| FCC v. Consumers' Research | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 26, 2025 Decided June 27, 2025 | |
| Full case name | Federal Communications Commission, et al. v. Consumers' Research, et al.; Schools, Health and Libraries Broadband Coalition v. Consumers' Research |
| Docket nos. | 24-354 24-422 |
| Citations | 606 U.S. ___ ( more ) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Questions presented | |
| 1. Whether Congress violated the nondelegation doctrine by authorizing the Federal Communications Commission to determine, within the limits set forth in 47 U.S.C. § 254, the amount that providers must contribute to the Universal Service Fund; 2. Whether the FCC violated the nondelegation doctrine by using the financial projections of the private company appointed as the fund's administrator in computing universal service contribution rates; 3. Whether the combination of Congress's conferral of authority on the FCC and the FCC's delegation of administrative responsibilities to the administrator violates the nondelegation doctrine; and 4. Whether this case is moot in light of the challengers' failure to seek preliminary relief before the 5th Circuit. | |
| Holding | |
| The universal-service contribution scheme does not violate the nondelegation doctrine. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Jackson |
| Concurrence | Kavanaugh |
| Concurrence | Jackson |
| Dissent | Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, Alito |
Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers' Research, 606 U.S. ___(2025), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of the Universal Service Fund under the nondelegation doctrine. [1] [2]
