EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P.

EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 29, 2014
Full case name	EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P.
Citations	572 U.S. 489 ( more )
Holding
The CAA does not require that states be given a second opportunity to file a State Implementation Plan after the EPA has quantified interstate pollution obligations under a reasonable interpretation of the Good Neighbor Provision.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Antonin Scalia  · Anthony Kennedy Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
Majority	Ginsburg
Dissent	Scalia, joined by Thomas
Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Clean Air Act

EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 572 U.S. 489(2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Clean Air Act does not require that states be given a second opportunity to file a state implementation plan after the Environmental Protection Agency has quantified interstate pollution obligations under a reasonable interpretation of the Good Neighbor Provision. ^{[1] [2]}

References

1. EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 572 U.S. 489 (2014).
2. Denniston, Lyle (April 29, 2014). "Opinion analysis: Paying for blocking ill winds". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved November 10, 2025.

External links

• Text of EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 572 U.S. 489(2014) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .