Fair Trials

Last updated
Fair Trials
Founded1992 by Stephen Jakobi
TypeNon-profit
NGO
Headquarters London, United Kingdom
Location
  • Global
ServicesProtecting and upholding fair trial rights, according to internationally recognised standards of justice
FieldsDirect-appeal campaigns, research, lobbying
Key people
Norman L Reimer (Global CEO)
Website www.fairtrials.org

Fair Trials is a UK-registered non-governmental organization which works for fair trials according to international standards of justice and the right to a fair trial, identifying where criminal justice is failing, alerting the world to the problems, and resolving these issues through campaigning, advocacy and strategic litigation. [1] It also builds regional legal capacity through targeted training, mentoring and network activities, [2] coordinating a network of criminal justice legal experts [3] and European human rights NGOs called JUSTICIA. [4]

Contents

History

Fair Trials was founded by lawyer Stephen Jakobi in 1992 (under the name Fair Trials Abroad) as a response to the case of Karen Smith, a British citizen arrested in Thailand for drug smuggling. [5] It now styles itself as the "global criminal justice watchdog". [6]

Current work

The areas where Fair Trials works are:

Pre-trial detention

Since 2011, Fair Trials has campaigned for international human rights standards on pre-trial detention to be more widely understood and applied in practice. This began with a 2011 report, [7] which was followed by a 2014 report. [8] These reports called for the adoption of EU-wide minimum standards on pre-trial detention, including:

Plea bargaining ('Trial waivers')

Fair Trials has researched the use of plea bargaining, also known as "trial waivers", campaigning for a "a rights-based approach" to trial waiver systems. [9] They coordinated research across 90 countries, assessing the legal and human rights implications and providing recommendations in a report, "The Disappearing Trial". [10]

EU defence rights

Fair Trials has been responsible for the production of detailed reports and policy briefings [11] [12] for EU policy-makers. It has worked for the proper implementation of EU law, through strategic litigation and training [13] and has helped people access local expertise by producing "Notes of Advice" [14] on criminal proceedings and justice systems in Europe. Additionally, Fair Trials set up the Legal Experts Advisory Panel (LEAP), [15] which is an EU-wide network of experts in criminal justice and human rights working to promote fair and effective judicial cooperation within Europe, as well as informing the EU's work on criminal justice.

Extradition reform

Fair Trials' work in this area has been focused on campaigning to reform the European Arrest Warrant, a fast-track system for surrendering people from one EU country to another.

Fair Trials has highlighted a number of cases [16] which demonstrate that the European Arrest Warrant system is jeopardising the right to a fair trial. [17] In particular, Fair Trials alleges that:

Interpol

Interpol systems, particularly its international "wanted person" alerts ("Red Notices") can be abused in order to persecute refugees, journalists and peaceful political demonstrators [19] [20] worldwide.

In 2013, Fair Trials released a report [21] [22] which identified two major areas for INTERPOL reform:

  1. Protection from abuse of Interpol's tools by member countries, and
  2. Creation of a more fair and transparent process for individuals who are challenging data that has been processed by INTERPOL.

Fair Trials has met with Interpol on multiple occasions [23] [24] as part of an ongoing dialogue between the two organisations to prevent the abuse of its systems.

In a follow-up report, Fair Trials outlined a series of further reforms which Fair Trials holds to be necessary in order to ensure protection of INTERPOL’s systems against abuse. [25]

Casework

In its early years, Fair Trials used to provide case support, assisting around 500 individuals each year and provide assistance in approximately 50 cases at any one time. It used a network of lawyers and diplomatic, political and media contacts to advocate on behalf of clients. It did not charge clients for the service it offers. [1]

Fair Trials provided assistance on several high-profile cases [26] including the case of English nanny Louise Woodward who, in 1997, was arrested in America for murder, after the death of a baby in her care. [27] Woodward was found guilty of second degree murder, although her sentence was reduced on appeal as the court found that there was no malice in Louise's actions and that “allowing this defendant on this evidence to remain convicted of second-degree murder would be a miscarriage of justice.” [28] In 2007, 10 years later, the key prosecution witness reversed his evidence stating: “the science we have today could, in fact, have exonerated Louise. There is certainly, in retrospect, reasonable doubt.” [29]

