Entanglement of formation

Last updated July 26, 2024

The entanglement of formation is a quantity that measures the entanglement of a bipartite quantum state.^[1]^[2]

Definition

For a pure bipartite quantum state $|\psi \rangle _{AB}$ , using Schmidt decomposition, we see that the reduced density matrices of systems A and B, $\rho _{A}$ and $\rho _{B}$ , have the same spectrum. The von Neumann entropy $S(\rho _{A})=S(\rho _{B})$ of the reduced density matrix can be used to measure the entanglement of the state $|\psi \rangle _{AB}$ . We denote this kind of measure as $E_{f}(|\psi \rangle _{AB})=S(\rho _{A})=S(\rho _{B})$ , and call it the entanglement entropy. This is also known as the entanglement of formation of a pure state.

For a mixed bipartite state $\rho _{AB}$ , a natural generalization is to consider all the ensemble realizations of the mixed state. We define the entanglement of formation for mixed states by minimizing over all these ensemble realizations,

E_{f}(\rho _{AB})=\inf \left\{\sum _{i}p_{i}E_{f}(|\psi _{i}\rangle _{AB})\right\}

, where the infimum is taken over all the possible ways in which one can decompose

\rho _{AB}

into pure states

\rho _{AB}=\sum _{i}p_{i}|\psi _{i}\rangle \langle \psi _{i}|_{AB}

.

This kind of extension of a quantity defined on some set (here the pure states) to its convex hull (here the mixed states) is called a convex roof construction.

Properties

Entanglement of formation quantifies how much entanglement (measured in ebits) is necessary, on average, to prepare the state. The measure clearly coincides with entanglement entropy for pure states. It is zero for all separable states and non-zero for all entangled states. By construction, $E_{f}$ is convex.

Entanglement of formation is known to be a non-additive measure of entanglement.^[3] That is, there are bipartite quantum states $\rho _{AB},\sigma _{AB}$ such that the entanglement of formation of the joint state $\rho _{AB}\otimes \sigma _{AB}$ is smaller than the sum of the individual states' entanglement, i. e., $E_{f}(\rho _{AB}\otimes \sigma _{AB})<E_{f}(\rho _{AB})+E_{f}(\sigma _{AB})$ . Note that for other states (for example pure or separable states) equality holds.

Furthermore, it has been shown that the regularized entanglement of formation equals the entanglement cost. That is, for large $n$ the entanglement of formation of $n$ copies of a state $\rho$ divided by $n$ converges to the entanglement cost ^[4]

\lim _{n\to \infty }E_{f}(\rho ^{\otimes n})/n=E_{c}(\rho )

The non-additivity of $E_{f}$ thus implies that there are quantum states for which there is a “bulk discount” when preparing them from pure states by local operations: it is cheaper, on average, to prepare many together than each one separately.

Relation with concurrence

For states of two qubits, the entanglement of formation has a close relationship with concurrence. For a given state $\rho _{AB}$ , its entanglement of formation $E_{f}(\rho _{AB})$ is related to its concurrence $C$ :

E_{f}=h\left({\frac {1+{\sqrt {1-C^{2}}}}{2}}\right)

where $h(x)$ is the Shannon entropy function,

h(x)=-x\log _{2}x-(1-x)\log _{2}(1-x).

Related Research Articles

Quantum teleportation is a technique for transferring quantum information from a sender at one location to a receiver some distance away. While teleportation is commonly portrayed in science fiction as a means to transfer physical objects from one location to the next, quantum teleportation only transfers quantum information. The sender does not have to know the particular quantum state being transferred. Moreover, the location of the recipient can be unknown, but to complete the quantum teleportation, classical information needs to be sent from sender to receiver. Because classical information needs to be sent, quantum teleportation cannot occur faster than the speed of light.

Quantum entanglement is the phenomenon of a group of particles being generated, interacting, or sharing spatial proximity in such a way that the quantum state of each particle of the group cannot be described independently of the state of the others, including when the particles are separated by a large distance. The topic of quantum entanglement is at the heart of the disparity between classical and quantum physics: entanglement is a primary feature of quantum mechanics not present in classical mechanics.

