Gender Equality Index

Last updated

The Gender Equality Index is a tool to measure the progress of gender equality in several areas of economic and social life in the EU and its Member States, developed by the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). [1] These areas are summarised into a hierarchical structure of domains and sub-domains. The Index consists of 31 indicators and ranges from 1 to 100, with 100 representing a gender-equal society. The aim of the Index is to support evidence-based and informed decision-making in the EU and to track progress and setbacks in gender equality since 2005. Additionally, it helps to understand where improvements are most needed and thus supports policymakers in designing more effective gender equality measures.

Contents

The EU Gender Equality Strategy 2020–2025 acknowledges the Index as a key benchmark for gender equality in the EU and sets out its intention to introduce annual monitoring of gender equality, building on the Gender Equality Index.

The first Gender Equality Index was published in 2013, followed by 2015 and 2017. Since 2019 the Index is published annually and contains two parts. While the first part displays the scores of the domains, the second part has a different dedicated thematic focus each year. Apart from the Gender Equality Index report, EIGE also publishes country factsheets with dedicated analyses of scores and indicators for every EU Member State. [2]

Domains

The Gender Equality Index is a composite measure which consists of six core domains – work, money, knowledge, time, power, health – counting towards the Index score. The core domains are further divided into 14 sub-domains capturing key gender-equality issues in the respective area. Two additional domains – violence and intersecting inequalities – belong to the Index structure. They are not included in the core Index, because they focus on specific phenomena that apply only to a selected group of the population.

The core and additional domains of EIGE's Gender Equality Index Gender Equality Index 2017 structure.jpg
The core and additional domains of EIGE's Gender Equality Index

The conceptual framework is presented in the first edition of the Index [3] and was updated in 2017. [4]

The Gender Equality Index is calculated using the main EU-wide surveys and data collection covering all the EU Member States. Data sources include Eurostat (education statistics, European Union Labour Force Survey, European Health Interview Survey, European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions, Structure of Earnings Survey), Eurofound (European Working Conditions Survey, European Quality of Life Survey), and EIGE (Women and Men in Decision-Making).

Core domains

Work

The domain of work compares the position of women and men in the European Union's labour market. It measures gender gaps in participation in the labour market, sectoral segregation patterns and quality of work (such as flexibility of working time and career prospects).

Money

The domain of money examines inequalities in financial resources and the economic situation of women and men. It measures gaps in earnings and income, as well as the risk of poverty and income distribution.

Knowledge

The domain of knowledge shows differences between women and men in terms of education and training. This domain measures gaps in participation in tertiary and lifelong education as well as segregation in educational fields.

Time

The domain of time measures inequalities in the allocation of time that women and men spend on different activities. It measures gender gaps in the involvement of women and men in caring for their children or grandchildren, older people and people with disabilities, as well as their involvement in cooking and housework in comparison to time spent on social activities.

Power

The domain of power measures gender equality in decision-making positions across the political, economic and social spheres. The sub-domain of political power examines the representation of women and men in national parliaments, government and regional/local assemblies. The sub-domain of gender balance in economic decision-making is measured by the proportion of women and men on corporate boards of the largest nationally registered and national Central banks. The Index also presents data in the sub-domain of social power, which includes data on decision-making in research-funding organisations, media and sports.

Health

The domain of health measures gender equality in three health-related aspects: health status, healthy/unhealthy behaviour and access to health services. Health status looks at the differences in life expectancy of women and men together with self-perceived health and healthy life years. This is complemented by a set of health behaviour factors, based on recommendations from the World Health Organisation on healthy behaviour, namely fruit and vegetable consumption, physical activity, smoking and alcohol consumption. Access to health services is measured by the percentage of people who report unmet medical and/or dental needs.

Additional domains

Intersecting inequalities

Since women and men are not homogeneous groups, this domain looks at other characteristics that may affect gender equality. Five social factors or ‘intersections’ were selected for further investigation: family type, age, country of birth, disability, and education. [5] This allows for analysis of the situation of different sub-groups separately as well as gender gaps within these groups. From a policy perspective, it becomes possible to identify which groups of women and men are least/most disadvantaged and to indicate further better-targeted policy measures.

