Economic anxiety

Last updated

Economic anxiety, also referred to as economic insecurity, is the state of concern about the future of one's economic prospects, owing to low economic security. Economic anxiety can increase due to loss of household income or decreased purchasing power, causing affected individuals to self-report having more issues with societal structure and a lower quality of life. [1] Anxiety occurs when the idea of a situation is regarded as highly threatening, unpleasant and doubtful, motivating individuals to stay away from insecurity by creating an environment that is safe in order to protect themselves and their families from threatening groups and events (Jarymowicz & Bar-Tal, 2006; Nabi, 1999; Roseman & Evdokas, 2004). [2]

Contents

Events in the life of an individual such as unemployment, divorce, or a serious illness can also trigger decreased income, and by result, economic anxiety. Research has shown that high levels of economic insecurity exist among low-income households, and that economic anxiety has a positive correlation with growing economic inequality in the United States. [3] This was due to larger family instability and volatility in income in the United States in the 2000s as compared to 1960s. Economic insecurity could originate from the perception one holds towards social stratification (which inspects risks of job loss, distribution of income and downward mobility) and changes in their economic status. Furthermore, single-parent families are more vulnerable to losing jobs than two-parent families because it takes time to digest and absorb the shock of uncertainty (Western et al. 2008). [3] Moreover, economic insecurity is associated with suicide/ suicidal thoughts, heart diseases, psychological disorders and physiological illness and the reason why this could be triggered could be because of economic policies. [4]

Social and physical effects of economic anxiety

There are a myriad of adverse physical and social conditions that research correlates with individuals who feel economic anxiety. Higher levels of economic anxiety have been shown to be positively correlated with a fear of crime. [5] When faced with economic anxiety, individuals are more likely to smoke cigarettes as a "self-medicating" coping mechanism. The reason why there is a positive correlation between the increase in smoking and economic anxiety is because agonists of nicotine receptors enhances mood and cognition. [6] Moreover, anxiety tend to trigger various fear in an individual and influence the degree to which they attempt to avoid/escape pain. Hence, smoking cigarette helps cope with physiological distress and the expectancy that smoking decreases anxiety, as a result of witnessing other smokers and their experience with drugs/substances. [7] Studies have shown even a 1 percent increase in the chances of becoming unemployed make an individual 2.4 percent more likely to start or continue smoking. [8] Researchers have also found that economic anxiety causes people to gain weight, and that economic anxiety self-reinforces obesity. [9] In one study, a .01 percent increase in chances of becoming unemployed caused average weight gain over a 12-year period to increase by about 0.6 pounds. Each 50% decrease in annual income caused average weight gain for that 12-year period to increase by an extra 5 pounds. [9]

Studies have also found that economic insecurity causes physical pain and reduces pain tolerance levels. When individuals lose their jobs, contemplate unemployment levels in their home state or neighbourhood, or even when they contemplate past or future economic insecurity, pain levels rise. One reason behind the increase in the level of pain could be the fact that economic anxiety triggers feelings of lack of control as the foundation of human motivation is built mainly on having stability in life (Kelley, 1971; Landau, Kay & Whitson, 2015). To further add on, economic anxiety can damage one's self-esteem, impair cognitive functioning and people become more prone to various illness such as heart diseases and psychiatric disorders. [10] This suggests that just the prospect, or idea, of economic loss can also be harmful to health. [11] Relative preference theories state that an individual's use of income is parallel to their past income (adaptive expectations) or corresponding to other people (reference people). Therefore, raising the income of all doesn't necessarily mean greater happiness if other people belonging from the same reference group also have a similar salary (Dorn et al., 2007, Ferrer-i-Carbonell,2005, Luttmer, 2005, Weinzierl, 2005). [12] On the other hand, absolute utility theory presumes that higher income can fulfil more needs indicating a positive correlation with an increase in happiness (Veenhoven, 1991). [13]

