Hadith of Muhammad's inheritance

Last updated

Hadith of Muhammad's inheritance refers to a statement attributed to the Islamic prophet Muhammad, in which he reportedly disinherited his family, leaving to his successor as a charitable endowment his properties, including a valuable share of the agricultural lands of Fadak near Medina. In Sunni sources, this hadith is narrated primarily on the authority of the first caliph, Abu Bakr, who is said to have cited it to reject the claims of Muhammad's daughter Fatima to Fadak. In contrast, the authenticity of the hadith of inheritance is rejected in Shia Islam. Rather than a financial dispute, the saga of Fadak is largely viewed as a political conflict over the succession to Muhammad between Abu Bakr and Ali. The latter was Muhammad's cousin and Fatima's husband.

Contents

Historical background

Fadak

Fadak was a village located to the north of Medina, at a distance of two days travel. [1] As part of a peace treaty with a Jewish tribe, half of the agricultural land of Fadak was considered fay and belonged to Muhammad, [2] [1] in line with verse 59:6 of the Quran. [1] There is some evidence that Muhammad gifted his share of Fadak to Fatima in Medina when verse 17:26 was revealed, [1] [3] [4] and her agents managed the property when Muhammad was alive. [1] [5] This is the view of Shia authors, [1] including al-Kulayni (d.941) and al-Ayyashi (d.932). [6] Among Sunnis, al-Suyuti (d.1505) and al-Dhahabi (d.1348) are of this view, while al-Jurjani (d.1078) and Ibn Kathir (d.1373) are uncertain whether the verse was revealed to Muhammad in Medina. [1] The revenue of Fadak largely supported needy travelers, the poor, military expeditions, and Muhammad's family, [1] [2] who were forbidden from receiving general alms. [7]

Confiscation of Fadak

Following Muhammad's death in 632 and early in his caliphate, Abu Bakr is said to have seized Fadak from Fatima, [1] [8] and evicted her agents, possibly as a show of authority to Muhammad's clan (Banu Hashim) who had not yet pledged their allegiance to Abu Bakr, [1] or perhaps in retaliation for his exclusion by the Banu Hashim from the funeral rites of Muhammad. [9] The confiscation of Fadak by Abu Bakr is the Shia view. In Sunni sources, the charge of usurpation appears, for instance, in the works of Ibn Hajar al-Haytami (d.1566) and Ibn Sa'd (d.845). [1] [8]

Among others, the Sunni al-Baladhuri (d.892) relates that Fatima objected to Abu Bakr, saying that Fadak was a gift from her father. Her husband Ali and a maid at Muhammad's house, named Umm Aiman, are reported to have offered their testimonies in support of Fatima. [1] By some accounts, Fatima also brought her two sons as witnesses. [10] Abu Bakr, however, did not find their testimonies sufficient to establish the ownership of Fatima, [1] [2] requiring two men or one man and two women as witnesses per Islamic law. [11] Khetia adds here that Fatima might have expected her closeness with Muhammad to strengthen her case. [11] Shias similarly contend that the truthful Fatima would have not claimed something which was not hers. [12] By one Shia account, Ali made this point to Abu Bakr, and added that the burden of proof was on Abu Bakr and not Fatima, whose agents administered the land at the time of the dispute. [5] Sajjadi comments here that possession is the decisive factor in determining ownership in Islamic law. [1] The Sunni Sibt ibn al-Jawzi (d.1256-7) and the Shia al-Tabrisi (d.1153-4) relate that Abu Bakr finally agreed to return Fadak to Fatima but was dissuaded by his ally Umar, [3] [1] who tore up the deed written by Abu Bakr. [13] [1] Other versions of this last account are collected in Sharh nahj al-balagha by the Mu'tazilite Ibn Abi'l-Hadid (d.1258). [1]

Hadith of inheritance

Most likely after Abu Bakr had rejected Fatima's claim of ownership, she demanded her inheritance from the estate of her father. [1] Abu Bakr rejected this too, saying that Muhammad had disinherited his family, [7] personally telling the former that prophets do not leave any inheritance, and what they leave behind is public property that should be administered by the caliph. [14] Abu Bakr was initially the sole witness to this statement, referred to as the hadith of Muhammad's inheritance. [7] [15] The version reported by the Sunni al-Tabari (d.923) is as follows. [1]

We, the prophets, do not leave any inheritance; whatever we leave is charity. [1]

