John E. Jones III

Last updated

If you look at public polls in the United States, at any given time a significant percentage of Americans believe that it is acceptable to teach creationism in public high schools. And that gives rise to an assumption on the part of the public that judges should 'get with the program' and make decisions according to the popular will.

There's a problem with that. ... The framers of the Constitution, in their almost infinite wisdom, designed the legislative and executive branches under Articles I and II to be directly responsive to the public will. They designed the judiciary, under Article III, to be responsive not to the public will--in effect to be a bulwark against public will at any given time--but to be responsible to the Constitution and the laws of the United States.

That distinction, just like the role of precedent, tends to be lost in the analysis of judges' decisions, including my decision. [7]

In 2008, Jones was awarded the American Humanist Association's Humanist Religious Liberty Award at the World Humanist Congress in Washington, D.C. In his acceptance speech, Jones explained how he was blasted by Bill O'Reilly, Phyllis Schlafly, and Ann Coulter for the decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. Jones also remarked on the shortcomings of civics education and how the American public tends to have a limited understanding of the Constitution and the importance of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and separation of church and state established by the Founding Fathers of the United States. Jones gave his perspective on the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution: "Articles 1 and 2 designate the legislative branch and the executive branch, respectively, as majoritarian—they are subject to the will of the people; they stand in popular elections. But article 3 is counter-majoritarian. The judicial branch protects against the tyranny of the majority. We are a bulwark against public opinion. And that was very much done with a purpose, and I think that it really has withstood the test of time. The judiciary is a check against the unconstitutional abuse and extension of power by the other branches of government." Jones added that Alexander Hamilton himself remarked: "Enthusiasm is certainly a very good thing but religious enthusiasm is, at least, a dangerous instrument." [8]

Whitewood v. Wolf (2014)

In 2014, Jones presided over Deb Whitewood et al. v. Michael Wolf, a case in which the plaintiffs sought relief from Pennsylvania's Marriage Laws (23 Pa. C.S. § 1102). He delivered an opinion striking down the Pennsylvania statute barring same-sex marriage on May 20, 2014, on grounds that it unconstitutionally infringed the plaintiffs rights of due process and equal protection guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. He did not attach a stay to his order, so the decision would be immediately effective.

In 2014, Jones appeared on CNN to discuss same-sex marriage and the law he anticipated would be applied by the U.S. Supreme Court. [9]

Personal life

Jones is a Lutheran of Welsh descent. He married his wife, Beth Ann, in 1982. They have two children and three grandchildren. He has a share in a business operated by others in his family, Distinct Golf, which runs five golf courses in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.[ citation needed ]

Jones is a member of the board of regents of Mercersburg Academy. Jones is the 30th president of Dickinson College, a private, residential liberal arts college in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. [10] Jones also serves as co-chair of the Pennsylvania Commission on Judicial Independence. He was appointed by Chief Justice Roberts to the Judicial Security Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States.

Awards, positions, and honors

John E. Jones III
Judge John E Jones III.jpg
Jones in 2005
30th President of Dickinson College
Assumed office
July 1, 2021

References

  1. Miller, Mat (May 22, 2020). "Judge John E. Jones III to take over the helm of U.S. Middle District Court". pennlive. Retrieved June 1, 2020.
  2. Bad Frog Beer to 'intelligent design', Amy Worden, Philadelphia Inquirer October 16, 2005.
  3. "Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Ruling" (PDF). December 20, 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 21, 2005. Retrieved December 14, 2013.
  4. 1 2 False judge makes mockery of case for 'intelligent design' Phyllis Schlafly Townhall.com January 2, 2006
  5. Dan Margolies (November 19, 2007). "Decision on murder case holds up". Kansas City Star. Retrieved March 23, 2008.[ dead link ]
  6. "Speech by U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III to the Anti-Defamation League National Executive Committee Meeting". Archived from the original on June 2, 2006.
  7. The Myth of "Activist Judges", an excerpt from remarks made on Nov. 26, 2006, hy Federal Judge John E. Jones at Bennington College's Ruth D. Ewing Lecture in Social Activism
  8. 1 2 Judge John E. Jones III, Inexorably toward Trial: Reflections on the Dover Case and the "Least Dangerous Branch," The Humanist, January/February 2009. "The Humanist - a magazine of critical inquiry and social concern". Archived from the original on June 13, 2011. Retrieved August 29, 2010..
  9. Mallonee, Mary Kay (January 9, 2015). "U.S. Supreme Court to meet again on issue of gay marriage - CNNPolitics.com". CNN.
  10. https://www.dickinson.edu/homepage/1494/dickinson_college_president, May 7, 2008
  11. "TIME". Archived from the original on June 18, 2006.
  12. "Muhlenberg News". Archived from the original on July 14, 2007.
  13. "GSA press release - GSA 09-46: Judge Jones receives President's Medal, speaks at Darwin Day".