Gravitational shielding

Last updated

The term gravitational shielding refers to a hypothetical process of shielding an object from the influence of a gravitational field. Such processes, if they existed, would have the effect of reducing the weight of an object. The shape of the shielded region would be similar to a shadow from the gravitational shield. For example, the shape of the shielded region above a disk would be conical. The height of the cone's apex above the disk would vary directly with the height of the shielding disk above the Earth. [1] Experimental evidence to date indicates that no such effect exists. Gravitational shielding is considered to be a violation of the equivalence principle and therefore inconsistent with both Newtonian theory and general relativity. [2]

Contents

The concept of gravity shielding is a common concept in science fiction literature, especially for space travel. One of the first and best known examples is the fictional gravity shielding substance "Cavorite" that appears in H. G. Wells' classic 1901 novel The First Men in the Moon . Wells was promptly criticized for using it by Jules Verne. [3]

Tests of the equivalence principle

As of 2008, no experiment was successful in detecting positive shielding results. To quantify the amount of shielding, at the beginning of 20th century Quirino Majorana [4] suggested an extinction coefficient h that modifies Newton's gravitational force law as follows:

The best laboratory measurements have established an upper bound limit for shielding of 4.3×10−15 m²/kg. [5] The best estimate based on the most accurate gravity anomaly data during the 1997 solar eclipse has provided a new constraint on the shielding parameter 6×10−19 m²/kg. [6] However, astronomical observations impose much more stringent limits. Based on lunar observations available in 1908, Poincaré [7] established that h can be no greater than 10−18 m²/kg. Subsequently, this bound has been greatly improved. Eckhardt [8] showed that lunar ranging data implies an upper bound of 10−22 m²/kg, and Williams, et al., [9] have improved this to h = (3 ± 5)×10−22 m²/kg. Note that the value is smaller than the uncertainty. The consequence of the negative results of those experiments (which are in good agreement with the predictions of general relativity) is, that every theory which contains shielding effects like Le Sage's theory of gravitation, must reduce those effects to an undetectable level. For a review of the current experimental limits on possible gravitational shielding, see the survey article by Bertolami, et al. [2] Also, for a discussion of recent observations during solar eclipses, see the paper by Unnikrishnan et al. [10]

Majorana's experiments and Russell's criticism

Some shielding experiments were conducted in the early 20th century by Quirino Majorana. [4] [11] Majorana claimed to have measured positive shielding effects. Henry Norris Russell's analysis of the tidal forces showed that Majorana's positive results had nothing to do with gravitational shielding. [12] To bring Majorana's experiments in accordance with the equivalence principle of General Relativity he proposed a model, in which the mass of a body is diminished by the proximity of another body, but he denied any connection between gravitational shielding and his proposal of mass variation. For another explanation of Majorana's experiments, see Coïsson et al. [13] But Majorana's results couldn't be confirmed up to this day (see the section above) and Russell's mass variation theory, although meant as a modification of general relativity, is inconsistent with standard physics as well.

Minority views

The consensus view of the scientific community is that gravitational shielding does not exist, but there have been occasional investigations into this topic, such as the 1999 NASA-funded paper which reported negative results. [14] [15] [16] Eugene Podkletnov claimed in two papers, one of which he later withdrew, that objects held above a magnetically-levitated, superconducting, rotating disc underwent a reduction of between 0.5 and 2% in weight. [17] Theoreticians have attempted to reconcile Podkletnov's claims with quantum gravity theory. [18] [19] However, neither Podkletnov's claims, nor the similar claims of others, of "gravity reduction", "gravity shielding", or the like, have yet been successfully replicated[ citation needed ], verified by independent review, or subjected to public demonstration.

Electrets

In his 1976 paper, Electromagnetism and Gravitation, physicist Edward Teller discussed experimentation with electrets, or materials with a permanent electric dipole moment, near its transition point to discover the transition between dipole states. [20] On July 9, 1997, William Rhodes, an inventor, made a posting on Usenet concerning a discovery of an antigravity effect related to electrets. [21] Also, Dr. Martin Tajmar, a physicist and professor for Space Systems at the Dresden University of Technology has written a paper on propellantless propulsion and makes numerous references to electrets. [22] A patent for a gravitational attenuating material that utilizes an organic based material was made by inventor Ronald J. Kita. [23] [24] [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General relativity</span> Theory of gravitation as curved spacetime

General relativity, also known as the general theory of relativity and Einstein's theory of gravity, is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915 and is the current description of gravitation in modern physics. General relativity generalises special relativity and refines Newton's law of universal gravitation, providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time or four-dimensional spacetime. In particular, the curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present. The relation is specified by the Einstein field equations, a system of second order partial differential equations.

