recognized as a primary source of public international law. While international treaties are written agreements by which States establish certain rules, customary international law consists of unwritten rules which derive from “general practice accepted as law”. [1] Therefore, for a rule of international custom to be established, two elements are required: “an objective one, the repeated behaviour of States ... and a subjective one, the belief that such behaviour depends on a legal obligation ( opinio juris sive necessitatis )”. [2] The objective element is also often referred to as State practice; the subjective element as opinio juris.

International humanitarian law

International humanitarian law (IHL), also known as the law of war or the law of armed conflict, is the area of public international law which aims, “for humanitarian reasons, to limit the effects of armed conflict. It protects persons who are not or are no longer participating in the hostilities and restricts the means and methods of warfare”. [3]

War is as old as mankind and so, in a sense, is IHL. Behaviour during armed conflict “has always been subject to certain principles and customs”, based on the practices of armies around the world. [3] Since the mid-19th century, however, many such rules have been codified by States in international treaties, like the Hague Regulations and Geneva Conventions. [4] Not withstanding this increasing codification of IHL, customary rules remain relevant in contemporary armed conflicts.

Current relevance

Customary international humanitarian law complements the protection provided by international humanitarian treaty law in situations of armed conflict. International treaty law only binds States which are party to a particular treaty; customary international law, on the other hand, is, in general, binding on all States. And while some international humanitarian law treaties, such as the 1949 Geneva Conventions, are today universally ratified, this is not the case for all treaties. [4] Here, customary international humanitarian law can be used to fill gaps in the protection provided in situations of armed conflict.

Furthermore, many of today's armed conflicts do not take place between States but are of a non-international character. International humanitarian treaty law, however, while highly detailed as regards international armed conflicts, is considerably less developed in relation to non-international armed conflicts. Here, again, customary international humanitarian law provides further rules which are not stated in conventions.

In 2005, mandated by the States convened at the 26th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, and after nearly 10 years of research and consultation, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) presented a Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law, published by Cambridge University Press. [5] Volume I of the study contains 161 rules assessed by the authors of the Study to be of customary status, most of them applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. Volume II presents the practice which forms the basis of the conclusions in Volume I.

Since August 2010, an online version of the Study, the ICRC's Customary IHL Database, is also available. Part One of the database reflects Volume I of the print edition of the study. Part Two, based on Volume II of the print edition, presents what the authors believe is state practice relating to most aspects of IHL, purportedly expressed in national legislation, military manuals, official statements, and case-law, and the practice of other entities such as international organizations and international courts and tribunals. Part Two is updated regularly through a joint project of the ICRC and the British Red Cross Society, based at the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge.

This Study has been the subject of serious criticism, in light of controversial ways used for identifying customary humanitarian law. One criticism has been that "Although the Study’s introduction describes what is generally an appropriate approach to assessing State practice, the Study frequently fails to apply this approach in a rigorous way," and that "the Study tends to merge the practice and opinio juris requirements into a single test." [6] Professor Yoram Dinstein was very critical of the Study. He wrote that "as regards international armed conflicts, the Study clearly suffers from an unrealistic desire to show that controversial provisions of API are declaratory of customary international law... By overreaching, I think that the Study has failed its primary mission." [7]

ICRC's customary international humanitarian law database

A database of International Committee of the Red Cross' Customary IHL Study, developed in association with the British Red Cross, was launched by the International Committee of the Red Cross in August 2011. [8] It is designed to be used as a legal reference in international and non-international armed conflicts, including by courts, tribunals and international organizations. [9]

The database is updated on a regular basis. A selection of national practice of 30 countries was added in March 2011 followed by an additional 27 countries in November of the same year. On 13 December 2012, the ICRC made available its updated collection and analysis of what it considers practice from 23 countries [10] – Argentina, Bangladesh, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Djibouti, El Salvador, Guatemala, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Serbia, Serbia and Montenegro, Senegal, Spain, Switzerland, Uruguay, and Viet Nam.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement</span> International humanitarian movement

The organized International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement is a humanitarian movement with approximately 16 million volunteers, members, and staff worldwide. It was founded to protect human life and health, to ensure respect for all human beings, and to prevent and alleviate human suffering. Within it there are three distinct organisations that are legally independent from each other, but are united within the movement through common basic principles, objectives, symbols, statutes, and governing organisations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">War crime</span> Individual act constituting a violation of the laws of war

A war crime is a violation of the laws of war that gives rise to individual criminal responsibility for actions by combatants in action, such as intentionally killing civilians or intentionally killing prisoners of war, torture, taking hostages, unnecessarily destroying civilian property, deception by perfidy, wartime sexual violence, pillaging, and for any individual that is part of the command structure who orders any attempt to committing mass killings including genocide or ethnic cleansing, the granting of no quarter despite surrender, the conscription of children in the military and flouting the legal distinctions of proportionality and military necessity.

A civilian is a person not a member of an armed force nor a person engaged in hostilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of war</span> International regulations of warfare

The law of war is the component of international law that regulates the conditions for initiating war and the conduct of hostilities. Laws of war define sovereignty and nationhood, states and territories, occupation, and other critical terms of law.

A reprisal is a limited and deliberate violation of international law to punish another sovereign state that has already broken them. Since the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, reprisals in the laws of war are extremely limited, as they commonly breach the rights of non-combatants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-combatant</span> Person who does not take a direct part in hostilities during war

Non-combatant is a term of art in the law of war and international humanitarian law to refer to civilians who are not taking a direct part in hostilities; persons, such as combat medics and military chaplains, who are members of the belligerent armed forces but are protected because of their specific duties ; combatants who are placed hors de combat; and neutral persons, such as peacekeepers, who are not involved in fighting for one of the belligerents involved in a war. This particular status was first recognized under the Geneva Conventions with the First Geneva Convention of 1864.

