EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime

Last updated

The EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Mechanism is a mechanism of the Council of the European Union to punish personnel from non-EU countries responsible for gross violations of human rights. Inspired by the Global Magnitsky Act in the US, the mechanism permits the EU to maintain a list of human rights violators around the globe, imposing on them various sanctions, such as visa bans or asset freezes, on behalf of the entire bloc. [1]

Contents

Background

In its history, the EU has on multiple occasions imposed sanctions on other countries for human rights violations. Some of the examples include an arm embargo imposed on China since 1989 for the Tiananmen Square Massacre, [2] or asset freezes on certain officials in Iran who repressed and tortured human right activists. [3] However, those were individual sanctions which only targeted particular countries. This approach of adopting a new sanction policy for each country has its limitations, such as the time required to go through the legislation process in the EU or the political implications the process may bring. [4]

In 2016, the US enacted the Global Magnitsky Act which allows the US government to impose sanctions on human right violators on a global scope. [5] Multiple countries, including several members of the EU, soon followed the US's lead and enacted similar legislations to crack down on foreign human right violations. Estonia passed a law in 2016 banning foreigners deemed guilty of human right abuse from entering the country. [6] Lithuania, [7] Latvia, [8] and the United Kingdom, [9] which was a member of the EU at that time, also followed suit and passed similar laws. Additionally, the Dutch parliament has on multiple occasions requested the Dutch government to initiate a similar legislation. However, the Dutch government refused and argued that such a legislation will be more effective if passed on the EU level, which led to the discussion of an EU level human rights sanction regime later. [10]

Developments

In late 2018, the Dutch government drafted a position paper named Towards An EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, in which it proposed an EU-level sanction regime as the title suggested. Following the proposal, the Dutch government invited representatives from all other EU member states to The Hague for discussion. [11] The European Parliament subsequently adopted a resolution regarding the proposed sanction regime on 14 March 2019, in which it called on the council to swiftly establish an EU-level human right sanction regime. The resolution also gave several suggestions regarding the regime, such as that it should symbolically carry Sergei Magnitsky’s name, and that an EU-level advisory committee may be set up to oversee the regime. [12]

On 9 December 2019, Josep Borrell, the EU High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, confirmed that the member states of the EU have reached a strong consensus on the proposed regime, and thus the European External Action Service will start to prepare the documentation for the sanction regime. [13]

After 6 months, the European Parliament passed a resolution regarding the Hong Kong national security law on 15 June 2020, in which it called for the council to finalise the preparatory work on the sanction regime, and to use the regime to impose sanctions on Chinese officials responsible for the Hong Kong national security legislation. [14]

On 22 March, 2021, sanctions were applied against a number of individuals and entities from China, Eritrea, Libya, North Korea, South Sudan and Russia. Among those targeted were Minister of State Security Jong Kyong-thaek and Minister of Social Security Ri Yong-gil allegedly for 'torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment' and executions by the police forces in North Korea. However, the impact of these sanction is thought to be minimal to North Korea and that the sanctions were driven by external factors, instead of any situations inside the DPRK. [15]

Reasons for Implementation

A faster and more flexible process

At the present time, the procedure required to impose an EU sanction on an individual are complex and long, and is thus usually only utilized when a major event involving violent conflict or democratic backsliding occurred. Under an article in the Lisbon Treaty [ which? ]concerning terrorism, any measures of freezing funds or assets must be adopted by the Council and the European Parliament through the normal legislative procedure. In contrast, the new sanction framework, albeit not yet finalized, can provide a more simple procedure to blacklist human right violators without having to adopt a new legislation every time. [16]

Avoidance of unintended negative effect

All the previous sanctions imposed by the EU in the past, except the terrorism list, are all state-based sanctions. In contrast, the new sanction regime will be individual-based. While state-based sanctions may induce a deterrent effect on countries guilty of human rights violations, they may also unintendedly affect the social rights and the quality of life of innocent civilians living in the targeted state. For example, a trade ban targeted at a third country can significantly disrupt the distribution of food and sanitation supplies to vulnerable groups such as the poor or women, but the oppressive elites in the targeted state may be able to maintain their quality of life as they usually enjoy considerable wealth. This may also diminish the effectiveness of sanctions as the elites may be unaffected by them. Therefore, a sanction regime targeting individuals instead of states can avoid the unintended adverse impact on innocent civilians, while also being more effective in applying pressure to the personnel responsible for the human rights violations. [17]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic sanctions</span> Financial penalties applied by nations

Economic sanctions are commercial and financial penalties applied by states or institutions against states, groups, or individuals. Economic sanctions are a form of coercion that attempts to get an actor to change its behavior through disruption in economic exchange. Sanctions can be intended to compel or deterrence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States sanctions</span> Trade restrictions levied by the United States government

United States sanctions are financial and trade restrictions imposed against individuals, entities, and jurisdictions whose actions contradict U.S. foreign policy or national security goals. Financial sanctions are primarily administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), while export controls are primarily administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).

