Gifted at-risk

Last updated

Gifted students are outstanding learners who are not usually considered at risk of academic failure or problems. However, gifted students can still underachieve. [1] There are risks related to the student's giftedness. This concept was formally set forth in 1972 in the U.S. in the Marland Report:

Contents

Gifted and talented children are, in fact, deprived and can suffer psychological damage and permanent impairment of their abilities to function well which is equal to or greater than the similar deprivation suffered by any other population with special needs served by the Office of Education. [2]

Specific risks

The following risks are listed in The Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Children:

There is a cause-and-effect relationship between the unmet learning needs of gifted students and the above risks. "Research indicates that many of the emotional and social difficulties gifted students experience disappear when their educational climates are adapted to their level and pace of learning." [14]

Linda Kreger Silverman enumerates these additional risks: [15]

Further, there exists anecdotal evidence of truancy problems with gifted children, who sometimes miss school because of disengagement, and worse, fear of bullying. In 1999, legislation was introduced in Colorado to recognize gifted students as at-risk, with truancy as a factor, but the bill did not become law. [16]

Given the ease with which gifted children can excel in school, the expectation might be that very few of them drop out. However, meta-analysis from the paper "Gifted Students Who Drop Out—Who and Why: A Meta-Analytical Review of the Literature" finds that 4.5% of high school dropouts are gifted, and they leave school in part because of school-related issues. [17] According to the Achievement Trap, this problem is even more pronounced among economically disadvantaged children. [18]

See also

References

Notes

  1. D. Betsy McCoach, Del Siegle (Spring 2003). "Factors That Differentiate Underachieving Gifted Students From High-Achieving Gifted Students" (PDF). Gifted Child Quarterly. 47 (2): 144–154. doi:10.1177/001698620304700205. S2CID   146404949.
  2. Marland, S. P., Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented Archived 2013-11-03 at the Wayback Machine Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (Government Documents Y4.L 11/2: G36), pp. xi-xii.
  3. NAGC 2002, p. 11.
  4. NAGC 2002, p. 14.
  5. NAGC 2002, p. 23.
  6. NAGC 2002, p. 26.
  7. NAGC 2002, p. 34.
  8. NAGC 2002, p. 35.
  9. NAGC 2002, p. 43.
  10. NAGC 2002, p. 64.
  11. NAGC 2002, p. 65.
  12. 1 2 NAGC 2002, p. 75.
  13. NAGC 2002, p. 93.
  14. NAGC 2002, p. 287.
  15. Silverman, Linda Kreger (1987). "Applying knowledge about social development to the counseling process with gifted adolescents". In Buescher, T. M. (ed.). Understanding Gifted and Talented Adolescents. Evanston: The Center for Talent Development. pp. 40–44.
  16. "HB1210". State of Colorado. Archived from the original on 2012-02-25. Retrieved 2010-02-19.
  17. Kaşkaloğlu, Esra Ayşe (2003). Gifted Students Who Drop Out—Who and Why: A Meta-Analytical Review of the Literature. Hawaii International Conference on Education.
  18. Wyner, Joshua S.; Bridgeland, John M.; DiIulio, Jr., John J. (2007-09-09). Achievement Trap: How America Is Failing Millions of High-Achieving Students from Lower-Income Families (PDF). Jack Kent Cooke Foundation & Civic Enterprises. p. 5.

Sources

Further reading