Feeling thermometer

Last updated

A feeling thermometer, also known as a thermometer scale, is a type of visual analog scale that allows respondents to rank their views of a given subject on a scale from "cold" (indicating disapproval) to "hot" (indicating approval), analogous to the temperature scale of a real thermometer. It is often used in survey and political science research to measure how positively individuals feel about a given group, individual, issue, or organisation, as well as in quality of life research to measure individuals' subjective health status. It typically uses a rating scale with options ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. [1] [2] [3] Questions using the feeling thermometer have been included in every year of the American National Election Studies since 1968. [4]

Contents

Since its inclusion in a national forum, the tool has developed and become popular in both the political sphere and for medical and psychological research purposes. As it is a relatively new method of research [5] and is still being studied and improved, the feeling thermometer is commonly criticised for its limits of accuracy and validity due to restricted research in certain fields. However, despite certain limitations, there is a great deal of experimentation and case studies using the feeling thermometer in both the medical and political spaces. Individuals' views can be easily gathered through this analogy scale, primarily to gauge an overall public opinion using the 'hot' and 'cold' temperature measurements. [6] In addition, the feeling thermometer has a variety of applications in research to assist in understanding the burden of diseases and psychological states of people.

History

Using the feeling thermometer as a teaching resource in the classroom to simplify the identification of their feelings. USMC-111130-M-IV598-017.jpg
Using the feeling thermometer as a teaching resource in the classroom to simplify the identification of their feelings.

In 1921, Hayes and Patterson used the visual analog scale (VAS) method for the first time to measure and record the pain intensity of patients' medical issues. [7] Throughout the mid-1900s, different types of visual analog scales were developed such as the traditional, graphic and numeric rating scales that all use a continuous line of measurement to gather an outcome. [8] The feeling thermometer is a numeric rating scale as the users of it are asked to express their emotions and feelings using numbers, from 0 to 100. This explains the name of the methodology which refers to the temperatures on the thermometer to gather a calculation. The system uses higher numbers and warmth to reflect positivity in contrast to colder degrees to express any negative feelings.

The American National Election Studies (ANES) was the first wide-scale forum that implemented the feeling thermometer measurement. [7] From its first inclusion in 1964, "feeling thermometer scales have been quite popular to measure attitudes towards politicians, groups, and public figures," [9] thereby allowing for an expansion of the tool to reach wider audiences. Throughout the survey, participants are asked a variety of questions that aim to determine public opinions about political partisans. The questions asked aimed to remain neutral and unbiased, as with all feeling thermometers, only providing a statement and explaining how participants can rate it. An extract of a survey question from the 1996 American National Election Study (ANES) is as follows;

"In the list that follows, rate that person/party using something we call the feeling thermometer. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favourable and warm toward the person/party. Ratings between 0 and 50 degrees mean that you don't feel favourable toward the person/party and that you don't care too much for that person. You would rate the person at the 50-degree mark if you don't feel particularly warm or cold toward the person." [10]

The reliability of the ANES feeling thermometer in 1970 was tested by Alwin (2007) to reveal that "it spans in quite a large range". [11] However, as the accuracy has developed, the scale has become a highly popular means to determine the feelings toward political leaders, issues and ideologies. [12] [13] Studies are regularly conducted about the accuracy of the feelings thermometer and expanding the possible uses beyond the common fields of research. This progression has led to more recent accounts, from early 2021 to 2022, documenting the use of the feeling thermometer in gathering respondents' subjective thoughts towards vaccinated and unvaccinated people during the COVID-19 pandemic. [14] [15] [16] Additionally, the pandemic saw an increase in studies of attitudes against minorities or beliefs of racism, such as xenophobia against Asian populations. [17] These served an importance for governments and leaders to identify the basis of the problem, what is causing misinformed attitudes, paving way for potential solutions to the problem.

Applications in research

Amidst its popularity in political research, the feeling thermometer has also assisted in both psychological and sociological research as well as in the medical field. [18] Research has been conducted to identify individuals' feelings towards different social groups and societal issues such as quality of life, economics and environmental issues. Additionally, case studies have been carried out to identify the burden of various diseases and the extent of pain an individual may be in, due to their medical condition or illness.

