Ethnographic cartography of the Balkans in the late 19th and early 20th century

Last updated

The decline of the Ottoman Empire in the late 19th century led to fierce territorial competition between the Greeks, Serbs, Bulgarians and Turks, in particular over the contested region of Macedonia. As a result, a large number of maps attempting to depict the ethnic demographics of the Balkans were published at this time, particularly from 1876 onwards, following a Serb and Montenegrin uprising and the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878. Maps were produced and used by the various sides to justify their claims. The phenomenon has been labelled as a "map mania". [1]

Contents

Greeks, Serbs, and Bulgarians tended to manipulate and distort the maps, also relying on fake sources and modifying old data. [2] The maps depicted ethnic groups as blocks of solid colors, obscured ethnic diversity, merged sub-groups into dominant ethnicities, and ignored population density. In order to provide an impression of uniformity and stability, substantial minorities (even up to 49 percent in some cases) and scattered communities were omitted; map's scale was adjusted according to the map's aim whether to include or exclude specific minorities. [3]

The maps by Ami Boué and Guillaume Lejean were influential in the early period, and were generally favorable to the Bulgarians, but they greatly exaggerated Albanian presence towards the south, and their reputation suffered as a result. [4] The 1876 map by Heinrich Kiepert was particularly influential and used at the Congress of Berlin. In response, three pro-Greek maps were generated due to Greek efforts (Stanford, Bianconi, Synvet), but these had little impact, [5] and no one outside Greece took them seriously. [6] The standard Greek practice in all the maps it produced was to consider as Greeks not only the Greek-speakers, but also all the Christian Vlachs (Aromanians and Megleno-Romanians), the Christian Albanians, and the Exarchist Slavs, an approach rejected by international figures. [7]

