Fort de Dailly

Last updated
Fort de Dailly
Part of Fortress Saint-Maurice
Western Switzerland
Chablais valaisan valley.jpg
The Rhône valley with the Fort de Dailly on the heights to the right
Switzerland adm location map.svg
Red pog.svg
Fort de Dailly
Coordinates 46°12′25″N7°01′43″E / 46.20692°N 7.0287°E / 46.20692; 7.0287
Site information
Controlled bySwitzerland
Open to
the public		From April 2014
Site history
Built1892, expanded through the 1960s
In useNot in use
MaterialsRock excavation
Garrison information
OccupantsBrigade de Forteresse 10

The Fort de Dailly is the largest component of Fortress Saint-Maurice, which is in turn one of the three principal fortified regions of the National Redoubt of Switzerland. Almost entirely subterranean, the Fort de Dailly was built in the Massif de Dailly to the east of Saint-Maurice beginning in 1892. With the Fort de Savatan, it comprises a fortress complex encased in rock high above the strategic Saint-Maurice valley, capable of commanding the valley from Chillon to Martigny. It is the central component of Fortress Saint-Maurice in terms of both its position and its military power. Construction began in 1892 and the fort became operational in 1894. The fort was nearly constantly upgraded with new artillery in increasingly secure positions. Following an incident in which three ammunition magazines exploded in close succession in 1946, the fort was repaired and upgraded with two fully automatic 150 mm gun turrets with a range of 24 kilometres (15 mi). After reassessments by the Swiss Armed Forces of their requirements for fixed fortifications, Dailly was progressively closed down starting in 1995, with full closure at the end of 2003.

Contents

Fortress complex

The Fort de Dailly is the largest part of a fortress complex extending the length of the Saint-Maurice valley, with coordinated fields of artillery fire and interlocking defenses. [1] While most of these positions are detached from one another and are self-sufficient installations, Dailly and its neighbor Savatan are connected. The Fort de Savatan adjoins Dailly at a lower level, facing to the north, and is connected by an inclined funicular in the mountain. [2] The forts at Dailly and Savatan were completed in 1894 and became the central elements of Fortress Saint-Maurice. [3] They were progressively expanded and upgraded through the twentieth century. Over time, Dailly was equipped with an example of virtually every Swiss artillery piece and construction method, from rock-cut artillery galleries to revolving gun turrets. [4]

The Fort de Dailly and surrounding installations were manned through their modern history by Fortress Brigade 10. Dailly and Savatan comprised Fortress Group 2, under Fortress Regiment 19 of Fortress Brigade 10. [5]

Description

Principal emplacements of Fort de Dailly Festung Dailly.PNG
Principal emplacements of Fort de Dailly

Fort de Dailly is one of the largest and most heavily armed forts in Switzerland, and the central position in Fortress Saint-Maurice. [6] The artillery fort is located on the end of the Dailly massif at a higher level than Savatan, with fields of fire to the north, west and south. The fort therefore is capable of firing on an enemy advancing southeast into the heart of the Alpine redoubt from the direction of Lac Léman, or northwest from the Great Saint Bernard or Simplon passes. [7] Work began at Dailly in 1892. [8] The entrance to the underground fort lies at an elevation of 1,400 metres (4,600 ft) at the end of 29 switchbacks. The fort initially was armed with six 120 mm gun turrets with additional open artillery positions, including six additional 120 mm guns on rail-mobile disappearing mounts. [9] Two 75 mm guns were mounted in casemates, while portable 53 mm gun turrets occupied prepared surface positions. [10] Dailly was upgraded with 105 mm artillery during the 1940s, with as many as ten 105 mm guns in casemate positions. Flanking coverage from across the valley was provided by the Fort du Scex. [8]

The construction of Dailly and other fortifications at Saint-Maurice raised concerns in France at the turn of the twentieth century. The Saint-Maurice defenses were first reconnoitered in December 1896 by a French Colonel Raymond, followed by Lieutenant Vignon in July, 1898.. French citizens working on the fortification projects were interviewed by the French gendarmerie. In 1901 the French military attaché in Bern obtained pictures of Dailly from a Swiss officer. [11]