Children using an interactive feeling thermometer to help identify and communicate their emotions. USMC-111130-M-IV598-006.jpg
Children using an interactive feeling thermometer to help identify and communicate their emotions.

As the feeling thermometer can be used to measure the effect of diseases on populations, it is often incorporated into research, for example, in conjunction with the Crohn's Disease Activity Index. [19] In this study about the effects of Crohn's Disease, patients conducted a questionnaire containing the feeling thermometer to report their health and the burden of both the disease and its specific treatment. [20] The feeling thermometer was effective in measuring their health outcomes and provided "a quick and accurate assessment of the burden of Crohn's disease on patients"[3] which supported the other research tools used and identified common issues. [20]

As proven in the American National Election Surveys, feeling thermometers have also been a beneficial tool as a longitudinal study measure to estimate population changes over time. [21] Its ability to analyse and represent large groups of data efficiently allows for the tool to be used on a wide-scale such as for international collection of data as explored in Use in the political sphere.

A variation of the feeling thermometer has also become highly popular amongst psychologists and behavioural therapists to explore emotions of clients and help identify them. [22] [23] The same concept of connecting a particular area of the scale to a feeling is used, although, to simplify the identification process, colours replace the numbers. Thus, 0 degrees is represented with light green or blue to signify cold, unfavourable feelings such as apathy and 100 degrees depicting happy, warm emotions. However, this model varies between thermometers depending on what outcome the behavioural therapist is seeking to achieve. For cognitive behavioural therapists, clients can be asked to create their own feeling thermometers [24] to "recognise emotions in self and others, regulate and manage strong emotions (positive and negative), and recognising strengths and areas of need." [25] Allowing individuals to express their emotions using their own methodologies helps the results to be more accurate and is also an effective classroom learning strategy. [26] [27] Thus, teachers have incorporated this tool to help students communicate their emotions without the pressure of talking and trying to recognise their feelings. [28] [29]

Limitations and criticisms

As with many visual analog scales, the feeling thermometer has been criticised for its limits of accuracy, precision, range and reliability. The process of using the measurement allows for a high level of bias from participants when answering questions and in turn providing their ratings. The instructions provided state that "ratings between 50 and 100 degrees mean that you feel favourable and warm towards the person (group)" [30] and the opposite feeling goes for ratings between 0 and 50 degrees. Arguably, these directions can be interpreted in different ways by various individuals depending on their knowledge of the political topic being questioned, therefore limiting the ability to compare scores between people. As suggested by Brady (1985), "feeling thermometer scores may be plagued by problems of interpersonal incompatibility" [31] which presents the difficulties that come with making decisive decisions about personal matters.

Another commonly researched limitation of the feeling thermometer is the difficulty for respondents in making precise distinctions between the measurement points to reflect their accurate feelings. People's opinions can change quickly based on a large range of factors such as the time of performing the test, their mood and exterior influences such as people. "People are not capable psychologically of making such fine distinctions of their own internal dispositions" [32] and individuals may have difficulty expressing their exact emotions, especially when in a medical review to rate their pain or discomfort.

In psychology, Affect is defined as "any experience, feeling or emotion...from the simplest to the most complex sensations of feeling" [33] described as positive or negative which can be consistent with the feeling thermometers role in collecting individuals' responses to stimuli. [34] This definition holds importance in relation to criticisms of the feeling thermometer from Abelson and Marcus (1988) who state that ratings "are not themselves affective responses." [35] They suggest the model is bipolar and two-dimensional and unaccepting of the fact that feelings are complex and will not always be on a certain side of the spectrum, rather being flexible and often changing. Multiple researchers [36] [37] have discovered that "people can simultaneously experience positive and negative affect toward the same object and that these experiences had distinctive effects" [38] limiting the feeling thermometer's ability to collect accurate data.