Maps

ImageDate Cartographer Comments
Ethnographic map Ami Boue, 1847.jpg 1847 Ami Boué The first map to show Slavic preponderance in the Balkans (until 1880). Among the maps' major mistakes are that it greatly exaggerated the southward presence of Albanians, while underrepresenting Ottomans and Muslims in Macedonia, Thrace, and northeastern Bulgaria, thereby ruining its reputation. [8] Boué was supported by the Austrian government and served Austrian imperial interests. [9]
Balkans-ethnic (1861).jpg 1861 Guillaume Lejean The map further served to legitimize Bulgarian aspirations. Although it was the first map to rely on historical documents, it confused historical arguments with the contemporary situation, and secondly, incorrectly extended Albanian presence too far southwards. [10]
Ethnic map of Balkans - russian 1867.jpg 1867 Mikhail Mirkovich Pro-Bulgarian map, which served as the basis of the Slavic Congress of 1867. It expanded the boundaries of the Bulgarian nation past Adrianople, and following Boué's map, also greatly exaggerated Albanian presence west of the Pindus, extending it down to the Gulf of Corinth. As a result, the map's reputation suffered and it was labeled unreliable with regards to the rest of its content. [11]
Ethnic map of Balkans - german 1876.jpg 1876 Heinrich Kiepert Kiepert was considered the foremost cartographer of his day, particularly by Bismarck, and his map was used at the 1876 Congress of Berlin. [12]
Balkans-ethnic (1877).jpg 1877 Alexandre Synvet Pro-Greek map. Southern Albanians are not depicted as "Albanians", but as "Greeks" and "Muslims". The coast of the Black sea is indicated as "Greek". The map's coloring with thick and dense cross-hatching makes it more or less useless. [13]
Ethnographic map of European Turkey from 1877 by Carl Sax.jpg 1877 Carl Sax Former Austrian consul working for Austrian interests. His map undermined Slavic presence and also attempted to show the complexity of the demographics of Macedonia. The map was generally well-received. [14]
Edward Stanford 1877.jpg 1877 Ioannis Gennadios, prepared at Stanfords Geographical EstablishmentExtreme pro-Greek map, which covers most of the Balkan peninsula with the color associated with the Greeks. Cartographers Sax and Kiepert 'dismissed the map as utter nonsense'. [6]
Ethnic map of Balkans Kiepert.1878.png 1878 Constantine Paparrigopoulos Extreme pro-Greek map, falsely attributed to Heinrich Kiepert who publicly disclaimed it. [6] [15]
Ernst-Ravenstein-Balkans-Ethnic-Map-1880.jpg 1880 Ernst Georg Ravenstein
Andree64-1.jpg 1881Andrees Allgemeiner Handatlas
Ethnographic map of the South Balkans, Pallas Nagy Lexikon, 1897.jpg 1897Pallas Nagy Lexikon
Balkans-ethnique.JPG 1898 Paul Vidal de la Blache
The Balkan Peninsula, Distribution of Races. EB 1911.png 1911Encyclopædia Britannica, 1911
The Historical Atlas, 1911 - Distribution of Races in the Balkan Peninsula and Asia Minor.jpg 1911William Robert Shepherd
Ethnographic Map of Central and South Eastern Europe.jpg 1916War Office, London
Cvijic, Jovan - Breisemeister, William A. - Carte ethnographique de la Peninsule balkanique (pd).jpg 1918 Jovan Cvijić Pro-Serbian map. [16]
Macedonians on a french.rev.jpg 1918Jovan CvijićPro-Serbian map. [16]
Hellenism in the Near East 1918.jpg 1918George SoteiriadesPro-Greek map. Less extreme than the previous Greek maps, but continuing the Greek approach that considered Vlachs (Aromanians and Megleno-Romanians), Christian Albanians, and Patriarchate Bulgarians as Greeks, although acknowledging the existence of "Macedonoslavs". It was presented at the Paris conference of 1918 and represented the more realistic approach of Eleftherios Venizelos. [17]
Distribution Of Races 1918 National Geographic.jpg 1918National Georgaphic Society
Macedonians coloured on this map from 1922.jpg 1922J. N. Larned et al.
Ethnographic Map of the Balkans (1912-1918) - Historische alte Landkarte (Sammlerstuck) von 1924.jpg 1924Unknown author - Historische alte Landkarte (Sammlerstück) 1924
Mitteleuropa (ethnische Karte) 1932.jpg 1932Der Grosse Herder Atlas

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Balkan Wars</span> Wars in the Balkans from 1912 to 1913

The Balkan Wars were a series of two conflicts that took place in the Balkan states in 1912 and 1913. In the First Balkan War, the four Balkan states of Greece, Serbia, Montenegro and Bulgaria declared war upon the Ottoman Empire and defeated it, in the process stripping the Ottomans of their European provinces, leaving only Eastern Thrace under Ottoman control. In the Second Balkan War, Bulgaria fought against the other four original combatants of the first war. It also faced an attack from Romania from the north. The Ottoman Empire lost the bulk of its territory in Europe. Although not involved as a combatant, Austria-Hungary became relatively weaker as a much enlarged Serbia pushed for union of the South Slavic peoples. The war set the stage for the July crisis of 1914 and thus served as a prelude to the First World War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Balkans</span> Region of southeastern Europe

The Balkans, corresponding partially with the Balkan Peninsula, is a geographical area in southeastern Europe with various geographical and historical definitions. The region takes its name from the Balkan Mountains that stretch throughout the whole of Bulgaria. The Balkan Peninsula is bordered by the Adriatic Sea in the northwest, the Ionian Sea in the southwest, the Aegean Sea in the south, the Turkish straits in the east, and the Black Sea in the northeast. The northern border of the peninsula is variously defined. The highest point of the Balkans is Musala, 2,925 metres (9,596 ft), in the Rila mountain range, Bulgaria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macedonia (region)</span> Geographical and historical region in Europe

Macedonia is a geographical and historical region of the Balkan Peninsula in Southeast Europe. Its boundaries have changed considerably over time; however, it came to be defined as the modern geographical region by the mid-19th century. Today the region is considered to include parts of six Balkan countries: all of North Macedonia, large parts of Greece and Bulgaria, and smaller parts of Albania, Serbia, and Kosovo. It covers approximately 67,000 square kilometres (25,869 sq mi) and has a population of around five million. Greek Macedonia comprises about half of Macedonia's area and population.