Abu Bakr added that he would administer those properties like Muhammad and that his kin should henceforth rely on general alms, [16] which was forbidden for them in his lifetime because of their status of purity in the Quran. This prohibition is still upheld today by all schools of Islamic jurisprudence. [17] Abu Bakr thus deprived Muhammad's kin also of their Quranic share of the booty and fay, [7] in verses 8:41 and 59:7, respectively, to which they were previously entitled instead of general alms. [17]

Authenticity

In his al-Tabaqat al-kubra, the Sunni traditionist Ibn Sa'd (d.845) furnishes the hadith of inheritance with two chains of transmission which include numerous companions of Muhammad, such as Umar, Uthman, and Zubayr. [18] In particular, he includes in these chains some prominent Hashimites, such as Ali and Ibn Abbas, who are both reported to have vehemently disputed this claim of Abu Bakr in other sources. [19]

On the other hand, Soufi holds that Abu Bakr is generally regarded as the only credible narrator of this hadith in Sunni sources, adding that similar reports attributed to other companions have been rejected by Sunnis. [20] Along these lines, Sajjadi writes that all (credible) versions of this hadith are narrated from Abu Bakr, his ally Umar, his daughter Aisha, and Malik ibn Aus Al-Hadathan, [1] though some primary sources have disputed the status of the last one as a companion of Muhammad. [21]

Twelver scholars have mostly rejected the authenticity of the hadith of inheritance on the basis of statements by Fatima, Ali, and other Shia Imams, who are viewed as infallible and thus truthful in Twelver Shia. [1] Other Twelvers have classified this hadith as a solitary narration (khabar wahid), [1] which is thus viewed as unreliable by experts. [22] Similarly, that Muhammad would make a statement without informing the parties involved was doubted by his widow Umm Salama, reports the Twelver al-Qazvini (d.1994) in his Fatima al-Zahra: min al-mahd ilaal-lahd. [23]

Sermon of Fadak

In protest, Fatima is said to have delivered a speech at the Prophet's Mosque, known as the Sermon of Fadak. [24] [25] [1] Among other sources, this sermon appears in the Sunni Balaghat al-nisa' , an anthology of eloquent speeches by Muslim women, [25] [26] though the attribution of this speech to Fatima is mostly rejected by Sunnis. [26] The version of this speech in Balaghat upholds Ali as the rightful successor to Muhammad, [27] chastises Abu Bakr for denying Fatima of her inheritance, [28] [1] accuses him of (hadith) fabrication, [1] [29] and adds that Muhammad could have not contradicted the Quran, [28] in which verse 27:16 describes how Solomon inherited from his father David, [3] [30] and verse 19:6 is about how Zechariah prayed for a son who would inherit from him and from the House of Jacob. [3] [30] Verses 8:75 and 33:6 about the rights of every Muslim to inheritance are also quoted in the speech in Balaghat. [31] [32]

Contradiction with the Quran

The ostensible contradiction of the hadith of inheritance with the Quran has been noted by some contemporary authors, [33] [34] [9] and also explained to Abu Bakr by Ali in the account of the Sunni Ibn Sa'd. [35] Nevertheless, Soufi notes that Abu Bakr's testimony is strong enough for Sunnis to make an exception to the Quranic rules of inheritance. [36] Alternatively, the Sunni Ibn Kathir, Abd al-Jabbar (d.1025), and al-Haytami have attempted to justify the above contradiction with verses 27:16 and 19:6, arguing that the inheritance of the past prophets in these verses is knowledge and wisdom, rather than material property. [34] [37] The Sunni al-Zuhri (d.741-2) and Ibn Sa'd have instead argued that the hadith refers to Muhammad alone and not all the prophets, [34] [33] though Madelung, Soufi, and Ibn Abi'l-Hadid reject this argument because it contradicts the text of the hadith (ma'shar al-anbiya'). [34] [38] Shias have similarly rejected these claims, saying that the past prophets had also left material inheritances and that Abu Bakr's statement could not make an exception to the general application of the Quranic rules of inheritance. There also exist Shia traditions to the effect that Muhammad left another property inside Medina for Fatima. [36]

Muhammad's widows

Abu Bakr terminated the status of purity of Muhammad's kin by requiring them to rely on general alms which Muhammad had forbidden for them in his lifetime. [7] [16] At the same time, Abu Bakr allowed the widows of Muhammad to inherit his quarters in Medina, [39] [15] [1] and particularly granted his daughter Aisha some properties in the Aliya part of Medina and in Bahrain. [39] [15] By maintaining their status, Abu Bakr might have signaled to the Muslim community that his daughter Aisha and the rest of the widows were the true heirs of Muhammad, according to Aslan. [40] Madelung holds a similar view. [41]