Use in the political sphere

ANES feeling thermometer results 1980 through 2016 demonstrating affective polarisation ANES feeling thermometer 1980 through 2016.jpg
ANES feeling thermometer results 1980 through 2016 demonstrating affective polarisation

Since the first inclusion of the feeling thermometer in the American National Election Study (ANES), the feeling thermometer has become a popular tool to gather political opinions. [7] Its use in the political sphere has been on both a national and international scale to identify the attitudes and values of political leaders and their countries. The American National Election Studies, voters from the whole of the United States are surveyed by through academic research question, directly before and after presidential elections. Since 2016, a similar approach is taken before and after political debates to determine whether or not they are a factor in the increase of political polarisation. [39] [40] A study after the 2016 general election debates, a study was conducted to examine the role of emotion on people's attitudes and responses to candidates. Prior to the debate, a series of questions were asked about attitudes towards the presidential candidates at the time, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, issues they discussed in addition to demographic questions. [41] The feeling thermometer was used to analyse any changes that had occurred, calculating the difference between subjects' scores which ranged from 0-100 "(with 100 indicating the most favourable feelings toward the candidate)". [41]

A 2014 YouGov dataset containing the countries of France, Germany, the United States of America and the United Kingdom were compared in an attempt to explain "why democracies go to war more often with non-democracies than with democracies". [42] In using the feeling thermometer to measure populations' feelings towards foreign countries, it was gathered that power was the main component that influenced a relationship between democratic countries and a divide between foreign states. [42] Feeling thermometer data also helps identify significant polarisation as the scale easily differentiates "colder" and "warmer" feelings towards both parties and leaders. [43]

To gain specific responses from the survey tool, well-tested equations and questions have been developed to gain specific outcomes that can assist in research and predictions of future political forums. The presidential and congressional feeling thermometer [44] equation are examples of popular political calculators that assist in deciphering between public responses. [45] Trust in democracy and the political system began becoming a common point of topic in the early 2000s leading to improvement of such formulations to measure individual's satisfaction (or dissatisfaction) with political leaders. [46] [47] Since the president is "the focal point of the political system" [46] in the United States of America, analysis of people's specific feelings towards their overall leader is vital in understanding the general consensus. [48] [49] Additionally, the consistent use as a longitudinal study method, for example, in collecting ratings of presidential candidates "before and immediately after six elections (1972, 1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996)," [50] allow for detailed analysis and comparisons in society. [39] Thus, the presidential feeling thermometer is a beneficial tool in the political sphere.  

Related Research Articles

In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is described as the mental disturbance people feel when they realize their cognitions and actions are inconsistent or contradictory. This may ultimately result in some change in their cognitions or actions to cause greater alignment between them so as to reduce this dissonance. Relevant items of information include peoples' actions, feelings, ideas, beliefs, values, and things in the environment. Cognitive dissonance is typically experienced as psychological stress when persons participate in an action that goes against one or more of those things. According to this theory, when an action or idea is psychologically inconsistent with the other, people do all in their power to change either so that they become consistent. The discomfort is triggered by the person's belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein the individual tries to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.

Stress management consists of a wide spectrum of techniques and psychotherapies aimed at controlling a person's level of psychological stress, especially chronic stress, generally for the purpose of improving the function of everyday life. Stress produces numerous physical and mental symptoms which vary according to each individual's situational factors. These can include a decline in physical health, such as headaches, chest pain, fatigue, sleep problems, and depression. The process of stress management is a key factor that can lead to a happy and successful life in modern society. Stress management provides numerous ways to manage anxiety and maintain overall well-being.

An opinion poll, often simply referred to as a survey or a poll, is a human research survey of public opinion from a particular sample. Opinion polls are usually designed to represent the opinions of a population by conducting a series of questions and then extrapolating generalities in ratio or within confidence intervals. A person who conducts polls is referred to as a pollster.