The history of North Macedonia encompasses the history of the territory of the modern state of North Macedonia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Balkan League</span> 1912 anti-Ottoman military alliance

The League of the Balkans was a quadruple alliance formed by a series of bilateral treaties concluded in 1912 between the Eastern Orthodox kingdoms of Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia and Montenegro, and directed against the Ottoman Empire, which still controlled much of Southeastern Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macedonians (ethnic group)</span> South Slavic ethnic group

Macedonians are a nation and a South Slavic ethnic group native to the region of Macedonia in Southeast Europe. They speak Macedonian, a South Slavic language. The large majority of Macedonians identify as Eastern Orthodox Christians, who share a cultural and historical "Orthodox Byzantine–Slavic heritage" with their neighbours. About two-thirds of all ethnic Macedonians live in North Macedonia; there are also communities in a number of other countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Demographic history of Macedonia</span> Historical overview of Macedonias demographics

The region of Macedonia is known to have been inhabited since Paleolithic times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Balkans</span>

The Balkans and parts of this area may also be placed in Southeastern, Southern, Eastern Europe and Central Europe. The distinct identity and fragmentation of the Balkans owes much to its common and often turbulent history regarding centuries of Ottoman conquest and to its very mountainous geography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Torlakian dialects</span> Group of South Slavic dialects

Torlakian, or Torlak, is a group of transitional South Slavic dialects of southeastern Serbia, Kosovo, northeastern North Macedonia, and northwestern Bulgaria. Torlakian, together with Bulgarian and Macedonian, falls into the Balkan Slavic linguistic area, which is part of the broader Balkan sprachbund. According to UNESCO's list of endangered languages, Torlakian is vulnerable.

<i>Macedonia</i> (terminology) Use of the name Macedonia

The name Macedonia is used in a number of competing or overlapping meanings to describe geographical, political and historical areas, languages and peoples in a part of south-eastern Europe. It has been a major source of political controversy since the early 20th century. The situation is complicated because different ethnic groups use different terminology for the same entity, or the same terminology for different entities, with different political connotations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Serbs in North Macedonia</span> Ethnic group in North Macedonia

The Serbs are one of the constitutional ethnic groups of North Macedonia, numbering about 24,000 inhabitants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macedonian nationalism</span> Social movement since the 19th and 20th century

Macedonian nationalism is a general grouping of nationalist ideas and concepts among ethnic Macedonians that were first formed in the late 19th century among separatists seeking the autonomy of the region of Macedonia from the Ottoman Empire. The idea evolved during the early 20th century alongside the first expressions of ethnic nationalism among the Slavs of Macedonia. The separate Macedonian nation gained recognition during World War II when the Socialist Republic of Macedonia was created as part of Yugoslavia. Macedonian historiography has since established links between the ethnic Macedonians and various historical events and individual figures that occurred in and originated from Macedonia, which range from the Middle Ages up to the 20th century. Following the independence of the Republic of Macedonia in the late 20th century, issues of Macedonian national identity have become contested by the country's neighbours, as some adherents to aggressive Macedonian nationalism, called Macedonism, hold more extreme beliefs such as an unbroken continuity between ancient Macedonians, and modern ethnic Macedonians, and views connected to the irredentist concept of a United Macedonia, which involves territorial claims on a large portion of Greece and Bulgaria, along with smaller regions of Albania, Kosovo and Serbia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Macedonians (ethnic group)</span>