Quantum gravity (QG) is a field of theoretical physics that seeks to describe gravity according to the principles of quantum mechanics. It deals with environments in which neither gravitational nor quantum effects can be ignored, such as in the vicinity of black holes or similar compact astrophysical objects, such as neutron stars as well as in the early stages of the universe moments after the Big Bang.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tractor beam</span> Fictional technological device

A tractor beam is a device that can attract one object to another from a distance. The concept originates in fiction: The term was coined by E. E. Smith in his novel Spacehounds of IPC (1931). Since the 1990s, technology and research have labored to make it a reality, and have had some success on a microscopic level. Less commonly, a similar beam that repels is known as a pressor beam or repulsor beam. Gravity impulse and gravity propulsion beams are traditionally areas of research from fringe physics that coincide with the concepts of tractor and repulsor beams.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zero-point energy</span> Lowest possible energy of a quantum system or field

Zero-point energy (ZPE) is the lowest possible energy that a quantum mechanical system may have. Unlike in classical mechanics, quantum systems constantly fluctuate in their lowest energy state as described by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Therefore, even at absolute zero, atoms and molecules retain some vibrational motion. Apart from atoms and molecules, the empty space of the vacuum also has these properties. According to quantum field theory, the universe can be thought of not as isolated particles but continuous fluctuating fields: matter fields, whose quanta are fermions, and force fields, whose quanta are bosons. All these fields have zero-point energy. These fluctuating zero-point fields lead to a kind of reintroduction of an aether in physics since some systems can detect the existence of this energy. However, this aether cannot be thought of as a physical medium if it is to be Lorentz invariant such that there is no contradiction with Einstein's theory of special relativity.

In theoretical physics, negative mass is a hypothetical type of exotic matter whose mass is of opposite sign to the mass of normal matter, e.g. −1 kg. Such matter would violate one or more energy conditions and show some strange properties such as the oppositely oriented acceleration for an applied force orientation. It is used in certain speculative hypothetical technologies, such as time travel to the past and future, construction of traversable artificial wormholes, which may also allow for time travel, Krasnikov tubes, the Alcubierre drive, and potentially other types of faster-than-light warp drives. Currently, the closest known real representative of such exotic matter is a region of negative pressure density produced by the Casimir effect.

The Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Project (BPP) was a research project funded by NASA from 1996-2002 to study various proposals for revolutionary methods of spacecraft propulsion that would require breakthroughs in physics before they could be realized. The project ended in 2002, when the Advanced Space Transportation Program was reorganized and all speculative research was cancelled. During its six years of operational funding, this program received a total investment of $1.2 million.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-gravity</span> Idea of creating a place or object that is free from the force of gravity

Anti-gravity is a hypothetical phenomenon of creating a place or object that is free from the force of gravity. It does not refer to neither the lack of weight under gravity experienced in free fall or orbit, nor to balancing the force of gravity with some other force, such as electromagnetism and aerodynamic lift. Anti-gravity is a recurring concept in science fiction. Examples are the gravity blocking substance "Cavorite" in H. G. Wells's The First Men in the Moon and the Spindizzy machines in James Blish's Cities in Flight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equivalence principle</span> Principle of general relativity stating that inertial and gravitational masses are equivalent

In the theory of general relativity, the equivalence principle is the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass, and Albert Einstein's observation that the gravitational "force" as experienced locally while standing on a massive body is the same as the pseudo-force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial (accelerated) frame of reference.

Eugene Podkletnov is a Russian ceramics engineer known for his claims made in the 1990s of designing and demonstrating gravity shielding devices consisting of rotating discs constructed from ceramic superconducting materials.

Tests of general relativity serve to establish observational evidence for the theory of general relativity. The first three tests, proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915, concerned the "anomalous" precession of the perihelion of Mercury, the bending of light in gravitational fields, and the gravitational redshift. The precession of Mercury was already known; experiments showing light bending in accordance with the predictions of general relativity were performed in 1919, with increasingly precise measurements made in subsequent tests; and scientists claimed to have measured the gravitational redshift in 1925, although measurements sensitive enough to actually confirm the theory were not made until 1954. A more accurate program starting in 1959 tested general relativity in the weak gravitational field limit, severely limiting possible deviations from the theory.

In theoretical physics, Whitehead's theory of gravitation was introduced by the mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead in 1922. While never broadly accepted, at one time it was a scientifically plausible alternative to general relativity. However, after further experimental and theoretical consideration, the theory is now generally regarded as obsolete.

Ning Li was an Han Chinese scientist holding dual citizenship in both the USA and her birth country of China. She is known for her physics and anti-gravity research. In the 1990s, Li worked as a research scientist at the Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research, University of Alabama in Huntsville. In 1999, she left the university to form a company, AC Gravity, LLC, to continue anti-gravity research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Martin Tajmar</span>

Martin Tajmar is a physicist and professor for Space Systems at the Dresden University of Technology. He has research interests in advanced space propulsion systems, FEEP thrusters, breakthrough propulsion physics and possible connections between gravity and superconductivity.