Violence

The domain of violence provides a set of indicators that can assist Member States in assessing the extent and nature of violence against women and enable the monitoring and evaluation of the institutional response to this phenomenon. To provide the most complete and reliable picture of violence against women in the EU, a three-tier structure of measurement was defined including: (1) a set of indicators on the extent of violence against women that will form the composite measure; (2) a set of additional indicators covering a broader range of forms of violence against women; (3) a set of contextual factors, which can provide insights on some of the causes and circumstances surrounding violence against women. [6]

Thematic focus

The 2022 Index has a thematic focus on the COVID-19 pandemic and care. [7] Based on EIGE's survey on the socioeconomic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender equality with over 40 000 respondents across the EU, the focus explores the division of informal childcare, long-term care (LTC) and housework between women and men. [8] [9] Conducted in June and July 2021, the survey also looks at the pandemic's impact on working arrangements, access to services, work-life balance and the well-being of carers.

The 2021 Index thematic focus on Health explores gender differences in three dimensions – health status (including mental health), health behaviours and access to health services. [10] It also provides a gender and intersectional analysis of sexual and reproductive health and the COVID-19 pandemic.

The thematic focus of the 2020 Gender Equality Index examines Digitalisation and the future of work from a gender perspective. [11] It discusses patterns in the use of new technologies, the digital transformation of the world of work and broader consequences of digitalisation such as artificial intelligence or online harassment in a work setting and their respective gender implications.

The first thematic focus in the 2019 edition of the Gender Equality Index centers on Work-life balance. [12] It cuts across three broad areas: paid work, unpaid work (care), and education and training by providing indicators in six specific areas: parental leave policies; informal care for older adults or people with disabilities, as well as long-term care services; caring for children and childcare services; transport and public infrastructure; flexible working arrangements; and lifelong learning.

Results

In 2022, the Gender Equality Index score for the EU is 68.6 points out of 100, a 0.6‑point increase since the 2021 Index and only 5.5 points higher than in 2010. This marks an advance but at a slow pace. Progress in gender equality is largely driven by the domain of power, which conversely has the greatest gender inequalities in the EU. Without this domain, the Index score would have fallen due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. For the first time since its inception, the Gender Equality Index is recording decreases in scores in the domains of work and knowledge with higher gender inequalities in employment (full-time equivalent employment rate (FTE) and duration of working life), education (tertiary graduation and participation in formal or informal education and training) as well as health status and access to health services. Gender gaps in the risk of poverty and the distribution of income between women and men have remained constant.

Criticism

The Gender Equality Index has been criticized for not including the gender-equality of conscription. [13]

Reports

Related Research Articles

Gender equality, also known as sexual equality or equality of the sexes, is the state of equal ease of access to resources and opportunities regardless of gender, including economic participation and decision-making; and the state of valuing different behaviors, aspirations, and needs equally, regardless of gender.

Feminization of poverty refers to a trend of increasing inequality in living standards between men and women due to the widening gender gap in poverty. This phenomenon largely links to how women and children are disproportionately represented within the lower socioeconomic status community in comparison to men within the same socioeconomic status. Causes of the feminization of poverty include the structure of family and household, employment, sexual violence, education, climate change, "femonomics" and health. The traditional stereotypes of women remain embedded in many cultures restricting income opportunities and community involvement for many women. Matched with a low foundation income, this can manifest to a cycle of poverty and thus an inter-generational issue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Institute for Gender Equality</span> EU-initiated body based in Lithuania

The European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) is a European Union-initiated body dedicated exclusively to gender equality. In accordance to Regulation (EC) the institute was founded on 20 December 2006. The staff of the institute was recruited in 2007 at the European coordinating body in Vilnius. Since the beginning, the institution has difficulties to balance the democratic deficit, in the context of the issue of equality between women and men. From the very beginning equality is one of the principles of the EU. Nevertheless, there is an existing gender gap in the levels of participation, payment and benefits of women in comparison to men in the EU.

The Gender Development Index (GDI) is an index designed to measure gender equality.