The history of Macedonians has been shaped by population shifts and political developments in the southern Balkans, especially within the region of Macedonia. The ideas of separate Macedonian identity grew in significance after the First World War, both in Vardar and among the left-leaning diaspora in Bulgaria, and were endorsed by the Comintern. During the Second World War, these ideas were supported by the Communist Partisans, but the decisive point in the ethnogenesis of these South Slavic people was the creation of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia after World War II, as a new state in the framework of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bulgarians in Albania</span> Ethnic group in Albania

The Bulgarians in Albania live mostly in the areas of Mala Prespa, Gollobordë and Gora. Ethnic identity can be fluid among Albania's Slavophonic population, who might identify as Albanian, Bulgarian or Macedonian, depending on the circumstances. Between 2001 and 2016, around 4,470 Albanian nationals applied for a Bulgarian citizenship and over 2,600 of them were granted one. The Bulgarian minority was recognized by the Albanian government in October 2017. In the 2023 Albania census, 7,057 people declared themselves to be Bulgarians making them the largest Slavophone population in Albania.

Slavic speakers are a minority population in the northern Greek region of Macedonia, who are mostly concentrated in certain parts of the peripheries of West and Central Macedonia, adjacent to the territory of the state of North Macedonia. Their dialects are called today "Slavic" in Greece, while generally they are considered Macedonian. Some members have formed their own emigrant communities in neighbouring countries, as well as further abroad.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macedonian Bulgarians</span> Bulgarians from the geographic region of Macedonia

Macedonians or Macedonian Bulgarians, sometimes also referred to as Macedono-Bulgarians, Macedo-Bulgarians, or Bulgaro-Macedonians are a regional, ethnographic group of ethnic Bulgarians, inhabiting or originating from the region of Macedonia. Today, the larger part of this population is concentrated in Blagoevgrad Province but much is spread across the whole of Bulgaria and the diaspora.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geographical name changes in Greece</span> Overview of geographical name changes in Greece

The Greek state has systematically pursued a policy of Hellenisation following its independence from the Ottoman Empire in the early 1830s. This ideology included replacing all geographical and topographic names with revived names rooted in Classical Greece – that is, any name deemed foreign, divisive against Greek unity, or considered to be "bad Greek" was hidden or assimilated. The names that were considered foreign were usually of Albanian, Slavic or Turkish origin. Byzantine Greek was considered bad Greek at the time of the establishment of the state until well after the Balkan Wars; accordingly those places were also renamed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bulgarian Millet</span>

Bulgarian Millet was an ethno-religious and linguistic community within the Ottoman Empire from the mid-19th to early 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slavic speakers in Ottoman Macedonia</span> Ethnic group

Slavic-speakers inhabiting the Ottoman-ruled region of Macedonia had settled in the area since the Slavic migrations during the Middle Ages and formed a distinct ethnolinguistic group. While Greek was spoken in the urban centers and in a coastal zone in the south of the region, Slav-speakers were abundant in its rural hinterland and were predominantly occupied in agriculture. Habitually known and identifying as "Bulgarian" on account of their language, they also considered themselves as "Rum", members of the community of Orthodox Christians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macedonian (obsolete terminology)</span>

Macedonians as an obsolete terminology was used in regional and in ethnographic sense and had several meanings, different from these used mostly today. The name of Macedonia was revived on the Balkans during the early 19th century as result of the Western Europe-derived obsession with Ancient Greece. The designation Macedonian arose at the eve of the 20th century and was used beyond but its meanings have changed during the time, and some of them are rarely used anymore.