Construction

Initial studies were carried out for a fortification at Savatan in 1890. It became clear that a position in the higher Dailly massif to the south would protect forces on the Savatan plateau and would complement a battery on the opposite side of the valley at Scex. A small hotel on the site of an old weather observation station on the Dailly massif was chosen for the barracks. Robert Weber was the architect in charge of the works. [12] Initial work installed two 150 mm mortars on Dailly at an altitude of about 3,000 metres (9,800 ft), which remained in place until the 1920s. A single 120 mm howitzer in an armored turret was installed on the summit, remaining in place through the 1940s. For local defense, two 84 mm guns were placed in concreted casemates near an observation point in 1894, called the Batterie de la Galerie de Morcles. [13]

Heavier artillery was initially installed in open positions. 150 mm Krupp field guns were installed in open emplacements in 1894, allowing fire in two directions. Battery C15 was placed on the ridge between Righi and the Aiguille, firing north and south. Battery C10 with two 105 mm guns and the Batterie Aiguille with the same equipment were placed near the summit. The Batterie de l'Observatoire, located above the Galerie des Mordes, was equipped with four 120 mm guns. The Batterie Rossignol placed two 120 mm pieces each facing north and south, while the Batterie de Plan 2 and the Batterie de Righi each mounted two 120 mm pieces. These were replaced in 1923 by Model 1912 120 mm howitzers with a higher rate of fire. [14]

As construction continued, rotating guns were installed to exploit the broad field of fire afforded by the heights. Four or six 120 mm guns on mobile were installed on tracks in the Righi area. The guns were stored in garages in the rock, and were in service until the 1930s, forming batteries E1, E2 and E3. Two or four mobile guns were converted to fixed positions, replacing the C10 battery. Fixed turret guns were installed in the 1930s. The Model 1939 105 mm gun was developed with an underground barbette, with the gun carriage in an armored turret and only the barrel exposed. Battery Panaux, with two turrets, was placed in service in 1940, remaining in service until 1994. [14]

Lighter guns were installed for local defense. From 1907 the Batterie Aiguille at the east end of the Aiguille crest covered the direction of Javerne with 75 mm guns. Two more guns installed in an open position between Righi and the Aiguille in 1909 formed the Batterie Golèze, covering the area of Demècre. The exposed nature of this battery led to its replacement with a rock-protected position in the 1940s, remaining in service until all 75 mm guns were withdrawn in the 1980s. [13]

Open heavy gun positions were judged to be relatively safe from opposing artillery fire, given their altitude above any potential opposing batteries, which would interfere with an optimal firing trajectory for an attacker. However, after the First World War, confidence in this approach lessened. The open positions were abandoned in the 1930s, replaced by artillery galleries under rock protection. At the Battery Rossignol, elevation 1,400 metres (4,600 ft), a gallery was excavated of sufficient size to allow towed artillery to be moved, with branching galleries on either side mounting Bofors 105 mm guns with a range of 18,000 metres (59,000 ft) in ten armored positions. Four guns, aimed to the north, constituted the Batteries des Buits. Four more, aimed to the south, were the Batterie de Plex, and two aimed to the east were the Batterie de Rosseline. [14]

Ammunition explosion and renovation

Dailly was the scene of an ammunition explosion on 28 May 1946, when about 5500 105 mm shells, amounting to 449 tons, exploded in three separate magazines successively. [2] The blast threw all four 105 mm guns of the Batterie de Plex from their emplacements and damaged six more. The 120 mm guns of the C10 battery were also damaged. Six construction workers were killed, part of a crew working on a funicular shaft linking Dailly to the upper part of Savatan. The explosion was attributed to decomposition of nitrocellulose propellant. Two similar explosions happened at Grisons in June 1946 and at Blausee-Mitholz in 1947, where 9 persons were killed in the village. The damage to Dailly resulted in a comprehensive modernization of the fort, with additions of 81 mm and 120 mm mortars, removal of obsolete weapons and the installation of two modern 150 mm gun turrets. An underground caserne for 650 men was built at this time, with NBC protection. [2] The four 105 mm guns of the Batteries des Buits and the two 105 mm guns of the Batterie de Rosseline were repaired and upgraded, but the four guns of the south battery were never replaced, as their rock cover was judged to be insufficient. [14]

