Friedel oscillations

Screening of negatively charged particle in a pool of positive ions

Friedel oscillations, ^[1] named after French physicist Jacques Friedel, arise from localized perturbations in a metallic or semiconductor system caused by a defect in the Fermi gas or Fermi liquid. ^[2] Friedel oscillations are a quantum mechanical analog to electric charge screening of charged species in a pool of ions. Whereas electrical charge screening utilizes a point entity treatment to describe the make-up of the ion pool, Friedel oscillations describing fermions in a Fermi fluid or Fermi gas require a quasi-particle or a scattering treatment. Such oscillations depict a characteristic exponential decay in the fermionic density near the perturbation followed by an ongoing sinusoidal decay resembling sinc function. In 2020, magnetic Friedel oscillations were observed on a metal surface. ^{[3] [4]}

One-dimensional electron gas

Friedel oscillations of the electron density in 1D electron gas occupying the half-space ${\displaystyle x>0}$. Here, ${\displaystyle n_{0}=2k_{\rm {F}}/\pi }$, and ${\displaystyle k_{\rm {F}}}$ is the Fermi wave vector.

As a simple model, consider one-dimensional electron gas in a half-space ${\displaystyle x>0}$. The electrons do not penetrate into the half-space ${\displaystyle x\leq 0}$, so that the boundary condition for the electron wave function is ${\displaystyle \psi (x=0)=0}$. The oscillating wave functions that satisfy this condition are

${\displaystyle \psi _{k}(x)={\sqrt {\frac {2}{L}}}\sin kx}$ ,

where ${\displaystyle k>0}$ is the electron wave vector, and ${\displaystyle L}$ is the length of the one-dimensional box (we use the 'box" normalization here). We consider degenerate electron gas, so that the electrons fill states with energies less than the Fermi energy ${\displaystyle E_{\rm {F}}}$. Then, the electron density ${\displaystyle n(x)}$ is calculated as

${\displaystyle n(x)=2\sum _{k<k_{F}}|\psi _{k}(x)|^{2}}$,

where summation is taken over all wave vectors less than the Fermi wave vector ${\displaystyle k_{\rm {F}}={\sqrt {2mE_{\rm {F}}/\hbar ^{2}}}}$, the factor 2 accounts for the spin degeneracy. By transforming the sum over ${\displaystyle k}$ into the integral we obtain

${\displaystyle n(x)=2{\frac {L}{\pi }}\int \limits _{0}^{k_{\rm {F}}}|\psi _{k}(x)|^{2}dk={\frac {2k_{\rm {F}}}{\pi }}\left(1-{\frac {\sin 2k_{\rm {F}}x}{2k_{\rm {F}}x}}\right)}$.

We see that the boundary perturbs the electron density leading to its spatial oscillations with the period ${\displaystyle \lambda _{\rm {F}}=\pi /k_{\rm {F}}}$ near the boundary. These oscillations decay into the bulk with the decay length also given by ${\displaystyle \lambda _{\rm {F}}}$. At ${\displaystyle x\to +\infty }$ the electron density equals to the unperturbed density of the one-dimensional electron gas ${\displaystyle 2k_{\rm {F}}/\pi }$.

Scattering description

The electrons that move through a metal or semiconductor behave like free electrons of a Fermi gas with a plane wave-like wave function, that is

${\displaystyle \psi _{\mathbf {k} }(\mathbf {r} )={\frac {1}{\sqrt {\Omega }}}e^{i\mathbf {k} \cdot \mathbf {r} }}$.

Electrons in a metal behave differently than particles in a normal gas because electrons are fermions and they obey Fermi–Dirac statistics. This behaviour means that every k-state in the gas can only be occupied by two electrons with opposite spin. The occupied states fill a sphere in the band structure k-space, up to a fixed energy level, the so-called Fermi energy. The radius of the sphere in k-space, k_F, is called the Fermi wave vector.

If there is a foreign atom embedded in the metal or semiconductor, a so-called impurity, the electrons that move freely through the solid are scattered by the deviating potential of the impurity. During the scattering process the initial state wave vector k_i of the electron wave function is scattered to a final state wave vector k_f. Because the electron gas is a Fermi gas only electrons with energies near the Fermi level can participate in the scattering process because there must be empty final states for the scattered states to jump to. Electrons that are too far below the Fermi energy E_F can't jump to unoccupied states. The states around the Fermi level that can be scattered occupy a limited range of k-values or wavelengths. So only electrons within a limited wavelength range near the Fermi energy are scattered resulting in a density modulation around the impurity of the form

${\displaystyle \rho (\mathbf {r} )=\rho _{0}+\delta n{\frac {\cos(2k_{\rm {F}}|\mathbf {r} |+\delta )}{|\mathbf {r} |^{3}}}}$.^{[ further explanation needed ]}

Qualitative description

Scanning tunneling microscopy image of an elliptical quantum corral built by Co atoms on a Cu surface.

In the classic scenario of electric charge screening, a dampening in the electric field is observed in a mobile charge-carrying fluid upon the presence of a charged object. Since electric charge screening considers the mobile charges in the fluid as point entities, the concentration of these charges with respect to distance away from the point decreases exponentially. This phenomenon is governed by Poisson–Boltzmann equation. ^[5] The quantum mechanical description of a perturbation in a one-dimensional Fermi fluid is modelled by the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid. ^[6] The fermions in the fluid that take part in the screening cannot be considered as a point entity but a wave-vector is required to describe them. Charge density away from the perturbation is not a continuum but fermions arrange themselves at discrete spaces away from the perturbation. This effect is the cause of the circular ripples around the impurity.

N.B. Where classically near the charged perturbation an overwhelming number of oppositely charged particles can be observed, in the quantum mechanical scenario of Friedel oscillations periodic arrangements of oppositely charged fermions followed by spaces with same charged regions. ^[2]

In the figure to the right, a 2-dimensional Friedel oscillations has been illustrated with an STM image of a clean surface. As the image is taken on a surface, the regions of low electron density leave the atomic nuclei ‘exposed’ which result in a net positive charge.

See also

• Lindhard theory

References

1. W. A. Harrison (1979). Solid State Theory. Dover Publications. ISBN   978-0-486-63948-2.
2. "Friedel Oscillations: wherein we learn that the electron has a size". Gravity and Levity. June 2, 2009. Retrieved December 22, 2009.
3. Mitsui, T. and Sakai, S. and Li, S. and Ueno, T. and Watanuki, T. and Kobayashi, Y. and Masuda, R. and Seto, M. and Akai, H. (2020). "Magnetic Friedel Oscillation at the Fe(001) Surface: Direct Observation by Atomic-Layer-Resolved Synchrotron Radiation ${\displaystyle ^{57}\mathrm {Fe} }$ Mössbauer Spectroscopy". Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (23): 236806. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.236806. PMID   33337194. S2CID   229318516.
4. Michael Schirber. "Magnetic Oscillations at a Metal Surface". APS physics.
5. Hans-Jürgen Butt, Karlheinz Graf, and Michael Kappl, Physics and Chemistry of Interfaces, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
6. D. Vieira et al., “Friedel oscillations in one-dimensional metals: From Luttinger’s theorem to the Luttinger liquid”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 320, pp. 418-420, 2008. ,, (arXiv Submission)

External links

• http://gravityandlevity.wordpress.com/2009/06/02/friedel-oscillations-wherein-we-learn-that-the-electron-has-a-size/ - a simple explanation of the phenomenon