Economic patriotism

Last updated May 24, 2024

Economic patriotism, also referred to as New Economic Patriotism, is a term used to describe the practice of making economic decisions that prioritize certain groups, businesses, or industries based on their regional status. It involves favoring the interests of a specific region over personal interests, and implies a moral obligation to the community that supersedes obligations to those outside of it. Economic patriotism can encompass different geographical areas and can involve transfers between various levels of economic affinity.

Economic patriotism is not limited to protectionism and can include a variety of policy approaches, from protectionist measures to market opening strategies. Unlike economic nationalism, economic patriotism emphasizes supporting and promoting one's own region's economy without abandoning strategic trade or foreign direct investment and without severely restricting immigration.

Into the 2020s, the concept of New Economic Patriotism has gained traction, emphasizing the importance of a nation's productive capabilities for its security, stability, and overall well-being. New Economic Patriotism promotes the idea that nations can build sustainable and inclusive economies without engaging in zero-sum competition or disfavoring other countries' development. Its strategy involves prioritizing domestic production, and investing in diverse industries and regions.

Overview

Ben Clift and Cornelia Woll

Economic patriotism, as defined by Ben Clift and Cornelia Woll, refers to making economic decisions that give priority to certain groups, businesses, or industries based on their regional status. It entails a form of partiality in economic matters, where the interests of a specific region are given greater consideration than personal interests. Economic patriotism implies that people have a moral obligation to their community that surpasses their responsibilities to those outside of it. It is not limited to protectionism and can encompass various geographical areas, from local to national and regional. Economic patriotism encompasses a wider scope than economic nationalism and is flexible in its definition of the unit of allegiance. It also involves transfers between various levels of economic affinity, including the supranational and subnational levels. Economic patriotism can encompass a variety of policy approaches, from protectionist measures to market opening strategies. Policymakers play a crucial role in providing incentives for growth and supporting favorable competition policies.^[1]

In the context of financial control over industrial groups, the concept of economic patriotism has emerged as a means of safeguarding a country's vital economic interests; however, the regional or sometimes multinational nature of these groups makes it challenging to establish a direct link with a specific state. This poses a problem when attempting to apply the principle of economic patriotism to these entities. Despite this, calls for economic patriotism persist due to the perceived threat to a country's economic interests. In particular, the sensitivity of the energy sector has highlighted the need for collective action at a regional level. Issues with Russian gas exports have served as a reminder that European interests and vulnerabilities extend beyond national borders.^[2]

New Economic Patriotism

US Representative Ro Khanna has advocated for a New Economic Patriotism plan to restore American manufacturing and technology leadership, and to respect workers who will help achieve that goal. Policy advocate Robert C. Hockett highlights the significance of rebalancing trade relations as a crucial part of New Economic Patriotism. He emphasizes that pride in the country involves recognizing the potential and creative powers of its people, and advocates for policies that provide free or affordable education, medical access, childcare, housing, food, and job and retirement security for all citizens.^[3]

Examples

During her 2020 presidential campaign, US Senator Elizabeth Warren's proposed economic patriotism policy aimed to support American workers through the implementation of government policies and interventions. This includes the creation of a new government agency, the Department of Economic Development, to consolidate job creation programs. The policy also includes measures such as managing currency value to boost exports, increasing federal R&D investments possibly with conditions for domestic production, boosting export promotion, leveraging the purchasing power of the federal government to create markets for American-made products, and restructuring worker training programs. Warren's goal for this economic patriotism is to provide American workers and industries the best opportunity to compete globally, while primarily investing in American workers rather than diminishing competitors.^[4]

Economic patriotism was a concept championed by Barack Obama during his time in office. According to Obama, his economic patriotism was rooted in the idea that a thriving middle class was crucial for the growth of the economy. He had a comprehensive plan to achieve this, which included a number of initiatives aimed at strengthening middle-class security. Some of the key components of his plan included reforming the corporate tax code, ending tax deductions for companies that ship jobs overseas, taking on unfair trade practices, investing in education and training for workers, and creating innovation institutes.^[5]

As an advocate for a New Economic Patriotism, Khanna asserts that the country's failed trade policies with China have led to the loss of millions of good-paying jobs and disproportionately harmed both urban Black and rural small city manufacturing workers. He argues that the federal government should partner with the private sector to finance upgrading factories in manufacturing regions with low or zero-interest loans. He encourages investing in the next generation of workers, and providing grants to support new manufacturing process innovation and productivity enhancements. The plan would also establish a National Economic Development Council to bring together different agency heads, economists, and business and education leaders to ensure that key components of supply chains are done in the US or cooperating partners. Khanna argues that this plan is not just about creating jobs but also unifying regions of Americans with a renewed shared purpose.^[6]

