Gun stabilizer

Last updated

A gun stabilizer is a device that facilitates aiming an artillery piece by compensating for the motion of the platform on which it is mounted. For naval applications see ship gun fire-control system. Moving land-based systems tend to require more specialized stabilization. Due to the need to fire while in motion, tanks in World War II made some use of stabilization, but it became commonplace in later decades during the Cold War.

Contents

History

The gunner of the early Matilda II tank elevated and depressed the gun by hand, and had a shoulder pad by which he could support it steadily as the tank moved while he stood.

The primary armament of most US tanks was stabilized in elevation starting with the M3A1 Light Tank and the M3 Medium tank in November 1941. Except for the 105mm-equipped M4 Sherman tanks, all U.S.-built tanks had a stabilization system for gun elevation usable at low speeds. [1] All US tanks were stabilized at least by 1944. [2] Some attempt was made to stabilize Soviet tank guns as early as 1938. [3] [4]

U.S. tanks equipped with the single plane gun elevation stabilization were found to be more effective at engaging targets while moving at up to 10 mph using the stabilization system. However, its use in the war was limited as the British did not use it in their US Lend-Lease vehicles, and American forces lost their proficiency as less-trained crewmen replaced the crews that had trained on their vehicles for years in the US before deployment. The crews did not know how to use stabilization; also, most U.S. tanks fired while stationary. Lack of maintenance also reduced its use. In some units the crews swore by it; in others, they removed the system.

Post-war, British and then Soviet tank designers developed improved gun stabilizers. In 1948, the British Centurion Mk. 3 featured the first two-plane stabilization system in a production tank, while 1954 saw the introduction of the STP-1 stabilizer complex for the T-54A, and similar systems would be implemented on virtually all Soviet tanks from then on. [5] The US would not utilize gun stabilization in any of their Medium and Main Battle Tanks until the Add-On Stabilization (AOS) upgrade package developed for the M60A1 in the early 1970s, though the M551 Sheridan light tank, introduced in 1967, was equipped with a gun stabilizer.

In 1960, West Germany prototyped a unique proof-of-concept three-axis stabilized turret on a widened Leopard 1 chassis. The primary cannon remained stationary, while the turret rotated conventionally for horizontal aiming and employed oscillation for vertical alignment. Additionally, the turret could tilt left or right along a third axis to accommodate aiming corrections on uneven terrain. All turret movements were exclusively powered, lacking manual controls. Design was cost ineffective and was ultimately not adopted, but lessons learned were carried over to other FCS research.

Operation

There are many forms of gun stabilization. The simple single-plane stabilizer only stabilizes on a vertical axis, and the two-plane stabilizer stabilizes both the vertical and horizontal axis.

The mechanism usually includes an angular reference device such as a mechanical or optical gyroscope and servomechanisms. In the case of a tank, one servo stabilizes the turret and another the elevation of the gun. This was experimented with in late 1944-1945, continuing after the war. In WWII only gun elevation was stabilized using a gyro. [1] The input was directly to the gun. The aiming is then done by control input to the mechanism, rather than directly on the gun. The control mechanism usually has other functions, such as applying super-elevation and leading the target according to its velocity, making it a fire-control system, and some guns are entirely automatic.

Stabilization was added for the turret, keeping the turret pointed in the direction the gunner placed it regardless of the direction of the hull. With both the gun and turret stabilized the gun would remain pointed where the gun sight was pointed regardless of the movement of the tank unless the elevation or depression limits were exceeded. This was a mechanical, then electrical system inputting to mechanical, then electrical or hydraulic motor systems controlling the gun movement based on the input from one gyro system, for the gun, or two, also for the turret. This type of system with an ability to almost equal the accuracy of firing the gun from a full halt was introduced into the U.S. M60A1 tank in the early 1970s. [6] An alternative system was also developed where instead of stabilizing the gun the gun sights were stabilized and the gun fired when its aim matched the gun sight's position. This allowed the gun to elevate or depress free from the gun sight allowing the use of auto-loaders where the gun moves to be loaded, then back to match where the gunsight points.