In quantum mechanics, a density matrix is a matrix that describes an ensemble of physical systems as quantum states. It allows for the calculation of the probabilities of the outcomes of any measurements performed upon the systems of the ensemble using the Born rule. It is a generalization of the more usual state vectors or wavefunctions: while those can only represent pure states, density matrices can also represent mixed ensembles. Mixed ensembles arise in quantum mechanics in two different situations:

when the preparation of the systems lead to numerous pure states in the ensemble, and thus one must deal with the statistics of possible preparations, and
when one wants to describe a physical system that is entangled with another, without describing their combined state; this case is typical for a system interacting with some environment. In this case, the density matrix of an entangled system differs from that of an ensemble of pure states that, combined, would give the same statistical results upon measurement.

In quantum physics, a measurement is the testing or manipulation of a physical system to yield a numerical result. A fundamental feature of quantum theory is that the predictions it makes are probabilistic. The procedure for finding a probability involves combining a quantum state, which mathematically describes a quantum system, with a mathematical representation of the measurement to be performed on that system. The formula for this calculation is known as the Born rule. For example, a quantum particle like an electron can be described by a quantum state that associates to each point in space a complex number called a probability amplitude. Applying the Born rule to these amplitudes gives the probabilities that the electron will be found in one region or another when an experiment is performed to locate it. This is the best the theory can do; it cannot say for certain where the electron will be found. The same quantum state can also be used to make a prediction of how the electron will be moving, if an experiment is performed to measure its momentum instead of its position. The uncertainty principle implies that, whatever the quantum state, the range of predictions for the electron's position and the range of predictions for its momentum cannot both be narrow. Some quantum states imply a near-certain prediction of the result of a position measurement, but the result of a momentum measurement will be highly unpredictable, and vice versa. Furthermore, the fact that nature violates the statistical conditions known as Bell inequalities indicates that the unpredictability of quantum measurement results cannot be explained away as due to ignorance about "local hidden variables" within quantum systems.

The joint quantum entropy generalizes the classical joint entropy to the context of quantum information theory. Intuitively, given two quantum states $and, represented as density operators that are subparts of a quantum system, the joint quantum entropy is a measure of the total uncertainty or entropy of the joint system. It is written or, depending on the notation being used for the von Neumann entropy. Like other entropies, the joint quantum entropy is measured in bits, i.e. the logarithm is taken in base 2.$

The Peres–Horodecki criterion is a necessary condition, for the joint density matrix $of two quantum mechanical systems and, to be separable. It is also called the PPT criterion, for positive partial transpose . In the 2\times2 and 2\times3 dimensional cases the condition is also sufficient. It is used to decide the separability of mixed states, where the Schmidt decomposition does not apply. The theorem was discovered in 1996 by Asher Peres and the Horodecki family$

In physics, the von Neumann entropy, named after John von Neumann, is an extension of the concept of Gibbs entropy from classical statistical mechanics to quantum statistical mechanics. For a quantum-mechanical system described by a density matrix $ρ$ , the von Neumann entropy is

In quantum mechanics, separable states are multipartite quantum states that can be written as a convex combination of product states. Product states are multipartite quantum states that can be written as a tensor product of states in each space. The physical intuition behind these definitions is that product states have no correlation between the different degrees of freedom, while separable states might have correlations, but all such correlations can be explained as due to a classical random variable, as opposed as being due to entanglement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LOCC</span> Method in quantum computation and communication

LOCC, or local operations and classical communication, is a method in quantum information theory where a local (product) operation is performed on part of the system, and where the result of that operation is "communicated" classically to another part where usually another local operation is performed conditioned on the information received.

In linear algebra, the Schmidt decomposition refers to a particular way of expressing a vector in the tensor product of two inner product spaces. It has numerous applications in quantum information theory, for example in entanglement characterization and in state purification, and plasticity.

In quantum mechanics, notably in quantum information theory, fidelity quantifies the "closeness" between two density matrices. It expresses the probability that one state will pass a test to identify as the other. It is not a metric on the space of density matrices, but it can be used to define the Bures metric on this space.

