Hadley Arkes

Last updated
Hadley P. Arkes
Arkes2021photoshoot1.jpg
Arkes in 2021
Born1940 (age 8384)
Education University of Illinois (BA)
University of Chicago (PhD)
Occupation(s)Political Scientist, Professor
Years active1966–present
EmployerJames Wilson Institute on Natural Rights & the American Founding
Known forNatural law advocacy

Hadley P. Arkes (born 1940) is an American political scientist and the Edward N. Ney Professor of Jurisprudence and American Institutions Emeritus at Amherst College, where he has taught since 1966. He is currently the founder and director of the James Wilson Institute on Natural Rights & the American Founding in Washington, D.C.

Contents

Early life and education

Arkes grew up in Chicago. [1] Until his immediate family moved to an apartment elsewhere in Chicago in 1944, Arkes lived with his grandparents, parents, aunts, and uncles. [1] Despite the war and the looming danger for his Jewish people, he describes his childhood as one of blissful freedom: "There was a vast world in which to move, and those fences, occasionally seen, were not barriers to my freedom but fences for my protection." [1]

Arkes received a B.A. degree at the University of Illinois and a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago, where he was a student of Leo Strauss. [2]

Teaching

Arkes started teaching at Amherst College in 1966, earning the title of the Edward Ney Professor of Jurisprudence in 1987. [3] He assumed emeritus status in 2016. [3]

Writing

Books

In a series of books and articles dating from the mid-1980s, Arkes has written on a priori moral principles and advocated for their impact on constitutional interpretation. He has also dealt with their relation to constitutional jurisprudence and natural law, and their challenge to moral relativism. His works draw on political philosophers from Aristotle through the U.S. Founding Fathers, Lincoln, and contemporary authors and jurists.

John O. McGinnis, reviewing Arkes's Constitutional Illusions & Anchoring Truths in The Wall Street Journal, writes that it tries to find a path between the position of originalism, where the meaning of the U.S. Constitution is defined by its original text, and the idea of the living constitution, where its meaning is interpreted through the lens of evolving social attitudes. [4]

In The Philosopher in the City (1981), Arkes introduced the idea, taken from the Founders, that law should be a teacher of virtue and not just a regulator of vice. Republican virtue, Arkes wrote, presented the solution to the interconnected problems of racial integration, free speech, and urban crime. Arkes also sharply criticized libertarian philosophy as simplistic and morally obtuse. [5]

First Things (1986) was the first of Arkes's many contributions to legal philosophy, in which he argued for a jurisprudence based in Lincoln's understanding of natural law and contrasted it with positive rights such as the "right to privacy" which underpins pro-abortion arguments. [6] Arkes returned to this theme in a later book, Natural Rights and the Right to Choose (2002), and elaborated on the moral and legal confusion which he believes was the philosophical legacy of Roe v. Wade. Michael Uhlmann wrote in a review of that book, “Arkes would be the first to acknowledge that his take on particular cases and controversies can be reasonably disputed, but he brings to the table of constitutional discourse a long missing and badly needed element—the recognition that the text of the Constitution rests on a particular kind of moral reasoning that conservatives ignore at their peril, and at the peril of the very rights they seek to protect." [7]

In 1992, Arkes wrote Beyond the Constitution, a reevaluation of originalism. Arkes questioned the conservative argument that a purely textualist approach to the enumerated rights found in the Bill of Rights would be sufficient to check the advance of legal positivism. Reviewers praised Arkes’s breadth of knowledge, wit, and concision. [8]

Arkes’s next book, The Return of George Sutherland, was an intellectual history of Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland. Steven J. Eagle reviewed Arkes’s successful defense of Sutherland in the Wall Street Journal, writing, “Advocating that the Supreme Court again espouse natural-rights jurisprudence is an ambitious undertaking, as is attempting to rehabilitate the Supreme Court justice who, for many, personifies the ideas behind substantive due process. Hadley Arkes accomplishes both tasks with rhetorical skill and intellectual tenacity.” [9]

Articles

Among Arkes's most well-known articles have been his 1974 Supreme Court Review entry titled Civility and the Restriction of Speech: Rediscovering the Defamation of Groups, [10] his 1996 addition to the First Things symposium on The End of Democracy? The Judicial Usurpation of Politics, [11] and the 2013 publication in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy of The Natural Law Challenge, his adapted remarks from the Fifth Annual Rosenkranz Debate at the 2012 Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention. [12]

In 2021, Arkes co-authored the influential manifesto "A Better Originalism" with lawyer and writer Josh Hammer, Matthew Peterson, and Garrett Snedeker. The manifesto argues for "a bolder, more robust jurisprudence rooted in the principles and practices of American constitutionalism. [13]

Boards

Arkes serves on the advisory board and writes for First Things , an ecumenical journal that focuses on encouraging a "religiously informed public philosophy for the ordering of society." Arkes also serves on the advisory boards of Americans United for Life , the Catholic League , and St. Augustine's Press. Arkes serves on the board of trustees of the National Center on Sexual Exploitation .

