Fowler v. United States | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Decided May 26, 2011 | |
Full case name | Fowler v. United States |
Citations | 563 U.S. 668 ( more ) |
Holding | |
When someone is charged of a killing under the federal witness-tampering statute, the state must prove a violation by showing there was a reasonable likelihood that a relevant communication would have been made to a federal officer. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Breyer |
Concurrence | Scalia |
Dissent | Alito, joined by Ginsburg |
Fowler v. United States, 563 U.S. 668(2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that when someone is charged of a killing under the federal witness-tampering statute, the state must prove a violation by showing there was a reasonable likelihood that a relevant communication would have been made to a federal officer. [1] [2]
While preparing to rob a bank, Charles Andrew Fowler and others were discovered by a local police officer, whom Fowler killed. Fowler was convicted of violating the federal witness-tampering statute, which makes it a crime "to kill another person, with intent to... prevent the communication by any person to a [Federal] law enforcement officer" of "information relating to the... possible commission of a Federal offense." Rejecting Fowler's argument that the evidence was insufficient to show that he had killed the officer intending to prevent him from communicating with a federal officer, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a showing of a possible or potential communication to federal authorities was sufficient. [1]
![]() | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (September 2025) |
The Supreme Court issued an opinion on May 26, 2011. [1]
![]() | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (September 2025) |
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .