Deepan Budlakoti

Last updated

Deepan Budlakoti (born 17 October 1989) is an Ottawa-born man best known for Canada's refusal to acknowledge him as a citizen. [1] His case, supported by numerous human rights organizations and a modest mobilization of public support, was heard by several Canadian courts, and has captured domestic and international attention. Since Budlakoti does not hold any citizenship, [2] his case raises questions of citizenship, statelessness and deportation. [3]

Contents

Background

Budlakoti was born on 17 October 1989 in Ottawa, Ontario, to Indian nationals who had been employed at the Indian High Commission. [4] Section 3(2) of the Citizenship Act states that children of diplomats and their staff, when born in Canada, are not entitled to Canadian citizenship. [5] The Government of Canada alleged that, at the time of Budlakoti's birth, his parents were working as cleaning staff at the High Commission; [6] Budlakoti contended that his parents had left that job several months before. [7] After his birth, Budlakoti was issued with an Ontario birth certificate and subsequently two Canadian passports. [8] In 1992, Budlakoti's parents applied for permanent residency, listing Budlakoti as a dependent. The application was accepted. [9]

In late 2010, Budlakoti was convicted for weapons trafficking, firearm possession and cocaine trafficking, and sentenced to three years in prison. [10] [1] The Justice for Deepan Support Committee, which worked with Budlakoti to raise awareness about the case, raised money for escalating legal fees, and put political pressure on elected officials to reverse the decision, contends that Budlakoti was entrapped by an undercover police officer, and that Budlakoti pleaded guilty due to the high legal fees. [11]

While Budlakoti was in prison, Citizenship and Immigration Canada determined that he was not and had never been a Canadian citizen, and thus was inadmissible to Canada on the basis of section 36(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act , [1] [12] and issued a removal order accordingly. [13] Budlakoti was released in 2012 while awaiting judicial review of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada's decision. As a result, he lost all other corresponding Canadian identification, leaving him unable to work, access health care, exercise the full extent of his mobility rights, or live alone. [14]

At trial

In June 2014, Budlakoti's case was heard before the Federal Court. He argued that his section 7 Charter rights to life, liberty and security of the person were violated. In fall 2014, the Federal Court dismissed his application for judicial review, holding that "[t]he fact that passports were issued to the Applicant is not, in this case, determinative of citizenship". [15] The court found that issuing a declaration of citizenship would fall outside the court's authority. [16] The court dismissed Budlakoti's section 7 Charter argument, finding that "denial of citizenship is not synonymous with deportation", [17] and that "the denial of state funded health care does not violate s 7", per Chaoulli v Quebec (AG) . [18] [ needs update ]

Budlakoti appealed to the Federal Court of Appeal, where the appeal was dismissed. The court held that he was not stateless, per the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness , since he could still "take steps to apply for citizenship in India and in Canada" [19] through the general citizenship application process, or by invoking the "special and unusual hardship" rule in the Citizenship Act. [20] The court found that he had not yet availed himself of either of these procedures in Canada or in India. [21] Budlakoti argued that the then-Minister of Citizenship, Chris Alexander, was biased, as a spokesperson for Alexander had previously denounced Budlakoti as a "criminal". [22] The court rejected this argument, finding that if Budlakoti applied under the "special and unusual hardship" rule, the hardship would be "determinative... [and] neither the Minister nor his officials have commented on that issue". [23]

A request for leave for appeal to the Supreme Court was denied in January 2016. [1] [ needs update ]

Issues

This case is unique and has attracted international attention. Amnesty International has condemned the Canadian government's actions, [24] arguing that, as a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness , [25] Canada should "act to reduce statelessness and uphold the right to a nationality". [24]

Criminal activity

On 8 November 2017, charges were announced against Deepan Budlakoti and five others, for gun trafficking, possessing the proceeds of crime, breaching a gun ban and drug trafficking. The investigation was conducted by the Ontario Provincial Police's organized crime enforcement bureau and Ottawa and Gatineau police. [26] [ needs update ]

Related Research Articles

In international law, a stateless person is someone who is "not considered as a national by any state under the operation of its law". Some stateless people are also refugees. However, not all refugees are stateless, and many people who are stateless have never crossed an international border. At the end of 2022, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees estimated 4.4 million people worldwide as either stateless or of undetermined nationality, 90,800 (+2%) more than at the end of 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jeremy Hinzman</span> American deserter and Iraq War resister

Jeremy Dean Hinzman is an Iraq War resister who was the first American deserter to seek refugee status in Canada.