Privacy law is the body of law that deals with the regulating, storing, and using of personally identifiable information, personal healthcare information, and financial information of individuals, which can be collected by governments, public or private organisations, or other individuals. It also applies in the commercial sector to things like trade secrets and the liability that directors, officers, and employees have when handling sensitive information.

The Financial Sanctions Unit of the Bank of England formerly administered financial sanctions in the United Kingdom on behalf of HM Treasury. It was in operation since before 1993, when it applied sanctions against the Government of Libya. More recently, since Libya became an ally of the United Kingdom, sanctions have been applied against those who allegedly fought against the Government of Libya at the time it was not an ally. Responsibility for the administration of Financial Sanctions in the UK transferred from the Bank of England to HM Treasury on 24 October 2007. In April 2016 HM Treasury set up the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation, a new body whose mission is to "provide a high-quality service to the private sector, working closely with law enforcement to help ensure that financial sanctions are properly understood, implemented and enforced."

There have been a number of international sanctions against Iran imposed by a number of countries, especially the United States, and international entities. Iran was the most sanctioned country in the world until it was surpassed by Russia, following Russia's invasion of neighboring Ukraine in February 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 2011

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 was a measure adopted unanimously by the UN Security Council on 26 February 2011. It condemned the use of lethal force by the government of Muammar Gaddafi against protesters participating in the Libyan Civil War, and imposed a series of international sanctions in response.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magnitsky Act</span> 2012 United States federal law

The Magnitsky Act, formally known as the Russia and Moldova Jackson–Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012, is a bipartisan bill passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama in December 2012, intending to punish Russian officials responsible for the death of Russian tax lawyer Sergei Magnitsky in a Moscow prison in 2009 and also to grant permanent normal trade relations status to Russia.

International sanctions are political and economic decisions that are part of diplomatic efforts by countries, multilateral or regional organizations against states or organizations either to protect national security interests, or to protect international law, and defend against threats to international peace and security. These decisions principally include the temporary imposition on a target of economic, trade, diplomatic, cultural or other restrictions that are lifted when the motivating security concerns no longer apply, or when no new threats have arisen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bans on communist symbols</span>

Communist symbols have been banned, in part or in whole, by a number of the world's countries. As part of a broader process of decommunization, these bans have mostly been proposed or implemented in countries that belonged to the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War, including some post-Soviet states. In some countries, the bans also extend to prohibit the propagation of communism in any form, with varying punishments applied to violators. Though the bans imposed by these countries nominally target the communist ideology, they may be accompanied by popular anti-leftist sentiment and therefore a de facto ban on all leftist philosophies, such as socialism, while not explicitly passing legislation to ban them.

A number of countries and international bodies have imposed international sanctions against North Korea. Currently, many sanctions are concerned with North Korea's nuclear weapons program and were imposed after its first nuclear test in 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act</span> 2017 U.S. law sanctioning Iran, North Korea and Russia

The Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) is a United States federal law that imposed sanctions on Iran, North Korea, and Russia. The bill was passed by the Senate on July 27, 2017, 98–2, after it passed the House 419–3. It was signed into law on August 2, 2017 by President Donald Trump, who nevertheless believed that the legislation was "seriously flawed".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International sanctions against Afghanistan</span> Embargo imposed by the United Nations against Taliban-controlled Afghanistan

International sanctions against Afghanistan were implemented by the United Nations in November 1999. The sanctions were aimed at terrorists, Osama bin Laden and members of Al-Qaeda.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights</span> Canadian non-governmental organization

The Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights (RWCHR) is a Canadian non-governmental organization dedicated to pursuing justice through the protection and promotion of human rights. The RWCHR's name and mission is inspired by Raoul Wallenberg's humanitarian legacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act</span> U.S. law on Xinjiang human rights

The Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 is a United States federal law that requires various federal U.S. government bodies to report on human rights abuses by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese government against Uyghurs in Xinjiang, China, including internment in the Xinjiang re-education camps.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magnitsky legislation</span> Sanctions against foreign individuals

Magnitsky legislation refers to laws providing for governmental sanctions against foreign individuals who have committed human rights abuses or been involved in significant corruption. They originated with the United States which passed the first Magnitsky legislation in 2012, following the torture and death of Sergei Magnitsky in Russia in 2009. Since then, a number of countries have passed similar legislation such as Canada, the United Kingdom and the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Responses to the 2020 Chinese involvement with Hong Kong national security law</span>

In early May 2020, the Chinese Government announced plans to draft a new national security law for Hong Kong, something required under Hong Kong Basic Law but which should explicitly be written and enacted by Hong Kong's own government. In response to apparent mainland intent to bypass Hong Kong's local legislature, the United Kingdom – which administered Hong Kong until 1997 – announced that if a security law drafted by China was approved, Britain would open a route for all Hong Kong residents born under British rule to become British citizens. Other nations and organisations have given various responses to the decision, to legislation plans, and ultimately the law itself as passed by the Chinese Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on 28 May 2020 with 2878 votes "for", 1 vote against, and 6 blank votes. At 9:30 am, 30 June 2020, the same Standing Committee unanimously voted to enact the law. The law became effective at 11 pm on the same day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom applying to the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russia Sanctions Act 2022</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Russia Sanctions Act 2022 is an Act of Parliament passed by the New Zealand Parliament that establishes the framework for autonomous sanctions against Russia in response to its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. This legislation would allow sanctions to be placed on those responsible for or associated with the Russian invasion of Ukraine including people, services, companies and assets. The Sanctions Act also allows for sanctions to be imposed on other states complicit with Russian aggression including Belarus. On 9 March 2022, the Russian Sanctions Act passed with unanimous support from all parties represented in Parliament.

The Otkhozoria–Tatunashvili List was compiled by the Georgian government to punish individuals responsible for crimes committed against Georgians in Abkhazia and South Ossetia since secessionist conflicts in the 1990s.

References

  1. ↑ "MEPs call for EU Magnitsky Act to impose sanctions on human rights abusers". The European Parliament. 14 March 2019. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  2. ↑ "Specific restrictive measures in relation to the events at the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989". EU Sanctions Map. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  3. ↑ "Restrictive measures in relation to serious human rights violations in Iran". EU Sanctions Map. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  4. ↑ "An EU human rights sanctions regime?" (PDF). The European Parliament. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  5. ↑ "The US Global Magnitsky Act". Human Rights Watch. 13 September 2017. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  6. ↑ "Estonia joins US in passing Magnitsky law". EU Observer. 9 December 2016. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  7. ↑ Picard, Renee (16 November 2017). "Lithuania: Parliament Adopts Version of Magnitsky Act". Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  8. ↑ Carolan, Sinead (9 February 2018). "Latvia Becomes Final Baltic State to Pass Magnitsky Law". Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  9. ↑ "UK House of Commons Passes the Magnitsky Asset Freezing Sanctions". Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. 21 February 2017. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  10. ↑ "The Magnitsky Act Comes to the EU: A Human Rights Sanctions Regime Proposed by the Netherlands". Netherlands Helsinki Committee. 20 December 2019. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  11. ↑ Jozwiak, Rikard (19 November 2018). "Netherlands Proposes New EU Human Rights Sanctions Regime". Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  12. ↑ "European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2019 on a European human rights violations sanctions regime". European Parliament. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  13. ↑ Barigazzi, Jacopo (9 December 2019). "EU to prepare Magnitsky-style human rights sanctions regime". Politico. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  14. ↑ "European Parliament resolution on the PRC national security law for Hong Kong and the need for the EU to defend Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy". European Parliament. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  15. ↑ "EU hits North Korea with human rights-related sanctions for the first time | NK News". NK News - North Korea News. 2021-03-23. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
  16. ↑ "Targeted sanctions against individuals on grounds of grave human rights violations – impact, trends and prospects at EU level" (PDF). Directorate General for External Policies of the Union, The European Union. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  17. ↑ Peksen, Dursun (January 2009). "Better or Worse? The Effect of Economic Sanctions on Human Rights". Journal of Peace Research. 46 (1): 59–77. doi:10.1177/0022343308098404. S2CID   110505923 . Retrieved 24 July 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.