Alternatives to general relativity are physical theories that attempt to describe the phenomenon of gravitation in competition with Einstein's theory of general relativity. There have been many different attempts at constructing an ideal theory of gravity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravitational wave</span> Propagating spacetime ripple

Gravitational waves are waves of the intensity of gravity that are generated by the accelerated masses of an orbital binary system, and propagate as waves outward from their source at the speed of light. They were first proposed by Oliver Heaviside in 1893 and then later by Henri Poincaré in 1905 as waves similar to electromagnetic waves but the gravitational equivalent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quirino Majorana</span>

Quirino Francesco Valentino Majorana was an Italian experimental physicist who investigated a wide range of phenomena during his long career as professor of physics at the Universities of Rome, Turin (1916–1921), and Bologna (1921–1934).

American interest in "gravity control propulsion research" intensified during the early 1950s. Literature from that period used the terms anti-gravity, anti-gravitation, baricentric, counterbary, electrogravitics (eGrav), G-projects, gravitics, gravity control, and gravity propulsion. Their publicized goals were to discover and develop technologies and theories for the manipulation of gravity or gravity-like fields for propulsion. Although general relativity theory appeared to prohibit anti-gravity propulsion, several programs were funded to develop it through gravitation research from 1955 to 1974. The names of many contributors to general relativity and those of the golden age of general relativity have appeared among documents about the institutions that had served as the theoretical research components of those programs. Since its emergence in the 1950s, the existence of the related gravity control propulsion research has not been a subject of controversy for aerospace writers, critics, and conspiracy theory advocates alike, but their rationale, effectiveness, and longevity have been the objects of contested views.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravitoelectromagnetism</span> Analogies between Maxwells and Einsteins field equations

Gravitoelectromagnetism, abbreviated GEM, refers to a set of formal analogies between the equations for electromagnetism and relativistic gravitation; specifically: between Maxwell's field equations and an approximation, valid under certain conditions, to the Einstein field equations for general relativity. Gravitomagnetism is a widely used term referring specifically to the kinetic effects of gravity, in analogy to the magnetic effects of moving electric charge. The most common version of GEM is valid only far from isolated sources, and for slowly moving test particles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theoretical spacecraft propulsion</span> Hypothetical propulsion systems for interstellar travel

Theoretical spacecraft propulsion refers to a series of theoretical spacecraft propulsion systems mainly proposed for interstellar travel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C.S. Unnikrishnan</span> Indian physicist and professor (born 1962)

C. S. Unnikrishnan is an Indian physicist and professor known for his contributions in multiple areas of experimental and theoretical physics. He has been a professor at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai and is currently a professor in the School of Quantum Technology at the Defence Institute of Advanced Technology in Pune. He has made significant contributions in foundational issues in gravity and quantum physics and has published over 250 research papers and articles. Unnikrishnan is also a key member of the LIGO-India project and a member of the global LIGO Scientific Collaboration