<i>Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143 is the first Supreme Court of Canada case to deal with the equality rights provided under Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. British law graduate Mark David Andrews challenged the validity of Section 42 of the Barristers and Solicitors Act contending that the Canadian citizenship requirement for being called to the bar violated Section 15 of the Charter.

In law, an alien is any person who is not a citizen or a national of a specific country, although definitions and terminology differ to some degree depending upon the continent or region. More generally, however, the term "alien" is perceived as synonymous with foreign national.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oath of Citizenship (Canada)</span>

The Oath of Citizenship, or Citizenship Oath, is a statement recited and signed by those who apply to become citizens of Canada. Administered at a ceremony presided over by a designated official, the oath is a promise or declaration of fealty to the Canadian monarch and a promise to abide by Canada's laws and uphold the duties of a Canadian citizen; upon signing the oath, citizenship is granted to the applicant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immigration Act 1971</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Immigration Act 1971 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom concerning immigration and nearly entirely remaking the field of British immigration law. The Act, as with the Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962, and that of 1968, restricts immigration, especially primary immigration into the UK. It introduced the concept of patriality or right of abode. It was also partly passed to legally clarify the rights of Commonwealth citizens within the United Kingdom in preparation for membership of the European Communities (EC) in which the United Kingdom would become a member state from 1 January 1973. It was coincidentally the same day which the Act came into full legal force which gave not only new automatic rights to EC member state citizens but would also give them priority over non-EC citizens under the obligations of the Treaty of Rome, of which the UK become a signatory though the Treaty of Accession, signed on 22 January 1972. In relation to deportation notices, the Act is referenced at sections 11 and 23 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

The Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) is an economics-oriented publishing and education centre based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mohamed Harkat</span>

Mohamed Harkat is a native-born Algerian and permanent resident of Canada who was arrested in 2002 on suspicion of ties to terrorism and was imprisoned under security certificates. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) alleged that he entered the country as a sleeper agent for al-Qaeda.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian passport</span> Passport issued to citizens of Canada

A Canadian passport is the passport issued to citizens of Canada. It enables the bearer to enter or re-enter Canada freely; travel to and from other countries in accordance with visa requirements; facilitates the process of securing assistance from Canadian consular officials abroad, if necessary; and requests protection for the bearer while abroad.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Canadian nationality law</span> History of citizenship in Canada

The history of Canadian nationality law dates back over three centuries, and has evolved considerably over that time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian immigration and refugee law</span>

Canadian immigration and refugee law concerns the area of law related to the admission of foreign nationals into Canada, their rights and responsibilities once admitted, and the conditions of their removal. The primary law on these matters is in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, whose goals include economic growth, family reunification, and compliance with humanitarian treaties.

<i>Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the areas of constitutional law and administrative law. The Court held that, under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in most circumstances the government cannot deport someone to a country where they risk being tortured, but refugee claimants can be deported to their homelands if they are a serious security risk to Canadians.

<i>Charkaoui v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Charkaoui v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of procedures for determining the reasonableness of a security certificate and for reviewing detention under a certificate. The Court held that the security certificate process, which prohibited the named individual from examining evidence used to issue the certificate, violated the right to liberty and habeas corpus under section 7, 9 and 10 of the Canadian Charter. The Court however rejected the appellant arguments that the extension of detentions violated the right against indefinite detention, that the differential treatment violated equality rights, and that the detention violated the rule of law. As remedy, the Court declared the "judicial confirmation of certificates and review of detention" to be of no force and effect, striking down articles 33 and 77 to 85 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, but suspended the ruling for one year.

<i>Al-Kateb v Godwin</i> 2004 decision of the High Court of Australia

Al-Kateb v Godwin, was a decision of the High Court of Australia, which ruled on 6 August 2004 that the indefinite detention of a stateless person was lawful. The case concerned Ahmed Al-Kateb, a Palestinian man born in Kuwait, who moved to Australia in 2000 and applied for a temporary protection visa. The Commonwealth Minister for Immigration's decision to refuse the application was upheld by the Refugee Review Tribunal and the Federal Court. In 2002, Al-Kateb declared that he wished to return to Kuwait or Gaza. However, since no country would accept Al-Kateb, he was declared stateless and detained under the policy of mandatory detention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lost Canadians</span>

Lost Canadians are individuals who have believed themselves to be Canadian citizens or to be entitled to citizenship, but who are not/were not officially considered citizens due to particular and often obscure aspects or interpretations of Canadian nationality law. Although these individuals had strong, undeniable connections to Canada, they were either never actually Canadian citizens throughout their entire life, or else had Canadian citizenship and lost it unknowingly through certain provisions of the Citizenship Act.