Other high-profile, notable cases include

Ian Stillman : In August 2000, deaf charity worker Ian Stillman was arrested in India for smuggling 20 kilograms of cannabis after the drug was found in a shared taxi. He has always maintained his innocence. Fair Trials campaigned for his release and in 2002 he was finally released after spending two years in prison. [30]

Greek Plane Spotters: In November 2001, a group of 12 British and two Dutch plane spotters were arrested on charges of espionage after taking notes during an open day at a Greek Air Force base. They were found guilty in 2002. The Greek courts overturned the conviction on appeal. [31]

Ghana Girls: In July 2007, two 16-year-old girls, Yetunde Diya and Yasemin Vatansever, were arrested for possession of six kilograms of cocaine at Accra airport in Ghana. The girls claimed they did not know they were carrying drugs. With help from Fair Trials International (as it was then known), the girls received only a one-year prison sentence instead of the maximum three-year sentence. [32]

Andrew Symeou : In July 2008, British student Andrew Symeou stood wrongly accused of killing a holiday maker on a Greek island. Although evidence against him was deeply flawed and his innocence could be proven, he was extradited to Greece on a European Arrest Warrant and held in prison for a year before being acquitted in 2011. [33]

Related Research Articles

Universal jurisdiction is a legal principle that allows states or international organizations to claim criminal jurisdiction over an accused person regardless of where the alleged crime was committed, and regardless of the accused's nationality, country of residence, or any other relation to the prosecuting entity. Crimes prosecuted under universal jurisdiction are considered crimes against all, too serious to tolerate jurisdictional arbitrage. The concept of universal jurisdiction is therefore closely linked to the idea that some international norms are erga omnes, or owed to the entire world community, as well as to the concept of jus cogens – that certain international law obligations are binding on all states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Extradition</span> Transfer of a suspect from one jurisdiction to another by law enforcement

In an extradition, one jurisdiction delivers a person accused or convicted of committing a crime in another jurisdiction, over to the other's law enforcement. It is a cooperative law enforcement procedure between the two jurisdictions and depends on the arrangements made between them. In addition to legal aspects of the process, extradition also involves the physical transfer of custody of the person being extradited to the legal authority of the requesting jurisdiction.

Trial in absentia is a criminal proceeding in a court of law in which the person who is subject to it is not physically present at those proceedings. In absentia is Latin for "in (the) absence". Its meaning varies by jurisdiction and legal system.

An Interpol notice is an international alert circulated by Interpol to communicate information about crimes, criminals, and threats by police in a member state to their counterparts around the world. The information disseminated via notices concerns individuals wanted for serious crimes, missing persons, unidentified bodies, possible threats, prison escapes, and criminals' modus operandi.

The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is an arrest warrant valid throughout all member states of the European Union (EU). Once issued, it requires another member state to arrest and transfer a criminal suspect or sentenced person to the issuing state so that the person can be put on trial or complete a detention period. It is a simplified cross-border judicial surrender method, and has replaced the lengthy extradition procedures that used to exist between member states. The EAW has been in force since 1 January 2004 in all Member States.

Justice is a human rights and law reform organisation based in the United Kingdom. It is the British section of the International Commission of Jurists, the international human rights organisation of lawyers devoted to the legal protection of human rights worldwide. Consequently, members of Justice are predominantly barristers and solicitors, judges, legal academics, and law students.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International criminal law</span> Public international law

International criminal law (ICL) is a body of public international law designed to prohibit certain categories of conduct commonly viewed as serious atrocities and to make perpetrators of such conduct criminally accountable for their perpetration. The core crimes under international law are genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.

