Federal Judicial Service Commission

Last updated
Federal Judicial Service Commission
Agency overview
Formed1999
Jurisdiction Federal Republic of Nigeria
Headquarters Supreme Court Complex, Abuja
Agency executives
Parent department National Judicial Council
Website fjsc.gov.ng

The Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) is an entity established by Section 153 (1) of the Constitution of Nigeria of 1999, as amended. Its primary responsibility is to advise the National Judicial Council (NJC) on nominations for key judicial appointments. [1] These include positions like the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justices of the Supreme Court, President of the Court of Appeal, among others. The FJSC is empowered to recommend the removal of judicial officers and exercises control over certain court personnel. [2]

Contents

History

The FJSC was created in accordance with the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, which marked the return to democracy in Nigeria. It succeeded the former Federal Judicial Service Committee, dissolved in 1988, aiming to safeguard the judiciary's independence from executive influence. [3]

Composition

Consisting of nine members, the FJSC is appointed by the Nigerian President, upon the NJC's recommendation. The members include the Chief Justice of Nigeria, President of the Court of Appeal, Attorney-General, Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, President of the National Industrial Court, legal practitioners, and individuals recognized for their integrity. Halimatu Abdullahi Turaki serves as the Secretary and Chief Executive of the Commission. [4]

Functions

The FJSC is primarily tasked with advising the NJC on judicial appointments and recommending the discipline or removal of judicial officers. [5] It holds the authority to manage personnel in specific courts and is empowered to perform various functions conferred by law. Ancillary tasks include organizing training programs, publishing judicial materials, maintaining a website, collaborating with judicial bodies, and contributing to the promotion of the rule of law and judicial reforms. [6]

Related Research Articles

Chapter 9: Judiciary.Chapter 9 of the 1997 Constitution of Fiji is titled Judiciary. It is divided into twenty-two sections, setting out the composition and functions of the Judicial branch of the Fijian government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Nigeria</span> Highest court of Nigeria

The Supreme Court of Nigeria (SCN) is the highest court in Nigeria, and is located in the Central District, Abuja, in what is known as the Three Arms Zone, so called due to the proximity of the offices of the Presidential Complex, the National Assembly, and the Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Pakistan</span> National judicial system

The judiciary of Pakistan is the national system of courts that maintains the law and order in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Pakistan uses a common law system, which was introduced during the colonial era, influenced by local medieval judicial systems based on religious and cultural practices. The Constitution of Pakistan lays down the fundamentals and working of the Pakistani judiciary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government of Oklahoma</span> Government of the U.S. state of Oklahoma

The government of the U.S. State of Oklahoma, established by the Oklahoma Constitution, is a republican democracy modeled after the federal government of the United States. The state government has three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial. Through a system of separation of powers or "checks and balances," each of these branches has some authority to act on its own, some authority to regulate the other two branches, and has some of its own authority, in turn, regulated by the other branches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of India</span> National court system

The judiciary of India is a system of courts that interpret and apply the law in the Republic of India. India uses a common law system, first introduced by the British East India Company and with influence from other colonial powers and Indian princely states, as well as practices from ancient and medieval times. The Constitution of India provides concept for a single and unified judiciary in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Malta</span>

The judiciary of Malta interprets and applies the laws of Malta, to ensure equal justice under law, and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The legal system of Malta is based partially on English law and partly on Continental law, whilst also being subject to European Union law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial system of Bhutan</span>

The judicial system of Bhutan is the purview of the Royal Court of Justice, the judicial branch of the government of Bhutan under the Constitution of 2008. The judicial system comprises the Judicial Commission, the courts, the police, the penal code, and regulations on jabmi (attorneys).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Privy Council of Tonga</span>

The Privy Council of Tonga is the highest ranking council to advise the Monarch in the Kingdom of Tonga. It is empowered to advise the King in his capacity as Head of State and Fountain of Justice under the provisions of Clause 50 (1) of the Constitution of Tonga:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judges' Council</span>

The Judges' Council is a body in England and Wales that, representing the judiciary, advises the Lord Chief Justice on judicial matters. It has its historical roots in the original Council of the Judges of the Supreme Court, created by the Judicature Act 1873 to oversee the new Supreme Court of Judicature. This body initially met regularly, reforming the procedure used by the circuit courts, and the new High Court of Justice but met less regularly as time went on, meeting only twice between 1900 and 1907, with a gap of ten years between meetings in 1940 and 1950 respectively. After relative inactivity, it was eventually wound up through the Supreme Court Act 1981, which contained no provisions for its continued existence, something Denis Dobson attributes to newer bodies which performed the duties the Council had originally been created to do.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of Nigeria</span> Types of law

The Law of Nigeria consists of courts, offences, and various types of laws. Nigeria has its own constitution which was established on 29 May 1999. The Constitution of Nigeria is the supreme law of the country. There are four distinct legal systems in Nigeria, which include English law, Common law, Customary law, and Sharia Law. English law in Nigeria is derived from the colonial Nigeria, while common law is a development from its post-colonial independence.

