Glenn Branch

Last updated
Glenn Branch
Glenn-branch.jpg
EducationM.A., UCLA
Years active2002 to current
Employer National Center for Science Education
Notable work"Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design is Wrong for Our Schools"
TitleDeputy Director, NCSE
Notes

Glenn Branch is the deputy director of the National Center for Science Education. He is a prominent critic of creationism and intelligent design and an activist against campaigns of suppressing teaching of evolution and climate change in school education. [1] He is also a fellow with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. [2]

Contents

Early life

Branch earned his Master of Arts degree in philosophy from the University of California, Los Angeles. He won The Rudolph and Ina Carnap Prize for excellent philosophical writing by a graduate student in 1997–98, [3] and the Yost Prize For Excellence In Teaching in 1994–95. [4] He joined the National Center for Science Education in 1999 and has served as the deputy director since 2002. [5] Branch is member of editorial boards of multiple journals. [6] [7]

Advocacy

Branch is a prominent critic of creationism and intelligent design having published multiple papers on both. [8] [9] He emphasizes the need of appreciating creationists' actions at the different levels of educational governance, and the need to change tactics in fighting against them. He believes scientists are in a unique position to defend the teaching of evolution, both by resisting creationist incursions as they occur and by helping to improve the teaching of evolution at both the precollege and college levels. [10] Branch criticized how creationists call evolution a theory in an NPR interview. "In everyday conversation, a theory is a hunch or guess,... That's not how scientists use it. For scientists, a theory is a systematic explanation for a range of natural phenomena." [11]

Branch was involved in the campaign against the Discovery Institutes' "Teach the Controversy," [12] a challenge to the key principles of Darwinian evolution based on an annotated bibliography of 44 peer-reviewed scientific article which were said to raise doubts about Darwin's theories. The bibliography title "Bibliography of Supplementary Resources for Ohio Science Education" was analyzed by the staff of the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) with the assistance of many of the authors of the publications listed in it, finding that the Discovery Institute (1) misrepresented the significance of the publications in the Bibliography, (2) described the publications in the Bibliography in a frequently inaccurate and tendentious manner, and (3) fails to present any principled basis for the publications selected nor any pedagogical rationale for the use of the publications in the classroom. NCSE concluded that the only purpose of the Discovery Institute's Bibliography was to mislead members of the Board of Education and of the public about the status of evolution. In an opinion piece written with Eugenie Scott, the coauthors stated that it "is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible to teach that scientists seriously debate the validity of evolution." [13]

Branch was also highly involved in the effort to combat New Mexico's proposed change in Science standards in 2017. NCSE coordinated the effort to educate the public through journalists and activists and was able to successfully affect the regulators. As a result of the campaign, the New Mexico's Public Education Department announced that instead of the flawed standards originally proposed, it would be adopting the Next Generation Science Standards. [14]

Branch is a vocal critic against the movement of climate denial. He believes one of the most effective ways to improve awareness of climate change is through school education by science teachers. [15] He states that this is a difficult task due to multiple issues of limited federal role, state attacks on science, local attitudes, etc. [1] An increase of bills aimed at changing standards for climate science education introduced by state officials in early 2019 has signaled concern. "The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education by speaking about them." [16]

Glenn Branch discusses the history of flat Earth at SkeptiCal Conference 2019.

At the 2019 SkeptiCal conference held in San Francisco, Branch presented a history of the Flat Earth movement which began in 1819 and evolved into the movement of today. [17] He attributes the resurgence of the movement to a YouTube video posted in 2011 entitled "The Globe Model Attempts to Deceive the Public." According to Branch, the old flat earth theory focused on creationism is dying out, while the new version is fueled by social media feeding conspiracy theories to people and pushing them further down the rabbit hole. Ultimately, Branch thinks the craze is going to fail for a lack of consensus between methods. Susan Gerbic agrees with Branch, stating "...they also don't have scientists, strong leaders, and an organization." In closing his talk, Branch said "National Center for Science Education will be there to fight," no matter what happens. [17]

Interviewed for the New York Times in 2022, Branch emphasizes that state curriculum does not devote much time to the teaching of climate change. There is "hardly enough time to teach the essentials ... They need to learn, at the very least, the fundamentals of climate science, including the role humans play, the consequences of a changing climate, as well as solutions". Branch says that state standards should be updated more often and climate change given a bigger role in those standards. [18]

Selected publications

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creationism</span> Belief that nature originated through supernatural acts

Creationism is the religious belief that nature, and aspects such as the universe, Earth, life, and humans, originated with supernatural acts of divine creation. In its broadest sense, creationism includes a continuum of religious views, which vary in their acceptance or rejection of scientific explanations such as evolution that describe the origin and development of natural phenomena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creation science</span> Pseudoscientific form of Young Earth creationism

Creation science or scientific creationism is a pseudoscientific form of Young Earth creationism which claims to offer scientific arguments for certain literalist and inerrantist interpretations of the Bible. It is often presented without overt faith-based language, but instead relies on reinterpreting scientific results to argue that various myths in the Book of Genesis and other select biblical passages are scientifically valid. The most commonly advanced ideas of creation science include special creation based on the Genesis creation narrative and flood geology based on the Genesis flood narrative. Creationists also claim they can disprove or reexplain a variety of scientific facts, theories and paradigms of geology, cosmology, biological evolution, archaeology, history, and linguistics using creation science. Creation science was foundational to intelligent design.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Center for Science Education</span> Nonprofit supporting the teaching of evolution and climate change.

