George Modelski

Last updated
George Modelski
Born
Jerzy Modelski

(1926-01-09)January 9, 1926 [1]
DiedFebruary 21, 2014(2014-02-21) (aged 88) [2] [3]
Washington, D. C.
Occupation(s)Political scientist, professor
Academic background
EducationPh. D. (1955), University of London [3]
George Modelski Georgemodelski.jpeg
George Modelski

George Modelski was Professor of political science in the University of Washington. [4] Modelski was a professor there from 1967 to 1995. [3]

Contents

Before working at the University of Washington, Modelski was a senior research fellow at the Institute of Advanced Studies at the Australian National University. [3]

Modelski did work on long-term processes in global politics and economics, as well as the world urban macrodynamics and world system evolution. [5] He was a neorealist. [6] In 2012 he was awarded with the Bronze Kondratieff Medal [7] by the International N. D. Kondratieff Foundation.

Long cycles theory

George Modelski devised a cyclical theory of world leadership. [8] Each cycle is about 100 years' duration and a new hegemonic power appears each time.

The five world leaders

Portugal 1492-1580; in the Age of Discovery

the Netherlands 1580-1688; beginning with the Eighty Years' War, 1579-1588

United Kingdom (1) 1688-1792; beginning with the wars of Louis XIV

United Kingdom (2) 1792-1914; beginning with the French Revolution and Napoleonic wars

the United States 1914 to (predicted) 2030; beginning with World War I and two. [9]

The four phases of the cycle

1, Global War, which a) involves almost all global powers, b) is 'characteristically naval' [10] c) is caused by a system breakdown, d) is extremely lethal, e) results in a new global leader, capable of tackling global problems. [11] The war is a 'decision process' analogous to a national election. [12] The emerging global power typically enjoys a 'good war' with undamaged domestic infrastructure and a booming economy. [13]

The Thirty Years War, though lasting and destructive, was not a 'global war' [14]

2, World Power, which lasts for 'about one generation'. [15] The new incumbent power 'prioritises global problems', mobilises a coalition, is decisive and innovative. [16] For example, the UK after 1815 acted against the transatlantic slave trade and led the Congress system; the US after 1945 co-founded the UN, the IMF, GATT, and the Bretton Woods system.

Pre-modern communities become dependent on the hegemonic power [17]

3, Delegitimation. This phase can last for 20–27 years; the hegemonic power falters, as rival powers assert new nationalistic policies. [18]

4, Deconcentration. The hegemony's problem-solving capacity declines. It yields to a multipolar order of warring rivals. Pre-modern communities become less dependent. [19]

The role of the 'challenger'

In the deconcentration phase a rival state or challenger, isolated and fearing encirclement [20] , appears. Spain challenged Portugal; Louis XIV and France challenged the Netherlands; Napoleon Bonaparte sought to bring down the UK; Germany under Kaiser Wilhelm II and Hitler brought an end to British hegemony for a second time. Writing in 1987, Modelski forecast that the USSR would challenge American power from 2030, in a new global war. [9]

Why challengers have failed

World leader nations tend to have: 'insular geography' and a strong naval power providing 'global reach'; a stable, open society; a strong economy; strategic organisation, and strong political parties. By contrast, the 'challenger' nations have: closed systems; absolute rulers; domestic instability; continental geographic locations; and weaker naval power. [21]

Origins and evolution

According to Modelski, the cycle originated in about 1493 through a) the decline of Venetian naval power, b) Chinese abandonment of naval exploration, and c) discovery of sea routes to India and the Americas. [22] It has developed in parallel with the growth of the nation-state, political parties, command of the sea, and 'dependency of pre-modern communities'. [23] The system is flawed, lacking in coherence or solidarity; it also fails to address the North-South divide. [24]

Function

Modelski wrote that the cycle is a 'learning process' and a 'motor of modernity', providing leadership on a global scale. [25] The cycle ushers in new waves of innovation in orderly fashion. Awareness of the cycle provides a balanced perspective, and a counter to the widespread belief in global anarchy. [26]

Forecasts

Modelski speculates that US deconcentration might be replaced by a power based in the 'Pacific rim' or by an explicit coalition of nations, as 'co-operation is urgently required in respect of nuclear weapons'. [27] It is possible for the US to become world leader a second time, as Britain did in the 19th century. [28]

