Friday Night at the ER is an experiential team-learning game. Played on game boards at tables with four players per board, each gameplay session is followed by a detailed debriefing in which participants relate the simulation experience to their own work and gain insights for performance improvement.
The game simulates the challenge of managing a hospital during a 24-hour period. Players perform distinct functions, but they come to realize that they also depend on one another. While the game was designed to teach systems thinking, it has served diverse learning objectives across many industries and cultures.
Each session includes 1.5 hours of game play followed by approximately 1.5 to 2 hours of debrief and discussion.
Background
The Friday Night at the ER game was developed in 1992 by Breakthrough Learning, Inc., a consulting and training firm based in Morgan Hill, California.[1] Its initial purpose was to broadly teach people to think systemically, collaborating across functional boundaries to achieve system goals. The game's design objectives were:
to create an experiential learning tool that would engage people in a learning process;
to simulate and illustrate dynamics that are common to complex systems; and
to promote an understanding of key systems principles in a way that enables people to gain insight about their relevance.
Since its initial release, Friday Night at the ER has found use for a broader range of learning objectives within diverse organizations. Demonstrating the universality of systems principles, the game is in use by service organizations, manufacturing companies, government agencies, academic institutions and others in at least 30 countries.
History and development
A predecessor learning game, the Beer Distribution Game, demonstrates effective team learning about the behavior of complex systems through an experiential activity.
Friday Night at the ER has its origins in a business case that took place in 1990 at San Jose Medical Center, in San Jose, California, where a persistent problem of decreasing capacity for emergency patients was resolved using a system dynamics study that included a simulation model of patient flow.[3] A high-leverage intervention to resolve the problem required collaboration across departments to share nursing staff during times of peak emergency demand.
In 1992, healthcare management consultant Bette Gardner created Friday Night at the ER, loosely based on that case, to teach management principles and the practice of systems thinking within healthcare and other organizations.[4] The game development process included a computer-based simulation model (using the IThink simulation modelling environment),[5] populated with time-of-day, day-of-week hospital arrival rates, and other data from public and private sources. The game was pilot tested with groups and presented at conferences starting in 1992.[6][7][8][9][10][11]
In 1997, Friday Night at the ER was published in electronic form in Activating the Fifth Discipline, a PC-based multimedia education program[12][13][14]
Although Friday Night at the ER depicts a hospital based in the United States, it has been adopted and widely used as a team-learning tool both within the healthcare field[15][16] and beyond, finding use across diverse industries including other service organizations, manufacturing companies, government agencies, and academic institutions. Friday Night at the ER has been used for training in at least 30 countries.[citation needed]
In 2014, an updated version of Friday Night at the ER was released with modernized and upgraded game and support materials.[17]
Reports of the effectiveness of Friday Night at the ER are largely based on Likert surveys, testimonials and Net Promoter surveys. In 2018, educators at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro published results of research in which students were assessed before and after using Friday Night at the ER. They concluded that it is a useful teaching strategy for complex problem solving and application of systems thinking concepts.[18]
Program structure
Participants in a group (from 4 to 200 people) are assembled at tables equipped with game boards and associated materials. A program leader or coordinator provides verbal instructions; then participants play the game on their own for approximately one hour. The gameplay is followed by scoring to measure team performance. After a brief stretch break, participants reconvene for a debriefing. The debrief is facilitated by the program leader with a structured progression of discussion questions, reflection exercises, didactic presentation, and group tasks to bring to light key lessons of the experience, its relevance to the group and how participants will put lessons into practice after the program.
The structure of the program may be varied. For example, the gameplay's 24-hour simulation may be conducted in two 12-hour segments with a short debrief or planning meeting in between segments. Another variation has groups playing in separate rooms with a slightly different instruction or game-board structure in each room so that behavior and results can be compared. In addition to variations in the gameplay, the structure and content of the debrief may be designed to teach either a narrow or broad purpose.
The program generally requires 3.5 to 4 hours to complete the gameplay and debrief.