Empathy is generally described as the ability to take on other's perspective, to understand, feel, and possibly share and respond to their experience. There are more definitions of empathy that include but are not limited to social, cognitive, and emotional processes primarily concerned with understanding others. Often times, empathy is considered to be a broad term, and broken down into more specific concepts and types that include cognitive empathy, emotional empathy, somatic empathy, and spiritual empathy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attitude (psychology)</span> Concept in psychology and communication studies

An attitude "is a summary evaluation of an object of thought. An attitude object can be anything a person discriminates or holds in mind." Attitudes include beliefs (cognition), emotional responses (affect) and behavioral tendencies. In the classical definition an attitude is persistent, while in more contemporary conceptualizations, attitudes may vary depending upon situations, context, or moods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spiral of silence</span> Political science and mass communication theory

The spiral of silence theory is a political science and mass communication theory which states that an individual's perception of the distribution of public opinion influences that individual's willingness to express their own opinions. Also known as the theory of public opinion, the spiral of silence theory claims individuals will be more confident and outward with their opinion when they notice that their personal opinion is shared throughout a group. But if the individual notices that their opinion is unpopular with the group, they will be more inclined to be reserved and remain silent. In other words, from the individual's perspective, "not isolating themself is more important than their own judgement", meaning their perception of how others in the group perceive them is more important to themself than the need for their opinion to be heard.

Political polarization is the divergence of political attitudes away from the center, towards ideological extremes. Scholars distinguish between ideological polarization and affective polarization.

The Beck Depression Inventory, created by Aaron T. Beck, is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used psychometric tests for measuring the severity of depression. Its development marked a shift among mental health professionals, who had until then, viewed depression from a psychodynamic perspective, instead of it being rooted in the patient's own thoughts.

Ambivalence is a state of having simultaneous conflicting reactions, beliefs, or feelings towards some object. Stated another way, ambivalence is the experience of having an attitude towards someone or something that contains both positively and negatively valenced components. The term also refers to situations where "mixed feelings" of a more general sort are experienced, or where a person experiences uncertainty or indecisiveness.

The authoritarian personality is a personality type characterized by a disposition to treat authority figures with unquestioning obedience and respect. Conceptually, the term authoritarian personality originated from the writings of Erich Fromm, and usually is applied to people who exhibit a strict and oppressive personality towards their subordinates. Regardless of whether authoritarianism is more of a personality, attitude, ideology or disposition, scholars find it has significant influence on public opinion and political behavior.

In social science research, social-desirability bias is a type of response bias that is the tendency of survey respondents to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others. It can take the form of over-reporting "good behavior" or under-reporting "bad", or undesirable behavior. The tendency poses a serious problem with conducting research with self-reports. This bias interferes with the interpretation of average tendencies as well as individual differences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affect (psychology)</span> Experience of feeling or emotion

Affect, in psychology, is the underlying experience of feeling, emotion, attachment, or mood. It encompasses a wide range of emotional states and can be positive or negative. Affect is a fundamental aspect of human experience and plays a central role in many psychological theories and studies. It can be understood as a combination of three components: emotion, mood, and affectivity. In psychology, the term affect is often used interchangeably with several related terms and concepts, though each term may have slightly different nuances. These terms encompass: emotion, feeling, mood, emotional state, sentiment, affective state, emotional response, affective reactivity, disposition. Researchers and psychologists may employ specific terms based on their focus and the context of their work.

Sentiment analysis is the use of natural language processing, text analysis, computational linguistics, and biometrics to systematically identify, extract, quantify, and study affective states and subjective information. Sentiment analysis is widely applied to voice of the customer materials such as reviews and survey responses, online and social media, and healthcare materials for applications that range from marketing to customer service to clinical medicine. With the rise of deep language models, such as RoBERTa, also more difficult data domains can be analyzed, e.g., news texts where authors typically express their opinion/sentiment less explicitly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Survey (human research)</span> List of questions aimed at obtaining data from a group of people

In research of human subjects, a survey is a list of questions aimed for extracting specific data from a particular group of people. Surveys may be conducted by phone, mail, via the internet, and also in person in public spaces. Surveys are used to gather or gain knowledge in fields such as social research and demography.

