Cyber Quest

Last updated

Cyber Quest is an annual U.S. Army event held at Fort Eisenhower in which participants assess new technologies against documented Cyberspace, Electronic Warfare (EW), and Signal operational requirements. Cyber Quest is sponsored by the Cyber Battle Laboratory (CBL) of the Cyber Center of Excellence (CCOE)

Contents

Military planners use the event results to analyze current capability development, doctrine writing efforts, and DOTMLPF.

Experimentation Focus

1. Repeatable/Annual Event

2. Led by the Cyber Center of Excellence (CCoE), but with support from the larger Community of Interest (CoI)

a. Operational force, Institutional, Industry, and Academia

3. Prototyping Experiment with Operational Construct/Wrapper

a. Assess emerging technologies against documented (CARR approved) Cyber/EW capability requirements
b. Inform current capability development & doctrine, as well as understand DOTMLPF impacts.
c. Enables early risk mitigation for Army acquisition and capability development of candidate solutions before participating in larger Army/Joint exercises and experiments (i.e. AWA, AEWE, JUICE, and NIE)
d. Focused at BDE TOC (IBCT)
e. Use of Live, Constructed, and Virtual Environments to simulate and stimulate
f. Use of national and local Cyber Ranges

4. Use of an Experimentation Force (EXFOR) for operational context

5. No Fear of Failure (Sandbox) to encourage innovation and cross vendor-collaboration

Cyber Quest Benefits

1. True Operational requirements

a. Requirements articulated by TRADOC Capability Manager (TCM) and then (GOSC) CARR OPT approved
b. These are the top critical challenges facing the force - Not a science experiment

2. No fear of failure – encourage innovation

a. Not expected to be ready for prime time
b. Determine art-of-the-possible
c. Time and ability to mature solutions

3. Flexibility to achieve collaboration

a. Acquisition/requirements/PM community collaboration with vendors

4. Operationally Focused Event

a. Operational needs experimented within an operational environment - not a simple demo in a hotel conference room
b. Visibility to Command and Control (C2) systems and capabilities necessary to implement/integrate solutions
c. Ability to refine TTPs/CONOPS against an operational "like" environment with near-peer threat
d. Acquisition/requirement community efficiency and cost savings

2016 Focus Areas

1. Integration of Cyber and Electronic Warfare Situational Awareness (SA) capabilities

a. Identify mature vendor solutions that demonstrate a capability to converge Cyber and EW User Defined Operational Pictures (UDOPs) to provide commanders a holistic view of the CEM environment
b. Explore the concept of using tactical radios as sensors to provide input to the CEM SA tools
c. Understand DOTMLPF implications of using a CEM SA tools
d. Inform Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures of the CEMA cell

2. Demonstrate tactical radios as Electronic Warfare solutions;

a. Tactical handheld radios that can operate from 200 – 2500 MHz
b. Tactical radios that have anti-jamming capabilities;
c. Tactical radios that automatically discover and operate in unused portions of the electromagnetic spectrum
d. Tactical radios capable of directing antenna energy to avoid jamming
e. Tactical radios capable of (near) silent operation

[1] [2]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electromagnetic warfare</span> Combat involving electronics and directed energy

Electromagnetic warfare or electronic warfare (EW) is warfare involving the use of the electromagnetic spectrum or directed energy to control the spectrum, attack an enemy, or impede enemy operations. The purpose of electromagnetic warfare is to deny the opponent the advantage of—and ensure friendly unimpeded access to—the EM spectrum. Electromagnetic warfare can be applied from air, sea, land, or space by crewed and uncrewed systems, and can target communication, radar, or other military and civilian assets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Strategic Command</span> Unified combatant command based in Nebraska

The United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) is one of the eleven unified combatant commands in the United States Department of Defense. Headquartered at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, USSTRATCOM is responsible for strategic nuclear deterrence, global strike, and operating the Defense Department's Global Information Grid. It also provides a host of capabilities to support the other combatant commands, including integrated missile defense; and global command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR). This command exists to give "national leadership a unified resource for greater understanding of specific threats around the world and the means to respond to those threats rapidly".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Army Command, Control, Communication, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Center</span> Military unit

The Combat Capabilities Development Command (CCDC) C5ISR Center, formerly the Communications-Electronics RD&E Center (CERDEC), is the United States Army information technologies and integrated systems center. CCDC C5ISR Center is headquartered at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, with activities at Fort Belvoir in Virginia and Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey.

The Rapid Equipping Force (REF) was a United States Army organization headquartered in Fort Belvoir, Virginia. The organization was charged with quickly providing Army units deployed globally with innovative government off-the-shelf and commercially available solutions that address urgent requirements within 180 days or less. The REF was able to do this through unique authorities and by maintaining a presence near the point of need. REF personnel were positioned in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Kuwait and mobile laboratories are available for quick solutions. Additionally, the REF empowered the Army at a grassroots level, enabling individual soldiers to communicate needs directly through simple request forms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asymmetric Warfare Group</span> Military unit

The Asymmetric Warfare Group was a United States Army unit created during the War on Terrorism to mitigate various threats with regard to asymmetric warfare. The unit was headquartered at Fort Meade, Maryland and had a training facility at Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia. The unit provided the linkage between Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) and the operational Army, and reported directly to the commanding general of TRADOC.

