European public sphere

Last updated

The European public sphere refers to the public sphere where ideas and information are exchanged by citizens of European societies that can influence the European political life (especially that of the European Union). It is to have an "arena for EU-wide public discourse". [1]

Contents

The European public sphere is incomplete and mostly consists of several attempts to create arenas for EU-wide public discourse. Proponents of the debate around the EU's democratic deficit considered the lack of European public sphere as one of the reasons behind this deficit. A fully-fledged European public sphere would provide citizens with the necessary information to participate in the political life of the EU, enable them to scrutinize and discuss political actions and to feed the development of the European citizenship.

Definition

The public sphere is defined by Jürgen Habermas as a space "made up of private people gathered together as a public and articulating the needs of society with the state". [2] This public space allows for different opinions to be expressed, problems to be discussed and collective solutions to be developed. The public sphere is a place of debates that Silke Adam identifies as the "link between politicians and citizens, which can be strengthened by the media" [3]

The ideology behind the public sphere theory is that governments' actions, and their legitimacy, come from the views expressed in the public sphere. [4] The discussions around this theory include the structure of the public sphere, the role of mass media, and what influence the public sphere has over political action and social life. Theorists of the European integration point out toward a democratic deficit within the EU, that is the gap that lies between the European institutions and the general public. [5] They argue that the democratic void is partly due to the absence of a political community defined by a shared European identity (i.e., a common public sphere).

A shifting concept

According to Corinne Doria, the European public sphere and its characteristic have been the subject of many debates since the 1950s and the beginning of the European integration. It has been considered as having always existed, currently being under formation or impossible to achieve. [6] Those who argue that the European public sphere has been in construction since the 1950s support their thesis by referring to the constant European integration with the elaboration of the single market, which is being more and more integrated, the successive enlargements, the increased given space to European news in national media, and the Eurovision. [7]

According to that idea, Doria suggests that the European public sphere is not a state per se but a process and only when this process is completed, European integration will be achieved as well. However, as she goes on, four approaches are opposing in the debate when it comes to the creation of a European public sphere. The first approach is that European public sphere has existed before, since the Middle Ages, in the form of communication networks between European scholars, artists, or diplomats. The second approach is that it has never existed and can only exist in the limitations of the nation-states. The third approach is that it has not existed but will exist eventually. The final approach is that it does not exist, and because of lack of necessary preconditions such as the use of common language, it will never exist. [6]

A panel of experts chaired by Hakan G. Sicakkan and Slavko Splichal reflected on the four mainstream models to explain the formation of a European public sphere". [8] Those models are:

According to them, these four models show that national public spheres will gradually diminish and be replaced by a pan-European public sphere through one of those four process. However, they find that the dominant model is the one supporting the Europeanization of national public spheres, in line with Doria's findings.

The role of media

In his theory, Jürgen Habermas argues that the public sphere requires "specific means for transmitting information and influencing those who receive it" [11] In other words, media are essential to constitute and maintain a public sphere. For instance, a study by S. Edgerly et al. shows that new mass media such as social networks like YouTube can be used as platform to support a public sphere. [12] Thanks to the wide range of voices which can be expressed, its ability to reach out to the masses, to propose social and political contents, YouTube can be viewed as a relevant online space for public discussion.

A 2015 study by Jaco Groshek and Ahmed Al-Rawi supports these findings. [13] By analyzing online protests against austerity measures during the European economic crisis, they conclude that with the movements being transnational, a form of European public sphere appeared for a period of time. This study showed a growing interest for European issues, even if it's brief and on specific topics. For J. Gerhards, this growing interest framed in a European perspective rather than a national one is crucial for the formation of a European public sphere. [3]

However, one of the many issues the idea of a European public sphere is facing is its elitism. As argued by Adam Silke, only the people interested in the EU — mostly people educated and already familiar with the complexity of the EU — will use these media. [14] He states that while national public opinions are more Europeanized today, it is mostly true for elites. Consequently, Michael Brüggeman and Hagen Schulz-Forberg find that the audience of transnational media (such as Arte) in Europe is small but influential. [14] This leaves the question to whether this audience could help fill the gap between the EU and European citizens to create a European public sphere. This could be achieved in two different but complementary ways: the Europeanization of national media and the development of transnational media.