Gameplay and scoring
At each four-person table, players each manage one of four departments in a hospital: Emergency, Surgery, Critical Care, and Step Down. The gameboard hospital is consolidated and simplified (relative to reality) to enable players to progress through a simulated 24 hours in just one hour.
Each department contains spaces in which patients are treated by staff, and game cards determine new patient arrivals as well as “ready to exit” indicators for patients. The game board may be seen as a hybrid version of a stock-flow map or process-flow chart. Players’ management tasks include determining staffing levels, accepting internal patient transfers, and remaining open to additional patients or diverting new ambulance arrivals. Among the other details of the gameplay are “events” that occur (e.g., a doctor is late, a room is being renovated, a staff member goes home sick), requiring reaction and management by players.
Demand rates in the gameplay, by hour, from mid-day Friday to mid-day Saturday, represent the typical pattern seen in hospitals. Emergency arrivals ramp up during Friday night (a time when people more often engage in risky behaviors that lead to emergencies); while arrivals to other departments in the hospital decrease as the weekend begins. A portion of Emergency arrivals flow through to other departments, so players experience the ripple effect of demand and the challenge of interdepartmental hand-offs.
Consequences of player decisions in the gameplay are both local and systemic. The structure of the game board, role assignments and the accounting system influence players to focus on department performance; yet as the game progresses it becomes evident that the more one tries to optimize a part, the worse the system as a whole performs.
During the gameplay, players keep track of certain data on paperwork forms at each department. Following the gameplay, individuals at each table contribute to calculating a team score that reflects the quality of service they delivered and financial performance. Teams scores are displayed to provide benchmarks and to enable participants to relate behavior to performance.
Debriefing
A standard debrief to teach applied systems thinking is described in the Friday Night at the ER Guide for Program Leaders with presentation slides to support key points. The debrief includes team reflection exercises, guided group discussion, didactic presentation and group tasks.
During the debrief, participants are guided to focus on collaboration, innovation and data-driven decision-making as key strategies necessary for successful system performance. These three strategies are examined and they are shown to be interdependent. Participants see that these three strategies produce excellent performance in the gameplay, and that the same applies to their real-world endeavors within organizations.
While these three strategies are not new ideas to most participants, the question is posed in the debrief, “Why, then, don’t we routinely put these strategies into day-to-day practice?”—as they demonstrated in the gameplay and as seen in the real world? An axiom from the field of system dynamics, “structure drives behavior,” is presented and participants are led through an exercise in which they examine how various structures within their organization may (unintentionally) inhibit desired behaviors.
Numerous variations to the standard debrief have been reported.
An early meeting of a new, cross-functional project team
Leadership development, strategic planning or team-building retreat
A training or education course
Orientation program for new employees
Examples of outcomes include:
Guiding principles for working together; improved ability to work together
New or heightened awareness about:
the need to collaborate, to share responsibility for organization performance
the presence of mental models and their impact on behavior and decision-making
the role of information and feedback in decision-making
Insight about the underlying structure in organizations that drives behavior and motivation for change
Personal insight about the effectiveness of one's management and communication practices
Improved competence in applying a newly learned discipline
Related Research Articles
A simulation is an imitative representation of a process or system that could exist in the real world. In this broad sense, simulation can often be used interchangeably with model. Sometimes a clear distinction between the two terms is made, in which simulations require the use of models; the model represents the key characteristics or behaviors of the selected system or process, whereas the simulation represents the evolution of the model over time. Another way to distinguish between the terms is to define simulation as experimentation with the help of a model. This definition includes time-independent simulations. Often, computers are used to execute the simulation.
Organization development (OD) is the study and implementation of practices, systems, and techniques that affect organizational change. The goal of which is to modify a group's/organization's performance and/or culture. The organizational changes are typically initiated by the group's stakeholders. OD emerged from human relations studies in the 1930s, during which psychologists realized that organizational structures and processes influence worker behavior and motivation.