A program executive officer, or PEO, is one of a few key individuals in the United States military acquisition process. As can be seen from the examples below, a program executive officer may be responsible for a specific program, or for an entire portfolio of similar programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center</span> Direct reporting unit of the United States Air Force responsible for test and evaluation

Located at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center is a direct reporting unit of Headquarters, United States Air Force. It is the Air Force independent test agency responsible for testing, under operationally realistic conditions, new systems being developed for Air Force and multi-service use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine Corps Communication Electronics School</span> Military unit

Marine Corps Communication-Electronics School (MCCES) is the Marine Corps training ground for the majority of the communications and air/ground electronic maintenance Military Occupational Specialties (MOS). MCCES is based at the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California.

DOTMLPF is an acronym for doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, and facilities. It is used by the United States Department of Defense and was defined in the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System, or JCIDS Process as the framework to design what administrative changes and/or acquisition efforts would fill a capability need required to accomplish a mission. Because combatant commanders define requirements in consultation with the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), they are able to consider gaps in the context of strategic direction for the total US military force and influence the direction of requirements earlier in the acquisition process, in particular, materiel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operational Test and Evaluation Force</span> U.S. Navy organization for operational testing and evaluation

The Operational Test and Evaluation Force (OPTEVFOR) is an independent and objective agency within the United States Navy for the operational testing and evaluation (OT&E) of naval aviation, surface warfare, submarine warfare, C4I, cryptologic, and space systems in support Navy and Department of Defense acquisition programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David J. Dorsett</span>

David John "Jack" Dorsett is a corporate vice president for cyber and C4 at Northrop Grumman, and a retired vice admiral of the U.S. Navy. He was the first Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Dominance and 63rd Director of Naval Intelligence. He served as the Director of Intelligence, Joint Chiefs of Staff from 2005 to 2008 prior to assuming his position on the Chief of Naval Operations staff.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fleet Electronic Warfare Center</span> Echelon IV component of the U.S. Navy

The Fleet Electronic Warfare Center (FEWC) is a subordinate organization of the Naval Network Warfare Command (NNWC), which was established in 2008 to be the center for US Navy fleet electronic warfare (EW) operational and tactical issues. It is currently located at Navy Information Dominance Forces (NIDF) Headquarters, in Suffolk, VA as an independent directorate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PM WIN-T</span> Military unit

PM WIN-T is a component of Program Executive Office Command, Control and Communications-Tactical in the United States Army. PM WIN-T has been absorbed into PM Tactical Networks as Product Manager for Mission Networks.

The Information Warfare Directorate of the Royal Australian Air Force's Air Warfare Centre (AWC) is the Australian Defence Force's central institution dealing with tactical information warfare.

A battle lab or battle laboratory is an organization dedicated to studying changes in the military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joint Deployable Analysis Team</span>

The Joint Deployable Analysis Team (JDAT) is part of the J6 Directorate of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federated Mission Networking</span>

Federated Mission Networking (FMN) is a significant initiative to help ensure interoperability and operational effectiveness of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, it is a key contribution to the Connected Forces Initiative, helping Allied and Partner forces to better communicate, train and operate together. This includes the NATO Command Structure as well as the NATO Force Structure. The purpose of FMN is ultimately to support Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) and decision-making in operations by enabling a rapid instantiation of mission networks. Including the NATO Command Structure, 37 nations have joined the FMN initiative as so called "FMN Affiliates" and work together under the FMN Framework Process to coordinate the design, development and delivery of operational and technical capabilities required to conduct net-centric operations. Each development increment is referred to as an "FMN Spiral". The respective requirements, architecture, standards, procedural and technical instructions are documented in so called "FMN Spiral Specifications". FMN Spiral Specifications are based on well known standards and best practices, hence supported by most off-the-shelf products and vendor neutral. TACOMS standards and profiles specify a common, technology and topology independent network interoperability layer for federated mission networks. There is also a rolling 10-year FMN Spiral Specification Roadmap of the envisioned future capabilities. At the same time, the Coalition Interoperability Assurance and Validation (CIAV) process ensures that current interoperability issues are being identified and fed back into FMN capability development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Army Futures Command</span> United States Army acquisition command

The United States Army Futures Command (AFC) is a United States Army command that runs modernization projects. It is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Joint All-Domain Command and Control or JADC2 is the concept that the Department of Defense has developed to connect sensors from all branches of the armed forces into a § unified network powered by artificial intelligence. These branches include the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy, as well as Space Force.

The US Army's Integrated Tactical Network (ITN) "is not a new or separate network but rather a concept"—PEO C3T. Avoid overspecifying the requirements for Integrated Tactical Network Information Systems Initial Capabilities Document. Instead, meet operational needs, such as interoperability with other networks, and release ITN capabilities incrementally.

References

  1. "Cyber Quest looks to blend cyber with electronic warfare -- Defense Systems". defensesystems.com. Retrieved 2016-04-13.
  2. "Cyber Quest - Federal Business Opportunities: Opportunities". www.fbo.gov. Retrieved 2016-04-13.