Development of transnational media

Brüggeman and Schulz-Forberg argue that pan-regional media are the type of transnational media that can contribute the most to a European public sphere. [9] One example is Euronews which has an increasing audience, broadcasting in thirteen different languages and reaching 400 million households in 155 countries. Another example is the website EurActiv.com which discusses about European issues. But it not considered as well known outside of people already familiar with said issues.

Europeanization of national media

This refers to the increasing coverage of European issues within national public spheres. This raises the question to whether or not national media have increased the share of EU news in their coverage over time. For instance, in 2016, authors have analyzed the content of various media in EU countries and found that national media attention for the EU's growth and jobs strategy is limited and that it doesn't increase over time. [15] However, they also emphasized transnational dimensions in the coverage as countries reference to each other in a benchmarking spirit.

They concluded that media coverage of the EU4s socio-economic strategy is Europeanized but found that the debate is only made by and for people already interested in the EU. They also drew a lesson for the European public sphere: the EU related dimensions are often dropped by national media which frame information according to national concerns.

Pan-European social movements and protests

Inside a proper public sphere, citizens can use the repertoire of protests and political actions to voice their concerns regarding political actions. In the case of the European public sphere, European citizens should be able to address their concerns about the European integration. In their paper, Maria Trif and Doug Imig argue that the development of a "realm of contentious political engagement with European policies appears to be part of the process of building Europe". [16] They find that a broad range of actors (NGOs, trade unions, federations of workers and/or companies) use the repertoire of contentious politics to voice their demands. This can be viewed as the temporary establishment of a pan-European public sphere. However, the life of these European public spaces only lasts as long as the protest does.

A concrete example of a pan-European social movement momentarily creating a proper European public space is the TTIP protest. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) was a proposed trade agreement between the EU and the United States, with the aim of promoting trade and multilateral economic growth. Several controversies came to life around the TTIP negotiations. Among those controversies, there is the secrecy of negotiations, the lack of transparency, its relative effect on the European economy and the high number of classified contents. [17] Many groups criticized the agreement which resulted in social protests by unions, NGOs and environmentalists' groups. These critics mainly targeted the undemocratic nature of the trade agreement, its impact on the environment and the threat it generates for the European social models as it would have put European workers in competition with Americans. [18]

In 2014, an online consultation conducted by the European Commission received more than 150 000 responses and 97% were provided by activists. [1] A self-organized European Citizens' Initiative against TTIP and CETA gathered around 3.2 million signatures within a year. [1] As the negotiations were dropped, the initiative was later withdrawn. The example of TTIP shows how European protests can structure themselves on the basis of already existing organizations. These social movements use a wide range of tools: institutional with the European Citizens' Initiative or petitions, physical protests... Furthermore, it shows how social protests manage to create ad hoc pan-European public spaces to voice opinion and debate relevant subjects of the EU integration.

European elections and transnational lists

The European elections held to elect the direct representatives of the European citizens are often considered as 'second-order' elections, in the sense that citizens give the priority to national elections. [1] This can be illustrated by the results. However, we witness a gradual increase in the interest of the citizens for the European elections. [1] The interest of citizens for the elections which are arguably one of the most important events for political debates at the EU level teaches us more about the state of the European public sphere. Therefore, by taking the example of the elections to explain the development of such sphere, obstacles are immediately apparent.