Critical response

Modelski 'dismisses the idea that international relations are anarchic'. His research, influenced by Immanuel Wallerstein, was 'measured in decades... a major achievement' says Peter J. Taylor [29]

Colin Flint saw several flaws in the argument. It is deterministic, incapable of prediction; 'Portugal's 16th century history does not determine the US's 21st century future.' Modelski took a state-centric view which focused on rich countries and ignored the Global South. Flint also questions whether naval power is still relevant in a time of cruise missiles, satellites and drones. [30]

Chinese leaders reject the idea of hegemony, and use the word as an insult. [31]

Joshua S Goldstein says however that long cycles are not mechanistic or deterministic, but 'evolutionary and dynamic' and therefore do have predictive power. [32]

Books

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kondratiev wave</span> Hypothesized cycle-like phenomena in the modern world economy

In economics, Kondratiev waves are hypothesized cycle-like phenomena in the modern world economy. The phenomenon is closely connected with the technology life cycle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hegemony</span> Political, economic or military predominance of one state over other states

Hegemony is the political, economic, and military predominance of one state over other states, either regional or global.

Power politics is a theory of power in international relations which contends that distributions of power and national interests, or changes to those distributions, are fundamental causes of war and of system stability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nikolai Kondratiev</span> Russian Soviet economist (1892–1938)

Nikolai Dmitriyevich Kondratiev was a Russian Soviet economist and proponent of the New Economic Policy (NEP) best known for the business cycle theory known as Kondratiev waves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neo-Gramscianism</span> International relations theory

Neo-Gramscianism is a critical theory approach to the study of international relations (IR) and the global political economy (GPE) that explores the interface of ideas, institutions and material capabilities as they shape the specific contours of the state formation. The theory is heavily influenced by the writings of Antonio Gramsci. Neo-Gramscianism analyzes how the particular constellation of social forces, the state and the dominant ideational configuration define and sustain world orders. In this sense, the neo-Gramscian approach breaks the decades-old stalemate between the realist schools of thought and the liberal theories by historicizing the very theoretical foundations of the two streams as part of a particular world order and finding the interlocking relationship between agency and structure. Karl Polanyi, Karl Marx, Max Weber, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno and Michel Foucault are cited as major sources within the critical theory of IR.

Hegemonic stability theory (HST) is a theory of international relations, rooted in research from the fields of political science, economics, and history. HST indicates that the international system is more likely to remain stable when a single state is the dominant world power, or hegemon. Thus, the end of hegemony diminishes the stability of the international system. As evidence for the stability of hegemony, proponents of HST frequently point to the Pax Britannica and Pax Americana, as well as the instability prior to World War I and the instability of the interwar period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World-systems theory</span> Approach emphasizing the world-system as the primary unit of social analysis

World-systems theory is a multidisciplinary approach to world history and social change which emphasizes the world-system as the primary unit of social analysis. World-systems theorists argue that their theory explains the rise and fall of states, income inequality, social unrest, and imperialism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social cycle theory</span> Type of social theories

Social cycle theories are among the earliest social theories in sociology. Unlike the theory of social evolutionism, which views the evolution of society and human history as progressing in some new, unique direction(s), sociological cycle theory argues that events and stages of society and history generally repeat themselves in cycles. Such a theory does not necessarily imply that there cannot be any social progress. In the early theory of Sima Qian and the more recent theories of long-term ("secular") political-demographic cycles as well as in the Varnic theory of P. R. Sarkar, an explicit accounting is made of social progress.

Polarity in international relations is any of the various ways in which power is distributed within the international system. It describes the nature of the international system at any given period of time. One generally distinguishes three types of systems: unipolarity, bipolarity, and multipolarity for three or more centers of power. The type of system is completely dependent on the distribution of power and influence of states in a region or globally.

Global politics, also known as world politics, names both the discipline that studies the political and economic patterns of the world and the field that is being studied. At the centre of that field are the different processes of political globalization in relation to questions of social power.

Power transition theory is a theory about the nature of war, in relation to the power in international relations. The theory was first published in 1958 by its creator, A.F.K. Organski, in his textbook, World Politics (1958).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Giovanni Arrighi</span> Italian economist and sociologist (1937–2009)

Giovanni Arrighi was an Italian economist, sociologist and world-systems analyst, from 1998 a Professor of Sociology at Johns Hopkins University. His work has been translated into over fifteen languages.

