Georgia House Bill 87

Last updated
Georgia House Bill 87
Georgia General Assembly
  • Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011
PassedApril 14, 2011
Signed by Nathan Deal
SignedMay 13, 2011
CommencedJuly 1, 2011
Legislative history
Bill titleHouse Bill 87
First reading January 27, 2011
Second reading January 31, 2011
Third reading March 3, 2011
Status: Current legislation

Georgia House Bill 87 (official title: Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011; abbreviated HB 87) is an anti-illegal immigration act passed by the Georgia General Assembly on April 14, 2011, and signed into law by Georgia governor Nathan Deal on May 13, 2011. [1] It took effect on July 1 of that year. [2] The law was authored by Peachtree City Republican state representative Matt Ramsey, and was partly based on Arizona's SB 1070 bill that had passed the previous year. [3] [4] [5]

Contents

Sponsors

In the Georgia House of Representatives, HB 87 was co-sponsored by Matt Ramsey, Rich Golick, Katie M. Dempsey, Rick Austin, Stephen Allison, and Ed Lindsey. In the Georgia State Senate, it was sponsored by Bill Hamrick. [1]

Provisions

HB 87 requires businesses in Georgia with more than 10 employees to use E-Verify to verify that prospective employees are eligible to work in the United States legally. The bill allows police in the state to attempt to determine the immigration status of some suspects. [3] It also makes the intentional transportation of undocumented immigrants while a crime is being committed punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and a prison sentence of up to a year. In addition, it punishes undocumented workers convicted of using fake identification to gain employment with up to 15 years in prison and up to a $250,000 fine. [3] [6]

Similarity to Arizona's SB 1070

Commentators noted that HB 87 was similar to other anti-illegal immigration laws that had recently been passed in other U.S. states, such as Arizona SB 1070. [3] Some of HB 87's critics dubbed it a "copycat" of SB 1070, a claim that PolitiFact rated "half true" because, although the two laws are similar, the authors of HB 87 tried to address concerns about the constitutionality of such legislation. For instance, HB 87 merely allows police to check the immigration status of suspects, whereas SB 1070 required them to do so. [7]

Reactions

When HB 87 was signed into law, it was widely described as one of the toughest such laws in the country. Multiple organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), also publicly raised the possibility of suing Georgia over the law. [2] [6] The bill was also criticized by the leaders of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights. [6] The government of Mexico also criticized Deal for signing the bill into law, saying in a statement that "The legislators and state executive ignored the many contributions of the immigrant community to the economy and society of Georgia." [6] Some critics, including Azadeh N. Shahshahani and Wade Henderson, criticized the bill on the basis that it would invite racial profiling of Latinos and other people of color. [6] [8] Other critics also criticized the law because they thought it would adversely affect trust in the police among immigrants. [9]

Supporters of the bill generally argued that it would benefit Georgia taxpayers by reducing the economic burdens associated with providing for undocumented immigrants in the state. [10] Support for the bill came from conservative groups that support strict immigration laws, including Americans for Immigration Control, whose spokesman, Phil Kent, said that the bill was about protecting taxpayers from the costs of illegal immigration. Kent told CNN that "We just want to make sure that people are welcome here and that they come here legally. And then we can cut back on the illegal immigration." [6] The bill was also supported by Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies, who said that in passing it, Georgia "...seems to have addressed the top-priority matters a state can deal with," and by Catherine Davis, legislative director for the Network of Politically Active Christians, who told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that the bill "will stop unscrupulous behavior." [3]

Effects

HB 87 has since been criticized for allegedly having a negative impact on Georgia's economy, especially in the agricultural sector, because it decreased the number of undocumented workers who were available to work on farms in Georgia. [11] [12] [13] A 2011 University of Georgia study showed that after the law, Georgia experienced a labor shortage of over 5,000 farm workers, which resulted in $140 million in crop losses. [14] Similarly, according to the 2012 Georgia Ag Forecast, Georgia experienced an agricultural labor shortage of almost 50% after HB 87 was passed. [15] An Atlanta Journal-Constitution survey, also conducted in 2011, estimated that farmers in Georgia would be short by about 11,000 workers during the upcoming season. [16] When Jason Carter was running for governor of Georgia in the 2014 election, he criticized Deal for signing the law, saying that it had resulted in an "economic disaster" for the state and noting that he had voted against it in the state legislature. Deal responded that Georgians believed it was important to enforce the law, and that the bill had served to remind the federal government how important it was to address the issue of undocumented immigration. [17]

Some researchers have also expressed concern that the law may adversely affect public health among Hispanic immigrants in Georgia. [18] For instance, a 2013 study found that visits to the pediatric emergency department among Hispanics in Georgia decreased after the law was implemented, while the acuity of these visits tended to increase; in contrast, no other group in Georgia saw these trends during the same time period. [19]

Protests

Prior to Governor Deal signing HB 87 into law, numerous protesters gathered outside his office at the Georgia State Capitol, and the group Southerners on New Ground called for a boycott of the state if the bill was enacted. [6] On July 2, 2011, a rally took place outside the State Capitol to protest the law; the size of the crowd was estimated at between 8,000 and 14,000. [20]

