This article or section is undergoing significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are actively editing this article or section, you can replace this template with {{in use|5 minutes}}.This article was last edited by Sangdeboeuf(talk | contribs) 4 seconds ago. (Updatetimer)
Female superiority is an assertion that women are superior to men. The belief rose towards the end of renaissance literature and into the early modern period. Emily Stoper and Roberta Ann Johnson write that American second-wave feminists of the 1970s believed women's nature was morally superior to that of men.[1]
Other notable examples include The Nobility and Excellence of Women and the Defects and Vices of Men by Lucrezia Marinella in 1601 and In Praise of Illustrious Learned Women, both Ancient and Modern by Marguerite Buffet in 1668. The argument for women being superior was widespread in Europe during the seventeenth century. These types of claims started through the notion that both men and women had rational souls, an idea which was uncontroversial at the time and was developed through a treatise by Cornelius Agrippa known as Declamation on the Nobility and Preeminence of the Female Sex in 1528. In the sixteenth century, pro-woman writers argued that the souls were equal and followed up with an argument that women are superior. The following century, some who argued women are superior did not believe that the sexes are equal. Marinella argued that both the bodies and the souls of women are superior to those of men, because the idea of a woman was more pleasing to God. She believed that women's bodies are more beautiful, writing "Divine beauty is . . . the first and principal cause of women’s beauty", a view she claimed was inspired by Platonism. She saw women's beauty as not the cause, but the effect of women's superiority. Buffet, inspired by Augustine, argued that men and women are equal when it comes to Christian salvation, their souls, and their organs, but argues that women's physiology, intellectualism, and morality is superior.[2]
Late modern period
Female superiority relates to the idea that women are more capable in solving political, economic, and social problems than men. A few women proposed that women are superior in the 1840s, and the idea expanded in 1874, during which Jane Fowler Willing, a staff member at Wesleyan university, Emily Huntington Miller, who worked in Northwestern university, and Martha McClellan Brown from Alliance, Ohio met together at Fairpoint, New York for a national Sunday school assembly. They believed that they could cure society's ills better than men could, and decided to combat liquor trafficking to prove that they could do it better than men. They then created an assembly and a national organization to promote this female work.[4]
In 1952, Ashley Montagu wrote the book The Natural Superiority of Women. In it, he argued that women are biologically superior. He argued that women have a better immune system, which makes them superior at dealing with things like sickness or fatigue. He also noted that although women may have smaller brains than men, they have more neurons within those brains, which makes women more insightful. He argues that women being superior is not meant to boast about how women are better, but to achieve equality between the sexes through men being convinced that women are superior, and that women are more equipped towards this plan than men. In the fourth edition of this book in 1992, Montagu said that "much new information bearing on the natural superiority of women has become available" as well as that "the new findings unexceptionally support and confirm the conclusions reached in this book." Despite opposing the latter chapters for being "paternalistic", Maureen Slade from the American Psychiatric Association recommended the book for general practitioners.[5]
Women are not equal to men; they are superior in many ways, and in most ways that will count in the future. It is not just a matter of culture or upbringing. It is a matter of chromosomes, genes, hormones, and nerve circuits. It is not mainly because of how experience shapes women, but because of intrinsic differences in the body and the brain.[citation needed]
He argues that brain scans show that women are less violent. He also argues that women are biologically more equipped for the future.[6][bettersourceneeded] Konner also argues that it's technically possible the human race will continue in the future without men.[7]
Hanna Rosin, a senior editor at The Atlantic, in her book The End of Men: And The Rise of Women, argued that the US is now in an era of female dominance. She said that the service economy is dominated by women. She also said she believes women will fill up leadership positions in many other industries, and that finance will be "the last one to go".[8]
Sharon Moalem argues that women are biologically superior, stating that they are more likely to survive COVID-19 and cancer, and that they are less likely to be born with disabilities. He refers to women as a mosaic, and says that saying men and women are more similar than they are different is a "naive mistake".[9]
Michele L. Norris argues that McKinsey & Company, a consulting firm, would have had a total revenue of $4.5 trillion by 2025 had it featured women more prominently. [10]
Steven Salzberg, in his 2012 article "1098 Reasons Why Women are Genetically Superior to Men", writes that females have an extra X chromosome, and that each X chromosome has as 1098 genes within it.[11]
Scarlett Curtis, writing for the BBC about whether feminism is done, answers that in order for that to happen, the future needs to be female, with boys in skirts, and girls in spaceships, and that activists are "dreaming up and writing [this] into reality every day".[12]
While noting that female superiority "has produced certain political benefits", Stoper and Ann argue that this idea limits women in politics and makes them psychologically weaker.[1]
12Stoper, Emily; Johnson, Roberta Ann (1977). "The Weaker Sex & the Better Half: The Idea of Women's Moral Superiority in the American Feminist Movement". Polity. 10 (2): 192–217. doi:10.2307/3234258. ISSN0032-3497. JSTOR3234258.
12Deslauriers, Marguerite (2022). "The Superiority of Women in the Seventeenth Century". Journal of the American Philosophical Association. 8 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1017/apa.2019.24. ISSN2053-4485.
↑Fonte, Moderata (1997). The Worth of Women: Wherein Is Clearly Revealed Their Nobility and Their Superiority to Men. Edited and translated by Virginia Cox. University of Chicago Press. ISBN9780226256825.
↑Mezvinsky, Norton (1961). "An Idea of Female Superiority". Journal of the Central Mississippi Valley American Studies Association. 2 (1): 17–26. ISSN2156-4876. JSTOR40640229.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
