Eugenie Scott | |
---|---|
Born | |
Education | University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (BS, MS) University of Missouri (PhD) |
Occupation | National Center for Science Education Advisor |
Awards | Public Welfare Medal (2010), Richard Dawkins Award (2012) |
Website | ncse |
Notes | |
Eugenie Carol Scott (born October 24, 1945) is an American physical anthropologist who has been active in opposing the teaching of young Earth creationism and intelligent design in schools. She coined the term "Gish gallop" to describe a fallacious rhetorical technique of overwhelming an interlocutor with as many individually weak arguments as possible, in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument.
From 1986 to 2014, [1] Scott served as the Executive Director of the National Center for Science Education, a nonprofit science education organization supporting teaching of evolutionary science. Since 2013, Scott has been listed on their advisory council. [2]
Scott serves on the Board of Trustees of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [3] Scott is a member of the Board of Advisers for the publication, Scientific American . She is also a Fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) and GWUP.
Scott grew up in Wisconsin and first became interested in anthropology after reading her sister's anthropology textbook. [4] Scott received BS and MS degrees from the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, followed by a PhD from the University of Missouri. She joined the University of Kentucky as a physical anthropologist in 1974, and shortly thereafter attended a debate between her mentor James A. Gavan and the young Earth creationist Duane Gish, which piqued her interest in the creation–evolution controversy. [5] [6] She also taught at the University of Colorado and at California State University, Hayward. Her research work focused on medical anthropology, and skeletal biology.
In 1980, Scott worked to prevent creationism from being taught in the public schools of Lexington, Kentucky. Scott was appointed the executive director of the National Center for Science Education in 1987, the year in which requiring the teaching of creation science in American public schools was deemed illegal by the Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard . Scott announced that she would be retiring from this position by the end of 2013, [7] [8] doing so on 6 January 2014. Her place was taken by Ann Reid. [9]
Scott was brought up in Christian Science by her mother and grandmother but later switched to a congregational church under the influence of her sister; she describes her background as liberal Protestant. [10] Scott is now a secular humanist and describes herself as a nontheist. In 2003, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that, "Scott describes herself as atheist but does not discount the importance of spirituality." [11] In 2003 she was one of the signatories to the third humanist manifesto, Humanism and Its Aspirations . [12]
Scott is an expert on creationism and intelligent design. Her book Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction was published by Greenwood Press in 2004 and then in paperback by the University of California Press in 2005. Niles Eldredge wrote the foreword in the first edition. A second edition of the book was published in 2008 and in paperback in 2009. The foreword to this edition was written by John E. Jones III, who was the presiding judge in the Kitzmiller v. Dover court case. [13] [14]
She co-edited with Glenn Branch the 2006 anthology Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design is Wrong for Our Schools .
In 2006 Jon D. Miller, Scott and Shinji Okamoto had a brief article published in Science entitled "Public Acceptance of Evolution", an analysis of polling on the acceptance of evolution from the last 20 years in the United States and compared to other countries. [15] [16] Turkey had the lowest acceptance of evolution in the survey, with the United States having the next-lowest, though the authors saw a positive in the higher percentage of Americans who are unsure about evolution, and therefore "reachable" for evolution. [17]
As of 2023 Scott has been the recipient of 10 honorary degrees.