Politics

Madelung suggests that the caliphate of Abu Bakr was inherently inconsistent with maintaining the privileged status of Muhammad's kin and applying the Quranic rules of inheritance to them. [7] Muhammad had become the owner of Fadak as the leader of the Muslim community. To inherit this property as a prerogative by the Banu Hashim might have implied their authority over the community, which is likely why Abu Bakr rejected Fatima's claims. [42] This was the opinion of Jafri, and similar views are voiced by some others, [29] [43] [44] [45] [5] while el-Hibri does not view the saga of Fadak as a mere financial dispute. [46] Aslan suggests that Abu Bakr intended to strip the House of Muhammad from its privileged status, weaken its political might, [40] and particularly undermine Ali's claim to the caliphate. Aslan also justifies Abu Bakr's efforts as partly rooted in his conviction that the caliphate must reside outside of Muhammad's clan and partly in the personal enmity between Abu Bakr and Ali. [40] Some contemporary authors have noted the poor relations between the two men. [47] [48] [49] [50]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ali</span> 4th Rashidun caliph from 656 to 661 and 1st Shia imam

Ali ibn Abi Talib was the cousin and son-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, and was the fourth Rashidun caliph who ruled from 656 to 661, as well as the first Shia imam. Born to Abu Talib ibn Abd al-Muttalib and Fatima bint Asad, a young Ali was raised by his elder cousin Muhammad and was among the first to accept his teachings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hasan ibn Ali</span> Grandson of Muhammad and the second Shia Imam (625–670)

Hasan ibn Ali was an Alid political and religious leader. The eldest son of Ali and Fatima and a grandson of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, Hasan briefly ruled as caliph from January 661 until August 661. He is considered as the second Imam in Shia Islam, succeeding Ali and preceding his brother Husayn. As a grandson of the prophet, he is part of the ahl al-bayt and the ahl al-kisa, and also participated in the event of mubahala.

Muhsin ibn Ali, also spelled Mohsin, was the youngest son of Fatima bint Muhammad and Ali ibn Abi Talib, and thus a maternal grandson of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. He was a brother of Husayn and Hasan. Controversy surrounds the fate of Muhsin as some canonical Shia sources report that Muhsin died in miscarriage, following a raid on her house led by Umar, a companion of Muhammad. Alternatively, Sunnis hold that Muhsin died in infancy of natural causes.

The Saqifa of the Banu Sa'ida clan refers to the location of an event in early Islam where some of the companions of the Islamic prophet Muhammad pledged their allegiance to Abu Bakr as the first caliph and successor to Muhammad shortly after his death in 11 AH. The Saqifa meeting is among the most controversial events in early Islam, due to the exclusion of a large number of Muhammad's companions, including his immediate family and notably Ali, his cousin and son-in-law. The conflicts that arose soon after Muhammad's death are considered to be the main cause of the current division among Muslims. Those who accepted Abu Bakr's caliphate were later labeled Sunnis, while the supporters of Ali's right to caliphate were later labeled Shia.

The issue of succession following the death of the Islamic prophet Muhammad is the central issue in the schisms that divided the early Muslim community in the first century of Islamic history into numerous schools and branches. The two most prominent branches that emerged from these divisions are Sunni and Shia branches of Islam. Sunni Islam asserts that Abu Bakr rightfully succeeded Muhammad through a process of election. In contrast, Shia Islam maintains that Ali ibn Abi Talib was Muhammad's designated successor.

Fadak was a village with fertile land in an oasis near Medina. The takeover of Fadak by Muslims in 629 CE was peaceful and a share of it thus belonged to the Islamic prophet Muhammad. After Muhammad died in 632, Fadak was confiscated from his daughter Fatima and administered as public property, despite her objections. Fadak later changed hands many times as a fief.

Umm Kulthūm bint 'Alī, also known as Zaynab al-Ṣughrā, was the youngest daughter of Fatima and Ali ibn Abi Talib. The former was the daughter of the Islamic prophet Muhammad and the latter was his cousin. Ali is also recognized as the fourth Rashidun caliph and the first Shia imam. A young Umm Kulthum lost her grandfather and mother in 632 CE. While she was still a child, the second Rashidun caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab asked for her hand in marriage, which was resisted by Umm Kulthum and her father Ali, possibly due to Umar's reputation for harsh treatment of women. By one Sunni account, Ali finally agreed to the marriage when Umar enlisted the support of prominent Muslims for his proposal.