Born-Alive Infants' Protection Act

Arkes co-created and advocated for the Born-Alive Infants' Protection Act. He first gave his proposal to George H.W. Bush in 1988, clarifying that his bill was only the first of many steps to protect life, giving abortion survivors protection under the law. Fourteen years later, on August 5, 2002, his son, President George W. Bush signed the bill into law, with Arkes by his side. [3]

Religion

In 2010, Arkes converted to Catholicism, which he described as a fulfillment of his previous Jewish faith. [14]

Legacy

Arkes was a founder and member of the Committee for the American Founding, a group of Amherst alumni and students who sought to preserve the doctrines of "natural rights" exposited by some American Founders and Lincoln through the Colloquium on the American Founding at Amherst and in Washington, D.C. [15] [16] When the Committee for the American Founding became defunct, Arkes took the same principles and founded the James Wilson Institute, a nonprofit organization in Alexandria, Virginia. The Institute unites law students and lawyers from across the country in promoting natural rights. [17]

In September 2016, Arkes was among 125 Conservatives for Trump who announced they supported Donald Trump's candidacy to be president. [18]

Selected publications

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jurisprudence</span> Theoretical study of law

Jurisprudence, also known as theory of law or philosophy of law, is the examination in a general perspective of what law is and what it ought to be. It investigates issues such as the definition of law; legal validity; legal norms and values; as well as the relationship between law and other fields of study, including economics, ethics, history, sociology, and political philosophy.

Natural law is a system of law based on a close observation of natural order and human nature, from which values, thought by natural law's proponents to be intrinsic to human nature, can be deduced and applied independently of positive law. According to the theory of law called jusnaturalism, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason". Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality".

In jurisprudence and legal philosophy, legal positivism is the theory that the existence of the law and its content depend on social facts, such as acts of legislation, judicial decisions, and customs, rather than on morality. This contrasts with natural law theory, which holds that law is necessarily connected to morality in such a way that any law that contradicts morality lacks legal validity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ronald Dworkin</span> American legal philosopher (1931–2013)

Ronald Myles Dworkin was an American legal philosopher, jurist, and scholar of United States constitutional law. At the time of his death, he was Frank Henry Sommer Professor of Law and Philosophy at New York University and Professor of Jurisprudence at University College London. Dworkin had taught previously at Yale Law School and the University of Oxford, where he was the Professor of Jurisprudence, successor to philosopher H. L. A. Hart.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Originalism</span> Constitutional interpretation doctrine

Originalism is a legal theory that bases constitutional, judicial, and statutory interpretation of text on the original understanding at the time of its adoption. Proponents of the theory object to judicial activism and other interpretations related to a living constitution framework. Instead, originalists argue for democratic modifications of laws through the legislature or through constitutional amendment.

Some philosophers distinguish two types of rights, natural rights and legal rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness</span> Phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence

"Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase from the United States Declaration of Independence. The phrase gives three examples of the unalienable rights which the Declaration says have been given to all humans by their Creator, and which governments are created to protect. Like the other principles in the Declaration of Independence, this phrase is not legally binding, but has been widely referenced and seen as an inspiration for the basis of government.

Harry Victor Jaffa was an American political philosopher, historian, columnist, and professor. He was a professor emeritus at Claremont McKenna College, Claremont Graduate University, and was a distinguished fellow of the Claremont Institute. Robert P. Kraynak says his "life work was to develop an American application of Leo Strauss's revival of natural-right philosophy against the relativism and nihilism of our times".

Rechtsstaat is a doctrine in continental European legal thinking, originating in German jurisprudence. It can be translated into English as "rule of law", alternatively "legal state", state of law, "state of justice", or "state based on justice and integrity". It means that everyone is subjected to the law, especially governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert P. George</span> American legal scholar and political philosopher (born 1955)

Robert Peter George is an American legal scholar, political philosopher, and public intellectual who serves as the sixth McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence and director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University. He lectures on constitutional interpretation, civil liberties, philosophy of law, and political philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Tushnet</span> American constitutional law scholar (born 1945)

Mark Victor Tushnet is an American legal scholar. He specializes in constitutional law and theory, including comparative constitutional law, and is currently the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Tushnet is identified with the critical legal studies movement.

Brian Slattery, B.A., BCL, D.Phil., F.R.S.C., is a Professor Emeritus of Law at Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He is a prominent academic in Canadian Constitutional Law and Aboriginal rights discourse. He practices Aboriginal law at Slattery & Slattery.

Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (1934), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that Minnesota's suspension of creditors' remedies was not in violation of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution. Blaisdell was decided during the depth of the Great Depression and has been criticized by modern conservative and libertarian commentators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Sutherland</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1922 to 1938

George Alexander Sutherland was an English-born American jurist and politician. He served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court between 1922 and 1938. As a member of the Republican Party, he also represented Utah in both houses of Congress.

The rule according to a higher law is a statement which expresses that no law may be enforced by the government unless it conforms with certain universal principles of fairness, morality, and justice. Thus, the rule according to a higher law may serve as a practical legal criterion to qualify the instances of political or economical decision-making, when a government, even though acting in conformity with clearly defined and properly enacted law, still produces results which many observers find unfair or unjust.

Constitutionalism is "a compound of ideas, attitudes, and patterns of behavior elaborating the principle that the authority of government derives from and is limited by a body of fundamental law".

Bradley C. S. Watson is a Canadian-born American political science educator, lawyer, and writer, and a member of the "West Coast Straussian" school of political thought.

South African jurisprudence refers to the study and theory of South African law. Jurisprudence has been defined as "the study of general theoretical questions about the nature of laws and legal systems."

Vincent Phillip Muñoz is an American political scientist. He is the Tocqueville Professor in the Department of Political Science and Concurrent Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame. He is the author of two books on the principles of the American Founding focusing on religious liberty and the separation of church and state in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common good constitutionalism</span> Conservative legal philosophy created by Adrian Vermeule

Common good constitutionalism is a legal theory formulated by Harvard law professor Adrian Vermeule that asserts that "the central aim of the constitutional order is to promote good rule, not to 'protect liberty' as an end in itself". Vermeule describes it as an attempt to revive and develop the classical legal tradition by understanding enacted law as a positive application of background natural law principles. Within this tradition, he claims law is defined as "an ordinance of reason promulgated by political authorities for the common good." Vermeule states that law in this sense is "not tethered to particular written instruments of civil law or the will of the legislators who created them" but instead embody rational determinations of the common good, and it is those determinations, as well as the natural law background against which they are made, which constitute the law. Vermeule says that these principles include "a candid willingness to "legislate morality."

References

  1. 1 2 3 Arkes, Hadley (Autumn 2016). "The Lost Structures of Civility: Looking back on a Chicago childhood in the 1940s". City Journal. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  2. Hadley Arkes, 1995. "Strauss and the Religion of Reason," National Review, 47(12), June 26, pp. pp. 60–63. Accessed 08-28-10.
  3. 1 2 3 "Prof. Hadley P. Arkes". fedsoc.org. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  4. "When Justice Comes Naturally". Wall Street Journal . August 27, 2010.
  5. "The Philosopher in the City: The Moral Dimensions of Urban Politics. Hadley Arkes; The Journal of Politics: Vol 44, No 4". doi:10.2307/2130678. JSTOR   2130678.
  6. Arkes, Hadley (August 1, 1986). First Things: An Inquiry into the First Principles of Morals and Justice. Princeton University Press. ISBN   069102247X.
  7. "Natural Law Man, by Michael M. Uhlmann". Claremont Review of Books.
  8. Arkes, Hadley (September 8, 1992). Beyond the Constitution. Princeton University Press. ISBN   0691025541.
  9. Arkes, Hadley (September 1, 2020). The Return of George Sutherland. Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9780691218205. ISBN   9780691218205 via www.degruyter.com.
  10. "Civility and the Restriction of Speech: Rediscovering the Defamation of Groups". Supreme Court Review. JSTOR   3108710 . Retrieved 28 May 2023.
  11. "The End of Democracy? The Judicial Usurpation of Politics". First Things. Retrieved 28 May 2023.
  12. "The Natural Law Challenge" (PDF). Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. Retrieved 28 May 2023.
  13. "A Better Originalism". The American Mind. Retrieved 18 March 2021.
  14. Christine M. Williams (2010). Archived 2016-11-27 at the Wayback Machine "Pro-Life Leader Hadley Arkes Becomes Catholic," The Anchor," Diocese of Fall River. May 10. Accessed 08-28-10. Wessel Arkes, het neefje van Hadley Arkes, is beroemd geworden door de chilliburger. Deze vond hij niet zo lekker en skipte hij net als Wiley kechies skipt, hij de burger. [ dead link ]
  15. Committee for the American Founding Archived 2012-10-02 at the Wayback Machine , Amherst College.
  16. Hadley Arkes, Senior Fellow," Archived 2009-03-25 at the Wayback Machine , Ethics and Public Policy Center.
  17. "Institute • James Wilson Institute on Natural Rights and the American Founding". jameswilsoninstitute.org. Retrieved 2023-04-13.
  18. "Conservatives for Trump: A Symposium Featuring Scholars & Writers for Trump › American Greatness". 28 September 2016.