Measuring economic anxiety

To measure economic anxiety, surveys measure not only financial anxiety, which relates to a person's anxiety about finances on a personal, individual level but also individuals' feelings surrounding the nation's economy. The Marketplace-Edison Research Poll surveys the economic anxiety of Americans regularly. How individual answers the questions in the Marketplace-Edison Research Poll determines their Economic Anxiety Index, which is a number ranging from 1-100 designed to represent a person's stress related to the economy. [14] The research poll and Index center on 12 questions regarding job security, savings and expenses, and general financial anxiety. The higher a person scores on the Economic Anxiety Index, the more concerned they are said to be about the state of their personal finances and the national economy. Surveys of Americans using the Economic Anxiety Index over time have shown there are strong divisions in economic anxiety between pay grades. Hourly workers have far more economic anxiety than salaried workers, and renters tend to be more stressed financially than those with home mortgages. [14]

An index of economic well-being is another method and has four components: income distribution, consumption, economic security and accumulation. The scale compares the GDP per individual against the economic well-being while seeing the differences in performance between various countries. People seek pleasure through consumption and savings for future generations. As the well-being of future generation depends on the inheritance of physical capital stock, assets, natural and human resources to build a sense of society. And in the long-run, it will guarantee sustainability in the economy. [15]

Another approach used by economists and psychologists is subjective well-being report (SWB) to find out how an individual feels and thinks about their life. As it helps economists and psychologists gain insight into the effect of income, relative income, inflation and unemployment. People were asked to rate themselves where they think they stand on the ladder for one being on the poorest level in their community and 10 being on the richest level in their community. Individuals judge themselves based on the standard of living in their own country (Graham and Felton, 2016). Moreover, well-being and life satisfaction rises as the number of hours increases as it provides a sense of job security. [16]

Examples of economic anxiety in recent years

The role of economic anxiety among working-class whites was a hot topic following Trump's presidential election in 2016. According to the News on the Web database, use of economic anxiety peaked on American news platforms in November 2016. [17] Economic anxiety has been widely cited (e.g. by commentators at FiveThirtyEight ) as a major reason for Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. [18] [19] Other commentators argued that economic anxiety was less of an important factor in predicting support for Trump than cultural anxiety, or the feeling that one is a stranger in America and that illegal immigrants should be deported. [20] In addition, there was a positive correlation between income and support for Trump in 2016; Hillary Clinton won among those with incomes under $50,000, while Trump won among those with incomes above $50,000, according to exit polls. [21] [22] The term has also been used sarcastically in response to racist statements and actions by Trump's supporters, to mock the attempts by certain political commentators to argue that support for Trump is due to concern about their economic prospects, not to racist attitudes. [23] [24]

Some fear now that economic anxiety spurred on by the COVID-19 pandemic will cause a long-term economic downturn worldwide. [25] In May 2020, the Marketplace-Edison Research Poll found that 44% of Americans were concerned about whether they could afford groceries and that economic anxiety had increased in all demographics since 2019, save those who made less than $25,000 per year in 2020 and the previous year. [26] Recently, several research papers have shown that the abrupt distortion and chaos caused around the world due to the on-going COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in levels of depression, anxiety, suicide and other symptoms of stress. One survey indicated that individuals tend to feel anxious if their workloads decrease or increase because the change in work routines causes stress and pressure. Moreover, a growing number of COVID cases in a country induces distress, dissatisfaction and anxiety as this will result in a longer period of lockdown which will slow down the economic growth. [27] The pandemic has left almost 400 million people around the world jobless with a decline in $8.5 trillion in the economy in 2 years time. Mental health problems are rising greatly amongst younger generations as they believe that they are missing out on factors like industrialisation and urbanization, also loses like home, family relations, a threat to their health can all majorly impact long-term deterioration in mental health. Therefore, policy-makers and governments are trying to provide full support like increasing mental health services, financial packages, loans, expanding unemployment insurance, etc. to help individuals better cope with economic insecurity. [28]