The National Center for Science Education (NCSE) is a not-for-profit membership organization in the United States whose stated mission is to educate the press and the public on the scientific and educational aspects of controversies surrounding the teaching of evolution and climate change, and to provide information and resources to schools, parents, and other citizens working to keep those topics in public school science education. Based in Oakland, California, it claims 4,500 members that include scientists, teachers, clergy, and citizens of varied religious and political affiliations. The Center opposes the teaching of religious views in science classes in America's public schools; it does this through initiatives such as Project Steve. The Center has been called the United States' "leading anti-creationist organization". The Center is affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolutionary creation</span> Religious belief

Evolutionary creation, also presented as Evolutionary creationism, is the religious belief that God created the earth using processes of evolution. The concept is similar to theistic evolution and accepts modern science, but there are theological differences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eugenie Scott</span> American anthropologist (born 1945)

Eugenie Carol Scott is an American physical anthropologist, a former university professor and educator who has been active in opposing the teaching of young Earth creationism and intelligent design in schools. She coined the term "Gish gallop" to describe a fallacious rhetorical technique of overwhelming an interlocutor with as many individually weak arguments as possible, in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument.

Project Steve is a list of scientists with the given name Stephen or Steven or a variation thereof who "support evolution". It was originally created by the National Center for Science Education as a "tongue-in-cheek parody" of creationist attempts to collect a list of scientists who "doubt evolution", such as the Answers in Genesis's list of scientists who accept the biblical account of the Genesis creation narrative or the Discovery Institute's A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism. The list pokes fun at such endeavors while making it clear that, "We did not wish to mislead the public into thinking that scientific issues are decided by who has the longer list of scientists!" It also honors Stephen Jay Gould. The level of support for evolution among scientists is very high. A 2009 poll by Pew Research Center found that "Nearly all scientists (97%) say humans and other living things have evolved over time."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rejection of evolution by religious groups</span> Religious rejection of evolution

Recurring cultural, political, and theological rejection of evolution by religious groups exists regarding the origins of the Earth, of humanity, and of other life. In accordance with creationism, species were once widely believed to be fixed products of divine creation, but since the mid-19th century, evolution by natural selection has been established by the scientific community as an empirical scientific fact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creation and evolution in public education</span> Status of creation and evolution in public education

The status of creation and evolution in public education has been the subject of substantial debate and conflict in legal, political, and religious circles. Globally, there are a wide variety of views on the topic. Most western countries have legislation that mandates only evolutionary biology is to be taught in the appropriate scientific syllabuses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen C. Meyer</span> American author, educator and advocate of intelligent design creationism

Stephen C. Meyer is an American author and former educator. He is an advocate of intelligent design, a pseudoscientific creationist argument for the existence of God. and helped found the Center for Science and Culture (CSC) of the Discovery Institute (DI), which is the main organization behind the intelligent design movement. Before joining the DI, Meyer was a professor at Whitworth College. Meyer is a senior fellow of the DI and director of the CSC.

Theistic science, also referred to as theistic realism, is the pseudoscientific proposal that the central scientific method of requiring testability, known as methodological naturalism, should be replaced by a philosophy of science that allows occasional supernatural explanations which are inherently untestable. Proponents propose supernatural explanations for topics raised by their theology, in particular evolution.

<i>Of Pandas and People</i> Creationist supplementary textbook by Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon

Of Pandas and People: The Central Question of Biological Origins is a controversial 1989 school-level supplementary textbook written by Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon, edited by Charles Thaxton and published by the Texas-based Foundation for Thought and Ethics (FTE). The textbook endorses the pseudoscientific concept of intelligent design – the argument that life shows evidence of being designed by an intelligent agent which is not named specifically in the book, although proponents understand that it refers to the Christian God. The overview chapter was written by young Earth creationist Nancy Pearcey. They present various polemical arguments against the scientific theory of evolution. Before publication, early drafts used cognates of "creationist". After the Edwards v. Aguillard Supreme Court ruling that creationism is religion and not science, these were changed to refer to "intelligent design". The second edition published in 1993 included a contribution written by Michael Behe.

Dean H. Kenyon is Professor Emeritus of Biology at San Francisco State University, a young Earth creationist, and one of the instigators of the intelligent design movement. He is the author of Biochemical Predestination.

