Florence Deeks

Last updated • 4 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
Florence Amelia Deeks
Annie and Florence Deeks circa 1880 Toronto Public Library.png
Florence (right) with her sister Annie c.1880
Born(1864-09-04)4 September 1864
Died17 June 1959(1959-06-17) (aged 94)
Toronto, Ontario.
Nationality Canadian
Occupation(s)Teacher, writer
Known forLegal battle with H. G. Wells

Florence Amelia Deeks (1864–1959) was a Canadian teacher and writer. She is known for accusing British writer H. G. Wells of having plagiarized her work when he wrote The Outline of History . The case was eventually taken to the Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council, the highest court in the British Empire, which rejected her claim.

Contents

Early years

Florence Amelia Deeks was born in 1864 and grew up in Morrisburg, Canada West, in a religious family. Her mother, Melinda, was a strong believer in education. [1] Her brother George found a new way to lay railway tracks, which enabled him to earn a fortune. He provided important financial support to his family, including Florence during the later legal trials. By her own account she spent most of her twenties travelling in Europe and America, studying literature and art. [2] When Florence was thirty she was admitted to Victoria College in the University of Toronto. She studied there for several years, then became a teacher at the Presbyterian Ladies College. [1]

Deeks probably joined the Women's Art Association of Canada in the mid-1890s, although the first record of her membership is from 1903. In 1912 she prepared a "historical sketch" of the early years of the association. [3] She was active in other women's groups and was the recording secretary for the Toronto women's Liberal Club. [1]

Web of the World's Romance

Deeks decided to write a history of the world that showed the contributions that women had made. [1] Her aim was to demonstrate the importance of women such as Lucrezia de' Medici, Elizabeth I of England and Margarethe, mother of Martin Luther. She spent four years researching and writing, with the support of her mother, sisters and brother. The manuscript of The Web of the World's Romance was complete by February 1918. [4] Deeks submitted it to Macmillan Company in Canada, asking if they would object to her using extracts from A Short History of the English People, a book for which they held the copyright. [5] Deeks entrusted the manuscript to Macmillan in August 1918, and it was returned to her in April 1919. [6] The manuscript was well-thumbed and dog-eared. Macmillan had rejected it. [7]

Deeks later came across H. G. Wells' The Outline of History (published 1919–1920), and was struck by the similarities to her work, but she had no proof that Wells had seen her manuscript. [8] [9] Over the next few years she consulted with experts and analyzed the similarities. [4] The Rev. William Andrew Irwin, then an associate professor of Old Testament Languages and Literature at the University of Toronto agreed to help her. He was interested in applying the same methods of textual analysis and comparison he used in his studies of ancient literature. He considered that there was convincing proof of plagiarism. [10]

Deeks launched her suit in 1928. [11] Deeks claimed breach of copyright, but in substance she was claiming breach of confidence in the use of her manuscript without consent. [6] She sued Wells and Macmillan for damages of CDN$500,000 in the Supreme Court of Ontario. The trial judge, Mr Justice Raney, found that Irwin's results were "fantastic hypotheses ... solemn nonsense ... comparisons without significance." [10] [12] Her case was dismissed. She then appealed to the Appellate Division of the Ontario Supreme Court, appearing on her own behalf without a lawyer. The Appellate Division unanimously dismissed the appeal. [10] [13]

Deeks finally appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London, the final court of appeal in the British Empire. [10] She could no longer afford a lawyer, so argued her own case in front of the Judicial Committee on 1 October 1932. [14] A month later, on 3 November 1932, the Judicial Committee dismissed her appeal. Lord Atkin gave the decision for the Committee. He stated that evidence presented on the basis of literary criticism is not admissible in a court of law, and upheld the decisions of the lower courts. [14] [15]

Assessment

Although the wording of the two books is rarely identical, in some cases the same mistakes appear in both books. [16] However, it was sworn on oath at the trial that the manuscript remained in Toronto in the safekeeping of Macmillan, and that Wells did not even know it existed, let alone had seen it. [10] The court found no proof of copying, and decided the similarities were due to the fact that the books had similar nature and both writers had access to the same sources. [17]

The case may have been lost in part due to bias against Deeks as a woman. [16] Deeks' lack of influential connections may also have been a factor. [18] A 2001 book by A. B. McKillop, a Canadian historian, explores the case in detail. Although the author clearly believes that Wells plagiarized Deeks' work, he presents no definitive proof. [19] Three years after McKillop's book appeared, Denis Magnusson, Professor Emeritus and former Dean of Law at Queen's University, Kingston, wrote an article responding to McKillop's thesis. Magnusson concluded that while Deeks may have received some discriminatory treatment from lawyers in the case, she was treated fairly by the courts. He concludes she had a weak case, and the courts would give a similar result if the case came forward at the present time. [20]

Death

Deeks died in 1959, aged about 95. [1]

Related Research Articles

H. G. Wells English writer (1866–1946)

Herbert George Wells was an English writer. Prolific in many genres, he wrote more than fifty novels and dozens of short stories. His non-fiction output included works of social commentary, politics, history, popular science, satire, biography, and autobiography. Wells' science fiction novels are so well regarded that he has been called the "father of science fiction".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial Committee of the Privy Council</span> Judicial body in the United Kingdom

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) is the highest court of appeal for the Crown Dependencies, the British Overseas Territories, some Commonwealth countries and a few institutions in the United Kingdom. Established on 14 August 1833 to hear appeals formerly heard by the King-in-Council, the Privy Council formerly acted as the court of last resort for the entire British Empire, other than for the United Kingdom itself.