A depression rating scale is a psychometric instrument (tool), usually a questionnaire whose wording has been validated with experimental evidence, having descriptive words and phrases that indicate the severity of depression for a time period. When used, an observer may make judgements and rate a person at a specified scale level with respect to identified characteristics. Rather than being used to diagnose depression, a depression rating scale may be used to assign a score to a person's behaviour where that score may be used to determine whether that person should be evaluated more thoroughly for a depressive disorder diagnosis. Several rating scales are used for this purpose.

Motivated reasoning is a cognitive and social response in which individuals, consciously or sub-consciously, allow emotion-loaded motivational biases to affect how new information is perceived. Individuals tend to favor evidence that coincides with their current beliefs and reject new information that contradicts them, despite contrary evidence.

Interpersonal emotion regulation is the process of changing the emotional experience of one's self or another person through social interaction. It encompasses both intrinsic emotion regulation, in which one attempts to alter their own feelings by recruiting social resources, as well as extrinsic emotion regulation, in which one deliberately attempts to alter the trajectory of other people's feelings.

The interviewer effect is the distortion of response to an interviewer-administered data collection effort which results from differential reactions to the social style and personality of interviewers or to their presentation of particular questions. The use of fixed-wording questions is one method of reducing interviewer bias. Anthropological research and case-studies are also affected by the problem, which is exacerbated by the self-fulfilling prophecy, when the researcher is also the interviewer it is also any effect on data gathered from interviewing people that is caused by the behavior or characteristics of the interviewer.

Political cognition refers to the study of how individuals come to understand the political world, and how this understanding leads to political behavior. Some of the processes studied under the umbrella of political cognition include attention, interpretation, judgment, and memory. Most of the advancements in the area have been made by scholars in the fields of social psychology, political science, and communication studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Negative partisanship</span>

Negative partisanship is the tendency of some voters to form their political opinions primarily in opposition to political parties they dislike. Whereas traditional partisanship involves supporting the policy positions of one's own party, its negative counterpart in turn means opposing those positions of a disliked party. It has been claimed to be the cause of severe polarization in American politics. It has also been studied in the Canadian context, as well as in Australia and New Zealand. Cross-national studies indicate that negative partisanship undermines public satisfaction with democracy, which threatens democratic stability. Traditional partisans, on the other hand, are more likely to support their country's democracy, which promotes democratic stability.