Gregorian Bivolaru also known as Magnus Aurolsson and nicknamed Grieg, Grig or, by the press, Guru is the founder of the Movement for Spiritual Integration into the Absolute (MISA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alberto Fujimori's arrest and trial</span>

Former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori was arrested, tried, and convicted for a number of crimes related to corruption and human rights abuses that occurred during his government. Fujimori was president from 1990 to 2000. His presidency ended when he fled the country in the midst of a scandal involving corruption and human rights violations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interpol</span> International police organization

The International Criminal Police Organization, commonly known as Interpol, is an international organization that facilitates worldwide police cooperation and crime control. It is the world's largest international police organization. It is headquartered in Lyon, France, with seven regional bureaus worldwide, and a National Central Bureau in all 195 member states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pre-trial detention</span> Detention after arrest and charge until a trial

Pre-trial detention, also known as preventive detention, provisional detention, or remand, is the process of detaining a person until their trial after they have been arrested and charged with an offence. A person who is on remand is held in a prison or detention centre or held under house arrest. Varying terminology is used, but "remand" is generally used in common law jurisdictions and "preventive detention" elsewhere. However, in the United States, "remand" is rare except in official documents and "kept in custody until trial" is used in the media and even by judges and lawyers in addressing the public. Detention before charge is referred to as custody and continued detention after conviction is referred to as imprisonment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Belarus</span> Overview of human rights in Belarus

The government of Belarus is criticized for its human rights violations and persecution of non-governmental organisations, independent journalists, national minorities, and opposition politicians. In a testimony to the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, former United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice labeled Belarus as one of the world's six "outposts of tyranny". In response, the Belarusian government called the assessment "quite far from reality". During 2020 Belarusian presidential election and protests, the number of political prisoners recognized by Viasna Human Rights Centre rose dramatically to 1062 as of 16 February 2022. Several people died after the use of unlawful and abusive force by law enforcement officials during 2020 protests. According to Amnesty International, the authorities didn't investigate violations during protests but instead harassed those who challenged their version of events. In July 2021, the authorities launched a campaign against the remaining non-governmental organizations, liquidating at least 270 of them by October, including all previously registered human rights organizations in the country.

An examining magistrate is a judge in an inquisitorial system of law who carries out pre-trial investigations into allegations of crime and in some cases makes a recommendation for prosecution. Also known as an investigating magistrate, inquisitorial magistrate, or investigating judge, the exact role and standing of examining magistrates varies by jurisdiction. Common duties and powers of the examining magistrate include overseeing ongoing criminal investigations, issuing search warrants, authorizing wiretaps, making decisions on pretrial detention, interrogating the accused person, questioning witnesses, examining evidence, as well as compiling a dossier of evidence in preparation for trial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area of freedom, security and justice</span> EUs home affairs and justice policies

The area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ) of the European Union (EU) is a policy domain concerning home affairs and migration, justice as well as fundamental rights, developed to address the challenges posed to internal security by collateral effects of the free movement of people and goods in the absence of border controls or customs inspection throughout the Schengen Area, as well as to safeguard adherence to the common European values through ensuring that the fundamental rights of people are respected across the EU.

Victims' rights are legal rights afforded to victims of crime. These may include the right to restitution, the right to a victims' advocate, the right not to be excluded from criminal justice proceedings, and the right to speak at criminal justice proceedings.

Syed Talha Ahsan is a British poet and translator. He is winner of the Platinum and Bronze Koestler Awards 2012 for his poetry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrew Symeou</span> British author

Andrew Christopher Symeou is a British born memoirist and author of the book Extradited: The European Arrest Warrant and My Fight for Justice from a Greek Prison Cell.

Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location is a form of detention regularly used by authorities in the People's Republic of China against individuals accused of endangering state security. RSDL is usually carried out at special facilities run by the Public or State Security Bureaus of China, often euphemistically called "training centers," or even hotels that have been converted into black jails. Laws regulating RSDL contain exceptions that allow the state to not inform the family members of the detained about their loved one's incarceration, while also denying detainees access to a lawyer. On the surface, the measure appears to be a softer form of detention like house arrest; but in practice the measure allows for what one journalist calls "the disappearing" of suspects into secret detention."

<i>Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v Murphy</i> Irish Supreme Court case

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v Murphy, [2010] IESC 17; [2010] 3 IR 77, is an Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that inpatient treatment with a restriction order attached to it in a European Arrest Warrant came within the meaning of "detention order" in s.10(d) of the European Warrant Act 2003. This gave the definition of "detention order" a wide meaning. The case involved an appeal against extradition to the United Kingdom.