Gun stabilization in both elevation and traverse added to other improvements. These included range finding through stereoscopic, then coincidence visual range finders, then laser range finders, which were introduced in the late 1970s. An analog and later digital computer was added which had the range input. Also input was the rate the turret rotated. The computer took the range input to use the rate of the turret rotation to determine the lead needed to hit a moving target by calculating its speed. Added to this was the barrel wear determined by the number of and types of ammunition fired, the temperature of the ammunition propellant measured by thermometers in the ammunition compartment, the wind direction and speed where the firing tank was located measured by sensors on the turret roof, and barrel droop by measuring the location of a barrel mounted reference system near the muzzle. Barrel droop was also limited by insulating the barrel so it expands and contracts evenly along its length. This enables the modern tank using the current stabilization systems to hit a target moving thirty miles an hour while itself is moving at the same speed at ranges of 2000 meters or more, as accurately as if standing still.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MGM-51 Shillelagh</span> Surface-to-surface missile

The Ford MGM-51Shillelagh was an American anti-tank guided missile designed to be launched from a conventional gun (cannon). It was originally intended to be the medium-range portion of a short, medium, and long-range system for armored fighting vehicles in the 1960s and '70s to defeat future armor without an excessively large gun. Developing a system that could fire both shells and missiles reliably proved complex and largely unworkable for the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indirect fire</span> Weapons firing without line of sight on target

Indirect fire is aiming and firing a projectile without relying on a direct line of sight between the gun and its target, as in the case of direct fire. Aiming is performed by calculating azimuth and inclination, and may include correcting aim by observing the fall of shot and calculating new angles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M48 Patton</span> Cold War-era American main battle tank

The M48 Patton is an American first-generation main battle tank (MBT) introduced in February 1952, being designated as the 90mm Gun Tank: M48. It was designed as a replacement for the M26 Pershing, M4 Sherman, M46 and M47 Patton tanks, and was the main battle tank of the U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps in the Vietnam War. Nearly 12,000 M48s were built, mainly by Chrysler and American Locomotive Company, from 1952 to 1961. The M48 Patton was the first U.S. medium gun tank with a four-man crew, featuring a centerline driver's compartment and no bow machine gunner. As with nearly all new armored vehicles it had a wide variety of suspension systems, cupola styles, power packs, fenders and other details among individual tanks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M60 tank</span> American second generation main battle tank

The M60 is an American second-generation main battle tank (MBT). It was officially standardized as the Tank, Combat, Full Tracked: 105-mm Gun, M60 in March 1959. Although developed from the M48 Patton, the M60 tank series was never officially christened as a Patton tank. The US Army considered it a "product-improved descendant" of the Patton tank's design. The design similarities are evident comparing the original version of the M60 and the M48A2. It has been sometimes informally grouped as a member of the Patton tank family. The United States fully committed to the MBT doctrine in 1963, when the Marine Corps retired the last (M103) heavy tank battalion. The M60 tank series became America's primary main battle tank during the Cold War, reaching a production total of 15,000 M60s. Hull production ended in 1983, but 5,400 older models were converted to the M60A3 variant ending in 1990.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fire-control system</span> Ranged weapon assistance system

A fire-control system (FCS) is a number of components working together, usually a gun data computer, a director and radar, which is designed to assist a ranged weapon system to target, track, and hit a target. It performs the same task as a human gunner firing a weapon, but attempts to do so faster and more accurately.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T95 medium tank</span> American prototype medium tank developed from 1955 to 1959

The T95 was an American prototype medium tank developed from 1955 to 1959. These tanks used many advanced or unusual features, such as siliceous-cored armor, new transmissions, and OPTAR fire-control systems. The OPTAR incorporated an electro-optical rangefinder and was mounted on the right side of the turret, and was used in conjunction with the APFSDS-firing 90 mm T208 smoothbore gun, which had a rigid mount without a recoil system. In addition, although the tanks were designed with a torsion beam suspension, a hydropneumatic suspension was fitted, and one of the tanks was fitted with a Solar Saturn gas turbine for demonstration purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laying</span> Process of aiming an artillery piece or turret

Gun laying is the process of aiming an artillery piece or turret, such as a gun, howitzer, or mortar, on land, in air, or at sea, against surface or aerial targets. It may be laying for direct fire, where the gun is aimed similarly to a rifle, or indirect fire, where firing data is calculated and applied to the sights. The term includes automated aiming using, for example, radar-derived target data and computer-controlled guns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gyro gunsight</span> Gunsight in which target lead and bullet drop are calculated automatically

A gyro gunsight (G.G.S.) is a modification of the non-magnifying reflector sight in which target lead and bullet drop are calculated automatically. The first examples were developed in Britain just before the Second World War for use during aerial combat, and more advanced models were common on Allied aircraft by the end of the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">B1 Centauro</span> Wheeled tank destroyer

The Centauro is a family of Italian military vehicles originating from a wheeled tank destroyer for light to medium territorial defense and tactical reconnaissance. It was developed by a consortium of manufacturers, the Società Consortile Iveco Fiat - OTO Melara (CIO). Iveco Fiat was tasked with developing the hull and propulsion systems while Oto Melara was responsible for developing the turrets and weapon systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">D-10 tank gun</span> Rifled tank/antitank gun

The D-10 is a Soviet 100 mm tank gun developed in late World War II. It originally equipped the SU-100 tank destroyers and was later selected for the T-55 tank, equipping these as late as 1979. On the T-55 the D-10 continues to be in active service in many countries.