Jeremy Black is an English historian, who was formerly a professor of history at the University of Exeter. He is a senior fellow at the Center for the Study of America and the West at the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrey Korotayev</span> Russian anthropologist, economic historian, comparative political scientist, and sociologist

Andrey Vitalievich Korotayev is a Russian anthropologist, economic historian, comparative political scientist, demographer and sociologist, with major contributions to world-systems theory, cross-cultural studies, Near Eastern history, Big History, and mathematical modelling of social and economic macrodynamics.

Leonid Efimovich Grinin is a Russian philosopher of history, sociologist, political anthropologist, economist, and futurologist.

Proto-globalization or early modern globalization is a period of the history of globalization roughly spanning the years between 1500 and 1800, following the period of archaic globalization. First introduced by historians A. G. Hopkins and Christopher Bayly, the term describes the phase of increasing trade links and cultural exchange that characterized the period immediately preceding the advent of so-called "modern globalization" in the 19th century.

Tessaleno Campos Devezas is a Brazilian-born Portuguese physicist, systems theorist, and materials scientist. He is best known for his contributions to the long waves theory in socioeconomic development, technological evolution, energy systems as well as world system analysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political globalization</span> Growth of the worldwide political system

Political globalization is the growth of the worldwide political system, both in size and complexity. That system includes national governments, their governmental and intergovernmental organizations as well as government-independent elements of global civil society such as international non-governmental organizations and social movement organizations. One of the key aspects of political globalization is the declining importance of the nation-state and the rise of other actors on the political scene. The creation and existence of the United Nations is called one of the classic examples of political globalization.

Joshua S. Goldstein is professor emeritus of international relations at American University. He graduated with a BA from Stanford University in 1981 and earned his doctorate at MIT 1986. He was appointed professor in 1993. He was on the faculty at the University of Southern California and American University and was a research scholar in political science at University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Global policeman is an informal term for a superpower which seeks or claims the right to intervene in other sovereign states. It has been used, firstly for the United Kingdom and, since 1945, for the United States, though it has been suggested that China has been seeking to take over the role in the 21st century.

References

  1. Biographical Directory. American Political Science Association. 1973. p. 335.
  2. "Passing of George Modelski". polisci.washington.edu/. University of Washington. Archived from the original on 23 February 2015. Retrieved 13 November 2014.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "Archived copy". www.polisci.washington.edu. Archived from the original on 13 November 2014. Retrieved 20 July 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  4. "George Modelski". The Evolutionary World Politics Homepage (Official). Archived from the original on May 20, 2007. Retrieved October 18, 2013.
  5. George Modelski. "World System Evolution" . Retrieved October 18, 2013.
  6. Hobson, John M. (2000). The State and International Relations. Cambridge University Press. p. 189. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612442. ISBN   978-0-521-64354-2.
  7. "The International N. D. Kondratieff Foundation". Ikf2010.ru. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved October 18, 2013.
  8. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p8
  9. 1 2 George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p40
  10. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p101
  11. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p43-6
  12. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p36-7
  13. Colin Flint, Introduction to geopolitics, Routledge, 2011, chapter 7 (appendix in later editions)
  14. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p45
  15. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p157
  16. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p14, 83, 93
  17. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, chapter 8
  18. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p40, p119
  19. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p119-20, p207
  20. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p33
  21. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p90, p220-5, chapter 7
  22. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p41-3, p95
  23. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, chapters 6, 7, 8; p153
  24. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p201
  25. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p10, 47, chapter 5
  26. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p1
  27. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p41-3, p230-33
  28. George Modelski, Long Cycles in World Politics, University of Washington, 1987, p229, 232
  29. Book reviews : Modelski, G. 1987: Long cycles in world politics. London: Macmillan. 244 pp. £29.50 cloth - Peter J. Taylor, 1989 (sagepub.com)
  30. Colin Flint, Introduction to geopolitics, Routledge, 2011, chapter 7 (relegated to an appendix in later editions)
  31. Goldstein and Pevehouse, International Relations, Longman 2007, p82
  32. https://www.joshuagoldstein.com/jgcyc14.pdf p349