The National Judicial Council (NJC), is an executive body established by the Federal Government of Nigeria in accordance with the provisions of Section 153 of the 1999 Constitution as amended to protect the Judiciary of Nigeria from the whims and caprices of the Executive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nigerian Courts of Appeal</span> Intermediate appellate courts

The Federal Court of Appeal of Nigeria is the intermediate Appellate Court of the Nigerian federal court system. The Court of Appeal of Nigeria decides appeals from the district courts within the federal judicial system, and in some instances from other designated federal courts and administrative agencies. As at 2010, there are 66 judges of the Nigerian courts of appeals authorized by the Senate. These judges are recommended by the National Judicial Council (NJC), nominated by the President of Nigeria and confirmed by the Senate. There are currently seventy-two Nigerian courts of appeals across the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria. There are 12 in the North-Central, 10 in North-East, 10 in North-West, 10 in South-South, 9 in South-East and 11 in South Western Nigeria. The headquarter is located at Three Arms Zone, Abuja.

Ayo Salami, is a Nigerian jurist and former President of the Nigerian courts of appeal.

The Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria are members of the Supreme Court of Nigeria composed of the Chief Justice of Nigeria and other justices not more than 21 including the chief justice, appointed by the president on the recommendation of the National Judicial Council, (NJC) and subject to confirmation by the Nigerian Senate. Justices of the Supreme Court must be qualified to practice law in Nigeria, and must have been so qualified for a period not less than fifteen years. Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria have a mandatory retirement age of 70 years.

The Rivers State Judicial Service Commission established under section 197 (1) (c) of the 1999 Constitution is the executive body that handles matters relating to appointment, discipline and promotion of Rivers State's judicial officers and their support staffs. It is chaired by the Chief Judge of the High Court of Rivers State.

An officer of the United States is a functionary of the executive or judicial branches of the federal government of the United States to whom is delegated some part of the country's sovereign power. The term officer of the United States is not a title, but a term of classification for a certain type of official.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Maraga</span> 14th Chief Justice of the Republic of Kenya

David Kenani Maraga is a Kenyan lawyer and jurist. He was the 14th Chief Justice and President of the Supreme Court of Kenya from October 2016 until his retirement in January 2021.

Judicial independence is regarded as one of the foundation values of the Australian legal system, such that the High Court held in 2004 that a court capable of exercising federal judicial power must be, and must appear to be, an independent and impartial tribunal. Former Chief Justice Gerard Brennan described judicial independence as existing "to serve and protect not the governors but the governed", albeit one that "rests on the calibre and the character of the judges themselves". Despite general agreement as to its importance and common acceptance of some elements, there is no agreement as to each of the elements of judicial independence.

Monica Bolna'an Dongban-Mensem is a Nigerian judge. She is the President of the Court of Appeal of Nigeria. Her appointment was confirmed on Thursday, 11 June 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ninety-ninth Amendment of the Constitution of India</span>

The Ninety-ninth Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as The Constitution Act, 2014, formed a National Judicial Appointments Commission. 16 State assemblies out of 29 States including Goa, Rajasthan, Tripura, Gujarat and Telangana ratified the Central Legislation, enabling the President of India to give assent to the bill. The amendment was struck down by the Supreme Court on 16 October 2015.

References

  1. Kincaid, J.; Moreno, M.F.; Colino, C.; Forum of Federations (2010). Diversity and Unity in Federal Countries. Global dialogue on federalism. Forum of Federations and International Association of Centers for Federal Studies. p. 242. ISBN   978-0-7735-3732-3 . Retrieved 28 October 2023.
  2. "National Judicial Council". njc.gov.ng. 14 July 2023. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
  3. Nigeria. Bureau of Public Procurement (2008). Public Procurement Journal. Bureau of Public Procurement. p. 408. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
  4. "MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION". FJSC. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
  5. Imoedemhe, O.C. (2016). The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: National Implementation in Africa. Springer International Publishing. p. 168. ISBN   978-3-319-46780-1 . Retrieved 28 October 2023.
  6. Erugo, S.; Adekoya, C.O. (2018). Lawyering With Integrity: Essays In Honour of Ernest Ojukwu, SAN. Lulu.com. p. 328. ISBN   978-1-387-82457-1 . Retrieved 28 October 2023.