Zaynab bint Ali, was the eldest daughter of Fatima and Ali ibn Abi Talib. The former was a daughter of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, and the latter was his cousin. Ali is also recognized as the fourth Rashidun caliph and the first Shia imam. Zaynab is best known for her role in the aftermath of the Battle of Karbala, in which her brother Husayn and most of her male relatives were massacred by the forces of the Umayyad caliph Yazid ibn Mua'awiya. Women and children in Husayn's camp were taken captive after the battle and marched to Kufa and then the Umayyad capital Damascus, where Zaynab gave impassioned speeches, condemning Yazid and spreading the news of Karbala. She was later freed and died shortly afterward in 682, but her burial site is uncertain. The two shrines associated with Zaynab in Damascus and Cairo are destinations for Muslim pilgrimage. She is considered to be a symbol of sacrifice, strength, and piety in Islam, and a role model for Muslim women, typifying courage, leadership, and defiance against oppression.

Ahl al-Bayt refers to the family of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, but the term has also been extended in Sunni Islam to all descendants of the Banu Hashim and even to all Muslims. In Shia Islam, the term is limited to Muhammad, his daughter Fatima, his cousin and son-in-law Ali ibn Abi Talib, and their two sons, Ḥasan and Husayn. A common Sunni view adds the wives of Muhammad to these five.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sunni view of Ali</span> Sunni view of Ali

Ali ibn Abi Talib was the cousin and son-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Ali contributed significantly to Islam in its early years and was likely the first male to accept the teachings of Muhammad. In Sunni Islam, Ali is recognized as a close companion, a foremost authority on the Quran and Islamic law, and the fountainhead of wisdom in Sunni spirituality. When Muhammad died in 632 CE, Ali had his own claims to leadership, perhaps in reference to Muhammad's announcement at the Ghadir Khumm, but he eventually accepted the temporal rule of the first three caliphs in the interest of Muslim unity. During this period, Ali is portrayed in Sunni sources as a trusted advisor of the first three caliphs, while their conflicts with Ali are neutralized or downplayed. Ali himself succeeded to the caliphate in 656 but his rule was immediately challenged by multiple pretenders and he was assassinated in 661.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shaqshaqiya sermon</span>

The Shaqshaqiya sermon is a controversial text in Nahj al-balagha, the best-known collection of sermons, letters, and sayings attributed to Ali ibn Abi Talib, who was the fourth Rashidun caliph, the first Shia imam, and the cousin and son-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. The sermon is highly critical of the predecessors of Ali, namely, Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman, accusing them of usurping the right of Ali to the caliphate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attack on Fatima's house</span> Event in history of Islam

The attack on Fatima's house refers to a disputed violent attack on the house of Fatima, daughter of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. The attack is said to have taken place shortly after the death of Muhammad in 11 AH and was instigated by his successor Abu Bakr and led by Umar, another companion. The purpose of the attack was to arrest Fatima's husband Ali, who had withheld his pledge of allegiance to Abu Bakr. Her injuries during the raid might have caused the young Fatima's miscarriage and death within six months of Muhammad.

Al-Imāma wa al-siyāsa is a work about the history of Islam written before the fifth century AH. This book is sometimes attributed to the Sunni Muslim Ibn Qutayba, although this attribution is disputed. The work might have been authored by another Sunni author, either in the Umayyad Spain or after the Abbasid rulers adopted Sunni orthodoxy as the basis of their authority.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fatima</span> Daughter of Muhammad (c. 605–632)

Fatima bint Muhammad, commonly known as Fatima al-Zahra', was the daughter of the Islamic prophet Muhammad and his wife Khadija. Fatima's husband was Ali, the fourth of the Rashidun Caliphs and the first Shia Imam. Fatima's sons were Hasan and Husayn, the second and third Shia Imams, respectively. Fatima has been compared to Mary, mother of Jesus, especially in Shia Islam. Muhammad is said to have regarded her as the best of women and the dearest person to him. She is often viewed as an ultimate archetype for Muslim women and an example of compassion, generosity, and enduring suffering. It is through Fatima that Muhammad's family line has survived to this date. Her name and her epithets remain popular choices for Muslim girls.