Helmut Oberlander was a naturalized Canadian citizen who was a member of the Einsatzgruppen death squads of Nazi Germany in the occupied Soviet Union during World War II. Oberlander was on the Simon Wiesenthal Center's list of most wanted Nazi war criminals. Beginning in 1994, the Government of Canada made several attempts to revoke Oberlander's citizenship on the basis of his misrepresenting his involvement with Nazi war crimes.

Zunera Ishaq is a Canadian Muslim woman living in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, who was at the centre of a debate about the right to wear a niqāb— a veil that covers most of the face—when taking the Oath of Citizenship at a public citizenship ceremony administered under the Citizenship Act, RSC 1985, c C-29, which became a point of controversy during the 2015 Canadian federal elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Relinquishment of United States nationality</span> Legal procedure to relinquish American citizenship

Under United States federal law, a U.S. citizen or national may voluntarily and intentionally give up that status and become an alien with respect to the United States. Relinquishment is distinct from denaturalization, which in U.S. law refers solely to cancellation of illegally procured naturalization.

Shamima Begum is a British-born woman who entered Syria to join the ISIS terrorist group at the age of 15 and was consequently stripped of UK citizenship. She lives in al-Roj detention camp in Syria.

<i>Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov</i> Canadian legal case

Canada v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that clarified the determination and application of standard of review in Canadian administrative law. Vavilov applies “a presumption that reasonableness is the applicable standard whenever a court reviews administrative decisions.”

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Deepan Budlakoti's appeal to be declared Canadian citizen dismissed by Supreme Court". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation . 28 January 2016. Retrieved 28 January 2016.
    - "Judgments in Leave Applications". LexUM . 28 January 2016. Retrieved 29 January 2016.
  2. ↑ "Editorial". Globe and Mail. 20 December 2012.
  3. ↑ "Deepan Budlakoti, Statelessness & Citizenship". Canadian Civil Liberties Association. March 2014. Archived from the original on 6 May 2015.
  4. ↑ Budlakoti v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 855, para 2, 17, 25.
    - "CCLA calls for recognition of Deepan Budlakoti's citizenship". Canadian Civil Liberties Association. 27 February 2015. Archived from the original on 6 August 2017. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
  5. ↑ Government of Canada Citizenship Act
  6. ↑ Koring, Paul (23 October 2011). "Would-be deportee pleads: 'I'm a Canadian'". Globe and Mail.
  7. ↑ 2014 FC 855, para 20.
  8. ↑ 2014 FC 855, para 2.
    - Duffy, Andrew (10 September 2014). "'Stateless' Ottawa-born man loses bid for citizenship". Ottawa Citizen . Retrieved 21 July 2017.
  9. ↑ Budlakoti v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FCA 139, para 4.
  10. ↑ 2014 FC 855, para 8.
  11. ↑ "Deepan's case gets attention in Europe". Justice for Deepan. Archived from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 28 January 2016.
  12. ↑ 2014 FC 855, para 4.
  13. ↑ 2014 FC 855, para 9.
  14. ↑ Bozinoff, Nikki; Goel, Ritika; Jones, Marcella; Shahid, Faraz Vahid (5 March 2015). "Canada made Deepan Budlakoti stateless, Now it is denying him health care". Rabble.
  15. ↑ 2014 FC 855, para 39.
  16. ↑ 2014 FC 855 at 29.
  17. ↑ 2014 FC 855, para 46.
  18. ↑ 2014 FC 855, para 47.
  19. ↑ 2015 FCA 139, paras 22–23.
  20. ↑ 2015 FCA 149, paras 52–54
  21. ↑ 2015 FCA 139, paras 55, 69.
  22. ↑ Keung, Nicholas (18 September 2013). "Canadian-born man faces deportation". Toronto Star . Retrieved 29 January 2016.
  23. ↑ 2015 FCA 139, para 66.
  24. 1 2 Neve, Alex (9 March 2015). "Nationality, Statelessness and the Case of Deepan Budlakoti". Amnesty International. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 28 January 2016.
  25. ↑ "Signatories to the International Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness". United Nations. Archived from the original on 25 March 2015.
  26. ↑ Gillis, Megan (9 November 2017). "Seven-month gun, drug-running probe suspects includes man in high-profile fight for citizenship". The Ottawa Citizen.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.