The new 150 mm gun turrets were mounted on barbettes 50 metres (160 ft) deep, with an individual rate of fire of 22 rounds per minute in bursts, or 15 rounds per minute sustained. [15] Design began in 1949, with the first test firings in 1960. [16] The range of these new guns approached 24 kilometres (15 mi), sufficient to reach Montreux, Sion or the Chamonix valley in France. Battery T1 46°12′07.87″N7°02′18.75″E / 46.2021861°N 7.0385417°E / 46.2021861; 7.0385417 (for "turret" or tourelle) was located at the old E3 mobile 120 mm battery at an elevation of 1,300 metres (4,300 ft). Battery T2 46°13′07.87″N7°01′49.18″E / 46.2188528°N 7.0303278°E / 46.2188528; 7.0303278 was located at 1,500 feet (460 m) on the Rosseline heights near Battery Planaux. Both batteries were operational from 1962 to 1994. [17]

Additional measures included the replacement of the summit batteries with two 81 mm fortress mortars, entirely buried in the mountain's peak. A battery of twinned 120 mm mortars was added in the 1960s. Both batteries remained in service until 1994. These batteries covered the entire Savatan massif. [13] The abandoned Batterie de Plex was replaced by the Batterie Dailly Nord, which remained operational until the end of 2003. [14]

Deactivation and present status

Dailly was partially deactivated in 1995 [6] and fully decommissioned at the end of 2003. [18] With the other Saint-Maurice fortifications, it has been designated as a candidate for preservation.

Notes

  1. ↑ Moret, J.C. "Le dispositif fortifié" (in French). Association Fort de Litroz. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  2. 1 2 3 "À l'origine des tourelles, la catastrophe du Fort de Dailly". Secteur fortifié de Saint-Maurice (in French). Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 4 January 2011.
  3. ↑ Kauffmann, pp. 152-153
  4. ↑ "Le fort de Dailly". Secteur fortifié de Saint-Maurice (in French). Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires. Archived from the original on 30 August 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  5. ↑ Elsig, Edgar (2006). "Fort de Dailly". Bulletin de l'Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires (in French): 27. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  6. 1 2 Nullis, Clare (October 20, 2002). "Swiss Army Adapts to Changing Times". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 4 January 2011.
  7. ↑ Moret, J.C. "Le secteur central de St Maurice - Le concept" (in French). Association Fort de Litroz. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  8. 1 2 "Fort Scex". Forteresse Historique de Saint-Maurice. Retrieved 3 January 2011.
  9. ↑ "Fort de Dailly at ASMEM (Association St-Maurice d'Études Militaires) (in French)". Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Retrieved 2015-10-09.
  10. ↑ Kauffmann, pp. 157-158
  11. ↑ Barros, Martin. "La Suisse sous surveillance". Quand la France surveillait les cols suisses (1815-1914) (in French). Revue Historique des Armées. Retrieved 6 January 2011.
  12. ↑ Rochat, Pierre (2007). "Genèse de Dailly". Bulletin de l'Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires (in French): 16. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  13. 1 2 3 "Le fort de Dailly - Occuper une position dominante". Secteur fortifié de Saint-Maurice (in French). Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 "Le fort de Dailly - Agir dans deux directions". Secteur fortifié de Saint-Maurice (in French). Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  15. ↑ "Le developpement des tourelles cuirassés de 15cm automatiques". Secteur fortifié de Saint-Maurice (in French). Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires. Archived from the original on 29 August 2011. Retrieved 4 January 2011.
  16. ↑ "Le programme de conception, fabrication et construction des tourelles". Secteur fortifié de Saint-Maurice (in French). Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires. Archived from the original on 29 August 2011. Retrieved 4 January 2011.
  17. ↑ "Le fort de Dailly - Maîtrer le centre du dispositif". Secteur fortifié de Saint-Maurice (in French). Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires. Retrieved 7 January 2011.
  18. ↑ "Le fort de Dailly 1". Secteur fortifié de Saint-Maurice (in French). Association Saint-Maurice d'Études Militaires. Archived from the original on 30 August 2011. Retrieved 4 January 2011.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disappearing gun</span> Artillery piece mounted so as to descend behind a parapet for loading