Gender inequality is the social phenomenon in which people are not treated equally on the basis of gender. This inequality can be caused by gender discrimination or sexism. The treatment may arise from distinctions regarding biology, psychology, or cultural norms prevalent in the society. Some of these distinctions are empirically grounded, while others appear to be social constructs. While current policies around the world cause inequality among individuals, it is women who are most affected. Gender inequality weakens women in many areas such as health, education, and business life. Studies show the different experiences of genders across many domains including education, life expectancy, personality, interests, family life, careers, and political affiliation. Gender inequality is experienced differently across different cultures.

Gender inequality in India refers to health, education, economic and political inequalities between men and women in India. Various international gender inequality indices rank India differently on each of these factors, as well as on a composite basis, and these indices are controversial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global Gender Gap Report</span> Index designed to measure gender equality

The Global Gender Gap Report is an index designed to measure gender equality. It was first published in 2006 by the World Economic Forum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender Parity Index</span> Socioeconomic index

UNESCO defined the Gender Parity Index (GPI) as a socioeconomic index usually designed to measure the relative access to education of males and females. It is used by international organizations particularly in measuring the progress of developing countries. For example, some UNESCO documents consider gender parity in literacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender Inequality Index</span> United Nations index for gender inequality

The Gender Inequality Index (GII) is an index for the measurement of gender disparity that was introduced in the 2010 Human Development Report 20th anniversary edition by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). According to the UNDP, this index is a composite measure to quantify the loss of achievement within a country due to gender inequality. It uses three dimensions to measure opportunity cost: reproductive health, empowerment, and labor market participation. The new index was introduced as an experimental measure to remedy the shortcomings of the previous indicators, the Gender Development Index (GDI) and the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM), both of which were introduced in the 1995 Human Development Report.

In South Korea, gender inequality is derived from deeply rooted patriarchal ideologies with specifically defined gender-roles. While it remains especially prevalent in South Korea's economy and politics, gender inequality has decreased in healthcare and education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender pay gap</span> Average difference in remuneration amounts between men and women

The gender pay gap or gender wage gap is the average difference between the remuneration for men and women who are working. Women are generally found to be paid less than men. There are two distinct numbers regarding the pay gap: non-adjusted versus adjusted pay gap. The latter typically takes into account differences in hours worked, occupations chosen, education and job experience. In other words, the adjusted values represent how much women and men make for the same work, while the non-adjusted values represent how much the average man and woman make in total. In the United States, for example, the non-adjusted average woman's annual salary is 79–83% of the average man's salary, compared to 95–99% for the adjusted average salary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender inequality in Mexico</span> Overview of gender inequality in Mexico

Gender inequality in Mexico refers to disparate freedoms in health, education, and economic and political abilities between men and women in Mexico. It has been diminishing throughout history, but continues to persist in many forms including the disparity in women's political representation and participation, the gender pay gap, and high rates of domestic violence and femicide. As of 2022, the World Economic Forum ranks Mexico 31st in terms of gender equality out of 146 countries. Structural gender inequality is relatively homogeneous between the Mexican states as there are very few regional differences in the inequalities present.

Measures of gender equality or inequality are statistical tools employed to quantify the concept of gender equality.

Gender budgeting means preparing budgets or analyzing them from a gender perspective. Also referred to as gender-sensitive budgeting, this practice does not entail dividing budgets for women. It aims at dealing with budgetary gender inequality issues, including gender hierarchies and the discrepancies between women's and men's salaries. At its core, gender budgeting is a feminist policy with a primary goal of re-orienting the allocation of public resources, advocating for an advanced decision-making role for women in important issues, and securing equity in the distribution of resources between men and women. Gender budgeting allows governments to promote equality through fiscal policies by taking analyses of a budget's differing impacts on the sexes as well as setting goals or targets for equality and allocating funds to support those goals. This practice does not always target intentional discrimination but rather forces an awareness of the effects of financial schemes on all genders.