On June 2, 2011, the ACLU, the SPLC, the Asian Law Caucus, and the National Immigration Law Center filed a lawsuit challenging HB 87, arguing that it was preempted by federal law and was unconstitutional. [21] In March 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a permanent injunction which blocked multiple provisions of the law, [22] including section 7, which made it illegal to transport or harbor undocumented immigrants while they were committing another crime. [23]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nathan Deal</span> American politician (born 1942)

John Nathan Deal is an American politician and former lawyer who served as the 82nd governor of Georgia from 2011 to 2019. A Republican, he previously served as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Reforming the immigration policy of the United States is a subject of political discourse and contention. Immigration has played an essential part in American history, as except for the Native Americans, everyone in the United States is descended from people who migrated to the United States. Some claim that the United States maintains the world's most liberal immigration policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gil Cedillo</span> American politician

Gilbert Anthony Cedillo is an American politician, who served as a member of the Los Angeles City Council for the 1st district from 2013 to 2022. A member of the Democratic Party, Cedillo was previously a member of both the California State Assembly and the California State Senate.

Defend Colorado Now (DCN) was a ballot initiative introduced in January 2006 to amend the constitution of Colorado to deny non-emergency public services that are not required by federal law to illegal immigrants in Colorado. It was similar to the recently approved Arizona Proposition 200 (2004), which denied public services to illegal aliens and California Proposition 187 (1994) which was declared unconstitutional by the Federal Appeals Court.

A sanctuary city is a municipality that limits or denies its cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">E-Verify</span> Website to determine US work eligibility

E-Verify is a United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) website that allows businesses to determine the eligibility of their employees, both U.S. and foreign citizens, to work in the United States. The site was originally established in 1996 as the Basic Pilot Program to prevent companies from hiring people who had violated immigration laws and entered the United States illegally. In August 2007, the DHS started requiring all federal contractors and vendors to use E-Verify. The Internet-based program is free and maintained by the United States government. While federal law does not mandate use of E-Verify for non-federal employees, some states have mandated use of E-Verify or similar programs, while others have discouraged the program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arizona SB 1070</span> 2010 border security legislation in Arizona

The Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act is a 2010 legislative Act in the U.S. state of Arizona that was the broadest and strictest anti-illegal immigration law in the United States when passed. It has received international attention and has spurred considerable controversy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immigration detention in the United States</span>

The United States government holds tens of thousands of immigrants in detention under the control of Customs and Border Protection and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Jessica Colotl is an undocumented immigrant to the United States whose 2010 arrest for driving without a license and possible deportation called attention to the issue of illegal immigration. Colotl was brought from Mexico by her parents without valid documentation into the US when she was either 10 or 11 years old. Colotl became the center of debate over immigration policy, including the enrollment of non-citizens in state universities and discussion of Immigration and Nationality Act Section 287(g) which allowed police to turn her over to immigration enforcement.

Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Arizona's SB 1070, a state law intended to increase the powers of local law enforcement that wished to enforce federal immigration laws. The issue is whether the law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement. The Court ruled that sections 3, 5(C), and 6 of S. B. 1070 were preempted by federal law but left other parts of the law intact, including a provision that allowed law enforcement to investigate a person's immigration status.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juan Crow</span> State and local laws against undocumented immigrants in the Southwestern United States

Juan Crow is political terminology that was coined by journalist Roberto Lovato. It first gained popularity when he used it in an article for The Nation magazine in 2008. "Call it Juan Crow: the matrix of laws, social customs, economic institutions and symbolic systems enabling the physical and psychic isolation needed to control and exploit undocumented immigrants." Lovato utilized the term to criticize immigration enforcement laws by analogizing them to Jim Crow laws, and has since become popular among immigration activists.

The California DREAMAct is a package of California state laws that allow children who were brought into the US under the age of 16 without proper visas/immigration documentation who have attended school on a regular basis and otherwise meet in-state tuition and GPA requirements to apply for student financial aid benefits. It and past similarly named legislation have been authored by California State Senator Gil Cedillo.

Alabama HB 56, titled the Beason-Hammon Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act is an anti-illegal immigration bill, signed into law in the U.S. state of Alabama in June 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Azadeh N. Shahshahani</span>

Azadeh N. Shahshahani is an American human rights attorney based in Atlanta. She is the legal and advocacy director for Project South. She previously served as president of the National Lawyers Guild and director of the National Security/Immigrants' Rights Project for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Georgia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cannabis in Georgia (U.S. state)</span>

Cannabis in Georgia is illegal for recreational use, but decriminalized in the cities of Atlanta, Savannah, Macon, Athens, and others. Limited medical use is allowed in the form of cannabis oil containing less than 5% THC.

Stewart Detention Center is a private prison operated by Corrections Corporation of America under contract with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, primarily used for housing immigrant detainees. The facility stands in Lumpkin, Stewart County, Georgia and has an official capacity of 1752 inmates.

As of October 1, 2023, 19 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico issue driver's licenses or permits to some or all of the population residing without inspection in the United States. State laws permitting this are on the books in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.