A disappearing gun, a gun mounted on a disappearing carriage, is an obsolete type of artillery which enabled a gun to hide from direct fire and observation. The overwhelming majority of carriage designs enabled the gun to rotate backwards and down behind a parapet, or into a pit protected by a wall, after it was fired; a small number were simply barbette mounts on a retractable platform. Either way, retraction lowered the gun from view and direct fire by the enemy while it was being reloaded. It also made reloading easier, since it lowered the breech to a level just above the loading platform, and shells could be rolled right up to the open breech for loading and ramming. Other benefits over non-disappearing types were a higher rate of repetitive fire and less fatigue for the gun crew.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ouvrage Kobenbusch</span>

Ouvrage du Kobenbusch is a gros ouvrage of the Maginot Line, located in the Fortified Sector of Thionville in the Cattenom Forest. It possesses seven combat blocks and two entrance blocks, one for ammunition and the other for men. It is located between petit ouvrage Bois-Karre and petit ouvrage Oberheid, and was named for the surrounding Kobenbusch Forest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ouvrage Galgenberg</span> Ouvrage of the Maginot Line

Ouvrage Galgenberg forms a portion of the Fortified Sector of Thionville of the Maginot Line. It is situated in the Cattenom Forest, near the gros ouvrage Kobenbusch and petit ouvrage Oberheid. The ouvrage was tasked with controlling the Moselle Valley and as such was called the "Guardian of the Moselle." Galgenberg did not see significant action in 1940 or 1944. After a period of reserve duty in the 1950s and 1960s, it was deactivated. It is now a museum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ouvrage Sapey</span> Work of Maginot Lines Alpine extension

Ouvrage Sapey is a work of the Maginot Line's Alpine extension, the Alpine Line, also known as the Little Maginot Line. The ouvrage consists of one entry block, three artillery blocks and one observation block two kilometers west of Modane. The ouvrage was built beneath the older Fort du Sapey. The new work cost 12.8 million francs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ouvrage Roche-la-Croix</span>

Ouvrage Roche-la-Croix is a work of the Maginot Line's Alpine extension, the Alpine Line, also known as the Little Maginot Line. The ouvrage consists of one entry block, two infantry blocks, one artillery block and two observation blocks in the vicinity of the Col de Larche. An aerial tram was provided for better access. The position is located at the top of a sheer escarpment that dominates Meyronnes and the valley of the Ubayette.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort de Vaujours</span>

The Fort de Vaujours, located in the commune of Courtry, Seine-Saint-Denis, near the town of Vaujours, is one of the forts built at the end of the 19th century to defend Paris. It became a research center for the Commissariat à l'énergie atomique (CEA), France's Atomic Energy Commission. The center was closed in 1997.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort de Guentrange</span>

The Fort de Guentrange dominates Thionville in the Moselle department of France. It was built by Germany next to the town of the same name in the late 19th century after the annexation of the Moselle following the Franco-Prussian War. The Fort de Guentrange was part of the Moselstellung, a group of eleven fortresses surrounding Thionville and Metz to guard against the possibility of a French attack aimed at regaining Alsace and Lorraine, with construction taking place between 1899 and 1906. The fortification system incorporated new principles of defensive construction to deal with advances in artillery. Later forts, such as Guentrange, embodied innovative design concepts such as dispersal and concealment. The later forts were designed to support offensive operations, as an anchor for a pivoting move by German forces into France.