Year | Degree | Institution | Location |
---|---|---|---|
2003 | Doctor of Science | McGill University | Québec, Canada [18] |
2005 | Doctor of Science | Ohio State University | Columbus, OH [19] |
2006 | Doctor of Science | Mount Holyoke College | South Hadley, MA [20] |
2006 | Doctor of Science | University of Wisconsin | Milwaukee, WI [21] |
2007 | Doctor of Science | Rutgers University | New Brunswick, NJ [22] |
2008 | Doctor of Science | University of New Mexico | Albuquerque, NM [23] |
2010 | Doctor of Science | University of Missouri-Columbia | Columbia, MO [24] |
2010 | Doctor of Science | Colorado College | Colorado Springs, CO [25] |
2013 | Honorary Doctorate | Chapman University | Orange, CA [26] |
2017 | Honorary Doctorate | Transylvania University | Lexington, KY [27] |
David Berlinski, a fellow at the Discovery Institute, describes Scott as an opponent "who is often sent out to defend Darwin". [29] Scott prefers to see herself as "Darwin's golden retriever". [30]
Scott has been profiled in The New York Times , [6] Scientific American , [31] The Scientist , [32] the San Francisco Chronicle , [33] and the Stanford Medical Magazine. [34] She has been interviewed for Science & Theology News, [10] CSICOP, [35] Church & State, [36] and Point of Inquiry. [37] [38] [39] Her commentary has been published by Science & Theology News , [40] and Metanexus Institute. [41]
Scott has taken part in numerous debates on MSNBC and Fox News. [42] [43] [44]
In 2004, Scott represented the National Center for Science Education on the Showtime television show Penn & Teller: Bullshit! , on the episode titled "Creationism", where she offered philosophical views about the creationist and intelligent design movements. [45]
In 2005, Scott and other NCSE staff served as scientific and educational consultants for the plaintiffs in the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case regarding the teaching of intelligent design in public schools. Judge John Jones ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. Scott said that "we won decisively" and "in triplicate", and "we had the better case." [38] About the merits of the case, she said, "Within evolutionary biology, we argue about the details... and the mechanisms," but "we don't argue about whether living things descended with modification from common ancestors, which is what biological evolution is all about.... The Dover School Board wanted students to doubt whether evolution had taken place." [38]
Year | Award | Awarded by | Description |
---|---|---|---|
1998 | Isaac Asimov Science Award | American Humanist Association | Given to recognize specific accomplishments that advance humanism [46] |
1999 | Bruce Alberts Award for Excellence in Science Education | American Society for Cell Biology | Awarded to an individual who has demonstrated innovative and sustained contributions to science education, with particular emphasis on the broad local, regional, and/or national impact [47] |
1999 | First Amendment Award | Hugh Hefner Foundation | Recognizes the efforts of an individual in defending the First Amendment [48] |
2001 | Public Service Award | Geological Society of America | Presented in honor of Gene and Carolyn Shoemaker, whose scientific work and generosity in sharing it inspired and stimulated the public's curiosity about the universe around them [49] |
2002 | AIBS Outstanding Service Award | American Institute of Biological Sciences | Given annually in recognition of an individual's and organization's noteworthy service to the biological sciences, especially integrative and organismal biology [50] |
2002 | National Science Board Public Service Award | National Science Board | The award recognizes outstanding contributions in communicating, promoting, or helping to develop broad public policy in science and engineering (Note: The Award has since been renamed the NSB Science and Society Award) [51] |
2002 | Margaret Nicholson Distinguished Service Award | California Science Teachers Association | CSTA's highest honor, the citation commemorates Scott "in recognition of your many contributions to science education, your leadership and service, and your positive impact on the quality of science teaching in California." [52] |
2006 | Anthropology in the Media Award | American Anthropological Association | Honors those who have raised public awareness of anthropology and have had a broad and sustained public impact at local, national, and international levels [53] |
2007 | Outstanding Educator's Award | Exploratorium Museum | Recognizing Scott's work in science education [54] |
2007 | Scientific Freedom and Responsibility Award | The American Association for the Advancement of Science | Honors scientists and engineers whose exemplary actions, often taken at significant personal cost, have served to foster scientific freedom and responsibility [55] |
2009 | The Stephen J Gould Prize | Society for the Study of Evolution | Recognizes "individuals whose sustained and exemplary efforts have advanced public understanding of evolutionary science and its importance in biology, education, and everyday life in the spirit of Stephen Jay Gould." [56] |
2009 | The Fellows Medal | California Academy of Sciences. | Awarded in recognition of a recipient's notable contributions to one or more of the natural sciences [57] |
2010 | The Public Welfare Medal | U.S. National Academy of Sciences | "For championing the teaching of evolution in the United States and for providing leadership to the National Center for Science Education." [58] |
2012 | The Richard Dawkins Award | Atheist Alliance of America | Awarded to individuals it judges to have raised the public consciousness of atheism [59] |
2014 | Lifetime Achievement Award | American Humanist Association | Recognizes the accomplishments and work of the individuals reflecting humanist values up to the date of the award and in concert with the prevailing humanist thought of the time [60] |
2014 | James Randi Award for Skepticism in the Public Interest | James Randi Educational Foundation | Award in recognition of Scott's outstanding achievements as an advocate for scientific skepticism and her promotion of science education [61] |
2018 | The Pojeta Award | Paleontological Society | The award recognizes "exceptional professional or public service by individuals or groups in the field of paleontology above and beyond that of existing formal roles or responsibilities" [62] |
2019 | Fellow for the German Skeptic group | Gesellschaft zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung von Parawissenschaften [English translation: Society for the Scientific Investigation of Parasciences] | Given to those who uphold scientific skepticism [63] |
2022 | Lifetime Achievement Award | California Freethought Day Committee | "Under her leadership, NCSE fought against 'intelligent design' and climate change denial in public schools." [64] |
Scott and her husband, lawyer Thomas C. Sager, have one daughter and reside in Berkeley, California.