Peter Michael Senge is an American systems scientist who is a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management, co-faculty at the New England Complex Systems Institute, and the founder of the Society for Organizational Learning. He is known as the author of the book The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization.
The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization is a book by Peter Senge focusing on group problem solving using the systems thinking method in order to convert companies into learning organizations that learn to create results that matter as an organization. The five disciplines represent classical approaches for developing three core and timeless learning capabilities: fostering aspiration, developing reflective conversation, and understanding complexity.
Laerdal is a multinational company that develops products and programs for healthcare providers, voluntary organizations, educational institutions, hospitals, and the military worldwide. Laerdal has over 2,000 employees in 26 countries. The headquarters is located in Stavanger, Norway.
In business management, a learning organization is a company that facilitates the learning of its members and continuously transforms itself. The concept was coined through the work and research of Peter Senge and his colleagues.
An after action review (AAR) is a technique for improving process and execution by analyzing the intended outcome and actual outcome of an action and identifying practices to sustain, and practices to improve or initiate, and then practicing those changes at the next iteration of the action AARs in the formal sense were originally developed by the U.S. Army. Formal AARs are used by all US military services and by many other non-US organizations. Their use has extended to business as a knowledge management tool.
Operational excellence is a mindset that embraces certain principles and tools to create a culture of excellence within an organization. Operational excellence means every employee can see, deliver, and improve the flow of value to a customer.
Business simulation or corporate simulation is simulation used for business training, education or analysis. It can be scenario-based or numeric-based.
Virtual Heroes, Inc. is a developer of serious games in Raleigh, North Carolina, United States. It was founded in 2004.
Patient safety is a discipline that emphasizes safety in health care through the prevention, reduction, reporting and analysis of error and other types of unnecessary harm that often lead to adverse patient events. The frequency and magnitude of avoidable adverse events, often known as patient safety incidents, experienced by patients was not well known until the 1990s, when multiple countries reported significant numbers of patients harmed and killed by medical errors. Recognizing that healthcare errors impact 1 in every 10 patients around the world, the World Health Organization (WHO) calls patient safety an endemic concern. Indeed, patient safety has emerged as a distinct healthcare discipline supported by an immature yet developing scientific framework. There is a significant transdisciplinary body of theoretical and research literature that informs the science of patient safety with mobile health apps being a growing area of research.
Debriefing is a report of a mission or project or the information so obtained. It is a structured process following an exercise or event that reviews the actions taken. As a technical term, it implies a specific and active intervention process that has developed with more formal meanings such as operational debriefing. It is classified into different types, which include military, experiential, and psychological debriefing, among others.
A serious game or applied game is a game designed for a primary purpose other than pure entertainment. The "serious" adjective is generally prepended to refer to video games used by industries like defense, education, scientific exploration, health care, emergency management, city planning, engineering, politics and art. Serious games are a subgenre of serious storytelling, where storytelling is applied "outside the context of entertainment, where the narration progresses as a sequence of patterns impressive in quality ... and is part of a thoughtful progress". The idea shares aspects with simulation generally, including flight simulation and medical simulation, but explicitly emphasizes the added pedagogical value of fun and competition.
Medical simulation, or more broadly, healthcare simulation, is a branch of simulation related to education and training in medical fields of various industries. Simulations can be held in the classroom, in situational environments, or in spaces built specifically for simulation practice. It can involve simulated human patients, educational documents with detailed simulated animations, casualty assessment in homeland security and military situations, emergency response, and support for virtual health functions with holographic simulation. In the past, its main purpose was to train medical professionals to reduce errors during surgery, prescription, crisis interventions, and general practice. Combined with methods in debriefing, it is now also used to train students in anatomy, physiology, and communication during their schooling.
Business game refers to simulation games that are used as an educational tool for teaching business. Business games may be carried out for various business training such as: general management, finance, organizational behavior, human resources, etc. Often, the term "business simulation" is used with the same meaning.