One of the main issues is the domestication of European political campaigns as observers find a dominance of domestic issues over European ones. According to the European Parliament report, only a fifth of the campaigns in Europe are centred on Europe topics. [19] The European parliament tried to harmonize national electoral rules, but it had little impact since most were not implemented for the 2019 elections. as only few Member states followed the proposals to increase the visibility of European political parties in the national campaign. One of the examples of the ways that can increase the visibility of European political parties in the national campaigns in member states is to ensure the logos and the names of the European parties to be visible on the national ballot papers, but few member states of the EU implement this proposal. In the paper by Boomgaarden and de Vreese, they found that national political actors are still dominating news media across the European Union, and European issues are still framed through national viewpoints. [20] [21]

Among the current debate on how to increase the 'Europeanness' of the elections, there is the idea to introduce transnational lists. This idea refers to the multiple debates and proposals from European and national actors to feature lists of candidates selected by transnational actors instead of national actors for the European elections. The most prominent proposal comes from the 'Duff report' elaborated by the former British MEP (Member of European Parliament) Andrew Duff. In his report, he suggests that each elector would be enabled to cast one vote for the EU-wide list in addition to their vote for the national or regional list. His hope was to add 25 transnationally elected MEPs from the (back then) already existing poll of 751, for the 2014 elections, an idea that was eventually abandoned.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jürgen Habermas</span> German social theorist and philosopher (born 1929)

Jürgen Habermas is a German philosopher and social theorist in the tradition of critical theory and pragmatism. His work addresses communicative rationality and the public sphere.

Public opinion, or popular opinion, is the collective opinion on a specific topic or voting intention relevant to society. It is the people's views on matters affecting them. The term originates from France, and first appeared in the 17th century, though writers had identified the importance of the opinion of the people long before this. Prior to the advent of mass media, public fora such as coffee houses and gentlemen's clubs were used as exchanges of opinion and some reputable locations had great influence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public sphere</span> Area in social life with political ramifications

The public sphere is an area in social life where individuals can come together to freely discuss and identify societal problems, and through that discussion influence political action. A "Public" is "of or concerning the people as a whole." Such a discussion is called public debate and is defined as the expression of views on matters that are of concern to the public—often, but not always, with opposing or diverging views being expressed by participants in the discussion. Public debate takes place mostly through the mass media, but also at meetings or through social media, academic publications and government policy documents.

Alternative media are media sources that differ from established or dominant types of media in terms of their content, production, or distribution. Sometimes the term independent media is used as a synonym, indicating independence from large media corporations, but this term is also used to indicate media enjoying freedom of the press and independence from government control. Alternative media does not refer to a specific format and may be inclusive of print, audio, film/video, online/digital and street art, among others. Some examples include the counter-culture zines of the 1960s, ethnic and indigenous media such as the First People's television network in Canada, and more recently online open publishing journalism sites such as Indymedia.

Incivility is a general term for social behaviour lacking in civility or good manners, on a scale from rudeness or lack of respect for elders, to vandalism and hooliganism, through public drunkenness and threatening behaviour. The word "incivility" is derived from the Latin incivilis, meaning "not of a citizen".

<i>A Berlin Republic</i> 1997 book by Jürgen Habermas

A Berlin Republic is a 1997 book composed of a collection of transcripts of interviews with the German philosopher and social critic Jürgen Habermas conducted by various European media in the mid-1990s. The common thread of the interviews is Habermas's disagreement with resurgent German nationalism after the reunification with the former German Democratic Republic (GDR).

In political theory, refeudalization is the process of recovering the political mechanisms and relationships that used to define feudalism. Because the term "feudalism" is slightly ambiguous, "refeudalization" is ambiguous, too.

<i>The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere</i> 1962 book by Jürgen Habermas

The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society is a 1962 book by the philosopher Jürgen Habermas. It was translated into English in 1989 by Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. An important contribution to modern understanding of democracy, it is notable for "transforming media studies into a hard-headed discipline."

In sociology, communicative action is cooperative action undertaken by individuals based upon mutual deliberation and argumentation. The term was developed by German philosopher-sociologist Jürgen Habermas in his work The Theory of Communicative Action.

<i>The Theory of Communicative Action</i> 1981 book by Jürgen Habermas

The Theory of Communicative Action is a two-volume 1981 book by the philosopher Jürgen Habermas, in which the author continues his project of finding a way to ground "the social sciences in a theory of language", which had been set out in On the Logic of the Social Sciences (1967). The two volumes are Reason and the Rationalization of Society, in which Habermas establishes a concept of communicative rationality, and Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, in which Habermas creates the two level concept of society and lays out the critical theory for modernity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legitimation crisis</span> Decline of trust in authority

Legitimation crisis refers to a decline in the confidence of administrative functions, institutions, or leadership. The term was first introduced in 1973 by Jürgen Habermas, a German sociologist and philosopher. Habermas expanded upon the concept, claiming that with a legitimation crisis, an institution or organization does not have the administrative capabilities to maintain or establish structures effective in achieving their end goals. The term itself has been generalized by other scholars to refer not only to the political realm, but to organizational and institutional structures as well. While there is not unanimity among social scientists when claiming that a legitimation crisis exists, a predominant way of measuring a legitimation crisis is to consider public attitudes toward the organization in question.

Transnational citizenship is a political concept which would redefine traditional notions of citizenship and replaces an individual's singular national loyalties with the ability to belong to multiple nation states, as made visible in the political, cultural, social and economic realms. Unlike national citizenship, where individuals interact in such capacities with one sovereign state, transnational citizenship transcends pre-established territorial boundaries in order to create a modern meaning of "belonging" in an increasingly globalized society. Additionally, while preconceived notions of citizenship are often divided between national, social and individual forms of identity, all three categories serve to contribute to the meaning of transnational citizenship. State citizenship can be defined as an individual establishing their sense of belonging by espousing to the liberal-democratic values of the state in the public sphere. When applied to transnational citizenship, an individual would have the opportunity to be civically engaged in multiple societies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional patriotism</span> Concept of citizenship

Constitutional patriotism is the idea that people should form a political attachment to the norms and values of a pluralistic liberal democratic constitution rather than to a national culture or cosmopolitan society. It is associated with post-nationalist identity because, while it is seen as a similar concept to nationalism, the attachment is based on the constitution rather than on a national culture. In essence, it is an attempt to re-conceptualize group identity with a focus on the interpretation of citizenship as a loyalty that goes beyond individuals' ethnocultural identification. Theorists believe this to be more defensible than other forms of shared commitment in a diverse modern state with multiple languages and group identities. It is particularly relevant in post-national democratic states in which multiple cultural and ethnic groups coexist. It was influential in the development of the European Union and a key to Europeanism as a basis for multiple countries belonging to a supranational union.

The study of global communication is an interdisciplinary field focusing on global communication, or the ways that people connect, share, relate and mobilize across geographic, political, economic, social and cultural divides. Global communication implies a transfer of knowledge and ideas from centers of power to peripheries and the imposition of a new intercultural hegemony by means of the "soft power" of global news and entertainment.

Demoicracy is a polity of multiple distinct people (demoi), polity of polities. The term is derived from demoi, meaning "peoples" and kratos (κράτος) meaning "power". It is apparently meant to become an alternative to democracy, understood as power of a single demos. The term is used mainly to describe the genus of the European Union (EU) but is also gaining currency in more general theories of democracy above state level.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental policy of the European Union</span> Environment protection policy

The European Union (EU) Environmental Policy was initiated in 1973 with the "Environmental Action Programme" at which point the Environmental Unit was formed. The policy has thereafter evolved "to cover a vast landscape of different topics enacted over many decades" (Reuters) and in 2015 the Institute for European Environmental Policy estimated that "the body of EU environmental law" amounted to 500+ directives, regulations and decisions.

"Over the past decades the European Union has put in place a broad range of environmental legislation. As a result, air, water and soil pollution has significantly been reduced. Chemicals legislation has been modernised and the use of many toxic or hazardous substances has been restricted. Today, EU citizens enjoy some of the best water quality in the world"

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership</span> Proposed free trade agreement between the EU and the US

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) was a proposed trade agreement between the European Union and the United States, with the aim of promoting trade and multilateral economic growth. According to Karel de Gucht, European Commissioner for Trade between 2010 and 2014, the TTIP would have been the largest bilateral trade initiative ever negotiated, not only because it would have involved the two largest economic areas in the world but also "because of its potential global reach in setting an example for future partners and agreements".