International humanitarian law (IHL), also referred to as the laws of armed conflict, is the law that regulates the conduct of war. It is a branch of international law that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict by protecting persons who are not participating in hostilities and by restricting and regulating the means and methods of warfare available to combatants.

Customary international law is an aspect of international law involving the principle of custom. Along with general principles of law and treaties, custom is considered by the International Court of Justice, jurists, the United Nations, and its member states to be among the primary sources of international law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protocol I</span> 1977 amendment protocol to the Geneva Convention

Protocol I is a 1977 amendment protocol to the Geneva Conventions concerning the protection of civilian victims of international war, such as "armed conflicts in which peoples are fighting against colonial domination, alien occupation or racist regimes". In practice, Additional Protocol I updated and reaffirmed the international laws of war stipulated in the Geneva Conventions of 1949 to accommodate developments of warfare since the Second World War (1937–1945).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seville Agreement</span>

The Seville Agreement was an agreement drafted by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement in 1997 to specify which Red Cross entity would take the lead role in different scenarios.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Committee of the Red Cross</span> Humanitarian institution based in Geneva, Switzerland

The International Committee of the Red Cross is a humanitarian organization based in Geneva, Switzerland, and is a three-time Nobel Prize Laureate. The organization has played an instrumental role in the development of rules of war and promoting humanitarian norms.

The Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts Project is an initiative of the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights to support the application and implementation of the international law of armed conflict.

The International Institute of Humanitarian Law (IIHL) is an independent, “non-profit, humanitarian association having social values as its objectives”, founded in 1970 in Sanremo, Italy. Its headquarters are situated in Villa Ormond, while a liaison office of the Institute is established in Geneva, Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Explosive weapon</span> Explosive used as a weapon

An explosive weapon is a weapon that uses an explosive to project blast and/or fragmentation from a point of detonation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geneva Conventions</span> International treaties of war

The Geneva Conventions are international humanitarian laws consisting of four treaties and three additional protocols that establish international legal standards for humanitarian treatment in war. The singular term Geneva Convention usually denotes the agreements of 1949, negotiated in the aftermath of the Second World War (1939–1945), which updated the terms of the two 1929 treaties and added two new conventions. The Geneva Conventions extensively define the basic rights of wartime prisoners, civilians and military personnel; establish protections for the wounded and sick; and provide protections for the civilians in and around a war-zone.

The growing number of disasters and their humanitarian impacts has prompted the need for a framework that addresses the responsibilities of states and humanitarian agencies in disaster settings. This has led to the emergence of international disaster response laws, rules and principles (IDRL): a collection of international instruments addressing various aspects of post-disaster humanitarian relief. The IDRL of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) examines the legal issues and frameworks associated with disaster response with particular emphasis on international humanitarian assistance. The IDRL Programme seeks to promote the use of the IDRL Guidelines and support national Red Cross societies in improving legal preparedness for natural disasters in order to reduce human vulnerability.

The HPCR Manual on International Law Applicable to Air and Missile Warfare was formulated by a multi-year project that was set up to restate the existing international laws applicable to air and missile warfare. The project was created in 2003 by the Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research at Harvard University (HPCR) after consulting with scholars and governmental experts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Restoring Family Links</span> Services provided by the Red Cross and Red Crescent movement

Restoring Family Links (RFL) is a program of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, more specifically the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies involving activities that aim to prevent separation and disappearance, look for missing persons, restore and maintain contact between family members and clarify the fate of persons reported missing. The activities are carried out by the components of the RFL is sometimes also referred to as family tracing.

The Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the use of Incendiary Weapons is a United Nations treaty that restricts the use of incendiary weapons. It is Protocol III to the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed To Be Excessively Injurious Or To Have Indiscriminate Effects. Concluded in 1981, it entered into force on 2 December 1983. As of January 2023, it had been ratified by 126 state parties.

In international humanitarian law and international criminal law, an indiscriminate attack is a military attack that fails to distinguish between legitimate military targets and protected persons. Indiscriminate attacks strike both legitimate military and protected objects alike, thus violating the principle of distinction between combatants and protected civilians. They differ from direct attacks against protected civilians and encompass cases in which the perpetrators are indifferent as to the nature of the target, cases in which the perpetrators use tactics or weapons that are inherently indiscriminate, and cases in which the attack is disproportionate, because it is likely to cause excessive protected civilian casualties and damages to protected objects.

References

  1. ↑ Article 38(1)(b), Statute of the International Court of Justice
  2. ↑ Tullio Treves, ‘Customary International Law’, in R. Wolfrum (Ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online edition), Oxford University Press, 2008.
  3. 1 2 ICRC, What is International Humanitarian Law, Legal Fact Sheet.
  4. 1 2 ICRC, International Humanitarian Law – Treaties & documents.
  5. ↑ J.-M. Henckaerts and L. Doswald-Beck (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law, 2 Volumes, Volume I: Rules, Volume II: Practice (Cambridge University Press & ICRC, 2005).
  6. ↑ Bellinger, John B. III; Haynes, William J. II (June 2007). "A US government response to the International Committee of the Red Cross study Customary International Humanitarian Law" (PDF). International Review of the Red Cross. 89: 444, 446.
  7. ↑ Dinstein, Yoram (2006). "The ICRC Customary International Law Study". International Law Studies. 82: 110.
  8. ↑ Customary Law database from the International Committee of the Red Cross and Red Crescent
  9. ↑ New legal database launched to enhance protection for war victims from the International Committee of the Red Cross and Red Crescent
  10. ↑ "ICRC database on customary international humanitarian law: new update of State practice - ICRC". www.icrc.org. 2012-12-11. Retrieved 2019-06-07.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.