The General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) M60-2000 or 120S was an upgrade of the M60 tank. The development of the M60-2000 was initiated primarily due to the large number of M60 main battle tanks in service with many Middle Eastern nations unable to afford a sufficient force of more modern main battle tanks. The upgrade was marketed at those M60 users with the industrial capability to convert the tanks themselves. The M60-2000/120S was a GDLS supplied conversion kit that married the turret of the M1A1 variant of the M1 Abrams to the M60A1 hull of the M60, offering many features of the M1A1 Abrams to existing M60 users at a reduced cost.

Armament of the <i>Iowa</i>-class battleship Armament of WWII battleship

The Iowa-class battleships are the most heavily armed warships the United States Navy has ever put to sea, due to the continual development of their onboard weaponry. The first Iowa-class ship was laid down in June 1940; in their World War II configuration, each of the Iowa-class battleships had a main battery of 16-inch (406 mm) guns that could hit targets nearly 20 statute miles (32 km) away with a variety of artillery shells designed for anti-ship or bombardment work. The secondary battery of 5-inch (127 mm) guns could hit targets nearly 9 statute miles (14 km) away with solid projectiles or proximity fuzed shells, and was effective in an anti-aircraft role as well. Each of the four battleships carried a wide array of 20 mm and 40 mm anti-aircraft guns for defense against enemy aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ship stability</span> Ship response to disturbance from an upright condition

Ship stability is an area of naval architecture and ship design that deals with how a ship behaves at sea, both in still water and in waves, whether intact or damaged. Stability calculations focus on centers of gravity, centers of buoyancy, the metacenters of vessels, and on how these interact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Type 80/88 main battle tank</span> Main battle tank

The Type 80 and the Type 88 are a family of Chinese second-generation main battle tanks (MBTs). They are also known as the ZTZ80 and ZTZ88.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T-55AGM</span> Medium tank

The T-55AGM is a medium tank, a Ukrainian modernization of the T-54/T-55 developed by the Kharkiv Morozov Machine Building Design Bureau. The T-55AGM rebuild package can also be applied to Chinese made Type 59s and the Soviet T-62. As these upgrades are developed for export only, the variants may differ greatly in accord with the customer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ship gun fire-control system</span> Type of analogue fire-control system

Ship gun fire-control systems (GFCS) are analogue fire-control systems that were used aboard naval warships prior to modern electronic computerized systems, to control targeting of guns against surface ships, aircraft, and shore targets, with either optical or radar sighting. Most US ships that are destroyers or larger employed gun fire-control systems for 5-inch (127 mm) and larger guns, up to battleships, such as Iowa class.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2A28 Grom</span> Main armament of the BMP-1 and BMD-1 infantry fighting vehicles

The 2A28 Grom is the main armament of the BMP-1 and BMD-1 infantry fighting vehicles. It is a 73 mm low pressure smoothbore semi-automatic gun with a wedge breech block. Development of the 2A28 Grom was directly linked to that of the SPG-9 recoilless gun; both fired projectiles similar to rocket-propelled grenades.

A weapon mount is an assembly or mechanism used to hold a weapon onto a platform in order for it to function at maximum capacity. Weapon mounts can be broken down into two categories: static mounts and non-static mounts.

The 2A42 Cobra is an overhead-mount modular one-man gun turret designed by the ZTS Dubnica nad Váhom design bureau. It is specially designed to fit many different types of tracked and wheeled IFVs and APCs such as the BMP-1, BMD-1, BTR-70, BTR-80 and the OT-64 SKOT.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sabrah Light Tank</span> A light tank designed by Elbit Systems

The Sabrah Light Tank is a light tank or tank destroyer designed by Elbit Systems. Two variants of the Sabrah exist:

References

  1. 1 2 Page 60, SHERMAN: A History of the American Medium Tank, 1978. R.P. Hunnicutt, ISBN   978-1-62654-861-9
  2. Popular Science, September 1944. September 1944.
  3. Chris Bishop, The Encyclopedia of Weapons of WWII, p. 37 (2002)
  4. Page 41, RUSSIAN TANKS 1900-1970, John Milsom, Stackpole Books, 1971
  5. Drapes, Iron (2017-01-10). "Tankograd: T-54". Tankograd. Retrieved 2022-06-24.
  6. author 1971, Bamberg, FRG