Thirdly, immigrants in a country can trigger anxiety and rage onto minority groups, especially during recession periods as individuals fear the increased competition for an inadequate amount of supply while also reducing job opportunities and increasing levels of taxes. Moreover, anxiety is an intuitive, emotional response when it comes to immigrants as it poses threat to physical safety in the United States. People process information through information seeking, attention and engagement. Firstly, individuals seek biased information towards immigrants and rely heavily on threatening news which further adds to their economic anxiety. Secondly, people tend to easily remember and favour terrifying news over non-threatening news leading to biased information processing, evaluation and opinion. And once they develop the fear, they continue to pay close attention to frightening information to changes in policies. [2] To add on, immigrant policies are frowned upon because of stereotypical beliefs on the intelligence and work ethic of a different group, mainly amongst white people. The condition of the economy influences stereotypical thinking varies across different cultures. Another factor affecting economic anxiety could be the quality and level of education achieved. As it is believed that the more educated an individual is the less affected they would be with an economic downturn. Hence, they will have a more open-mind towards immigration policies and will show less racist attitudes than the less educated people. The reason behind this could be because higher-income individuals feel more secure about their jobs than the poor. [29]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of the United States</span>

The United States is a highly developed/advanced mixed economy. It is the world's largest economy by nominal GDP; it is also the second largest by purchasing power parity (PPP), behind China. It has the world's seventh highest per capita GDP (nominal) and the eighth highest per capita GDP (PPP) as of 2022. The U.S. accounted for 25.4% of the global economy in 2022 in nominal terms, and about 15.6% in PPP terms. The U.S. dollar is the currency of record most used in international transactions and is the world's reserve currency, backed by a large U.S. treasuries market, its role as the reference standard for the petrodollar system, and its linked eurodollar. Several countries use it as their official currency and in others it is the de facto currency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food security</span> FOOD AND DRINK DISTRIBUTION Measure of the availability and accessibility of food

Food security is the availability of food in a country and the ability of individuals within that country (region) to access, afford, and source adequate foodstuff. The availability of food irrespective of class, gender or region is another element of food security. Similarly, household food security is considered to exist when all the members of a family, at all times, have access to enough food for an active, healthy life. Individuals who are food secure do not live in hunger or fear of starvation. Food insecurity, on the other hand, is defined as a situation of " limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways." Food security incorporates a measure of resilience to future disruption or unavailability of critical food supply due to various risk factors including droughts, shipping disruptions, fuel shortages, economic instability, and wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progressive tax</span> Form of tax

A progressive tax is a tax in which the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases. The term progressive refers to the way the tax rate progresses from low to high, with the result that a taxpayer's average tax rate is less than the person's marginal tax rate. The term can be applied to individual taxes or to a tax system as a whole. Progressive taxes are imposed in an attempt to reduce the tax incidence of people with a lower ability to pay, as such taxes shift the incidence increasingly to those with a higher ability-to-pay. The opposite of a progressive tax is a regressive tax, such as a sales tax, where the poor pay a larger proportion of their income compared to the rich.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic inequality</span> Distribution of income or wealth between different groups

Economic inequality is an umbrella term for a) income inequality or distribution of income, b) wealth inequality or distribution of wealth, and c) consumption inequality. Each of these can be measured between two or more nations, within a single nation, or between and within sub-populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program</span> United States government food assistance program

In the United States, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as the Food Stamp Program, is a federal government program that provides food-purchasing assistance for low- and no-income people to help them maintain adequate nutrition and health. It is a federal aid program administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) under the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), though benefits are distributed by specific departments of U.S. states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affordable housing</span> Housing affordable to those with a median household income

Affordable housing is housing which is deemed affordable to those with a household income at or below the median as rated by the national government or a local government by a recognized housing affordability index. Most of the literature on affordable housing refers to mortgages and a number of forms that exist along a continuum – from emergency homeless shelters, to transitional housing, to non-market rental, to formal and informal rental, indigenous housing, and ending with affordable home ownership.