Drutex, a Polish window manufacturing company, has demonstrated economic patriotism by not only distributing their products globally but also creating research programs, developing IT solutions, and employing Polish citizens. The company's activities generate significant benefits for Poland's economy, supporting other businesses and entire sectors while also contributing to the state budget as well as upholding the overall standard of Polish brands.^[7]

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced in February 2022 that he would take steps to improve the nation's defense readiness, which would entail implementing a bundle of new measures aimed at promoting economic patriotism and bolstering domestic industries. Among the measures were tax breaks and a stimulus program intended to encourage manufacturers and banks to stay in Ukraine and contribute to the country's financial growth.^[8]

History

As a term, economic patriotism has been in use since earlier times to describe nationalist intervention by the state.^[9] Throughout American history, the phrase economic patriotism has acquired a new mostly opposite meaning. In 1985, the term was used by William Safire in defense of the Strategic Defense Initiative during Ronald Reagan's time in office, and it was described as being proud of military investment.^[10] In 1992, former Massachusetts senator Paul Tsongas promoted economic patriotism by advocating the purchase of American products.^[11] In 2012, the phrase made a comeback in the context of the reelection campaign of Obama, who used it to promote policies focused on middle class jobs, education and training, growing small businesses, and innovation.^[12]

Criticism

Some critics argue that economic patriotism promotes protectionist policies. Cliff and Woll acknowledge that economic patriotism can be a controversial concept, as it may lead to protectionist policies that harm international trade and cooperation. They argue that economic patriotism should be balanced with a recognition of the benefits of global economic integration, and that policies should be designed to promote both regional economic interests and international cooperation and market development.^[13]

American conservatives, such as Kevin D. Williamson, commented that the concept of economic patriotism has been promoted by the Democratic Party in the United States. In his view, it lacks any substantial intellectual content. Williamson suggests that Democrats use the term to criticize companies that legally relocate to tax-friendly countries while disregarding the fact that Democrats themselves have inserted special breaks and carve-outs into the tax code as incentives not to relocate. Additionally, he pointed to what he describes as outdated similarities between the economic philosophy of Democrats and the idea of economic nationalism, which he says has a troubling history associated with fascist rhetoric. Ultimately, he argues that economic patriotism appears to be more about serving the interests of the Obama administration and its congressional allies rather than doing what is best for the country, while others argue it is about both of these.^[14]

French business leaders have criticized the government's policy of economic patriotism, which they typically interpret as a strategy to discourage unwanted acquisition attempts by foreign investors of essential French companies instead of encouraging cooperation. They argue that the policy is both protectionist and ineffective and has damaged France's image in the eyes of the world. The policy gained prominence after the government reacted strongly to rumors of a takeover bid for Danone by PepsiCo and following interest from Enel in acquiring Suez, leading to plans to merge Gaz de France with Suez. The then prime minister Dominique de Villepin defended the policy, stating that all governments take steps to defend their countries' economic interests.^[15] In 2007, Alistair Darling, the new chancellor of the Exchequer in Britain, criticized the then French president Nicolas Sarkozy's policy of nurturing national industrial champions, which he referred to as economic patriotism. Darling argued that such policies were protectionist in nature and would harm free trade. French officials defended their policy and dismissed concerns about its impact on the European Union's budget targets. They argued that the tax cuts introduced as part of the economic patriotism incentive would help improve France's competitive position while still adhering to their European obligations.^[16]

Related Research Articles

A tariff is a tax imposed by the government of a country or by a supranational union on imports or exports of goods. Besides being a source of revenue for the government, import duties can also be a form of regulation of foreign trade and policy that taxes foreign products to encourage or safeguard domestic industry. Protective tariffs are among the most widely used instruments of protectionism, along with import quotas and export quotas and other non-tariff barriers to trade.

Free trade is a trade policy that does not restrict imports or exports. In government, free trade is predominantly advocated by political parties that hold economically liberal positions, while economic nationalist and left-wing political parties generally support protectionism, the opposite of free trade.