References

  1. ↑ Lavrakas, Paul J., ed. (2008). "Feeling Thermometer". Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods: A-M. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412963947.n183. ISBN   9781412918084.
  2. ↑ Zavala-Rojas, Diana (2014). "Thermometer Scale (Feeling Thermometer)". In Michalos, Alex C. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Science+Business Media. pp. 6633–6634. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1028. ISBN   978-94-007-0752-8.
  3. ↑ Schünemann, H; Griffith, L; Jaeschke, R; Goldstein, R; Stubbing, D; Guyatt, G (December 2003). "Evaluation of the minimal important difference for the feeling thermometer and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with chronic airflow obstruction". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology . 56 (12): 1170–1176. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00115-X. PMID   14680667.
  4. ↑ Lebo, Matthew J.; Cassino, Daniel (December 2007). "The Aggregated Consequences of Motivated Reasoning and the Dynamics of Partisan Presidential Approval". Political Psychology . 28 (6): 719–746. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00601.x.
  5. ↑ Wisniak, Jaime (2004). "The Thermometer: From The Feeling To The Instrument". The Chemical Educator. 5 (2): 88–91. doi:10.1007/s00897990371a. ISSN   1430-4171. S2CID   94471222.
  6. ↑ WILCOX, CLYDE; SIGELMAN, LEE; COOK, ELIZABETH (1989-01-01). "Some Like It Hot: Individual Differences in Responses to Group Feeling Thermometers". Public Opinion Quarterly. 53 (2): 246–257. doi:10.1086/269505. ISSN   0033-362X.
  7. 1 2 3 Zavala-Rojas, Diana (2014), "Thermometer Scale (Feeling Thermometer)", Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 6633–6634, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1028, ISBN   978-94-007-0752-8 , retrieved 2022-05-13
  8. ↑ "Visual Analog Scales - SAGE Research Methods". methods.sagepub.com. Retrieved 2022-05-13.
  9. ↑ Zavala-Rojas, Diana (2014), "Thermometer Scale (Feeling Thermometer)", in Michalos, Alex C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 6633–6634, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1028, ISBN   978-94-007-0752-8 , retrieved 2022-05-13
  10. ↑ "Sample ANES (Survey Questions from the 1996 American National Election Study) | SSRIC - Social Science Research and Instructional Council". www.ssric.org. Retrieved 2022-05-13.
  11. ↑ Alwin, Duane F. (2007-06-27). Margins of Error. Wiley Series in Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9780470146316. ISBN   978-0-470-14631-6.
  12. ↑ Liu, Mingnan; Wang, Yichen (2015-07-01). "Data collection mode effect on feeling thermometer questions: A comparison of face-to-face and Web surveys". Computers in Human Behavior. 48: 212–218. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.057. ISSN   0747-5632.
  13. ↑ Liu, Mingnan; Conrad, Frederick G. (2016-02-01). "An experiment testing six formats of 101-point rating scales". Computers in Human Behavior. 55: 364–371. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.036 . ISSN   0747-5632.
  14. ↑ Lin, Jennifer; Lazer, David; Baum, Matthew; Perlis, Roy H.; Pippert, Caroline; Qu, Hong; Green, Jon; Druckman, James; Huh, Kirsten; Kobotis, Maryarita; Ognyanova, Katherine (2021-08-06). "The COVID States Project #59: What Americans think about people who are not vaccinated".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. ↑ "The COVID States Project #86: Misperceptions about the war in Ukraine and COVID-19 vaccines". osf.io. 2022. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
  16. ↑ Viskupič, Filip; Wiltse, David L.; Meyer, Brittney A. (2022-03-23). "Beyond vaccination: messaging from religious leaders can help increase adherence to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines following vaccination. A research note". The Social Science Journal: 1–10. doi:10.1080/03623319.2022.2049557. ISSN   0362-3319. S2CID   247637948.
  17. ↑ Reny, Tyler T.; Barreto, Matt A. (2022-03-15). "Xenophobia in the time of pandemic: othering, anti-Asian attitudes, and COVID-19". Politics, Groups, and Identities. 10 (2): 209–232. doi:10.1080/21565503.2020.1769693. ISSN   2156-5503. S2CID   219749159.