The social determinants of health (SDOH) are the economic and social conditions that influence individual and group differences in health status. They are the health promoting factors found in one's living and working conditions, rather than individual risk factors that influence the risk or vulnerability for a disease or injury. The distribution of social determinants is often shaped by public policies that reflect prevailing political ideologies of the area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy poverty</span> Lack of access to energy services such as electricity and heating

In developing countries and some areas of more developed countries, energy poverty is lack of access to modern energy services in the home. Today, 759 million people lack access to consistent electricity and 2.6 billion people use dangerous and inefficient cooking systems. Their well-being is negatively affected by very low consumption of energy, use of dirty or polluting fuels, and excessive time spent collecting fuel to meet basic needs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Income inequality in the United States</span> National income inequality

Income inequality has fluctuated considerably in the United States since measurements began around 1915, moving in an arc between peaks in the 1920s and 2000s, with a 30-year period of relatively lower inequality between 1950 and 1980.

Redistribution of income and wealth is the transfer of income and wealth from some individuals to others through a social mechanism such as taxation, welfare, public services, land reform, monetary policies, confiscation, divorce or tort law. The term typically refers to redistribution on an economy-wide basis rather than between selected individuals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social determinants of obesity</span> Overview of the social determinants of obesity

While genetic influences are important to understanding obesity, they cannot explain the current dramatic increase seen within specific countries or globally. It is accepted that calorie consumption in excess of calorie expenditure leads to obesity; however, what has caused shifts in these two factors on a global scale is much debated.

In the United States, the concept of a working class remains vaguely defined, and classifying people or jobs into this class can be contentious. Economists and pollsters in the United States generally define "working class" adults as those lacking a college degree, rather than by occupation or income. Many members of the working class, as defined by academic models, are often identified in the vernacular as being middle-class, despite there being considerable ambiguity over the term's meaning. According to Frank Newport, "for some, working class is a more literal label; namely, an indication that one is working."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affordable Care Act</span> U.S. federal statute also known as Obamacare

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and colloquially known as Obamacare, is a landmark U.S. federal statute enacted by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 amendment, it represents the U.S. healthcare system's most significant regulatory overhaul and expansion of coverage since the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welfare's effect on poverty</span>

The effects of social welfare on poverty have been the subject of various studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hunger in the United States</span> Food insecurity

Hunger in the United States of America affects millions of Americans, including some who are middle class, or who are in households where all adults are in work. The United States produces far more food than it needs for domestic consumption—hunger within the U.S. is caused by some Americans having insufficient money to buy food for themselves or their families. Additional causes of hunger and food insecurity include neighborhood deprivation and agricultural policy. Hunger is addressed by a mix of public and private food aid provision. Public interventions include changes to agricultural policy, the construction of supermarkets in underserved neighborhoods, investment in transportation infrastructure, and the development of community gardens. Private aid is provided by food pantries, soup kitchens, food banks, and food rescue organizations.

Economic globalization is one of the three main dimensions of globalization commonly found in academic literature, with the two others being political globalization and cultural globalization, as well as the general term of globalization. Economic globalization refers to the widespread international movement of goods, capital, services, technology and information. It is the increasing economic integration and interdependence of national, regional, and local economies across the world through an intensification of cross-border movement of goods, services, technologies and capital. Economic globalization primarily comprises the globalization of production, finance, markets, technology, organizational regimes, institutions, corporations, and people.

Community food security (CFS) is a relatively new concept that captures emerging ideas about the central place of food in communities. At times it refers to the measure of food access and availability at the community level, and at other times to a goal or framework for place-based food systems. It builds upon the more commonly understood concept of food security, which refers to food access and availability at an individual or household level (in health and social policy, for instance) and at a national or global level (e.g., in international development and aid work). Hamm and Bellows (2003) define CFS as “a situation in which all community residents obtain a safe, culturally acceptable, nutritionally adequate diet through a sustainable food system that maximizes community self-reliance and social justice” (p. 37). CFS involves social, economic, and institutional factors, and their interrelationships within a community that impact availability and access to resources to produce food locally. It takes into account environmental sustainability and social fairness through measures of the availability and affordability of food in that community relative to the financial resources available to purchase or produce it.