Canadian federalism involves the current nature and historical development of the federal system in Canada.

<i>The Outline of History</i> Book by H. G. Wells

The Outline of History, subtitled either "The Whole Story of Man" or "Being a Plain History of Life and Mankind", is a work by H. G. Wells chronicling the history of the world from the origin of the Earth to the First World War. It appeared in an illustrated version of 24 fortnightly installments beginning on 22 November 1919 and was published as a single volume in 1920. It sold more than two million copies, was translated into many languages, and had a considerable impact on the teaching of history in institutions of higher education. Wells modelled the Outline on the Encyclopédie of Denis Diderot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey</span> British lawyer, judge, politician and Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain

John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey, was a British lawyer, judge, Labour politician and Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, famous for many of his judgments in the House of Lords. He gave his name to the Sankey Declaration of the Rights of Man (1940).

Alexander Brian McKillop, known as A. B. McKillop or Brian McKillop, is Distinguished Research Professor and former Chancellor's Professor and Chair of the history department (2005–2009) of Carleton University in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme court</span> Highest court in a jurisdiction

In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court, also known as a court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal, is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are binding on all other courts in a nation and are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts. A Supreme Court can also, in certain circumstances, act as a court of original jurisdiction, however, this is typically limited to constitutional law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Platt Brett Sr.</span>

George Platt Brett Sr. was a British-born chairman and publisher of the American division of Macmillan Publishing. He was best known for serving as publisher, friend, and mentor of American author Jack London. Under Brett's leadership, Macmillan became one of the largest publishers in America. Sales grew from $50,000 in 1890 and grew to $8.5 million in 1931. In 1931, Macmillan annuals produced between 600 and 700 titles.

<i>Cook v Deeks</i>

Cook v Deeks [1916] UKPC 10 is a Canadian company law case, relevant also for UK company law, concerning the illegitimate diversion of a corporate opportunity. It was decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the court of last resort within the British Empire, on appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario, Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Mauritius</span> The Mauritius Supreme Court formed 1850

The Supreme Court of Mauritius is the highest court of Mauritius and the final court of appeal in the Mauritian judicial system. It was established in its current form in 1850, replacing the Cour d'Appel established in 1808 during the French administration and has a permanent seat in Port Louis. There is a right of appeal from the Supreme Court of Mauritius directly to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) is the court of final appeal for Mauritius.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women's Art Association of Canada</span> Organization founded in 1887

The Women's Art Association of Canada (WAAC) is an organization founded in 1887 to promote and support women artists and craftswomen in Canada, including artists in the visual media, performance artists and writers. At one time, it had almost 1,000 members. Although smaller today, it still plays an active role in fundraising and providing scholarships for young artists.

<i>Bank of Montreal v Stuart</i> JCPC decision from Canada on undue influence

Bank of Montreal v Stuart is a decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada. It deals with the principle of undue influence in relation to contracts, in the particular context of dealings between spouses. Decided in 1910, the case continues to be cited in the courts in Canada and in England and Wales.

Edwin Clarence Guillet was a Canadian historian, author and educator. He wrote or edited about 150 books, many about the history of Ontario.

<i>Deeks v Wells</i> Canadian court case on plagerism

Deeks v Wells was a Canadian court case between a Canadian writer, Florence Deeks, and the English writer, H.G. Wells. Deeks alleged that Wells had plagerised from her draft book, The Web of the World's Romance, in writing his own book, The Outline of History, thereby breaching her copyright. She also alleged breach of trust by the Canadian, American, and British Macmillan publishing companies. The case was finally decided in favour of Wells by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the highest court for the British Empire, including Canada.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Forster 2004, p. 73.
  2. Thomas 2001, p. 140.
  3. Mckillop 2011, p. 58.
  4. 1 2 Forster 2004, p. 74.
  5. Florence A. Deeks v H.G. Wells... Supreme Court, p. 8.
  6. 1 2 Richardson 2012, p. 117.
  7. The Spinster and the Prophet, Economist.
  8. Clarke 1978, p. 90.
  9. Magnusson 2004, p. 709.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Clarke 1978, p. 91.
  11. Greenspan & Rose 2001, p. 239.
  12. Deeks v. Wells 1930.
  13. Deeks v. Wells 1931.
  14. 1 2 Riss 1996.
  15. Deeks v. Wells 1932.
  16. 1 2 Bailey 2009.
  17. Florence A. Deeks v H.G. Wells... Supreme Court, p. 9.
  18. Backhouse & Backhouse 2005, p. 179.
  19. The case of the invisible woman, Telegraph.
  20. Magnusson 2004, p. 680.

Sources