2017 California Senate Bill 54, commonly referred to as "SB 54" and also known as the "California Values Act" is a 2017 California state law that prevents state and local law enforcement agencies from using their resources on behalf of federal immigration enforcement agencies. The law allows for cooperation between local, state and federal law enforcement in cases of violent illegal immigrants, and is often referred to as a "sanctuary law" due to its resemblance of sanctuary jurisdiction policies.

The issue of crimes committed by illegal immigrants to the United States is a topic that is often asserted by more conservative politicians and media outlets when discussing Immigration policy in the United States.

Adelina Nicholls is a sociologist and one of the co-founders of the Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights (GLAHR). She advocates and protests for the protection and extension of rights for immigrants in America, with particular focus on those from Latin American countries. She marched in Atlanta, Georgia in protest against an immigration reform law, HB 87 in 2011. In addition to being opposed by Nicholls and GLAHR, the law was also protested by the Mexican government. She has also marched to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) building in Atlanta.

References

  1. 1 2 "HB 87 2011–2012 Regular Session". www.legis.ga.gov. Retrieved 2017-09-02.
  2. 1 2 Brown, Robbie (2011-05-13). "New Georgia Immigration Law Is One of Toughest in Nation". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2017-09-02.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Redmon, Jeremy (2011-04-15). "Georgia lawmakers pass illegal immigration crackdown". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved 2017-09-02.
  4. Redmon, Jeremy (2016-03-03). "Georgia Legislature seeking to crack down on illegal immigration". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved 2017-09-02.
  5. Redmon, Jeremy (2011-05-13). "Governor signs Arizona-style immigration bill into law". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved 2017-09-10.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Valdes, Gustavo (2011-05-13). "Georgia governor signs controversial anti-illegal immigration law". CNN. Retrieved 2017-09-02.
  7. Mariano, Willoughby (2011-03-07). "Immigration bill foes label legislation an Arizona "copycat"". Politifact. Retrieved 2017-09-11.
  8. Shahshahani, Azadeh (2012-05-18). "HB 87 Negatively Impacts Georgia Economy and Reputation". Jurist. Retrieved 2017-09-11.
  9. Altschulter, Daniel (2011-06-30). "Georgia's HB 87 Goes into Effect on July 1". Americas Quarterly. Retrieved 2017-09-11.
  10. Ruiz, Iris D.; Sánchez, Raúl (2016-10-15). Decolonizing Rhetoric and Composition Studies: New Latinx Keywords for Theory and Pedagogy. Springer. p. 163. ISBN   9781137527240.
  11. Esses, Victoria M.; Brochu, Paula M.; Dickson, Karen R. (2012-12-01). "Economic Costs, Economic Benefits, and Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Immigration". Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 12 (1): 133–137. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01269.x. ISSN   1530-2415.
  12. McArdle, Megan (2011-06-21). "Georgia's Harsh Immigration Law Costs Millions in Unharvested Crops". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2017-09-03. Thanks to the resulting labor shortage, Georgia farmers have been forced to leave millions of dollars' worth of blueberries, onions, melons and other crops unharvested and rotting in the fields. It has also put state officials into something of a panic at the damage they've done to Georgia's largest industry.
  13. Asbed, Greg; Sellers, Sean (2011-10-17). "The Nation: The High Cost Of Anti-Immigrant Laws". NPR.org. Retrieved 2017-09-03.
  14. "HB 87 is costing Georgia big bucks". WALB. Retrieved 2017-09-03.
  15. Gallant, Andre (2013-02-02). "Georgia prepares for impact of immigration reform in D.C." Athens Banner-Herald. Archived from the original on 2017-09-03. Retrieved 2017-09-03.
  16. Khimm, Suzy (2011-06-24). "If Georgia Drives Away Immigrant Workers, Will Its Economy Suffer?". Mother Jones. Retrieved 2017-09-09.
  17. "Carter, Deal clash over immigration". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved 2017-09-20.
  18. Aponte-Rivera, Vivianne R.; Dunlop, Boadie W. (November 2011). "Public health consequences of state immigration laws" (PDF). Southern Medical Journal. 104 (11): 718–719. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318233539b . ISSN   1541-8243. PMID   22024776.
  19. Beniflah, Jacob D.; Little, Wendalyn K.; Simon, Harold K.; Sturm, Jesse (2013-12-01). "Effects of Immigration Enforcement Legislation on Hispanic Pediatric Patient Visits to the Pediatric Emergency Department". Clinical Pediatrics. 52 (12): 1122–1126. doi:10.1177/0009922813493496. ISSN   0009-9228. PMID   23836808.
  20. Haines, Errin (2011-07-02). "Protesters rally against Georgia immigration law". Salon.
  21. Ceasar, Stephen (2011-06-02). "Georgia immigration law taken to court". Los Angeles Times. ISSN   0458-3035 . Retrieved 2017-09-09.
  22. "Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. Deal". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved 2017-09-02.
  23. Kowalski, Daniel (2013-04-01). "Section 7 of Georgia's HB 87 Permanently Enjoined". LexisNexis. Retrieved 2017-09-02.