Attachment and health is a psychological model which considers how the attachment theory pertains to people's preferences and expectations for the proximity of others when faced with stress, threat, danger or pain. In 1982, American psychiatrist Lawrence Kolb noticed that patients with chronic pain displayed behaviours with their healthcare providers akin to what children might display with an attachment figure, thus marking one of the first applications of the attachment theory to physical health. Development of the adult attachment theory and adult attachment measures in the 1990s provided researchers with the means to apply the attachment theory to health in a more systematic way. Since that time, it has been used to understand variations in stress response, health outcomes and health behaviour. Ultimately, the application of the attachment theory to health care may enable health care practitioners to provide more personalized medicine by creating a deeper understanding of patient distress and allowing clinicians to better meet their needs and expectations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic policy of the Donald Trump administration</span>

The economic policy of the Donald Trump administration was characterized by the individual and corporate tax cuts, attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare"), trade protectionism, immigration restriction, deregulation focused on the energy and financial sectors, and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The social determinants of mental health (SDOMH) are societal problems that disrupt mental health, increase risk of mental illness among certain groups, and worsen outcomes for individuals with mental illnesses. Much like the social determinants of health (SDOH), SDOMH include the non-medical factors that play a role in the likelihood and severity of health outcomes, such as income levels, education attainment, access to housing, and social inclusion. Disparities in mental health outcomes are a result of a multitude of factors and social determinants, including fixed characteristics on an individual level – such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation – and environmental factors that stem from social and economic inequalities – such as inadequate access to proper food, housing, and transportation, and exposure to pollution.