  18. ↑ J., Lavrakas, Paul (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. SAGE Publications. ISBN   978-1-4522-6147-8. OCLC   233969508.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. ↑ Gregor, James C.; McDonald, John W. D.; Klar, Neil; Wall, Ronald; Atkinson, Kenneth; Lamba, Binu; Feagan, Brian G. (1997-11-01). "An Evaluation of Utility Measurement in Crohn's Disease". Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 3 (4): 265–276. doi: 10.1097/00054725-199712000-00004 . ISSN   1078-0998. PMID   23282873.
  20. 1 2 Wilcox, Allison R.; Dragnev, Maria Concepcion C.; Darcey, Christopher J.; Siegel, Corey A. (2010). "A new tool to measure the burden of Crohnʼs disease and its treatment". Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 16 (4): 645–650. doi:10.1002/ibd.21094. ISSN   1078-0998. PMC   2846405 . PMID   19714751.
  21. ↑ HERNON, P (2004). "The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research MethodsEdited by Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Alan Bryman, and Tim Futing Liao. 3 vols. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004. 1305 pp. $450.00. ISBN 0-7619-2363-2". Library & Information Science Research. 26 (3): 404–406. doi:10.1016/s0740-8188(04)00032-5. ISSN   0740-8188.
  22. ↑ Burg, James E. (2005-01-04). "The Emotions Thermometer: An Intervention for the Scaling and Psychoeducation of Intense Emotions". Journal of Family Psychotherapy. 15 (4): 47–56. doi:10.1300/J085v15n04_04. ISSN   0897-5353. S2CID   142547842.
  23. ↑ Attwood, Tony (2004-09-01). "Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Children and Adults with Asperger's Syndrome". Behaviour Change. 21 (3): 147–161. doi:10.1375/bech.21.3.147.55995. ISSN   0813-4839. S2CID   145546940.
  24. ↑ Banks, Tachelle; Zionts, Paul (2009). "Teaching a Cognitive Behavioral Strategy to Manage Emotions Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy in an Educational Setting". Intervention in School and Clinic. 44 (5): 307–313. doi:10.1177/1053451208330893. ISSN   1053-4512. S2CID   55949928.
  25. ↑ Elias, Maurice J. (2004). "The Connection between Social-Emotional Learning and Learning Disabilities: Implications for Intervention". Learning Disability Quarterly. 27 (1): 53–63. doi:10.2307/1593632. ISSN   0731-9487. JSTOR   1593632. S2CID   41245106.
  26. ↑ Takeda, Shinya; Matsuo, Risa; Ohtsuka, Minako (2022). "Effects of a classroom-based assertion training program for Japanese junior high school students". International Journal of Educational Research Open. 3: 100108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100108 . ISSN   2666-3740. S2CID   245507307.
  27. ↑ Jones, Stephanie M.; Bailey, Rebecca; Jacob, Robin (2014). "Social-emotional learning is essential to classroom management". Phi Delta Kappan. 96 (2): 19–24. doi:10.1177/0031721714553405. ISSN   0031-7217. S2CID   145449434.
  28. ↑ Hart, Sura; Hodson, Victoria Kindle (2008). The No-fault Classroom: Tools to Resolve Conflict & Foster Relationship Intelligence. PuddleDancer Press. ISBN   978-1-892005-18-2.
  29. ↑ Farrell, Amy (2019). "A spectrum of inclusion: Strategies for students with ASD". Agora. 54 (2): 40–43.
  30. ↑ Bennett, S. E. (2005-09-01). "Adam J. Berinsky. Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2004. 200 pp. $35.00 (cloth)". Public Opinion Quarterly. 69 (3): 463–483. doi:10.1093/poq/nfi035. ISSN   0033-362X.
  31. ↑ "Proceedings of the American Association for Public Opinion Research At the Eighth Annual Conference on Public Opinion Research, Pocono Manor, Penn.: TO ALL AAPOR MEMBERS". Public Opinion Quarterly. 17 (4): 563–564. 1953-12-01. doi:10.1093/poq/17.4.563. ISSN   0033-362X.
  32. ↑ Bennett, S. E. (2005-09-01). "Adam J. Berinsky. Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2004. 200 pp. $35.00 (cloth)". Public Opinion Quarterly. 69 (3): 463–483. doi:10.1093/poq/nfi035. ISSN   0033-362X.
  33. ↑ "APA Dictionary of Psychology". dictionary.apa.org. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
  34. ↑ Lansing, Charles (2010). "Book Review: Martin Kitchen, The Third Reich: Charisma and Community, Pearson Education Limited: Harlow, 2008; 403 pp., 22 illus.; 9781405801690, £20.99 (pbk)". European History Quarterly. 40 (3): 534–536. doi:10.1177/02656914100400030622. ISSN   0265-6914. S2CID   145595776.