The Fort de Koenigsmacker is a fortification located to the northeast of Thionville in the Moselle department of France. It was built by Germany next to the town of the same name in the early 20th century after the annexation of the Moselle following the Franco-Prussian War. The Fort de Koenigsmacker was part of the Moselstellung, a group of eleven fortresses surrounding Thionville and Metz to guard against the possibility of a French attack aimed at regaining Alsace and Lorraine, with construction taking place between 1908 and 1914. The fortification system incorporated new principles of defensive construction to deal with advances in artillery. Later forts, such as Koenigsmacker, embodied innovative design concepts such as dispersal and concealment. These later forts were designed to support offensive operations, as an anchor for a pivoting move by German forces into France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort d'Illange</span>

The Fort d'Illange is a fortification located to the south of Thionville in the Moselle department of France. It was built by Germany next to the town of Illange in the early 20th century after the annexation of the Moselle following the Franco-Prussian War. The Fort d'Illange was part of the Moselstellung, a group of eleven fortresses surrounding Thionville and Metz to guard against the possibility of a French attack aimed at regaining Alsace and Lorraine, with construction taking place between 1905 and 1911. The fortification system incorporated new principles of defensive construction to deal with advances in artillery. Later forts, such as Illange, embodied innovative design concepts such as dispersal and concealment. These later forts were designed to support offensive operations, as an anchor for a pivoting move by German forces into France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fortified Sector of Montmédy</span>

The Fortified Sector of Montmédy was the French military organisation that in 1940 controlled the section of the Maginot Line between Sedan and Longuyon, a distance of about 60 kilometres (37 mi). The sector was not as strongly defended as other sections of the Maginot Line, facing the southern Ardennes region of Belgium. Large portions of the Montmédy sector were defended by fortified houses, blockhouses or casemates. The sector includes only four ouvrages of the type found in stronger sections of the Line. The weakly defended area in front of Sedan was the scene of a major breakthrough by German forces in the opening of the Battle of France. This was followed by a German assault on the Maginot Ouvrage La Ferté, which killed the entire garrison, the only such event on the Maginot Line.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fortified Sector of the Dauphiné</span>

The Fortified Sector of the Dauphiné was the French military organization that in 1940 controlled the section of the Alpine Line portion of the Maginot Line facing Italy in the vicinity of Briançon. By comparison with the integrated defenses of the main Maginot Line, or even of the Fortified Sector of the Maritime Alps to the south, the Dauphiné sector consisted of a series of distinct territories that covered two main invasion routes into France: the route from Turin over the Col de Montgenèvre to Briançon and Grenoble, and the route from Coni over the Col de Larche to Barcelonette and Gap. The sector was the scene of probing attacks by Italian forces during the Italian invasion of France in 1940, in which the French defenses successfully resisted Italian advances until the June 1940 armistice that granted Italy access to southeastern France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort des Ayvelles</span>

The Fort des Ayvelles, also known as the Fort Dubois-Crancé, is a fortification near the French communes of Villers-Semeuse and Les Ayvelles in the Ardennes, just to the south of Charleville-Mézières. As part of the Séré de Rivières system of fortifications, the fort was planned as part of a new ring of forts replacing the older citadel of Mézières with dispersed fortifications. With advances in the range and destructive power of artillery, the city's defensive perimeter had to be pushed away from the city center to the limits of artillery range. The Fort des Ayvelles was the only such fortification to be completed of the ensemble, as resources were diverted elsewhere. At the time of its construction the fort controlled the Meuse and the railway line linking Reims, Montmédy, Givet and Hirson. The Fort des Ayvelles was reduced in status in 1899, its masonry construction rendered obsolete by the advent of high-explosive artillery shells. However, it was re-manned for the First World War before it was captured by the Germans on 29 August 1914. The fort was partly destroyed in 1918. During the Battle of France in 1940 the fort was bombarded. French resisters were executed at Ayvelles during both world wars. At present the fort is maintained by a preservation society, and may be visited.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fortress Saint-Maurice</span>

Fortress Saint-Maurice is one of the three main fortification complexes comprising the Swiss National Redoubt. The westernmost of the three, Fortress Saint-Maurice complements Fortress Saint Gotthard and Fortress Sargans to secure the central alpine region of Switzerland against an invading force. The National Redoubt was first conceived in the 1880s as an easily defensible area to secure the survival of the Swiss Confederation. In the late 1930s and 1940s when neutral Switzerland was threatened with invasion from Germany, the National Redoubt and its components were modernized and expanded on a massive scale. The fortification system was maintained and upgraded during the Cold War. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the possibility of a Warsaw Pact invasion disappeared, and by 1995 many positions were abandoned by the military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort du Scex</span> Military museum in Switzerland