References

  1. ↑ Bechtel, Gordon. "The Societal Impact of Economic Activity". scholar.google.ca. Retrieved 2019-08-24.
  2. 1 2 Shana Kushner Gadarian; Bethany Albertson (2013). "Anxiety, Immigration, and the Search for Information". Political Psychology. 35 (2): 133–164. doi:10.1111/pops.12034 . Retrieved 13 February 2021.
  3. 1 2 Western, Bruce; Bloome, Deirdre; Sosnaud, Benjamin; Tach, Laura (2012-08-11). "Economic Insecurity and Social Stratification". Annual Review of Sociology. 38 (1): 341–359. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145434. ISSN   0360-0572.
  4. ↑ Ralph Catalano (September 1991). "The Health Effects of Economic Insecurity". American Journal of Public Health. 81 (9): 1148–1152. doi:10.2105/ajph.81.9.1148. PMC   1405640 . PMID   1951825.
  5. ↑ Britto, Sarah (2013-03-01). "'Diffuse anxiety': the role of economic insecurity in predicting fear of crime". Journal of Crime and Justice. 36 (1): 18–34. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2011.631399. ISSN   0735-648X. S2CID   143989314.
  6. ↑ Mojtabai, Ramin (September 2013). "Cigarette Smoking and Onset of Mood and Anxiety Disorders". American Journal of Public Health. 103 (9): 1656–1665. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300911. PMC   3726564 . PMID   23327282.
  7. ↑ Lisa R. LaRowe; Michael J. Zvolensky; Joseph W. Ditre (7 September 2018). "The Role of Anxiety-Relevant Transdiagnostic Factors in Comorbid Chronic Pain and Tobacco Cigarette Smoking". Cognitive Therapy and Research. 43 (1): 102–113. doi:10.1007/s10608-018-9957-y. S2CID   52271899 . Retrieved 4 February 2021.
  8. ↑ Barnes, Michael G.; Smith, Trenton G. (2009-11-05). "Tobacco Use as Response to Economic Insecurity: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth". The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. 9 (1). doi:10.2202/1935-1682.2124. ISSN   1935-1682. S2CID   18993322.
  9. 1 2 Smith, Trenton G.; Stoddard, Christiana; Barnes, Michael G. (2009-06-30). "Why the Poor Get Fat: Weight Gain and Economic Insecurity". Forum for Health Economics & Policy. 12 (2). doi:10.2202/1558-9544.1151. ISSN   1558-9544. S2CID   199547020.
  10. ↑ Chou, Eileen Y.; Parmar, Bidhan L.; Galinsky, Adam D. (2016-04-01). "Economic Insecurity Increases Physical Pain". Psychological Science. 27 (4): 443–454. doi:10.1177/0956797615625640. ISSN   0956-7976. PMID   26893293. S2CID   45207235.
  11. ↑ Rohde, Nicholas; Tang, Kam Ki; Osberg, Lars; Rao, D. S. Prasada (2017-02-01). "Is it vulnerability or economic insecurity that matters for health?". Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 134: 307–319. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.010. hdl: 10072/340364 . ISSN   0167-2681.
  12. ↑ Paul Dolan; Tessa Peasgood; Mathew White (19 September 2019). "Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being". Journal of Economic Psychology. 29 (1): 94–122. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001 . Retrieved 10 February 2021.
  13. ↑ Michael R. Hagerty; Ruut Veenhoven (1 October 2003). "Wealth and happiness revisited–growing national income does go with greater happiness". Social Indicators Research. 64: 1–27. doi:10.1023/A:1024790530822. S2CID   142290987 . Retrieved 10 February 2021.
  14. 1 2 "The Economic Anxiety Index, explained". Marketplace. 2015-10-26. Retrieved 2020-06-14.
  15. ↑ Lars Osberg; Andrew Sharpe (September 2020). "An Index of Economic Well-being for Selected OECD Countries". Review of Income and Wealth. 48 (3): 291–316. doi:10.1111/1475-4991.00056. S2CID   56427826 . Retrieved 13 February 2021.
  16. ↑ Paul Dolan; Tessa Peasgood; Mathew White (February 2008). "Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being Author links open overlay panel". Journal of Economic Psychology. 29 (1): 94–122. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001 . Retrieved 11 February 2021.
  17. ↑ Van Dam, Andrew (March 21, 2019). "White economic anxiety evaporated after the 2016 election. Now black economic anxiety is on the rise". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2019-03-22. Retrieved June 14, 2020.
  18. ↑ Casselman, Ben (2017-01-09). "Stop Saying Trump's Win Had Nothing To Do With Economics". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved 2017-08-13.
  19. ↑ Kolko, Jed (2016-11-10). "Trump Was Stronger Where The Economy Is Weaker". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved 2017-08-13.
  20. ↑ Green, Emma (2017-05-09). "It Was Cultural Anxiety That Drove White, Working-Class Voters to Trump". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2017-08-13.
  21. ↑ "Election 2016 exit polls: votes by income". Statista. Retrieved 2020-10-15.
  22. ↑ Hudak, John (2016-11-16). "A reality check on 2016's economically marginalized". Brookings. Retrieved 2020-10-15.
  23. ↑ Beutler, Brian (2016-08-16). "I Started the "Economic Anxiety" Joke about Trump—and It's Gone Too Far Now". New Republic. Retrieved 2017-08-13.
  24. ↑ Thompson, Derek (2016-08-18). "Does 'Economic Anxiety' Explain Donald Trump?". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2017-08-13.
  25. ↑ Fetzer, Thiemo; Hensel, Lukas; Hermle, Johannes; Roth, Chris (2020-03-21). "Coronavirus perceptions and economic anxiety". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 2020-06-14.
  26. ↑ "Nearly half of Americans are worried about their ability to buy food, groceries". Marketplace. 2020-05-05. Retrieved 2020-06-14.
  27. ↑ de Pedraza; Pablo; Guzi; Martin; Tijdens; Kea. "Life Dissatisfaction and Anxiety in COVID-19 pandemic" (PDF). GLO Discussion Paper: 544.
  28. ↑ M. Harvey Brenner; Dinesh Bhugra (15 December 2020). "Acceleration of Anxiety, Depression, and Suicide: Secondary Effects of Economic Disruption Related to COVID-19". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 11: 592467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.592467 . PMC   7771384 . PMID   33384627.
  29. ↑ Peter Burns; James G. Gimpel (2000). "Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy". Political Science Quarterly. 115 (2): 201–225. doi:10.2307/2657900. JSTOR   2657900 . Retrieved 14 February 2021.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.