  35. ↑ Granberg, Donald; Brown, Thad A. (1989). "On Affect and Cognition in Politics". Social Psychology Quarterly. 52 (3): 171–182. doi:10.2307/2786712. ISSN   0190-2725. JSTOR   2786712.
  36. ↑ Gardner, Wendi; Cacioppo, John; Berntson, Gary (1996). "Right lateralized P300s in response to emotional stimuli". PsycEXTRA Dataset. doi:10.1037/e526132012-146 . Retrieved 2022-05-27.
  37. ↑ Marcus, George E.; Neuman, W. Russell; MacKuen, Michael; Crigler, Ann N. (2007). The Affect Effect. University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226574431.001.0001. ISBN   978-0-226-57442-4.
  38. ↑ Steenbergen, Marco R.; Ellis, Christopher (2006), Redlawsk, David P. (ed.), "Fear and Loathing in American Elections: Context, Traits, and Negative Candidate Affect", Feeling Politics, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 109–133, doi:10.1057/9781403983114_7, ISBN   978-1-349-53320-6 , retrieved 2022-05-27
  39. 1 2 Warner, Benjamin R.; Park, Jihye; Kim, Go-Eun; McKinney, Mitchell S.; Paul, Wm. Bryan (2021-06-17). "Do Presidential Primary Debates Increase Political Polarization?". American Behavioral Scientist: 000276422110266. doi:10.1177/00027642211026613. ISSN   0002-7642. S2CID   237827451.
  40. ↑ Park, Jihye; Warner, Benjamin R.; McKinney, Mitchell S.; Kearney, Cassandra; Kearney, Michael W.; Kim, Go-Eun (2021-10-18). "Partisan Identity and Affective Polarization in Presidential Debates". American Behavioral Scientist: 000276422110465. doi:10.1177/00027642211046551. ISSN   0002-7642. S2CID   239137374.
  41. 1 2 Fridkin, Kim; Gershon, Sarah Allen (2021-07-04). "Nothing More than Feelings? How Emotions Affect Attitude Change during the 2016 General Election Debates". Political Communication. 38 (4): 370–387. doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1784325. ISSN   1058-4609. S2CID   225567479.
  42. 1 2 Gries, Peter; Fox, Andrew; Jing, Yiming; Mader, Matthias; Scotto, Thomas J.; Reifler, Jason (2020-01-01). "A new measure of the 'democratic peace': what country feeling thermometer data can teach us about the drivers of American and Western European foreign policy". Political Research Exchange. 2 (1): 1716630. doi: 10.1080/2474736x.2020.1716630 . ISSN   2474-736X. S2CID   213782001.
  43. ↑ Groenendyk, Eric; Sances, Michael W.; Zhirkov, Kirill (2020-10-01). "Intraparty Polarization in American Politics". The Journal of Politics. 82 (4): 1616–1620. doi:10.1086/708780. ISSN   0022-3816. S2CID   213780030.
  44. ↑ Hetherington, Marc J. (1998). "The Political Relevance of Political Trust". American Political Science Review. 92 (4): 791–808. doi:10.2307/2586304. ISSN   0003-0554. JSTOR   2586304. S2CID   55156472.
  45. ↑ Block Jr., Ray; Onwunli, Chinonye (2010-07-13). "Managing Monikers: The Role of Name Presentation in the 2008 Presidential Election: Block and Onwunli / MANAGING MONIKERS". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 40 (3): 464–481. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2010.03781.x.
  46. 1 2 Hetherington, Marc J. (1998). "The Political Relevance of Political Trust". The American Political Science Review. 92 (4): 791–808. doi:10.2307/2586304. ISSN   0003-0554. JSTOR   2586304. S2CID   55156472.
  47. ↑ Anderson, Christopher J.; LoTEMPIO, Andrew J. (2002). "Winning, Losing and Political Trust in America". British Journal of Political Science. 32 (2): 335–351. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000133. ISSN   1469-2112. S2CID   154933872.
  48. ↑ Wattenberg, Martin P. (1995). "The Role of Vice Presidential Candidate Ratings in Presidential Voting Behavior". American Politics Quarterly. 23 (4): 504–514. doi:10.1177/1532673X9502300408. ISSN   0044-7803. S2CID   145051009.
  49. ↑ Marcus, George E. (1988). "The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates". American Political Science Review. 82 (3): 737–761. doi:10.2307/1962488. ISSN   0003-0554. JSTOR   1962488. S2CID   146174733.
  50. ↑ Beasley, Ryan K.; Joslyn, Mark R. (2001). "Cognitive Dissonance and Post-Decision Attitude Change in Six Presidential Elections". Political Psychology. 22 (3): 521–540. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00252 . ISSN   0162-895X.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.