Larry Caldwell, a pro-intelligent design activist and attorney, has been active in bringing litigation in causes supporting the intelligent design movement. Caldwell along with his wife, Jeanne Caldwell a Christian school teacher who "takes the Bible literally" previously operated Quality Science Education for All, and are currently appealing to the Supreme Court of the United States an Establishment Clause of the First Amendment suit against the University of California, Berkeley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neo-creationism</span> Pseudoscientific creationism

Neo-creationism is a pseudoscientific movement which aims to restate creationism in terms more likely to be well received by the public, by policy makers, by educators and by the scientific community. It aims to re-frame the debate over the origins of life in non-religious terms and without appeals to scripture. This comes in response to the 1987 ruling by the United States Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard that creationism is an inherently religious concept and that advocating it as correct or accurate in public-school curricula violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

Brian J. Alters is a Canadian academic who is a professor in Chapman University's College of Educational Studies. He directs Chapman's Evolution Education Research Center, has taught science education at both Harvard and McGill Universities, and is regarded as a specialist in evolution education.

"A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism" was a statement issued in 2001 by the Discovery Institute, a Christian, conservative think tank based in Seattle, Washington, U.S., best known for its promotion of the pseudoscientific principle of intelligent design. As part of the Discovery Institute's Teach the Controversy campaign, the statement expresses skepticism about the ability of random mutations and natural selection to account for the complexity of life, and encourages careful examination of the evidence for "Darwinism", a term intelligent design proponents use to refer to evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of intelligent design</span> Outline of the topic

This timeline of intelligent design outlines the major events in the development of intelligent design as presented and promoted by the intelligent design movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Akron Fossils & Science Center</span> Museum in Copley, Ohio

The Akron Fossils & Science Center is a small museum and learning center located in Copley Township, Ohio, United States, a few miles west of Akron. The building contains the Creation Education Museum, which features exhibits displaying the arguments for and against creationism and intelligent design, as well as an exploration of the relationship between science and the Bible. The building also houses several areas with interactive tour stations and activities focused on hands-on science. An outdoor park offers playground equipment and a 200 ft zip-line.

The Louisiana Science Education Act, Act 473 (SB733) of 2008 is a controversial anti-evolution law passed by the Louisiana Legislature on June 11, 2008 and signed into law by Governor Bobby Jindal on June 25. The act allows public school teachers to use supplemental materials in the science classroom which are critical of scientific theories such as evolution and global warming and to promote creationism as science. Louisiana was the first state to have passed a law of this type.

References

  1. 1 2 Berbeco, M.; Rosenau, J.; Branch, Glenn (2016-03-03). "Climate education in the classroom: cloudy with a chance of confusion". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  2. "Committee for Skeptical Inquiry Elects 14 New Fellows from Six Countries". Skeptical Inquirer. 1 February 2022. Archived from the original on 17 September 2022. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
  3. "Rudolph and Ina Carnap Prize Essayists - UCLA Department of Philosophy". UCLA Department of Philosophy. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  4. "Yost Prize For Excellence In Teaching - UCLA Department of Philosophy". UCLA Department of Philosophy. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  5. "Staff". NCSE. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  6. "Evolution: Education and Outreach". Evolution: Education and Outreach.
  7. "Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society | SAGE Publications Inc". us.sagepub.com. 2015-10-28. Retrieved 27 January 2018.
  8. Jason, Rosenhouse; Glenn, Branch (1 March 2006). "Media Coverage of "Intelligent Design"". BioScience. 56 (3): 247. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0247:MCOID]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   0006-3568. S2CID   4871.
  9. Glenn, Branch; Forrest, Barbara (Jan–Feb 2005). "Wedging Creationism into the Academy". Academe. 91 (91): 36–41. doi:10.2307/40252735. ISSN   0190-2946. JSTOR   40252735. S2CID   141766477 . Retrieved 27 January 2018.
  10. Branch, Glenn; Scott, Eugenie C.; Rosenau, Joshua (2010). "Dispatches from the evolution wars: shifting tactics and expanding battlefields". Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 11: 317–338. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141815. PMID   20504219.
  11. "New Florida Law Lets Residents Challenge School Textbooks". NPR.org.
  12. "Analysis of the Discovery Institute's Bibliography". NCSE. 26 February 2016.
  13. Scott, Eugenie C.; Branch, Glenn (2003). "Evolution: what's wrong with 'teaching the controversy'". Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 18 (10): 499–502. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00218-0 . Retrieved 11 January 2020.
  14. "NCSE at Work: A New Mexico Story". NCSE. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  15. Branch, Glenn (13 March 2017). "Science teachers in the trenches of the climate wars". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  16. Firozi, Paulina. "The Energy 202: A wave of state bills could threaten science and climate education". The Washington Post. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  17. 1 2 Gerbic, Susan (26 July 2019). "Musings On SkeptiCal At Ten". Skeptical Inquirer. Retrieved January 5, 2020.
  18. Choi-Schagrin, Winston (1 November 2022). "Many States Omit Climate Education. These Teachers Are Trying to Slip It In". New York Times. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  19. Reid, Ann; Branch, Glenn. "50 Years Ago: Repeal of Tennessee's "Monkey Law"". Scientific American Blog Network. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN. Retrieved 24 January 2018.