Joseph Eugene Stiglitz is an American New Keynesian economist, a public policy analyst, and a full professor at Columbia University. He is a recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (2001) and the John Bates Clark Medal (1979). He is a former senior vice president and chief economist of the World Bank. He is also a former member and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. He is known for his support for the Georgist public finance theory and for his critical view of the management of globalization, of laissez-faire economists, and of international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

Rogernomics were the neoliberal economic reforms promoted by Roger Douglas, the Minister of Finance between 1984 and 1988 in the Fourth Labour Government of New Zealand. Rogernomics featured market-led restructuring and deregulation and the control of inflation through tight monetary policy, accompanied by a floating exchange-rate and reductions in the fiscal deficit.

Import substitution industrialization (ISI) is a trade and economic policy that advocates replacing foreign imports with domestic production. It is based on the premise that a country should attempt to reduce its foreign dependency through the local production of industrialized products. The term primarily refers to 20th-century development economics policies, but it has been advocated since the 18th century by economists such as Friedrich List and Alexander Hamilton.

A subsidy or government incentive is a type of government expenditure for individuals and households, as well as businesses with the aim of stabilizing the economy. It ensures that individuals and households are viable by having access to essential goods and services while giving businesses the opportunity to stay afloat and/or competitive. Subsidies not only promote long term economic stability but also help governments to respond to economic shocks during a recession or in response to unforeseen shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Protectionism, sometimes referred to as trade protectionism, is the economic policy of restricting imports from other countries through methods such as tariffs on imported goods, import quotas, and a variety of other government regulations. Proponents argue that protectionist policies shield the producers, businesses, and workers of the import-competing sector in the country from foreign competitors and raise government revenue. Opponents argue that protectionist policies reduce trade, and adversely affect consumers in general as well as the producers and workers in export sectors, both in the country implementing protectionist policies and in the countries against which the protections are implemented.

Race to the bottom is a socio-economic phrase to describe either government deregulation of the business environment or reduction in corporate tax rates, in order to attract or retain economic activity in their jurisdictions. While this phenomenon can happen between countries as a result of globalization and free trade, it also can occur within individual countries between their sub-jurisdictions. It may occur when competition increases between geographic areas over a particular sector of trade and production. The effect and intent of these actions is to lower labor rates, cost of business, or other factors over which governments can exert control.

<i>Globalization and Its Discontents</i> 2002 non-fiction book by Joseph E. Stiglitz

Globalization and Its Discontents is a book published in 2002 by the 2001 Nobel laureate Joseph E. Stiglitz. The title is a reference to Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents.

Economic nationalism or nationalist economics is an ideology that prioritizes state intervention in the economy, including policies like domestic control and the use of tariffs and restrictions on labor, goods, and capital movement. The core belief of economic nationalism is that the economy should serve nationalist goals. As a prominent modern ideology, economic nationalism stands in contrast to economic liberalism and economic socialism.

The Licence Raj or Permit Raj is a pejorative for the system of strict government control and regulation of the Indian economy that was in place from the 1950s to the early 1990s. Under this system, businesses in India were required to obtain licences from the government in order to operate, and these licences were often difficult to obtain.

Flexicurity is a welfare state model with a pro-active labour market policy. The term was first coined by the social democratic Prime Minister of Denmark Poul Nyrup Rasmussen in the 1990s.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), or Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), was a proposed trade agreement between 12 Pacific Rim economies: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam, and the United States. In the United States, the proposal was signed on 4 February 2016 but not ratified as a result of significant domestic political opposition. After taking office, the newly elected President Donald Trump formally withdrew the United States from TPP in January 2017, therefore ensuring the TPP could not be ratified as required and did not enter into force. The remaining countries negotiated a new trade agreement called Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, which incorporated most of the provisions of the TPP and which entered into force on 30 December 2018.

Capital strike is the practice of businesses withholding any form of new investment in an economy, in order to attain some form of favorable policy. Capital strikes may arise from the determination that return on investment may be low or nonexistent or from the belief that by withholding investment certain political or economic changes may be achieved—or from a combination of the two. Capital strikes can be economy-wide, or take place in a specific industry.

Tariffs have historically served a key role in the trade policy of the United States. Their purpose was to generate revenue for the federal government and to allow for import substitution industrialization by acting as a protective barrier around infant industries. They also aimed to reduce the trade deficit and the pressure of foreign competition. Tariffs were one of the pillars of the American System that allowed the rapid development and industrialization of the United States. The United States pursued a protectionist policy from the beginning of the 19th century until the middle of the 20th century. Between 1861 and 1933, they had one of the highest average tariff rates on manufactured imports in the world. However American agricultural and industrial goods were cheaper than rival products and the tariff had an impact primarily on wool products. After 1942 the U.S. began to promote worldwide free trade, but after the 2016 presidential election has gone back to protectionism.