Scott is a backyard beekeeper with two beehives, and is interested in colony collapse disorder and an advocate of amateur beekeeping. [65]
evolution vs. creationism.Also: Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-32122-1
Creationism is the religious belief that nature, and aspects such as the universe, Earth, life, and humans, originated with supernatural acts of divine creation. In its broadest sense, creationism includes a continuum of religious views, which vary in their acceptance or rejection of scientific explanations such as evolution that describe the origin and development of natural phenomena.
Intelligent design (ID) is a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God, presented by its proponents as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins". Proponents claim that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." ID is a form of creationism that lacks empirical support and offers no testable or tenable hypotheses, and is therefore not science. The leading proponents of ID are associated with the Discovery Institute, a Christian, politically conservative think tank based in the United States.
The National Center for Science Education (NCSE) is a not-for-profit membership organization in the United States whose stated mission is to educate the press and the public on the scientific and educational aspects of controversies surrounding the teaching of evolution and climate change, and to provide information and resources to schools, parents, and other citizens working to keep those topics in public school science education.
Project Steve is a list of scientists with the given name Stephen or Steven or a variation thereof who "support evolution". It was originally created by the National Center for Science Education as a "tongue-in-cheek parody" of creationist attempts to collect a list of scientists who "doubt evolution", such as the Answers in Genesis's list of scientists who accept the biblical account of the Genesis creation narrative or the Discovery Institute's A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism. The list pokes fun at such endeavors while making it clear that, "We did not wish to mislead the public into thinking that scientific issues are decided by who has the longer list of scientists!" It also honors Stephen Jay Gould. The level of support for evolution among scientists is very high. A 2009 poll by Pew Research Center found that "[n]early all scientists (97%) say humans and other living things have evolved over time."
Kenneth Raymond Miller is an American cell biologist, molecular biologist, and Professor Emeritus of Biology at Brown University. Miller's primary research focus is the structure and function of cell membranes, especially chloroplast thylakoid membranes. Miller is a co-author of a major introductory college and high school biology textbook published by Prentice Hall since 1990.
Theistic science, also referred to as theistic realism, is the pseudoscientific proposal that the central scientific method of requiring testability, known as methodological naturalism, should be replaced by a philosophy of science that allows occasional supernatural explanations which are inherently untestable. Proponents propose supernatural explanations for topics raised by their theology, in particular evolution.
Of Pandas and People: The Central Question of Biological Origins is a controversial 1989 school-level supplementary textbook written by Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon, edited by Charles Thaxton and published by the Texas-based Foundation for Thought and Ethics (FTE). The textbook endorses the pseudoscientific concept of intelligent design – the argument that life shows evidence of being designed by an intelligent agent which is not named specifically in the book, although proponents understand that it refers to the Christian God. The overview chapter was written by young Earth creationist Nancy Pearcey. They present various polemical arguments against the scientific theory of evolution. Before publication, early drafts used cognates of "creationist". After the Edwards v. Aguillard Supreme Court ruling that creationism is religion and not science, these were changed to refer to "intelligent design". The second edition published in 1993 included a contribution written by Michael Behe.