References

  1. Peckham 2000, pp. 77–79.
  2. Demeter & Bottlik 2021, pp. 122–123.
  3. Peckham 2000, p. 81.
  4. Demeter & Bottlik 2021, pp. 56–71.
  5. Wilkinson 1951, pp. 68074.
  6. 1 2 3 Heraclides 2020, p. 22.
  7. Heraclides 2020, pp. 21–22.
  8. Demeter & Bottlik 2021 , pp. 56–57: "It was Ami Boué, five years later, who drew the attention of the Western public opinion to the ethnic question and the Slavic predominance in the Balkans. In fact, the series of maps indicating Bulgarian predominance over the peninsula (a tendency remaining dominant until the 1880s) starts with Boué. Being a geologist (and not an ethnographer), he was among the first men trained for scientific fieldwork to explore the Balkan Peninsula in 1836–38. His attempt to separate Albanian tribes based on religion and dialects is remarkable, but his map contains major mistakes: the Albanian ethnos extends to the Bay of Arta in Greece, and the Ottomans are underrepresented in Macedonia. These mistakes ruined the reputation of the whole map. Compared to Šafarik's work, the map of Boué (published in 1847 in Berghaus's atlas) indicates fewer Greeks in Thrace and more Albanians in Kosovo and indicates the Vlachs separately in the Pindos Mountains. This map also underestimated the Turkish/Muslim presence in northeastern Bulgaria and in Thrace (App. 28). It is noteworthy that Boué was also supported by the Austrian government in his endeavour."
  9. Demeter & Bottlik 2021, p. 131: "Practically speaking, there is not much difference between the concept of Šafarik and Boué with the exception of their target groups. Both served Austrian imperial interests: the former advertised Austro-Yugoslavism for the inland (Slavs), while the latter was to disseminate this concept for the Western publicity, hiding imperial aspirations behind the sympathy towards the oppressed Slavs."
  10. Demeter & Bottlik 2021 , pp. 56–57: "The map of Guillaume Lejean also served as a basis for the legitimization of Bulgarian aspirations (App. 30). Traveling the Ottoman Balkans in 1858–9, the consul pointed out in the introduction of his work (1861) that studying ethnographic relations is no longer an "object of purely scientific curiosity", but a political issue as well, implicitly stating that science cannot remain neutral in its attitudes toward the national question. He separated himself from the previous ethnographers, claiming that language alone is not an adequate criterion for determining nationality in a region where "religious hatred and political inequality" overwrite original patterns, and people adopt languages that did not correspond to their "race". Instead he advised the use of historical evidence to determine nationality. This is why he indicated small Serbian patches around Lake Ohrid, confirming their existence by using historical arguments (in the nineth century, the whole area as far as Durazzo was Slavic; a local saint – Jovan Vladislav of Duklja – was well-known to Serbs and was executed by a Bulgarian ruler in the 11th century; the neighbouring patriarchate of Ipek was a 'Serbian' one). Although he was the first to use historical documents to prove his statements, he committed two serious errors: he confused arguments from history with the contemporary situation; secondly, the southern limits of the Albanian nation were wrongly drawn."
  11. Demeter & Bottlik 2021, p. 71: "Another Slavist, the Russian L. F. Mirkovič, had one innovation (App. 25): the Muslim zone in northeastern Bulgaria, formerly indicated as a homogeneous patch, was dismembered and depicted as a mixed region using the technique of cross-hatching (in one of its earliest implementations). Furthermore, he expanded the boundaries of the Bulgarian nation in Thrace beyond Adrianople. In this way the Slavic preponderance on the peninsula became more obvious. This was another Bulgarophile map, serving as the basis of the Slavic Congress in 1867, and it was later sharply criticised by Cvijić because it depicted an unfavourable situation for the Serbs. Unfortunately, Mirkovič accepted Boué's idea that Albanians are abundant west of the Pindos Mountains down to the Gulf of Arta, for which the whole map was also labelled 'unreliable' in regard to its other content and ethnic boundaries."
  12. Wilkinson 1951, pp. 68–69.
  13. Demeter & Bottlik 2021, pp. 86–89.
  14. Wilkinson 1951, pp. 76–82.
  15. Yosmaoǧlu 2010, pp. 171, 175–179.
  16. 1 2 Peckham 2000, p. 80.
  17. Heraclides 2020, p. 31.

Bibliography