Protectionism in the United States is protectionist economic policy that erects tariffs and other barriers on imported goods. In the US this policy was most prevalent in the 19th century. At that time it was mainly used to protect Northern industries and was opposed by Southern states that wanted free trade to expand cotton and other agricultural exports. Protectionist measures included tariffs and quotas on imported goods, along with subsidies and other means, to restrain the free movement of imported goods, thus encouraging local industry.

Rohit Khanna is an American politician and lawyer serving as the U.S. representative from California's 17th congressional district since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, he defeated eight-term incumbent Democratic Representative Mike Honda in the general election on November 8, 2016, after first running for the same seat in 2014. Khanna also served as the deputy assistant secretary in the United States Department of Commerce under President Barack Obama from August 8, 2009, to August 2011.

Economic democracy is a socioeconomic philosophy that proposes to shift ownership and decision-making power from corporate shareholders and corporate managers to a larger group of public stakeholders that includes workers, consumers, suppliers, communities and the broader public. No single definition or approach encompasses economic democracy, but most proponents claim that modern property relations externalize costs, subordinate the general well-being to private profit and deny the polity a democratic voice in economic policy decisions. In addition to these moral concerns, economic democracy makes practical claims, such as that it can compensate for capitalism's inherent effective demand gap.

The Global Markets Action Plan (GMAP) was Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government strategy to generate employment opportunities for Canadians by expanding Canadian businesses and investment in other countries in a highly competitive global environment.

Progressive capitalism is an approach to capitalism that seeks to improve the current neoliberal American capitalism that emerged in 1980. Progressive capitalism aims to improve economic results through four defining beliefs, namely the vital role businesses play in the economy by creating jobs, fostering innovation, enabling voluntary exchange, and providing competitive goods and services; the recognition of the important role public goods, public institutions, public services and public infrastructure play in supporting businesses including: research, schools, health care, social insurance, taxation, labor law and regulation of markets; the need for the state to be involved in design and oversight of the playing field; and the integration of social justice, stewardship of natural resources and responsibility to all major stakeholders. It is being advocated by Ro Khanna and Joseph Stiglitz.

References

↑ Clift, Ben; Woll, Cornelia (April 2014). "Economic patriotism: reinventing control over open markets". Journal of European Public Policy. 19 (3): 307–323. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.638117 . ISSN 1350-1763.
↑ "Le patriotisme économique, mirage dans un désert de croissance". LEFIGARO (in French). 17 March 2006. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
↑ Hockett, Robert (5 June 2023). "What is The New Economic Patriotism? Hint: It's About the Production". Forbes. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
↑ Yglesias, Matthew (4 June 2019). "Elizabeth Warren's latest big idea is 'economic patriotism'". Vox. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
↑ "Obama touts 'economic patriotism' in Virginia campaign swing". Reuters. 27 September 2012. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
↑ "America needs a New Economic Patriotism plan". The Boston Globe. October 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
↑ "Giants Built on the Fundamentals of Economic Patriotism". Warsaw Institute. 18 May 2020. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
↑ Hopkins, Valerie; Varenikova, Maria (22 February 2022). "Ukraine's president calls up reserves, urging his compatriots to fight for their country". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved 5 March 2023.
↑ Bump, Philip (17 July 2014). "'Economic patriotism': Explaining the vague, finger-wagging, immortal phrase". The Washington Post. Retrieved 24 May 2018.
↑ Safire, William (19 September 1985). "Opinion | ESSAY; The Year of Dee-fense". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved 1 April 2023.
↑ Shogan, Robert (12 April 1991). "Economy Focus of Tsongas' 1992 Bid : Election: Ex-senator says Democratic Party must change, form ties with business. He will announce candidacy for White House this month". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 1 April 2023.
↑ "Obama touts 'economic patriotism' in Virginia campaign swing". Reuters. 27 September 2012. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
↑ Ortega, Andrés (9 February 2021). "Economic patriotism: understandable but dangerous". Elcano Royal Institute. Retrieved 5 March 2023.
↑ "The Canard of 'Economic Patriotism'". National Review. 17 July 2014. Retrieved 5 March 2023.
↑ "No to 'economic patriotism' - Business - International Herald Tribune". The New York Times. 4 July 2006. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved 5 March 2023.
↑ Bennhold, Katrin (5 July 2007). "News Analysis: Is Sarkozy an old-style Gaullist in disguise?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved 5 March 2023.