3DiTeams is a first person serious video game developed by the Duke University Medical Center and Virtual Heroes and used for medical education and team training. The 3DiTeams Project was conceived by Dr. Jeffrey M. Taekman and Jerry Heneghan and is managed by the Human Simulation and Patient Safety Center at Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Industrial engineering is an engineering profession that is concerned with the optimization of complex processes, systems, or organizations by developing, improving and implementing integumentary systems of people, money, knowledge, information and equipment. Industrial engineering is central to manufacturing operations.
Attractiveness Principle is one of System Dynamics archetypes. System archetypes describe common patterns of behavior in dynamic complex systems. Attractiveness principle is a variation of Limits to Growth archetype, with restrictions caused by multiple limits. The limiting factors here are each of different character and usually cannot be dealt with the same way and/or they cannot be all addressed.
A rapid response system (RRS) is a system implemented in many hospitals designed to identify and respond to patients with early signs of clinical deterioration on non-intensive care units with the goal of preventing respiratory or cardiac arrest. A rapid response system consists of two clinical components, an afferent component, an efferent component, and two organizational components – process improvement and administrative.
MSR – The Israel Center for Medical Simulation is Israel's national institute for simulation-based medical education (SBME) and patient safety training. It is located at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center in the Tel HaShomer neighborhood of Ramat Gan, in the Tel Aviv District. MSR is internationally recognized as leader in patient safety simulation-based training.
↑ Gardner, Bette; Harmer, Chet (16 September 1992). The Integration of Systems Thinking and TQM - The Next Step in Quality Improvement. Bay Area Quality Improvement Network. Cupertino, California.
↑ Gardner, Bette (11 May 1994). Systems Thinking: A New Approach to Quality Improvement and Healthcare Delivery. Health Research and Educational Trust of New Jersey Healthcare Education Seminar. Princeton, New Jersey.
↑ Gardner, Bette (16 November 1994). Friday Night at the ER: A Team Learning Game. Systems Thinking in Action Conference, Pegasus Communications. San Francisco, California.
↑ Ryba, Rhoda; Spreadbury, Barbara (27 March 2006). Applied Systems Thinking with the Friday Night at the ER Game. 2006 Congress on Healthcare Management, American College of Healthcare Executives.
↑ Peter M. Senge (1997). Activating The Fifth Discipline (PC). The Learning Circle/Arthur Andersen.
↑ "What's New"(PDF). Friday Night at the ER. Archived from the original(PDF) on 13 May 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
↑ Bacon, Cynthia Thornton; Trent, Peggy; McCoy, Thomas P. (November 2018). "Enhancing Systems Thinking for Undergraduate Nursing Students Using Friday Night at the ER". Journal of Nursing Education. 57 (11): 687–689. doi:10.3928/01484834-20181022-11. PMID30388292. S2CID53257585.
"Health Care Change Agents: Interview with Bette Gardner, CEO and Founder, Breakthrough Learning". Medical Training Magazine. 6 (4): 10–12. December 2017.
Young, DNP, RN, CNE, Judith (January 2018). "Using a Role-Play Simulation Game to Promote Systems Thinking". The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 49 (1): 10–11. doi:10.3928/00220124-20180102-04. PMID29384582.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Gardner, Bette (2019). "Developing Essential Leadership Skills through Simulation". Organization Development Review. 51 (2): 58–59.
Sanko, Jill S.; Gattamorta, Karina; Young, Judith; Durham, Carol F.; Sherwood, Gwen; Dolansky, Mary (March 31, 2020). "A Multisite Study Demonstrates Positive Impacts to Systems Thinking Using a Table-top Simulation Experience". Nurse Educator. 46 (1): 29–33. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000817. hdl:1805/26648. PMID32209839. S2CID214644324.
Cady, Phil (2021). "Applied systems thinking: The impact of system optimization strategies on financial and quality performance in a team-based simulation". Healthcare Management Forum. 34 (1): 29–33. doi:10.1177/0840470420950378. PMID32844701. S2CID221325943.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