The verse of purification refers to verse 33:33 of the Quran, the central religious text in Islam. The verse concerns the status of purity of the Ahl al-Bayt, the last passage of which reads,

God only desires to remove defilement from you, O Ahl al-Bayt, and to purify you completely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hadith of the position</span> Hadith that compares Ali and Aaron

The hadith of the position is a widely-reported saying (hadith), attributed to the Islamic prophet Muhammad, that equates the standing of his cousin and son-in-law Ali ibn Abi Talib to him with the standing of Aaron to Moses, with the exception that Ali is not a prophet. In Shia Islam, this hadith is invoked to prove Ali's usurped right to succeed Muhammad. In Sunni Islam, the hadith of the position primarily supports the belief in the finality of Muhammad in the chain of prophets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marital life of Fatima</span> Overview of the marital life of Fatima, daughter of the Islamic prophet Muhammad

Marital life of Fatima portrays the marriage of Fatima, daughter of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, and Muhammad's cousin, Ali. Fatima and Ali were both significant figures in early Islam: Fatima has been compared to Mary, the mother of Jesus, especially in Shia Islam. Muhammad is said to have regarded her as the best of women and the dearest person to him. Ali was the fourth of the Rashidun Caliphs and the first Shia Imam. Muhammad is widely reported to have likened Ali's position in Islam to that of Aaron in Judaism.

Burial of Fatima is about the secret burial and the uncertainty in the resting place of Fatima, daughter of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, and wife of Ali, the fourth caliph after Muhammad and the first Shia Imam. Fatima died in 11 AH, within six months of Muhammad's death, perhaps from her injuries during a raid on her house ordered by the first caliph, Abu Bakr. Following her will, she was buried secretly at night. Her exact burial place in Medina remains uncertain, though two possible locations are the al-Baqi' cemetery and her home. In Shia sources, Fatima's wish for a secret burial is viewed as a sign of the disassociation of Muhammad's daughter with the Muslim community who largely failed to support her against Abu Bakr.

The Sermon of Fadak refers to a speech at the Prophet's Mosque in Medina, delivered by Fatima, daughter of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, shortly after his death in 632 CE. In this sermon, Fatima protested Abu Bakr's succession to Muhammad and criticized Muslims for descending to what she described as their pre-Islamic habits. Fatima considered her husband Ali to be the rightful successor of Muhammad, referring to his announcement at Ghadir Khumm.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Sajjadi 2018.
  2. 1 2 3 Veccia Vaglieri 2012.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Abbas 2021, p. 102.
  4. Ruffle 2011, p. 26.
  5. 1 2 3 Osman 2014, p. 121.
  6. Osman 2014, p. 146n145.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Madelung 1997, p. 50.
  8. 1 2 Khetia 2013, pp. 18–9.
  9. 1 2 McHugo 2018, p. 41.
  10. Khetia 2013, p. 27.
  11. 1 2 Khetia 2013, p. 26.
  12. Soufi 1997, pp. 102–3.
  13. Soufi 1997, p. 101.
  14. Buehler 2014, p. 186.
  15. 1 2 3 Aslan 2011, p. 121.
  16. 1 2 Soufi 1997, pp. 95–6.
  17. 1 2 Madelung 1997, p. 14.
  18. Khetia 2013, pp. 19, 20.
  19. Khetia 2013, p. 21.
  20. Soufi 1997, pp. 99, 100.
  21. Khetia 2013, p. 20.
  22. Sachedina 1981, pp. 60–1.
  23. Osman 2014, pp. 121, 146.
  24. Ruffle 2011, p. 25.
  25. 1 2 Qutbuddin 2006, p. 249.
  26. 1 2 Khetia 2013, p. 47-9.
  27. Soufi 1997, p. 107.
  28. 1 2 Khetia 2013, p. 53.
  29. 1 2 Mavani 2013, p. 116.
  30. 1 2 Khetia 2013, p. 52.
  31. Khetia 2013, pp. 52–3.
  32. Ruffle 2011, pp. 15, 26.
  33. 1 2 Soufi 1997, pp. 98–9.
  34. 1 2 3 4 Madelung 1997, p. 360.
  35. Madelung 1997, p. 361.
  36. 1 2 Soufi 1997, p. 100.
  37. Soufi 1997, p. 99n84.
  38. Soufi 1997, p. 99n86.
  39. 1 2 Madelung 1997, p. 51.
  40. 1 2 3 Aslan 2011, p. 122.
  41. Madelung 1997, pp. 50–1.
  42. Jafri 1979, p. 47.
  43. Soufi 1997, pp. 104–5.
  44. Ayoub 2014, pp. 21–2.
  45. Lalani 2000, p. 23.
  46. El-Hibri 2010, p. 9.
  47. Madelung 1997, pp. 42, 52, 213–4.
  48. McHugo 2018, p. 39.
  49. Abbas 2021, p. 94.
  50. Anthony 2013, p. 31.

Sources