In the case of systems composed of $subsystems, the classification of quantum-entangled states is richer than in the bipartite case. Indeed, in multipartite entanglement apart from fully separable states and fully entangled states, there also exists the notion of partially separable states.$

In quantum information science, the concurrence is a state invariant involving qubits.

Entanglement distillation is the transformation of N copies of an arbitrary entangled state $into some number of approximately pure Bell pairs, using only local operations and classical communication.$

In quantum mechanics, and especially quantum information theory, the purity of a normalized quantum state is a scalar defined as $where is the density matrix of the state and is the trace operation. The purity defines a measure on quantum states, giving information on how much a state is mixed.$

In quantum mechanics, negativity is a measure of quantum entanglement which is easy to compute. It is a measure deriving from the PPT criterion for separability. It has shown to be an entanglement monotone and hence a proper measure of entanglement.

The entropy of entanglement is a measure of the degree of quantum entanglement between two subsystems constituting a two-part composite quantum system. Given a pure bipartite quantum state of the composite system, it is possible to obtain a reduced density matrix describing knowledge of the state of a subsystem. The entropy of entanglement is the Von Neumann entropy of the reduced density matrix for any of the subsystems. If it is non-zero, it indicates the two subsystems are entangled.

The min-entropy, in information theory, is the smallest of the Rényi family of entropies, corresponding to the most conservative way of measuring the unpredictability of a set of outcomes, as the negative logarithm of the probability of the most likely outcome. The various Rényi entropies are all equal for a uniform distribution, but measure the unpredictability of a nonuniform distribution in different ways. The min-entropy is never greater than the ordinary or Shannon entropy and that in turn is never greater than the Hartley or max-entropy, defined as the logarithm of the number of outcomes with nonzero probability.

In quantum physics, the "monogamy" of quantum entanglement refers to the fundamental property that it cannot be freely shared between arbitrarily many parties.

Bell diagonal states are a class of bipartite qubit states that are frequently used in quantum information and quantum computation theory.

References

↑ Hill, Scott; Wootters, William K. (1997-06-30). "Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum Bits". Physical Review Letters. 78 (26). American Physical Society (APS): 5022–5025. arXiv: quant-ph/9703041 . doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022. ISSN 0031-9007.
↑ Wootters, William K. (1998-03-09). "Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits". Physical Review Letters. 80 (10). American Physical Society (APS): 2245–2248. arXiv: quant-ph/9709029 . doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245. ISSN 0031-9007.
↑ Horodecki, Ryszard; Horodecki, Pawel; Horodecki, Michal; Horodecki, Karol (2009). "Quantum entanglement". Rev. Mod. Phys. 81: 907–908. arXiv: quant-ph/0702225 . doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865.
↑ Hayden, Patrick M.; Horodecki, Michal; Terhal, Barbara M. (200). "The asymptotic entanglement cost of preparing a quantum state". J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (35): 6891–6898. arXiv: quant-ph/0008134 . doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/314.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Hill1997-1] Hill, Scott; Wootters, William K. (1997-06-30). "Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum Bits". Physical Review Letters. 78 (26). American Physical Society (APS): 5022–5025. arXiv: quant-ph/9703041 . doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022. ISSN 0031-9007.

[Wootters1998-2] Wootters, William K. (1998-03-09). "Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits". Physical Review Letters. 80 (10). American Physical Society (APS): 2245–2248. arXiv: quant-ph/9709029 . doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245. ISSN 0031-9007.

[3] Horodecki, Ryszard; Horodecki, Pawel; Horodecki, Michal; Horodecki, Karol (2009). "Quantum entanglement". Rev. Mod. Phys. 81: 907–908. arXiv: quant-ph/0702225 . doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865.

[4] Hayden, Patrick M.; Horodecki, Michal; Terhal, Barbara M. (200). "The asymptotic entanglement cost of preparing a quantum state". J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (35): 6891–6898. arXiv: quant-ph/0008134 . doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/314.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]