Public sphere pedagogy (PSP) represents an approach to educational engagement that connects classroom activities with real world civic engagement. The focus of PSP programs is to connect class assignments, content, and readings with contemporary public issues. Students are then asked to participate with members of the community in various forms of public sphere discourse and democratic participation, such as town hall meetings and public debate events. Through these events, students are challenged to practice civic engagement and civil discourse.

Politics and technology encompasses concepts, mechanisms, personalities, efforts, and social movements that include, but are not necessarily limited to, the Internet and other information and communication technologies (ICTs). Scholars have begun to explore how internet technologies influence political communication and participation, especially in terms of what is known as the public sphere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ruud Koopmans</span> Dutch sociologist

Ruud Koopmans is a Dutch sociologist and professor at the Humboldt University of Berlin. His research focuses on migration, social integration and transnationalization.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Katrin Auel and Guido Tiemann, Europeanising European Public Spheres (Brussels: Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament, 2013)
  2. ↑ Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press, p. 162, 1989). Translation by Thomas Burger from the original German, published in 1962.
  3. 1 2 Adam Silke, "European public sphere", in Mazzoleni et al (eds), International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. (2015). New York: Wiley.
  4. ↑ Sevla Benhabib, "Models of Public Space", in Craig Calhoun (eds), Habermas and the Public Sphere (1992): 87. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  5. ↑ Giandomenico Majone, "'Europe's Democratic Deficit': the Question of Standards", European Law Journal, 4 (1), (1998): 5-28.
  6. 1 2 Corinne Doria, "Public Sphere and the European Project," Encyclopédie d'histoire numérique de l'Europe [online], published on 22/06/20 and accessed on 05/04/2022
  7. ↑ Robert Frank, Hartmut Kaelble, Marie-Françoise Lévy et al., Building an European public sphere: from the 1950s to the Present (Berlin: Peter Lang, 2010).
  8. ↑ The European Consortium for Political Research, panel on "New Perspectives on the European Public Sphere" (22-25 August 2018), accessed on the 01/04/2022
  9. 1 2 Caroline de la Porte and Arjen Van Dalen, "Europeanization of national public spheres? Cross-national media debates about the European Union's socio-economic strategy," European Politics and Society, 17 (3), (2016): 279-293
  10. ↑ Katrin Auel and Guido Tiemann, Europeanising European Public Spheres (Brussels: Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament, 2013): 20
  11. ↑ Jürgen Habermas, "The Public Sphere," in Stephen E. Bronner and Douglas Kellner (eds.), Critical theory and Society: A Reader (New York: Routledge, 1989): 136-142.
  12. ↑ Jacob Groshek and Ahmed Al-Rawi, "Anti-Austerity in the Euro Crisis: Modeling Protest With Online-Mobile-Social Media Usage, Users, and Content", International Journal of Communication, n°9 (January 2015): 3280-3303.
  13. ↑ Jürgen Gerhards, "Westeuropaische Integration und die Schwiergkeiten der Enstehung einer europaïschen Offentlichkeit", Zietschrift für Soziologie, 22 (1993): 99.
  14. 1 2 Michael Brüggemann and Hagen Schulz-Forberg, "Becoming Pan-European? Transnational Media and the European Public Sphere," The International Communication Gazette, 71(8), (2009): 693-712
  15. ↑ Maria Trif and Doug Imig, "Demanding to be heard: Social movements and the European public sphere", University of Memphis, Hooks Institute and Political Science, (July 2003): 20.
  16. ↑ Tim Smedley, "TTIP: what does the transatlantic trade deal mean for renewable energy?", The Guardian, August 5, 2015
  17. ↑ Lee Williams, "What is TTIP? Ans dix reasons why the answer should scare you", The Independent, October 6, 2015
  18. ↑ « Stop TIIP », European Citizen's Initiative registered on July 10th, 2017, European Commission
  19. ↑ Hajo Boomgaarden and Claes de Vreese, "Do European Elections Create a European Public Sphere?", in (Un)intended Consequences of EU Parliamentary Elections, (March 2016): 19-35.
  20. ↑ Auel and Tiemann, Europeanising European Public Sphere, European Parliament, p. 11.
  21. ↑ "Duff: Look to transnational list for Barroso's successor", Euractiv, October 6, 2010
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.