The Fort du Scex is a component of Fortress Saint-Maurice, which is in turn one of the three principal fortified regions of the National Redoubt of Switzerland. The Fort du Scex was built in the Scex cliff face immediately to the west of Saint-Maurice beginning in 1911. With the later Fort de Cindey, it comprises a fortress complex encased in rock high above the strategic Saint-Maurice valley. The fort lost its combat function in 1984 and was entirely deactivated in 1995. It is now open for public tours during the summer months.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fortified Sector of Faulquemont</span>

The Fortified Sector of Faulquemont was the French military organization that in 1940 controlled the section of the Maginot Line in the area of Faulquemont to the east of Metz. With five petit ouvrages the sector was poorly equipped with fortress artillery, limiting the ouvrages ability to provide mutual support. The sector was attacked in 1940 by German forces in the Battle of France. Despite the withdrawal of the mobile forces that supported the fixed fortifications, the sector mounted a strong resistance. Two of the petit ouvrages fell to German attack, the remainder holding out until the Second Armistice at Compiègne. The surviving positions and their garrisons finally surrendered on 2 June 1940. During the Cold War, Ouvrage Kerfent was partially reactivated as a communications station for Royal Canadian Air Force units stationed in northwestern France with NATO. At present, most of the underground works in the sector are flooded by groundwater. Only Ouvrage Bambesch has been preserved and may be toured by the public.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Redoubt (Switzerland)</span> Defensive plan developed by the Swiss government

The Swiss National Redoubt is a defensive plan developed by the Swiss government beginning in the 1880s to respond to foreign invasion. In the opening years of the Second World War the plan was expanded and refined to deal with a potential German invasion. The term "National Redoubt" primarily refers to the fortifications begun in the 1880s that secured the mountainous central part of Switzerland, providing a defended refuge for a retreating Swiss Army.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defensive Organization of Corsica</span>

The Defensive Organization of Corsica was the French military organization that in 1940 was responsible for the defense of the French island of Corsica against a potential invasion by Fascist Italy. As part of the overall effort to fortify France's borders which included the Maginot Line, the fixed Corsican defenses were constructed in parallel with the Maginot Line, using the same organizational structure and similar designs, albeit scaled back in size, cost and fighting power. The Corsican defenses were designed to deter an Italian landing on the south end of Corsica, and to support artillery batteries capable of controlling the Strait of Bonifacio between Corsica and the Italian island of Sardinia, separated by only twelve kilometers. As World War II unfolded, no attempt was made by Italian forces to mount an opposed landing on Corsica. The island was instead occupied in November 1942. In 1943 Corsica saw fighting when German forces moved from Sardinia. Most of the fortified positions remain to the present day.

The forts of Metz are two fortified belts around the city of Metz in Lorraine. Built according to the design and theory of Raymond Adolphe Séré de Rivières at the end of the Second Empire—and later Hans von Biehler while Metz was under German control—they earned the city the reputation of premier stronghold of the German reich. These fortifications were particularly thorough given the city's strategic position between France and Germany. The detached forts and fortified groups of the Metz area were spared in World War I, but showed their full defensive potential in the Battle of Metz at the end of World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fortified Sector of Savoy</span>

The Fortified Section of Savoy(Secteur fortifié de la Savoie) was the French military organization that in 1940 controlled the section of the Alpine Line portion of the Maginot Line facing Italy in the Savoy region. The sector constituted part of the Alpine Line portion of the Maginot Line, between the Defensive Sector of the Rhône to the north, and the Fortified Sector of the Dauphiné to the south. The works combined a number of pre-1914 fortifications with Maginot-style ouvrages, with many forward-positioned cavern-style frontier stations or avant-postes that proved effective in holding invading forces near the order.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.