The trial of Abdullah Öcalan, the leader of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), began on 31 May 1999 and concluded on 29 June with a Death sentence for treason and separatism. Öcalan was captured in February 1999 in Nairobi, Kenya and brought to Turkey where he was imprisoned on the İmralı island in the Sea of Marmara. After his conviction, Öcalan appealed to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), which ruled he did not have a fair trial and demanded a retrial. The death sentence was confirmed by the Court of Cassation in November 1999 and Turkey denied Öcalan a retrial. His death sentence was commuted into life imprisonment in October 2002.

References

  1. 1 2 "The Right to a Fair Trial – Fair Trials".
  2. "Justice policies at a glance – European Commission" (PDF). ec.europa.eu.
  3. "Legal Experts Advisory Panel". Fair Trials. 2018-02-20. Retrieved 2020-09-24.
  4. "JUSTICIA". Fair Trials. 2018-03-24. Retrieved 2020-09-24.
  5. "Don't forget your toothbrush (and this man's number)". BBC News. 30 April 2002.
  6. "Home | Fair Trials". www.fairtrials.org. Retrieved 2020-09-24.
  7. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2015-08-25.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  8. http://www.fairtrials.org/wp-content/uploads/Stockholms-Sunset.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  9. "The Disappearing Trial". Fair Trials. 2018-03-29. Retrieved 2020-09-24.
  10. Fair Trials. "'The Disappearing Trial'" (PDF).
  11. "Justice and fundamental rights". European Commission – European Commission. Retrieved 2019-06-13.
  12. "JUST Newsroom – News overview – European Commission". ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 2019-06-13.
  13. "Funded Projects | the Legal Education Foundation". Archived from the original on 2015-07-10. Retrieved 2015-08-25.
  14. "Arrested In – Fair Trials".
  15. "Legal Experts Advisory Panel – Fair Trials".
  16. "House of Commons - Justice issues in Europe - Justice Committee". Archived from the original on 2011-06-05. Retrieved 2010-04-14.
  17. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2015-08-25.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  18. "Extradition Reform". Fair Trials international.
  19. Bowcott, Owen; correspondent, legal affairs (27 November 2013). "Interpol accused of failing to scrutinise red notice requests". The Guardian via www.theguardian.com.
  20. "Interpol's Red Notices used by some to pursue political dissenters, opponents – International Consortium of Investigative Journalists". 16 March 2012.
  21. http://www.fairtrials.org/wp-content/uploads/Fair-Trials-International-Strengthening-INTERPOL-brochure.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  22. http://www.fairtrials.org/wp-content/uploads/Strengthening-respect-for-human-rights-strengthening-INTERPOL4.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  23. "N20130920 / 2013 / News / News and media / Internet / Home – INTERPOL". www.interpol.int.
  24. "N2015-024 / 2015 / News / News and media / Internet / Home – INTERPOL". www.interpol.int.
  25. "Dismantling the Tools of Oppression: Ending the Misuse of INTERPOL" (PDF). fairtrials.org. Retrieved 2022-04-30.
  26. Lawyer, The (1998-10-10). "Last hope of the condemned". The Lawyer | Legal insight, benchmarking data and jobs. Retrieved 2019-06-13.
  27. Moyes, Jojo (2 October 1997). "New facts expose flaw in case against British nanny accused of murder". The Independent. London.
  28. "Woodward released after conviction cut". BBC News. 11 November 1997.
  29. "Killer nanny reinvents self as dance teacher in England". Boston Herald. Jun 3, 2008. Retrieved Oct 7, 2020.
  30. "Stillman's thwarted fight for freedom". BBC News. 11 January 2002.
  31. Blackstock, Colin (11 December 2001). "Judges to decide today on planespotters". The Guardian. London.
  32. Ross, Will (23 January 2008). "Ghana drug girls learn their fate". BBC News.
  33. "European warrants need reform, says acquitted Symeou". BBC News. 23 December 2015.