Barbara Carroll Forrest is a professor of philosophy at Southeastern Louisiana University in Hammond, Louisiana. She is a critic of intelligent design and the Discovery Institute.
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts testing a public school district policy that required the teaching of intelligent design (ID), ultimately found by the court to not be science. In October 2004, the Dover Area School District of York County, Pennsylvania, changed its biology teaching curriculum to require that intelligent design be presented as an alternative to evolution theory, and that Of Pandas and People, a textbook advocating intelligent design, was to be used as a reference book. The prominence of this textbook during the trial was such that the case is sometimes referred to as the Dover Panda Trial, a name which recalls the popular name of the Scopes Monkey Trial in Tennessee, 80 years earlier. The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism, and that the school board policy violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The judge's decision sparked considerable response from both supporters and critics.
Larry Caldwell, a pro-intelligent design activist and attorney, has been active in bringing litigation in causes supporting the intelligent design movement. Caldwell along with his wife, Jeanne Caldwell a Christian school teacher who "takes the Bible literally" previously operated Quality Science Education for All, and are currently appealing to the Supreme Court of the United States an Establishment Clause of the First Amendment suit against the University of California, Berkeley.
Neo-creationism is a pseudoscientific movement which aims to restate creationism in terms more likely to be well received by the public, by policy makers, by educators and by the scientific community. It aims to re-frame the debate over the origins of life in non-religious terms and without appeals to scripture. This comes in response to the 1987 ruling by the United States Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard that creationism is an inherently religious concept and that advocating it as correct or accurate in public-school curricula violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The intelligent design movement has conducted an organized campaign largely in the United States that promotes a pseudoscientific, neo-creationist religious agenda calling for broad social, academic and political changes centering on intelligent design.
Brian J. Alters is a Canadian academic who is a professor in Chapman University's College of Educational Studies. He directs Chapman's Evolution Education Research Center, has taught science education at both Harvard and McGill Universities, and is regarded as a specialist in evolution education.
"A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism" was a statement issued in 2001 by the Discovery Institute, a Christian, conservative think tank based in Seattle, Washington, U.S., best known for its promotion of the pseudoscientific principle of intelligent design. As part of the Discovery Institute's Teach the Controversy campaign, the statement expresses skepticism about the ability of random mutations and natural selection to account for the complexity of life, and encourages careful examination of the evidence for "Darwinism", a term intelligent design proponents use to refer to evolution.
Nicholas J. Matzke is the former Public Information Project Director at the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) and served an instrumental role in NCSE's preparation for the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial. One of his chief contributions was discovering drafts of Of Pandas and People which demonstrated that the term "intelligent design" was later substituted for "creationism". This became a key component of Barbara Forrest's testimony. After the trial he co-authored a commentary in Nature Immunology, was interviewed on Talk of the Nation, and was profiled in Seed as one of nine "revolutionary minds".
Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design is a 2004 book by Barbara Forrest and Paul R. Gross on the origins of intelligent design, specifically the Discovery Institute's Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture and its wedge strategy. The authors are highly critical of what they refer to as intelligent design creationism, and document the intelligent design movement's fundamentalist Christian origins and funding.
The Discovery Institute has conducted a series of related public relations campaigns which seek to promote intelligent design while attempting to discredit evolutionary biology, which the Institute terms "Darwinism". The Discovery Institute promotes the pseudoscientific intelligent design movement and is represented by Creative Response Concepts, a public relations firm.
This timeline of intelligent design outlines the major events in the development of intelligent design as presented and promoted by the intelligent design movement.
Glenn Branch is the deputy director of the National Center for Science Education. He is a prominent critic of creationism and intelligent design and an activist against campaigns of suppressing teaching of evolution and climate change in school education. He is also a fellow with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.
Christina Castillo Comer is the former Director of Science in the curriculum division of the Texas Education Agency (TEA). Comer spent nine years as the Director of Science until she resigned on November 7, 2007. Comer's resignation has sparked controversy about agency politics and the debate to teach evolution in public schools versus creationism or intelligent design.