Even in the modern era, gender inequality remains an issue in Japan. In 2015, the country had a per-capita income of US$38,883, ranking 22nd of the 188 countries, and No. 18 in the Human Development Index. In the 2019 Gender Inequality Index report, it was ranked 17th out of the participating 162 countries, ahead of Germany, the UK and the US, performing especially well on the reproductive health and higher education attainment indices. Despite this, gender inequality still exists in Japan due to the persistence of gender norms in Japanese society rooted in traditional religious values and government reforms. Gender-based inequality manifests in various aspects from the family, or ie, to political representation, to education, playing particular roles in employment opportunities and income, and occurs largely as a result of defined roles in traditional and modern Japanese society. Inequality also lies within divorce of heterosexual couples and the marriage of same sex couples due to both a lack of protective divorce laws and the presence of restrictive marriage laws. In consequence to these traditional gender roles, self-rated health surveys show variances in reported poor health, population decline, reinforced gendered education and social expectations, and inequalities in the LGBTQ+ community.

Foreign aid for gender equality in Jordan includes programs funded by governments or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that aim to empower women, close gender based gaps in opportunity and experience, and promote equal access to education, economic empowerment, and political representation in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gendered impact of the COVID-19 pandemic</span> Aspect of viral outbreak

COVID-19 affects men and women differently both in terms of the outcome of infection and the effect of the disease upon society. The mortality due to COVID-19 is higher in men. Slightly more men than women contract COVID with a ratio of 10:9.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable Development Goal 5</span> Global goal to achieve gender equality by 2030

Sustainable Development Goal 5 concerns gender equality and is fifth of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals established by United Nations in 2015. The 17 SDGs recognize that action in one area will affect outcomes in others, and that development must balance social, economic and environmental sustainability.

Energy poverty is defined as lacking access to the affordable sustainable energy service. Geographically, it is unevenly distributed in developing and developed countries. In 2019, there were an estimated 770 million people who have no access to electricity, with approximately 95% distributed in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Gender parity is a statistical measure used to describe ratios between men and women, or boys and girls, in a given population. Gender parity may refer to the proportionate representation of men and women in a given group, also referred to as sex ratio, or it may mean the ratio between any quantifiable indicator among men against the same indicator among women.

References

  1. EIGE (2023). "European Institute for Gender Equality".
  2. EIGE (2022). "Gender Equality Index 2022 - Country Factsheets".
  3. EIGE (2013). "Gender Equality Index 2013".
  4. EIGE (2017). "Gender Equality Index 2017 Methodological Report".
  5. EIGE (2019). "Intersecting inequalities: Gender Equality Index".
  6. EIGE (2017). "Gender Equality Index 2017: Measurement framework of violence against women - Report".
  7. EIGE (2022). "Gender Equality Index 2022: The COVID-19 pandemic and care".
  8. EIGE (2023). "Online Panel Survey of Gender Equality and Socioeconomic Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Technical Report".
  9. EIGE (2023). "Gender Statistics Database - Survey on gender equality and socio-economic consequences of Covid-19".
  10. EIGE (2021). "Gender Equality Index 2021: Health".
  11. EIGE (2020). "Gender Equality Index 2020: Digitalisation and the future of work".
  12. EIGE (2019). "Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance".
  13. Heikkilä, Jussi; Laukkanen, Ina (4 July 2022). "Gender-specific Call of Duty: A Note on the Neglect of Conscription in Gender Equality Indices". Defence and Peace Economics. 33 (5): 603–615. doi:10.1080/10242694.2020.1844400. ISSN   1024-2694.
  14. EIGE (2022). "Gender Equality Index 2022: The COVID-19 pandemic and care".
  15. EIGE (2021). "Gender Equality Index 2021: Health".
  16. EIGE (2020). "Gender Equality Index 2020: Digitalisation and the future of work".
  17. EIGE (2019). "Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance".
  18. EIGE (2019). "Intersecting inequalities: Gender Equality Index".
  19. EIGE (2017). "Gender Equality Index 2017: Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005-2015 - Report".
  20. EIGE (2017). "Gender Equality Index 2017: Measurement framework of violence against women - Report".
  21. EIGE (2015). "Gender Equality Index 2015 - Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005-2012: Report".
  22. EIGE (2013). "Gender Equality Index - Report".