References

  1. Unnikrishnan, C.S. (1996). "Does a superconductor shield gravity?". Physica C: Superconductivity. Elsevier BV. 266 (1–2): 133–137. Bibcode:1996PhyC..266..133U. doi:10.1016/0921-4534(96)00340-1.
  2. 1 2 Bertolami, Orfeu; Páramos, Jorge; Turyshev, Slava G. (2008). "General Theory of Relativity: Will It Survive the Next Decade?". Lasers, Clocks and Drag-Free Control. Astrophysics and Space Science Library. Vol. 349. pp. 27–74. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-34377-6_2. ISBN   978-3-540-34376-9. S2CID   12079261.
  3. Giblin, James (2000). The Century that was: Reflections on the Last One Hundred Years. Simon and Schuster. p. 8. ISBN   978-0-689-82281-0. I sent my travelers to the moon with gunpowder, something one sees every day. Where is Monsieur Wells' 'Cavorite'? Let him show it to me!
  4. 1 2 Majorana, Q. (1920). "XLVIII. On gravitation. Theoretical and experimental researches". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. Informa UK Limited. 39 (233): 488–504. doi:10.1080/14786440508636063.
  5. Unnikrishnan, C. S.; Gillies, G. T. (2000-04-13). "New limits on the gravitational Majorana screening from the Zürich G experiment". Physical Review D. American Physical Society (APS). 61 (10): 101101(R). Bibcode:2000PhRvD..61j1101U. doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.101101.
  6. Yang, Xin-She; Wang, Qian-Shen (2002). "Gravity Anomaly During the Mohe Total Solar Eclipse and New Constraint on Gravitational Shielding Parameter". Astrophysics and Space Science. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 282 (1): 245–253. Bibcode:2002Ap&SS.282..245Y. doi:10.1023/a:1021119023985. S2CID   118497439.
  7. Poincaré, Henri (1908). "La dynamique de l'électron" [The dynamics of the electron](PDF). Revue générale des sciences pures et appliquées (in French). 19: 386–402.
  8. Eckhardt, Donald H. (1990-09-15). "Gravitational shielding". Physical Review D. American Physical Society (APS). 42 (6): 2144–2145. Bibcode:1990PhRvD..42.2144E. doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.2144. PMID   10013064.
  9. Williams, James G.; Turyshev, Slava G.; Boggs, Dale H. (1 July 2009). "Lunar laser ranging tests of the equivalence principle with the earth and moon". International Journal of Modern Physics D. 18 (7): 1129–1175. arXiv: gr-qc/0507083 . Bibcode:2009IJMPD..18.1129W. doi:10.1142/S021827180901500X. S2CID   119086896.
  10. Unnikrishnan, C. S.; Mohapatra, A. K.; Gillies, G. T. (12 February 2001). "Anomalous gravity data during the 1997 total solar eclipse do not support the hypothesis of gravitational shielding". Physical Review D. 63 (6): 062002. Bibcode:2001PhRvD..63f2002U. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.062002.
  11. Martins, Roberto de Andrade (2002). "Majorana's experiments on gravitational absorption". In Edwards, Matthew R (ed.). Pushing gravity: new perspectives on Le Sage's theory of gravitation. Apeiron. pp. 219–238. ISBN   978-1-4237-1624-2. OCLC   61151058.
  12. Russell, Henry Norris (December 1921). "On Majorana's Theory of Gravitation". The Astrophysical Journal. 54: 334. Bibcode:1921ApJ....54..334R. doi: 10.1086/142649 .
  13. Coïsson, R.; Mambriani, G.; Podini, P. (April 2002). "A new interpretation of Quirino Majorana's experiments on gravitation and a proposal for testing his results". Nuovo Cimento B. 117 (4): 469. Bibcode:2002NCimB.117..469C.
  14. N. Li; D. Noever; T. Robertson; R. Koczor; W. Brantley (August 1997). "Static Test for a Gravitational Force Coupled to Type II YBCO Superconductors". Physica C . 281 (2–3): 260–267. Bibcode:1997PhyC..281..260L. doi:10.1016/S0921-4534(97)01462-7.
  15. Koczor, Ronald; Noever, David (1999). "Fabrication of large bulk ceramic superconductor disks for gravity modification experiments and performance of YBCO disks under EM field excitation". 35th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. doi:10.2514/6.1999-2147.
  16. Space.com on NASA funding Archived February 10, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  17. Podkletnov, E; Nieminen, R (December 10, 1992). "A possibility of gravitational force shielding by bulk YBa2Cu3O7−x superconductor". Physica C . 203 (3–4): 441–444. Bibcode:1992PhyC..203..441P. doi:10.1016/0921-4534(92)90055-H.
  18. Modanese, G (1996-08-20). "Theoretical analysis of a reported weak-gravitational-shielding effect". Europhysics Letters (EPL). 35 (6): 413–418. arXiv: hep-th/9505094 . Bibcode:1996EL.....35..413M. doi:10.1209/epl/i1996-00129-8. S2CID   10365722.
  19. Ning, Wu (2004-04-15). "Gravitational Shielding Effect in Gauge Theory of Gravity". Communications in Theoretical Physics. 41 (4): 567–572. arXiv: hep-th/0307225 . Bibcode:2004CoTPh..41..567W. doi:10.1088/0253-6102/41/4/567. S2CID   119407101.
  20. Teller, Edward (1 July 1977). "Electromagnetism and gravitation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 74 (7): 2664–2666. Bibcode:1977PNAS...74.2664T. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2664 . PMC   431235 . PMID   16592415.
  21. William Rhodes Usenet posting https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/rhodes$20%22gravity$20shield%22/sci.systems/3_11GyUQYUw/rc1Q5O_2EVQJ
  22. Tajmar, M (July 2013). Propellantless Propulsion with Negative Matter Generated by Electric Charges (PDF). 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. San Jose, CA.
  23. Gravitational Attenuating Material Ronald J. Kita https://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=08901943&IDKey=74419F9AD76C%0D%0A&HomeUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO2%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsearch-bool.html%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526co1%3DAND%2526d%3DPTXT%2526s1%3D%252522kita%252Bronald%252522%2526OS%3D%252522kita%252Bronald%252522%2526RS%3D%252522kita%252Bronald%252522
  24. Gravitational attenuating material (Patent) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-8901943-B1
  25. Gravitational attenuating material Google Patents https://patents.google.com/patent/US8901943B1/en